高级检索
    汪垚, 张志玉, 倪文俭, 刘见礼, 张大凤. 基于机载LiDAR数据的林下地形提取算法比较与组合分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(12): 25-35. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170300
    引用本文: 汪垚, 张志玉, 倪文俭, 刘见礼, 张大凤. 基于机载LiDAR数据的林下地形提取算法比较与组合分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(12): 25-35. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170300
    WANG Yao, ZHANG Zhi-yu, NI Wen-jian, LIU Jian-li, ZHANG Da-feng. Comparison of filter algorithms and combination analysis for DEM extracting based on airborne laser scanning point clouds[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(12): 25-35. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170300
    Citation: WANG Yao, ZHANG Zhi-yu, NI Wen-jian, LIU Jian-li, ZHANG Da-feng. Comparison of filter algorithms and combination analysis for DEM extracting based on airborne laser scanning point clouds[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(12): 25-35. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170300

    基于机载LiDAR数据的林下地形提取算法比较与组合分析

    Comparison of filter algorithms and combination analysis for DEM extracting based on airborne laser scanning point clouds

    • 摘要: 激光雷达(LiDAR)克服了传统测量技术的缺点, 成为了获取DEM的新型手段。针对不同地形林区,选择合理的点云滤波算法,是提取林下地形的关键步骤。本研究在黑龙江省凉水自然保护区内选择了3块具有代表性的区域,分别为平缓山地林区、陡峭山地林区和复杂地区。以1:10 000地形图矢量化生成的高精度DEM为参考,评价了迭代线性最小二乘法、基于坡度法、不规则三角网法(TIN)点云滤波算法在3种地形的适应性。结果表明:不同算法有不同的适应区域。3种方法在平缓山地林区都具有良好的效果,决定系数(R2)均达到了0.98,均方根误差(RMSE)均低于0.21 m。迭代线性最小二乘法在复杂地区滤波效果最好,R2为0.94,RMSE为0.21 m;不规则三角网法在陡峭山地林区效果最好,R2为0.99,RMSE为1.43 m。但是,单一的方法在复杂区域情况下、陡峭山地林区,有明显的分类误差,会将植被分为地面点。为提高林下地形提取精度,本文提出不同滤波方法的组合双重滤波,结果表明,迭代线性最小二乘法和不规则三角网方法组合可以在减少参数调整情况下得到良好滤波效果,对复杂地区、陡峭山地林区滤波效果大大改善。

       

      Abstract: Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) solves the shortcomings of traditional measurement technology, and becomes a new method to obtain digital elevation model (DEM). For forest areas in different terrains, it is a key step to extract the forest topography by choosing a reasonable point cloud filtering algorithm. In this paper, three blocks representing gently slope area, steep area and complicated area were selected. Three filtering algorithms were adopted in processing laser scanning point clouds, and the applicability of these three methods in different terrains was evaluated. Compared with the DEM derived from 1:10 000 topographic map, the results showed that different algorithms had varied adaptive regions. All of these three algorithms had good accuracies in gently slope area, the R2 was up to 0.98 and RMSE was lower than 0.21 m. In complicated area, the iterative linear least squares prediction had the best performance, R2 was 0.94 and RMSE was 0.21 m. In steep area, the algorithm based on triangulated irregular network (TIN) method had the best performance, R2 was 0.99 and RMSE was 1.43 m. However, there were obvious classification errors when extracting DEM by single filtering algorithm in steep area or complicated area since vegetation could be divided into ground points. In order to improve the accuracy of DEM extraction under the forest, this paper proposes the combinations of different filtering algorithms. It was proved that the combination of iterative linear least squares prediction and TIN algorithms could obtain best result under the condition of reducing parameter adjustment.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回