高级检索

    路侧绿篱修剪机器人的设计与试验评估

    Design and experimental evaluation of a roadside hedge trimming robot

    • 摘要:
      目的 绿篱修剪现有研究面临的主要难点是开发一种既能高效完成大规模基本形状修剪,又能精细处理复杂形状的机器人系统。针对此问题,本研究通过优化机械结构和控制系统,设计一种新型路侧绿篱修剪机器人,以提高道路两侧绿篱修剪质量并降低人工劳动强度。
      方法 构建由6自由度SCARA机械臂、往复式剪切刀具及小型履带底盘组成的机器人系统,并对机械臂构型进行优化。控制系统采用“PC + 运动控制卡”,开发基于C#的上位机软件用于机械臂轨迹规划。规划了直线、梯形和圆弧3种修剪路径,并进行修剪试验。设计了路径插值点间距和刀具移动速度的单因素试验,通过分析修剪后绿篱形状的误差来评估修剪精度。引入加权法构建综合评价函数,分析不同参数组合下的修剪效果,将修剪误差与作业时间作为指标进行量化评估,探索路径规划参数的最优组合。
      结果 试验验证了该机器人在0.6 ~ 1.6 m高度、0.5 ~ 1.2 m横向范围内的修剪能力。路径插值点间距与刀具移动速度对修剪误差的影响显著。单因素试验结果表明,不同参数组合对修剪误差与作业时间均有影响。在设定范围内,直线绿篱在插值点间距200 mm、速度50 mm/s,梯形绿篱在间隔110 mm、速度45 mm/s,圆弧绿篱在间隔108 mm、速度45 mm/s时,综合评价函数值最小,修剪精度与作业效率表现最佳。
      结论 本研究通过机械臂结构和控制系统的优化,成功开发了一种新型路侧绿篱修剪机器人,实现了高效与精细修剪的目标。研究结果验证了机器人在不同作业范围内的修剪能力,并明确了路径规划参数对修剪性能的影响,为绿篱修剪的自动化提供了技术支持。未来研究将进一步优化机器人性能,以适应更复杂的实际应用场景。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective Current research on hedge trimming faces the challenge of developing a robotic system that can efficiently perform large-scale basic shape trimming while also handling complex shapes with precision. To address this issue, this study optimizes the mechanical structure and control system to design a new type of roadside hedge trimming robot, aiming to improve the quality of hedge trimming on both sides of road and reduce labor intensity.
      Method A robotic system was constructed, consisting of a 6-degree-of-freedom SCARA robotic arm, a reciprocating shear cutter, and a small tracked chassis. The configuration of robotic arm was optimized. The control system employs a “PC + motion control card”, and C#-based upper computer software was developed for trajectory planning of robotic arm. Three trimming paths, i.e. linear, trapezoidal and arcuate, were planned and tested. A single-factor experiment was designed to evaluate trimming accuracy by analyzing shape error of hedges after trimming, with path interpolation interval and tool movement speed as variables. A weighted method was introduced to construct a comprehensive evaluation function, analyzing trimming performance under different parameter combinations. Trimming error and operation time were used as metrics for quantitative evaluation to explore the optimal combination of trajectory planning parameters.
      Result Experiments verified robot’s trimming capability within a height range of 0.6 to 1.6 m and a lateral range of 0.5 to 1.2 m. Path interpolation interval and tool movement speed significantly affected trimming errors. The single-factor experiment results indicated that different parameter combinations influenced both trimming errors and operation time. Within set range, the straight-line hedge trimming performed best with an interpolation interval of 200 mm and a speed of 50 mm/s, the trapezoidal hedge trimming with an interval of 110 mm and a speed of 45 mm/s, and the arc-shaped hedge trimming with an interval of 108 mm and a speed of 45 mm/s, where the comprehensive evaluation function value was minimized, showing the best trimming accuracy and operational efficiency.
      Conclusion Through the optimization of robotic arm structure and control system, this study successfully develops a new type of roadside hedge trimming robot, achieving the goals of both efficient and precise trimming. The results validate the robot’s trimming capabilities across different operational ranges and clarify the influence of trajectory planning parameters on trimming performance, providing technical support for hedge trimming automation. Future research will further optimize the robot’s performance to adapt to more complex real-world applications.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回