高级检索
    吴桐, 王列升, 孙一豪, 张子玉, 刘煜, 姚朋. 城市建成区水景观建设综合效益评价方法及应用以潍坊市建成区为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(11): 105-117. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200167
    引用本文: 吴桐, 王列升, 孙一豪, 张子玉, 刘煜, 姚朋. 城市建成区水景观建设综合效益评价方法及应用以潍坊市建成区为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(11): 105-117. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200167
    Wu Tong, Wang Liesheng, Sun Yihao, Zhang Ziyu, Liu Yu, Yao Peng. Comprehensive benefit evaluation method and application of water landscape construction in urban built-up area: a case study of Weifang City, Shandong Province of eastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 105-117. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200167
    Citation: Wu Tong, Wang Liesheng, Sun Yihao, Zhang Ziyu, Liu Yu, Yao Peng. Comprehensive benefit evaluation method and application of water landscape construction in urban built-up area: a case study of Weifang City, Shandong Province of eastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 105-117. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200167

    城市建成区水景观建设综合效益评价方法及应用以潍坊市建成区为例

    Comprehensive benefit evaluation method and application of water landscape construction in urban built-up area: a case study of Weifang City, Shandong Province of eastern China

    • 摘要:
        目的  城市建成区的水景观建设是与城镇发展和人民生活关系最为密切、功效发挥最为明显的重要生态工程,在新时代城市生态建设从高速增长向高质量发展迈进的背景下,以多学科综合的视角对其构建一套综合效益评价方法具有重要的理论与实践意义。
        方法  本文在分析水景观建设内涵的基础上,将城市建成区的水景观作为研究范围,提出将生态建设、生活游憩和生产发展作为综合效益评价的准则层,并确定了相关要素层;应用频度统计法、理论分析法和专家咨询法筛选出典型指标,构建了城市建成区水景观建设综合效益的评价指标体系;在此基础上通过层次分析法计算权重,进行单指标定量评价和多指标综合评价,对多准则集成获得的综合效益评价结果进行分级,形成了一套系统的综合效益评价方法;最后以潍坊市为例进行了应用研究。
        结果  (1)2004年,潍坊市建成区水景观建设的综合效益得分为17.11,提供了极少效益,3个子效益均处于极少效益等级。(2)2004—2012年,综合效益得分增长较快,子效益中生活游憩效益得分增长最为显著。2012年的综合效益得分达到53.46,提供了中等效益,3个子效益均达到中等效益等级。(3)2012—2018年,综合效益及子效益得分的增长速度减缓,2018年的综合效益得分为76.54,提供了较多效益,子效益中生活游憩效益和生态建设效益得分提高较快,生活游憩效益得分最高,3个子效益均达到较多效益等级。(4)2004—2018年,生态建设效益中的环境改善得分增长显著,生活游憩效益中的文化承载和活动支持得分增长较为显著,生产发展效益中的经济效益得分增长最为显著,是推动对应子效益增长的主要因素。
        结论  本研究评价方法的提出能够将城市建成区水景观建设的综合效益进行科学量化与比较,发现当前建设所存在的问题并明确未来建设方向,为我国城市水生态建设提供必要的评价标准和技术参考。

       

      Abstract:
        Objective  The construction of water landscape in urban built-up area is an important ecological project that has the closest relationship with town development and people’s life, as well as having the most obvious effect. In the context of urban ecological construction progressing from high-speed growth to high-quality development in the new era, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to construct a comprehensive benefit evaluation method for the water landscape construction in urban built-up area from a multidisciplinary perspective.
        Method  Based on the analysis of connotation of water landscape construction, this paper takes the water landscape in urban built-up area as the research scope, and puts forward ecological construction, life recreation and production development as the criterion layers for the comprehensive benefit evaluation. Meanwhile, relevant element layers were determined. Typical indicators were selected by the frequency statistics method, theoretical analysis method and expert consultation method, and an evaluation index system of the comprehensive benefit for water landscape construction in urban built-up area was constructed. On this basis, the weights were calculated by the analytic hierarchy process, the single index quantitative evaluation and multi-index comprehensive evaluation were carried out, the results of comprehensive benefit evaluation obtained by multi-criteria integration were graded, and a systematic evaluation method of the comprehensive benefit was formed. Finally, Weifang City was taken as an example for applied research.
        Result  (1) In 2004, the comprehensive benefit score of water landscape construction in the built-up area of Weifang City was 17.11, which provided rare benefit, and all three sub-benefits were at the level of rare benefit. (2) From 2004 to 2012, the comprehensive benefit score increased rapidly, the score of life recreation benefit among the sub-benefits increased most significantly. In 2012, the comprehensive benefit score reached 53.46, which provided moderate benefit, and all three sub-benefits reached the level of moderate benefit. (3) From 2012 to 2018, the growth rate of comprehensive benefit score and scores of sub-benefits slowed down. In 2018, the comprehensive benefit score was 76.54, which provided major benefit. Among the scores of sub-benefits, the scores of life recreation benefit and ecological construction benefit increased rapidly, the score of life recreation benefit was the highest, and all three sub-benefits reached the level of major benefit. (4) From 2004 to 2018, the score of environmental improvement in the ecological construction benefit increased significantly, the scores of cultural load and activity support in the life recreation benefit increased significantly, and the score of economic benefit in the production development benefit increased the most, which were the main factors driving the growth of corresponding sub-benefits.
        Conclusion  The evaluation method proposed in this study can scientifically quantify and compare the comprehensive benefit of water landscape construction in urban built-up area, discover the existing problems in the current construction and clarify future construction directions, providing the necessary evaluation standard and technical reference for the urban water ecological construction in China.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回