Characteristics analysis of quantity and spatial structure of standing live and dead trees in <i>Tilia amurensis</i> secondary forest on the west slope of Zhangguangcailing, northeastern China

Liu Yue; Xu Liying; Wang Yujiao; Yu Jiangbo; Yang Lixue

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190305

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2020 > 42(6): 68-79. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190305

Liu Yue, Xu Liying, Wang Yujiao, Yu Jiangbo, Yang Lixue. Characteristics analysis of quantity and spatial structure of standing live and dead trees in Tilia amurensis secondary forest on the west slope of Zhangguangcailing, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(6): 68-79. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190305

Citation:

PDF (1162 KB)

Characteristics analysis of quantity and spatial structure of standing live and dead trees in Tilia amurensis secondary forest on the west slope of Zhangguangcailing, northeastern China

College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin150040, Heilongjiang, China

More Information

Received Date: September 04, 2019
Revised Date: April 09, 2020
Available Online: May 17, 2020
Published Date: June 30, 2020

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to provide a basis for the growth, protection and management of Tilia amurensis secondary forest by analyzing the quantity and spatial structure characteristics of standing live and dead trees and exploring the growth state, succession process and the main causes of standing dead trees under two disturbance modes (non-cutting and selective cutting).
MethodThe research was conducted by analyzing the species composition, diameter structure, height structure and spatial structure of standing live and dead trees.
Result(1) Tilia amurensis, Acer mono, as well as other dominant tree species in living trees also had a dominant position in dead trees in selective cutting stand, while only Tilia amurensis was dominate among the living trees and standing dead trees in non-cutting stand, but Acer mono was only dominate in the living trees, and it was rare in dead standing trees. (2) The standing live and dead trees of the small diameter were dominant in all two stands, and the diameter distribution was roughly inverted J type. The height class distribution of living trees was roughly left-skewed distribution in two stands, while the standing dead trees were inverted J type, meanwhile, the small standing dead trees accounted for a large proportion. Therefore, it could be analyzed that the main reason for the formation of dead trees in the two stands was the competition among trees. (3) The trivariate distribution of spatial structure parameters had shown that there were more dominant living trees, which were randomly distributed, highly mixed and dominant in two stands. Whereas, most of the standing dead trees were randomly distributed, in disadvantaged state, and the surrounding trees were all other tree species or only one was the same tree species. (4) The quadrivariate distribution of spatial structure parameters showed that the standing dead trees of the two stands were randomly distributed in general with good mixture of species and obvious size differentiation. There were three or four standing live trees around one standing dead trees in that state.
ConclusionIt further indicates that inter-species competition is the main reason for the formation of standing dead trees. This study analyzed the spatial structure and quantitative characteristics of standing live and dead trees in the secondary forest of Tilia amurensis. Therefore it is not only exploring the formation of dead standing trees in the secondary forest, but also provides a theoretical basis for its protection and management.

FullText(HTML)

References (54)

