高级检索

    西藏亚高山森林土壤种子库与地上植被群落的海拔梯度分异特征

    Altitudinal differentiation characteristics of soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation in the sub-alpine forest of Tibet

    • 摘要:
      目的 土壤种子库是植被群落更新与演替的潜在种源储备,研究亚高山森林生态系统中土壤种子库的分布特征及其与地上植被的关联,有助于评估生态系统的自然恢复潜力,为群落重建与生态修复实践提供科学依据。
      方法 以西藏林芝市巴宜区海拔2 300 ~ 3 300 m的亚高山森林区为研究对象,采用样方法进行地上植被调查与土壤采样,并通过萌发法分析土壤种子库的物种组成、生活型构成及密度分布特征。
      结果 (1)土壤种子库中共萌发30种植物,分属15科27属,主要为一年生或多年生草本植物,物种组成较地上植被群落更为单一。(2)随着海拔升高,土壤种子库与地上植被的物种丰富度均呈现“先增后降”的趋势,多年生草本植物比例增加,表现出对高海拔环境的较强适应性。(3)Margalef、Shannon和Simpson指数随海拔升高呈现先升后降的趋势。不同海拔高度的土壤种子库与地上植被的Sørensen相似性指数较低(0.240 ~ 0.375),并随海拔升高呈下降趋势。(4)地上植被密度与土壤种子密度呈显著正相关关系(r = 0.721,P < 0.01)。土壤种子密度随海拔升高呈现先增大后减小的趋势,变化范围为(47.22 ± 2.78)粒/m2 ~ (141.67 ± 13.89)粒/m2,其垂直分布具有递减趋势,表现出明显的表层(0 ~ 10 cm)富集特征。
      结论 亚高山森林土壤种子库与地上植被在物种丰富度和生活型上差异显著,种子密度较低且木本成分匮乏,自然恢复能力有限。建议通过人工构建乡土物种种子库以促进生态修复。本研究为亚高山森林恢复潜力评估与修复策略制定提供了科学依据。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The soil seed bank serves as a reservoir of propagules essential for vegetation community regeneration and succession. This study investigates the distribution patterns of soil seed banks in subalpine forest ecosystems and their relationship with aboveground vegetation to evaluate the ecosystem's capacity for natural vegetation recovery. The findings provide a foundation for community restoration and ecological rehabilitation practices.
      Method The study focused on the subalpine forest region in Bayi District, Linzhi City, Tibet, spanning an altitude range of 2 300 m to 3 300 m. A systematic sampling approach was employed to conduct aboveground vegetation surveys and soil sampling. The germination method was utilized to determine the species composition, life-form composition, and density distribution characteristics of the soil seed bank.
      Result (1) A total of 30 species (representing 15 families and 27 genera) germinated from the soil seed bank. These species were predominantly annual or perennial herbaceous plants, with a relatively homogeneous species composition compared to the aboveground vegetation community. (2) The species richness of both the soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation exhibited an "increase followed by a decrease" trend with increasing elevation. Additionally, the proportion of perennial herbs increased, reflecting their strong adaptability to high-elevation environments. (3) The Margalef, Shannon, and Simpson indices initially increased and then decreased with rising elevation. The Sørensen similarity indices between the soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation at different elevations were low (0.240–0.375) and tended to decline with increasing elevation. (4) Aboveground vegetation density was positively correlated with soil seed bank density (r = 0.721, P < 0.01). Soil seed density displayed an “increase followed by a decrease” trend with elevation, ranging from (47.22 ± 2.78) seeds/m2 to (141.67 ± 13.89) seeds/m2. The vertical distribution of soil seed density showed a decreasing trend, with a clear pattern of enrichment in the surface layer (0–10 cm).
      Conclusion Significant differences exist between the soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation communities in terms of species richness and life-form composition in the subalpine forest region. Furthermore, the low density of the soil seed bank suggests that natural recovery of the original vegetation communities using the soil seed bank alone is challenging. Therefore, establishing an artificial seed bank of native species is recommended to enhance ecological restoration efforts. This study elucidates the seed bank's response to altitudinal gradients and its coupling relationship with aboveground vegetation in the subalpine forest area, providing theoretical support for assessing the soil seed bank's potential for vegetation restoration and formulating ecological restoration strategies in this region.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回