高级检索

    环湖城市生态网络构建与优化以合肥市为例

    Construction and optimization of the urban ecological network in lakeside cities: a case study of Hefei City

    • 摘要:
      目的 构建城湖共生的生态网络是环湖城市破解发展与保护矛盾的关键。本研究以合肥市为例,旨在识别巢湖与城市空间的连通性短板并提出优化方案。
      方法 基于形态学空间格局分析法 (MSPA)、最小累积阻力模型(MCR)、重力模型与电路理论,构建“源地—廊道—节点”分析框架。通过MSPA识别生态源地,结合景观连通度梯度分析确定7 500 m为最适距离阈值;构建包含土地利用类型、坡度、高程、道路因子的生态阻力面,利用MCR提取廊道,并根据重力模型分级;运用电路理论识别关键节点,据此优化网络并定量评估效果。
      结果 (1)合肥市生态网络由1 494.64 km2的核心生态源地和271条生态廊道构成,其中一级廊道69条,网络结构呈“南密北疏、环湖集聚”格局。(2)通过消除生态障碍点与补充生态源地,网络闭合指数、网络连接度指数和网络连通率指数分别从优化前的0.96、2.85和0.97提升至1.02、2.99和1.01,网络连通性显著提高。(3)结合合肥市生态网络格局特征,识别出310.53 km2的生态夹点区域与54处生态障碍点,提出“分级差异化管控”对策。
      结论 本研究揭示了环湖城市以湖泊为核心的放射状连通性格局,提出的夹点保护与障碍消除协同策略,可为长三角生态安全屏障建设提供方法支撑。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective Establishing an ecological network that fosters “city-lake symbiosis” is essential for addressing the conflict between urban development and environmental conservation in lakeside cities. Using Hefei as a case study, this research identifies connectivity deficiencies between Chaohu Lake and urban areas and proposes optimization strategies.
      Method The study employs a “source-corridor-node” analytical framework based on MSPA, the MCR model, the gravity model, and circuit theory. Ecological sources were identified using MSPA, and an optimal distance threshold of 7 500 m was determined through landscape connectivity gradient analysis. An ecological resistance surface was constructed, incorporating land use type, slope, elevation, and road factors. The MCR model was utilized to extract corridors, which were further classified using the gravity model. Critical nodes were identified using circuit theory, facilitating network optimization and quantitative evaluation.
      Result (1) The ecological network of Hefei encompasses 1 494.64 km2 of core ecological sources and 271 ecological corridors, including 69 primary corridors. The network structure exhibits a spatial pattern characterized by “greater density in the south, sparser distribution in the north, and clustering around the lake.” (2) By addressing ecological barrier points and augmenting ecological sources, the network closure index, network connectivity index, and network connectivity rate improved from 0.96, 2.85, and 0.97 before optimization to 1.02, 2.99, and 1.01, respectively, demonstrating a marked enhancement in network connectivity. (3) Based on the spatial characteristics of Hefei’s ecological network, 310.53 km2 of ecological pinch points and 54 ecological barrier points were identified. A strategy of "zonal differentiation and targeted management" was proposed.
      Conclusion This study elucidates the radial connectivity pattern centered on the lake in lakeside cities. The proposed integrated strategy of pinch point protection and barrier elimination offers methodological support for constructing ecological security barriers in the Yangtze River Delta region.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回