References

[1]	惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 徐海, 等. 结构化森林经营[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2007. Hui G Y, Hu Y B, Xu H, et al. Structure-based forest management[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2007.
[2]	Zhang L J, Hui G Y, Hu Y B, et al. Spatial structural characteristics of forests dominated by Pinus tabuliformis Carr.[J/OL]. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13: e0194710 (2018−04−13)[2018−10−22]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194710.
[3]	Sun J, Yu X, Wang H, et al. Effects of forest structure on hydrological processes in China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 561(1): 187−199.
[4]	Oliver C D, Larson B C. Forest stand dynamics: updated edition[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1996.
[5]	Fang L H, Legendre P, LaFrankie J V, et al. Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1997, 8(1): 105−114. doi: 10.2307/3237248
[6]	欧光龙, 王俊峰, 肖义发, 等. 思茅松天然林单木生物量地理加权回归模型构建[J]. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(2):213−218. Ou G L, Wang J F, Xiao Y F, et al. Modeling individual biomass of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis natural forests by geo-graphically weighted regression[J]. Forest Research, 2014, 27(2): 213−218.
[7]	龚直文, 亢新刚, 顾丽, 等. 天然林林分结构研究方法综述[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2009, 26(3):434−443. Gong Z W, Kang X G, Gu L, et al. Research methods on natural forest stand structure: a review[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2009, 26(3): 434−443.
[8]	Houghton R A. The worldwide extent of land-use change[J]. Bioscience, 1994, 44(5): 305−313. doi: 10.2307/1312380
[9]	Dobson A P, Bradshaw A D, Baker A J M. Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology[J]. Science, 1997, 277: 515−522. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.515
[10]	李博, 陈家宽, 沃金森. 植物竞争研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 1998, 15(4):18−29. Li B, Chen J K, Watkinson A R. A literature review on plant competition[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1998, 15(4): 18−29.
[11]	段仁燕, 王孝安. 太白红杉种内和种间竞争研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(2):242−250. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.02.009 Duan R Y, Wang X A. Intraspecific and interspecific competition in Larix chinensis[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005, 29(2): 242−250. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.02.009
[12]	Franklin J F, Shugart H H, Harmon M E, et al. Tree death as an ecological process: the causes, consequences, and variability of tree mortality[J]. Bioscience, 1987, 37(8): 550−556. doi: 10.2307/1310665
[13]	Jonsson B, Kruys N, Ranius T, et al. Ecology of species living on dead wood-lessons for dead wood management[J]. Silva Fennica, 2005, 39(2): 289−309.
[14]	Siitonen J. Ecology of woody debris in boreal forests forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: fennoscandian boreal forests as an example[J]. Ecological Bulletins, 2001 , 51(49): 11−21.
[15]	Harmon M E, Franklin J F, Swanson F J, et al. Role of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 2004, 34(15): 159−234.
[16]	Harmon M E. Carbon sequestration in forests: addressing the scale question[J]. Journal of Forestry, 2001, 99(4): 24−29.
[17]	Zielonka T. When does dead wood turn into a substrate for spruce replacement?[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2006, 17(6): 739−746. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02497.x
[18]	Lachat T, Brang P, Bolliger M, et al. Totholz im wald: entstehung, bedeutung und förderung[J]. Merkbl Prax, 2014, 52(1): 1−12.
[19]	Junninen K, Simila M, Kouki J, et al. Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi along the gradients of succession and naturalness in boreal pine-dominated forests in Fennoscandia[J]. Ecography, 2006, 29(1): 75−83. doi: 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04358.x
[20]	Ódor P, Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M, et al. Diversity of dead wood inhabiting fungi and bryophytes in semi-natural beech forests in Europe[J]. Biological Conservation, 2006, 131(1): 58−71. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.004
[21]	Uliczka H, Angelstam P. Assessing conservation values of forest stands based on specialised lichens and birds[J]. Biological Conservation, 2000, 95(3): 343−351. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00022-7
[22]	Similä M, Kouki J, Martikainen P, et al. Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead wood matters[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 174(1−3): 365−381. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00061-0
[23]	Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Gustafsson L, Kouki J, et al. Spatial and temporal scales relevant for conservation of dead-wood associ-ated species: current status and perspectives[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2014, 23(3): 513−535. doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0628-3
[24]	Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M. Fungal diversity on decaying beech logs: implications for sustainable forestry[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2003, 12(5): 953−973. doi: 10.1023/A:1022825809503
[25]	Heilmann-Clausen J, Aude E, Christensen M, et al. Cryptogam communities on decaying deciduous wood: does tree species diversity matter?[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2005, 14(9): 2061−2078. doi: 10.1007/s10531-004-4284-x
[26]	Müller J, Bütler R. A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2010, 129(6): 981−992. doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0400-5
[27]	国家林业局. 国家重点保护野生植物名录(第一批)[J]. 植物杂志, 1999(5):4−11. State Administration of Forestry. List of national key protected wild plant (first batch)[J]. Journal of Plants, 1999(5): 4−11.
[28]	Dale M R T, Gibson D J. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology[J]. Quarterly Review of Biology, 2002, 15(1): 195−196.
[29]	唐杨, 陈红, 童跃伟, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林不同强度择伐后关键树种的竞争关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5):1469−1478. Tang Y, Chen H, Tong Y W, et al. Competition of key tree species with selective cutting at different intensities in broadleaved-Korean pine mixed forest in the Changbai Mountain, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(5): 1469−1478.
[30]	许梅, 董树斌, 张德怀, 等. 北京市紫椴种群空间分布格局研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(8):81−88. Xu M, Dong S B, Zhang D H, et al. Study on spatial distribution pattern of Tilia amurensis population in Beijing[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University, 2017, 45(8): 81−88.
