• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Lin Qiao, Liu Zhe, Lü Yingshuo, Yu Xixuan, Zheng Xi. Stormwater management measures in Beijing suburban hilly area based on hydrological model: taking the upper reaches of Jiakuohe River as an example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 132-142. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190116
Citation: Lin Qiao, Liu Zhe, Lü Yingshuo, Yu Xixuan, Zheng Xi. Stormwater management measures in Beijing suburban hilly area based on hydrological model: taking the upper reaches of Jiakuohe River as an example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 132-142. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190116

Stormwater management measures in Beijing suburban hilly area based on hydrological model: taking the upper reaches of Jiakuohe River as an example

More Information
  • Received Date: March 18, 2019
  • Revised Date: September 03, 2019
  • Available Online: May 03, 2020
  • Published Date: June 30, 2020
  • ObjectiveThe suburban hilly area is the ecological barrier of city. Due to the steep slope of terrain in the suburban hilly area and the short peak time of flood peak, it is easy to form seasonal floods, resulting in flood disasters. The purpose of this paper is to explore reasonable stormwater management methods in suburban hilly area and to study the applicability of different stormwater management scenarios in mountainous area.
    MethodTaking the upper reaches of the Jiakuohe River in the shallow mountainous area of Beijing as an example, the hydrological model of HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS was used to simulate the stormwater runoff process under the once in 10 years stormwater. The three different stormwater management scenarios(traditional management scenario, low impact development scenario, and natural scenario) were compared and analyzed in stormwater control effects, ecological environmental impacts, and landscape effects, thereby exploring the effectiveness of stormwater management measures in different suburban hilly areas.
    Result(1) In terms of stormwater control effects, the storage capacity under traditional management scenario and low impact development scenario were 3.8 times and 5.0 times of natural scenario, and the maximum flooding range was 2.0% and 1.2% higher than natural scenario. The reduction rate of peak traffic flow in traditional management scenario and low impact development scenario was 18.3% and 31.5%, respectively, and the peak current time was delayed by 35 and45 min, respectively. (2) In terms of ecological environment impact, the positive effects of low impact development model on river vegetation environment and hydrological connectivity were greater than traditional management model and natural model. (3) In terms of landscape effects, low impact development scenario had great advantages in terms of water body scope and environmental fit.
    Conclusion(1) Compared with the traditional stormwater management model, the low impact development model has a good stormwater storage and storage function, which can increase the stormwater storage capacity, reduce the peak flow rate, delay the peak time, and further reduce the development mode. It can improve the river ecological environment and has a good landscape effect. Therefore, through comprehensive judgement, low impact development scenario is more suitable for the research basin of this paper. (2) The low impact development model can take advantage of the topography of suburban hilly area and collect upstream water collection by designing a stormwater reservoir in a gentle terrain. At the same time, the low impact development model formulates the stormwater flood target according to the design specifications of the sponge city, and realizes that the annual total runoff control rate of the upper reaches of the river channel is greater than 85%, taking into account the river ecological and landscape needs.(3)The HEC-RAS hydrological model can quantify and visualize different stormwater management scenarios and provide technical support for stormwater management in suburban hilly area. (4) The study emphasizes the particularity of each region. The stormwater management measures in suburban hilly area extend the application of low impact development scenario from another level, indicating that traditional water conservancy facilities are also applicable to the stormwater management concept of low impact development.
  • [1]
    俞孔坚, 袁弘, 李迪华, 等. 北京市浅山区土地可持续利用的困境与出路[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(11):3−8, 20.

    Yu K J, Yuan H, Li D H, et al. Difficulties and solutions of the sustainable land use strategy in suburban hilly area in Beijing[J]. China Land Science, 2009, 23(11): 3−8, 20.
    [2]
    冯艺佳. 风景园林视角下的北京市浅山区绿色空间理想格局构建策略研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016.

    Feng Y J. Study on the ideal pattern construction strategy of green space in shallow mountain area of Beijing through the view of landscape architecture[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
    [3]
    马梦超. 北京市山区小流域生态环境质量评价[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.

