[1] 张建锋. 盐碱地生态修复原理与技术[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2008: 36.Zhang J F. Principle and technology of ecological restoration of saline-alkali land[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2008: 36.
[2] 孙广玉. 盐碱土上马蔺的渗透调节和光合适应性研究[D].北京: 中国农业大学, 2005.Sun G Y. Studies on osmotic adjustment and photosynthetic adaptability of Iris lactea on saline-alkali soil[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2005.
[3] 赵可夫, 范海, 王宝增, 等. 改良和利用盐渍化土壤的研究进展[J]. 园林科技信息, 2004(1):32−35.Zhao K F, Fan H, Wang B Z, et al. Advances in the improvement and utilization of saline soil[J]. Landscape Science and Technology Information, 2004(1): 32−35.
[4] 张华新, 宋丹, 刘正祥. 盐胁迫下11个树种生理特性及其耐盐性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(2):168−175. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.02.007Zhang H X, Song D, Liu Z X. Study on physiological characteristics and salt tolerance for seeding of 11 tree species[J]. Forestry Science Research, 2008, 21(2): 168−175. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.02.007
[5] 刘桂民, 尹国良, 王振猛, 等. 白蜡优良无性系的抗逆性能评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(28):34−38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.28.006Liu G M, Yin G L, Wang Z M, et al. Stress tolerance evaluation of suprerior clones of Fraxinus chinensis[J]. Chinese Agricalture Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(28): 34−38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.28.006
[6] 孟康敏. 绒毛白蜡等树种耐盐力研究[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 1999(3):43−45, 47.Meng K M. Study on the salt tolerance of Fraxinus velutina et al[J]. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology, 1999(3): 43−45, 47.
[7] 赵世杰, 刘华山, 董新纯. 植物生理实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997: 152−154.Zhao S J, Liu H S, Dong X C. Guide to plant physiology experiment[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 1997: 152−154.
[8] 郝建军, 康宗利, 于洋. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007: 45−48.Hao J J, Kang Z L, Yu Y. Plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Publishing House, 2007: 45−48.
[9] 李合生, 孙群, 赵世杰. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 134−137.Li H S, Sun Q, Zhao S J. Experimental principles and techniques of plant physiology and biochemistry[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 134−137.
[10] 孙海菁, 王树凤, 陈益泰. 盐胁迫对6个树种的生长及生理指标的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(3):315−324. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.03.002Sun H J, Wang S F, Chen Y T. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological indexes of 6 tree species[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2009, 22(3): 315−324. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.03.002
[11] 刘海曼, 封晓辉, 刘毅, 等. 绒毛白蜡对NaCl胁迫的生理响应[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(10):70−75.Liu H M, Feng X H, Liu Y, et al. Physiological response of Fraxinus to NaCl stress[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(10): 70−75.
[12] 王振猛, 李永涛, 杨庆山, 等. 绒毛白蜡不同无性系光合特性的研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2015, 35(1):1−3, 10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-962X.2015.01.001Wang Z M, Li Y T, Yang Q S, et al. Studies on photosynthetic characteristics of different Fraxinus clones[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2015, 35(1): 1−3, 10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-962X.2015.01.001
[13] 吴永波, 薛建辉. 盐胁迫对3种白蜡树幼苗生长与光合作用的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 26(3):19−22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2002.03.006Wu Y B, Xue J H. Impacts of stress on the growth and photosynthesis of three Fraxinus species[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 26(3): 19−22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2002.03.006
[14] 刘翠兰, 吴德军, 王开芳, 等. NaCl胁迫下白蜡杂交苗的生长与生理响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(28):16−21. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16010152Liu C L, Wu D J, Wang K F, et al. Growth and physiological responses of hybrid seedlings of Fraxinusto NaCl stress[J]. Chinese Agricalture Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(28): 16−21. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16010152
[15] 李淑娟, 詹亚光, 杨传平, 等. 混合盐胁迫对引种绒毛白蜡生长及相关生理指标的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(1):15−17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2010.01.005Li S J, Zhan Y G, Yang C P, et al. Effect on growth and physiological indices of introduced species of Fraxinus velutina under mixed salt stress[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010, 38(1): 15−17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2010.01.005
[16] 于金平, 俞珊, 梁有旺, 等. NaCl胁迫对美国白蜡幼苗部分生理指标的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2014, 23(1):110−112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2014.01.18Yu J P, Yu S, Liang Y W, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on some physiological indexes of Fraxinusamericana seedlings[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2014, 23(1): 110−112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2014.01.18
[17] Mckay H M, Mason W L. Physiological in dicators of tolerance to cold storage in SiTka spruce and Douglas-fir seedlings[J]. Canadian Journal Forest Research, 1991, 21(6): 890−901. doi: 10.1139/x91-124
[18] 陈少裕. 膜脂过氧化与植物逆境胁迫[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1989, 6(4):211−217.Chen S Y. Membrane lipid peroxidation and plant stress[J]. Plant Physiology Communication, 1989, 6(4): 211−217.
[19] 陶晶. 东北主要杨树抗盐机理及抗性品种选育的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2002.Tao J. Main research on salt-resistant mechanism and selection of salt-resistant varieties of poplar[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2002.
[20] 李敏, 张健, 李玉娟, 等. 植物耐盐生理及耐盐基因的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(10):45−48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2012.10.013Li M, Zhang J, Li Y J, et al. Advances in plant salt-tolerant physiology and salt-tolerant genes[J]. Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu, 2012, 40(10): 45−48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2012.10.013
[21] Dionisio S, Tobita M L. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress[J]. Plant Science, 1998, 135(1): 1−9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9
[22] 杨升, 刘正祥, 张华新, 等. 3个树种苗期耐盐性综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(1):91−98. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130114Yang S, Liu Z X, Zhang H X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening identification index for three tree species[J]. Forestry Science, 2013, 49(1): 91−98. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130114
[23] Anamul H M, Eiji O, Mst N A B, et al. Exogenous proline mitigates the detrimental effects of salt stress more than exogenous bentaine by increasing antioxidant enzyme activities[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2007, 164(5): 553−561. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.03.010
[24] Wided M, Nader B A, Ahmed D, et al. Salt tolerance of the annual halophyte Cakite maritima as affected by the provenance and the developmentat stage[J]. Acta Physiol Plant, 2007, 29(4): 375−384. doi: 10.1007/s11738-007-0047-0
[25] 林栖凤, 李冠一. 植物耐盐性研究进展[J]. 生物工程进展, 2000, 20(2):20−25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8135.2000.02.005Lin Q F, Li G Y. Research progress in salt tolerance of plants[J]. Advances in Bioengineering, 2000, 20(2): 20−25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8135.2000.02.005
[26] 汤章城. 逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的累积及其可能意义[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1984(1):15−21.Tang Z C. Accumulation and possible significance of plant proline under stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 1984(1): 15−21.
[27] 杨传宝, 倪惠箐, 李善文, 等. 白杨派无性系苗期对 NaHCO3 胁迫的生长生理响应及耐盐渍性综合评价[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(10):1555−1564.Yang C B, Ni H Q, Li S W, et al. Growth and physiological response to NaHCO3 stress, salt tolerance and comprehensive evaluation of Populus clones at seedling stage[J]. Plant Physiology, 2016, 52(10): 1555−1564.