高级检索

    南方经济林产业增收效应及其影响因素以湖南、江西、广东为例

    Income increasing effect and its influencing factors of southern economic forest industry: a case study of Hunan, Jiangxi and Guangdong provinces

    • 摘要:
      目的 测度南方经济林产业的增收效应,探寻其影响因素,旨在探索南方经济林产业提质增效路径,为助力乡村振兴和推动区域林业高质量可持续发展提供新视角。
      方法 基于经济林产业增收效应的内在机制,构建经济林产业增收效应的影响因素模型。以湖南、江西和广东3省为例,运用Tobit标准回归模型和空间滞后模型,对2001—2022年3省的经济林产业面板数据进行实证分析,测算南方经济林产业增收效应和滞后效应,并分析其增收的主要影响因素。
      结果 (1)南方经济林产业因产业、科技、财经等政策刺激带来的增收效应总体显著,但受区域林业资源禀赋、经济发展水平、财政与信贷状况等因素影响在效应强度和结构方向上存在差异;(2)南方经济林产业的增收效应因区域经济林驱动类型的差异呈现区域异质性,表现为区域不均衡性;(3)受产业结构、经济林占比、收入结构等因素影响,增收效应存在1 ~ 2期的滞后,体现出时空滞后性。
      结论 南方经济林产业的快速发展有助于林农收入增长,但增收效应受区域经济生态位影响,表现出差异性、异质性和滞后性。针对不同的表现采取不同的措施:(1)针对经济林产业增收差异性,应从加强财政支持、强化科技研发、完善金融信贷、推动土地流转等方面制定针对性优化政策,改善其增收效应的强度与结构问题;(2)针对增收效应的异质性,结合湖南省、江西省和广东省3省差异成因,因地制宜地采取不同措施,增强增收效应传导,助力林农收入的增加;(3)针对增收效应滞后性,应从深化经济林产业的市场化机制、建立闭环利益联结机制、强化风险防控机制等方面激活滞后效应,确保林农增产增收的持续性与高效性。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective By measuring the income-increasing effect of southern economic forest industry, exploring its influencing factors, this paper aims to find paths for improving the quality and efficiency of southern economic forest industry, and provide a new perspective for boosting rural revitalization and promoting high-quality and sustainable development of regional forestry.
      Method Based on the internal mechanism of income-increasing effect of economic forest industry, an influencing factor model for income-increasing effect of economic forest industry was constructed. Taking Hunan, Jiangxi, and Guangdong provinces as examples, the Tobit standard regression model and spatial lag model were used to conduct an empirical analysis on the panel data of economic forest industry in the three provinces from 2001 to 2022. This study calculated the income-increasing effect and lag effect of southern economic forest industry and analyzed the main influencing factors of its income growth.
      Result (1) The income-increasing effect of southern economic forest industry driven by industrial, technological, financial, and other policies was generally significant. However, there were differences in intensity and structural direction of the effect due to factors such as regional forestry resource endowments, economic development levels, and fiscal and credit conditions. (2) The income-increasing effect of southern economic forest industry exhibited regional heterogeneity due to differences in regional economic forest-driven types, manifested as regional imbalance. (3) Affected by factors such as industrial structure, proportion of economic forests, and income structure, the income-increasing effect had a lag period of 1 to 2 phases, reflecting temporal and spatial lag.
      Conclusion The rapid development of southern economic forest industry is conducive to the income growth of forest farmers, but the income-increasing effect is affected by the regional economic niche, showing differences, heterogeneity and lag. Different measures should be taken for varied manifestations: (1) regarding the differences in income-increasing effect of the economic forest industry, targeted optimization policies should be formulated in terms of strengthening financial support, enhancing scientific and technological research and development, improving financial credit, and promoting land transfer to address the issues of intensity and structure of income-increasing effect. (2) Concerning the heterogeneity of efficiency-increasing effect, combined with the causes of differences among Hunan, Jiangxi, and Guangdong provinces, targeted measures should be adopted in accordance with local conditions to strengthen the transmission of income-increasing effect and help increaing the income of forest farmers. (3) In view of the lag of income-increasing effect, efforts should be made to activate the lag effect by deepening the market-oriented mechanism of economic forest industry, establishing a closed-loop interest linkage mechanism, and strengthening the risk prevention and control mechanism, so as to ensure the sustainability and efficiency of forest farmers’ output and income growth.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回