    Ma M C. Ecological environment quality evaluation of the watershed in Beijing mountainous area[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015.
    [4]
    余新晓, 牛健植, 徐军亮. 山区小流域生态修复研究[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2004, 2(1):4−10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2004.01.002

    Yu X X, Niu J Z, Xu J L. Research on the ecological restoration in mountain watershed[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004, 2(1): 4−10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2004.01.002
    [5]
    洪敏, 李迪华, 袁弘, 等. 基于地理设计的北京市浅山区土地利用战略规划[J]. 中国园林, 2014, 30(10):22−25.

    Hong M, Li D H, Yuan H, et al. Land use strategy planning in Beijing suburban hilly area based on geodesign[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2014, 30(10): 22−25.
    [6]
    郑时权, 龙仕红. 湖南凤凰县石灰岩山区河流治理适宜模式探讨[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2013, 23(1):74−75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9264.2013.01.032

    Zheng S Q, Long S H. Discussion on the appropriate mode of river governance in the limestone mountainous area of Fenghuang County, Hunan Province[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2013, 23(1): 74−75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9264.2013.01.032
    [7]
    张红萍. 山区小流域洪水风险评估与预警技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院, 2013.

    Zhang H P. Study on the flood risk management and technology of the small mountain watershed[D]. Beijing: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2013.
    [8]
    Campion B B, Venzke J F. Rainfall variability, floods and adaptations of the urban poor to flooding in Kumasi, Ghana[J]. Natural Hazards, 2013, 65(3): 1895−1911. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0452-6
    [9]
    Menzie C A, Deardorff T, Booth P, et al. Refocusing on nature: holistic assessment of ecosystem services[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2012, 8(3): 401−411. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1279
    [10]
    肖建红, 施国庆, 毛春梅, 等. 水坝对河流生态系统服务功能影响评价[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2):526−537. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.02.014

    Xiao J H, Shi G Q, Mao C M, et al. Evaluation of effects of dams on river ecosystem service functions in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(2): 526−537. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.02.014
    [11]
    Tullos D, Byron E, Galloway G, et al. Review of challenges of and practices for sustainable management of mountain flood hazards[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016, 83(3): 1763−1797.
    [12]
    Wyżga B, Radecki-Pawlik A, Zawiejska J. Flood risk management in the upper vistula basin in perspective: traditional versus alternative measures[M]//Kundzewicz Z W, Stoffel M, Niedźwiedź T, et al. Flood risk in the upper vistula basin. Cham: Springer, 2016.
    [13]
    殷洁, 裴志远, 陈曦炜, 等. 基于GIS的武陵山区洪水灾害风险评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(24):110−117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.24.015

    Yin J, Pei Z Y, Chen X W, et al. GIS-based flood disaster risk assessment in Wuling Mountain Region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(24): 110−117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.24.015
    [14]
    中华人民共和国住房城乡建设部. 海绵城市建设技术指南: 低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[Z]. 2014−10−15.

    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Technical guide for sponge city construction: construction of low impact development rainwater system (Trial)[Z]. 2014−10−15.
    [15]
    林辰松, 邵明, 葛韵宇, 等. 基于SWMM情境模拟的外源雨水型公园绿地雨洪调控效果研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(12):92−103.

    Lin C S, Shao M, Ge Y Y, et al. Research of storm flood regulation efficiency of the low impact development of exogenous-rainwater park based on the SWMM simulation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(12): 92−103.
    [16]
    时薏, 李运远, 戈晓宇, 等. 华北地区城市浅山区海绵绿道设计方法研究:以石家庄鹿泉区山前大道为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(11):82−91.

    Shi Y, Li Y Y, Ge X Y, et al. Design methods of sponge greenway in urban shallow mountainous area in northern China: taking the greenway of luquan district in Shijiazhuang as an example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(11): 82−91.
    [17]
    于淼, 戈晓宇. 基于SWMM模拟的首钢西十地块低影响开发系统雨洪调控效果研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(12):97−109.

    Yu M, Ge X Y. Effects of rain flood control about low impact development system in West 10 Plot of Shougang based on the SWMM simulation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(12): 97−109.
    [18]
    焦胜, 韩静艳, 周敏, 等. 基于雨洪安全格局的城市低影响开发模式研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(9):1704−1713.

