高级检索

    基于微钻阻力与LightGBM的活立木木材密度区间分类预测模型

    An Interval Classification Prediction Model for Standing Tree Wood Density Based on Micro-Drilling Resistance and LightGBM

    • 摘要:
      目的 微钻阻力法是活立木木材密度无损检测的主要技术之一,然而,现有基于该技术的回归预测模型易受仪器、操作及环境等多源干扰,存在稳定性差、通用性弱的问题,制约了其在工程实践(如木材分级、野外快速检测)中的应用,亦限制了科研中的可靠分析。为提升微钻阻力法在木材密度预测中的稳健性与实用性,本研究旨在探索一种能够包容测量不确定性的建模方法。
      方法 通过转换建模思路,将连续密度预测问题重构为离散区间分类任务。以木荷为例,基于经数据预处理与异常值剔除后保留的481组微钻阻力-密度匹配数据,采用基于机器学习法(LightGBM)的区间分类方法构建预测模型,并与多种传统回归模型进行系统性对比。该方法通过密度区间输出包容测量波动,从而提升模型的适应能力。
      结果 所构建的区间分类模型整体准确率达0.876,宏平均F1值为0.878,其性能显著优于本研究中作为对比的各类传统回归模型(其中表现最优的回归模型R2为0.771)。模型在各密度区间上均表现稳健,精确度范围为0.769 ~ 1.000;对于木材分级实践中常需明确区分的高、低密度两端区间,模型分类正确率均达到或超过84%,显示出良好的判别能力。结果表明,区间分类策略能够提供比传统点估计更稳健的分级结果。
      结论 所提出并验证的“区间分类”建模策略,通过将连续密度预测重构为区间分类任务,有效提升了微钻阻力法预测木材密度的实用性。该策略输出的密度等级直观适用于工程快速判断,其分类概率输出也为科学研究提供了结构化数据。研究为解决微钻阻力法应用中模型不稳定的共性问题,提供了一种侧重于稳健性与可用性的机器学习建模新视角。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The micro-drilling resistance method is one of the principal techniques for non-destructive evaluation of wood density in standing trees. However, existing regression-based prediction models built upon this technique are susceptible to multi-source disturbances arising from instrumentation, operators, and environmental conditions, leading to poor stability and limited generalizability. These shortcomings constrain its application in engineering practice (e.g., wood grading and rapid field testing) and impede reliable analysis in scientific research. To enhance the robustness and practical applicability of the micro-drilling resistance method for wood density prediction, this study aims to explore a modeling approach that accommodates measurement uncertainty.
      Method By transforming the modeling concept, the continuous density prediction problem was reconstructed as a discrete interval classification task. Taking Schima superba as an example, based on 481 sets of micro-drilling resistance–density paired data retained after data preprocessing and outlier removal, a predictive model was developed using an interval classification approach based on machine learning (LightGBM), and systematically compared with several conventional regression models. By outputting density intervals, this method accommodates measurement fluctuations, thereby enhancing the model’s adaptability.
      Result The developed interval classification model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.876 and a macro-average F1 score of 0.878, significantly outperforming all conventional regression models used for comparison in this study (the best-performing regression model attained an R2 of 0.771). The model performed consistently across all density intervals, with precision ranging from 0.769 to 1.000. For the high- and low-density end intervals, which frequently require unambiguous discrimination in practical wood grading, the classification accuracy reached or exceeded 84%, demonstrating strong discriminative capability. These results indicate that the interval classification strategy yields more robust grading outcomes than conventional point estimation.
      Conclusion The proposed and validated “interval classification” modeling strategy, by reformulating continuous density prediction as an interval classification task, effectively enhances the practical applicability of the micro-drilling resistance method for predicting wood density. The density grades output by this strategy are intuitively suited to rapid engineering judgment, while its classification probability outputs provide structured data for scientific research. This study offers a new machine learning modeling perspective focused on robustness and usability, for addressing the common problem of model instability in the application of the micro-drilling resistance method.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回