    Jiao S, Han J Y, Zhou M, et al. Low-impact urban development mode based on waterlogging security pattern[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(9): 1704−1713.
    [19]
    徐煜辉, 韩浩. 基于低影响开发的山地生态住区规划策略研究[J]. 华中建筑, 2015, 33(12):126−130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-739X.2015.12.027

    Xu Y H, Han H. Research on planning strategy of mountain ecological residence based on low-impact development[J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2015, 33(12): 126−130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-739X.2015.12.027
    [20]
    Gironás J, Roesner L A, Davis J. Storm water management model applications manual[R]. Cincinnati: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 2009.
    [21]
    李玥, 俞快, 程娘珠, 等. 低影响开发的7种城市雨洪管理模型[J]. 广东园林, 2016, 38(4):9−13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2641.2016.04.002

    Li Y, Yu K, Cheng N Z, et al. Seven stormwater management models in low impact development[J]. Guangdong Landscape Architecture, 2016, 38(4): 9−13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2641.2016.04.002
    [22]
    边易达. 基于HEC-HMS和SWMM的城市雨洪模拟[D].济南: 山东大学, 2014.

    Bian Y D. Urban stormwater simulation based on HEC-HMS and SWMM[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2014.
    [23]
    Scharffenberg W A, Fleming M J. Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS user’s manual vol version 3[R]. Davis: Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2005.
    [24]
    Hydrologic Engineering Center of the United States Army Corps of Engineers. HEC-RAS user’s manual version3.0[Z]. Davis: Hydrologic Engineering Center of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, 2001.
    [25]
    Mandal S P, Chakrabarty A. Flash flood risk assessment for upper Teesta River Basin: using the hydrological modeling system (HEC-HMS) software[J/OL]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2016 [2019−01−06]. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40808-016-0110-1.
    [26]
    Lee W H, Kim S J, Kim P S. Flood effects analysis of reservoir basin through the linkage of HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS models[J]. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2004, 46(2): 15−25. doi: 10.5389/KSAE.2004.46.2.015
    [27]
    Wan Y, Sun D, Labadie J. Modeling evaluation of dam removal in the context of river ecosystem restoration[J]. River Research and Applications, 2015, 31(9): 1119−1130. doi: 10.1002/rra.2805
    [28]
    廖如婷, 胡珊珊, 杜龙刚, 等. 基于HEC-HMS模型的温榆河流域水文模拟[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2018, 16(6):15−20.

    Liao R T, Hu S S, Du L G, et al. Hydrological simulation of Wenyu River Basin based on HEC-HMS model[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2018, 16(6): 15−20.
    [29]
    王璐, 叶磊, 吴剑, 等. 山丘区小流域水文模型适用性研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2018(2):78−84, 90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2018.02.018

    Wang L, Ye L, Wu J, et al. Research on muilt-hydrological models applicability of flash flood simulation in hilly areas[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2018(2): 78−84, 90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2018.02.018
    [30]
    黄鹏. 震区山洪灾害水文预报技术: 以震中牛圈沟为例[D]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2013.

    Huang P. Hydraulic forecasting of flash floods in the earthquake-afflicted area: a case study in Niujuangou, Wenchuan County[D]. Xiangtan: Hunan University of Science and Technology, 2013.
    [31]
    赵爱军. 小流域综合治理模式研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2005.

    Zhao A J. The research on comprehensive control model in small watershed[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2005.
    [32]
    卢剑波, 王兆骞. GIS支持下的青石山小流域农业生态信息系统(QWAEIS)及其应用研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(5):703−706. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.05.014

    Lu J B, Wang Z Q. Qingshishan Watershed agro-ecology information system and its application with the support of geographic information system (GIS)[J]. Chinese Journal of applied ecology, 2000, 11(5): 703−706. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.05.014
    [33]
    牟金磊. 北京市设计暴雨雨型分析[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2011.

    Mou J L. Design storm pattern analysis in the city of Beijing[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2011.

Catalog

    Article views (1657) PDF downloads (73) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return