[31]	张东来, 张玲. 帽儿山林区紫椴群落物种多样性、种间关系及对环境因子的响应[J]. 森林工程, 2015, 31(6):41−44, 166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-005X.2015.06.009 Zhang D L, Zhang L. atudy on species diversity, interspecific association and response to environmental factors of Tilia amurensis community in Maoer Mountain[J]. Forest Engineering, 2015, 31(6): 41−44, 166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-005X.2015.06.009
[32]	殷东生, 葛文志, 张凤海, 等. 色木槭天然次生林种群竞争关系研究[J]. 植物研究, 2012, 32(1):105−109. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2012.01.005 Yin D S, Ge W Z, Zhang F H, et al. Competition relationship of populations of natural secondary Acer mono forest[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2012, 32(1): 105−109. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2012.01.005
[33]	赵中华, 刘灵, 王宏翔, 等. 红花尔基沙地樟子松天然林枯立木特征分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(5):788−796. Zhao Z H, Liu L, Wang H X, et al. Dead standing trees characteristics analysis of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica natural forest in Honghuaerji[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(5): 788−796.
[34]	张岗岗, 刘瑞红, 惠刚盈, 等. 林分空间结构参数N元分布及其诠释: 以小陇山锐齿栎天然混交林为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(4):21−31. Zhang G G, Liu R H, Hui G Y, et al. N-variate distribution and its annotation on forest spatial structural parameters: a case study of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata natural mixed forest in Xiaolong Mountains, Gansu Province of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(4): 21−31.
[35]	Pommerening A. Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 224(3): 266−277. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.039
[36]	陈亚南, 杨华, 马士友, 等. 长白山2种针阔混交林空间结构多样性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(12):48−58. Chen Y N, Yang H, Ma S Y, et al. Spatial structure diversity of semi-natural and plantation stands of Larix gmelini in Changbai Mountains, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(12): 48−58.
[37]	汤孟平, 娄明华, 陈永刚, 等. 不同混交度指数的比较分析[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(8):46−53. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120808 Tang M P, Lou M H, Chen Y G, et al. Comparative analyses on different mingling indices[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(8): 46−53. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120808
[38]	王宏翔. 天然林林分空间结构的二阶特征分析[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2017. Wang H X. Analysis of second-order characteristics of stand spatial structure of natural forests[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017.
[39]	万盼. 经营方式对甘肃小陇山锐齿栎天然林林分质量的影响[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2018. Wan P. Impacts of forest management methods on stand quality of natural Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forest in Xiaolongshan, Gansu Province[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences, 2018.
[40]	白超. 空间结构参数及其在锐齿栎天然林结构动态分析中的应用[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2016. Bai C. Spatial structure parameters and the application on studying structure dynamics of natural Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forest[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences, 2016.
[41]	卢志军, 鲍大川, 郭屹立, 等. 八大公山中亚热带山地常绿落叶阔叶混交林物种组成与结构[J]. 植物科学学报, 2013, 31(4):336−344. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.40336 Lu Z J, Bao D C, Guo Y L, et al. Community composition and structure of Badagongshan (BDGS) forest dynamic plot in a mid-subtropical mountain evergreen and deciduous broadleaved mixed forest, central China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(4): 336−344. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.40336
[42]	Iida Y, Kohyama T S, Kubo T, et al. Tree architecture and life - history strategies across 200 co-occurring tropical tree species[J]. Functional Ecology, 2011, 25(6): 1260−1268. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01884.x
[43]	马芳, 王顺忠, 冯金朝, 等. 北京东灵山暖温带落叶阔叶林枯立木与活立木空间分布格局[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16):5717−5725. Ma F, Wang S Z, Feng J C, et al. Spatial distribution patterns of snag and standing trees in awarm temperate deciduous broadleaved forest in Dongling Mountain, Beijing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(16): 5717−5725.
[44]	陆龙龙. 长白山林区阔叶红松林不同演替阶段群落结构特征研究[D]. 吉林: 北华大学, 2019. Lu L L. Study on community structure characteristics of different succession stages of broadleaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain[D]. Jilin: Beihua University, 2019.
[45]	Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower S T, et al. Corrigendum: aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 32(8): 1441−1450.
[46]	Fraver S, Jonsson B G, Jönsson M, et al. Demographics and disturbance history of a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2008, 19: 789−798. doi: 10.3170/2008-8-18449
[47]	Eskelson B N I, Temesgen H, Hagar J C, et al. A comparison of selected parametric and imputation methods for estimating snag density and snag quality attributes[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 272: 26−30. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.041
[48]	Morris E C. Effect of localized placement of nutrients on root competition in selfthinning populations[J]. Annals of Botany, 1999, 78(3): 353−364.
[49]	Silvertown J W. Introduction to plant population ecology[M]. New York: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1993.
[50]	Ogawa K. Time-trajectory of mean phytomass and density during a course of self-thinning in a sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 214(1): 104−110.
[51]	Ogawa K. Relationships between mean shoot and root masses and density in an overcrowded population of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa (Sieb. et Zucc.) Endl.) seedlings[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 213(1−3): 391−398. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.005
[52]	周永斌, 殷有, 殷鸣放, 等. 白石砬子国家级自然保护区天然林的自然稀疏[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(21):6469−6480. Zhou Y B, Yin Y, Yin M F, et al. Self-thinning of natural broadleaved forests in Baishilazi Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(21): 6469−6480.
[53]	Escandón A B, Susana P, Rojas R K, et al. Sprouting extends the regeneration niche in temperate rain forests: the case of the long-lived tree Eucryphia cordifolia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 310(1): 321−326.
[54]	Travaini A, Delibes M, Ferreras P, et al. Diversity, abundance or rare species as a target for the conservation of mammalian carnivores: a case study in southern Spain[J]. Biodivers Conserv, 1997, 6(4): 529−535. doi: 10.1023/A:1018329127772

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

1.	左壮，张韫，崔晓阳. 火烧对兴安落叶松林土壤氮形态和含量的初期影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 147-154 .
2.	韩易伦，李晓英，蔡慧颖，刘静，陈魁. 林火对大兴安岭多年冻土土壤碳氮储量的影响. 冰川冻土. 2024(04): 1341-1355 .
3.	郑鑫，丛日征，王剑南，张吉利. 林火干扰对寒温带不同林型土壤养分及土壤酶活性的影响. 森林工程. 2023(05): 74-84 .
4.	平晓帆，魏云敏，宋小双，遇文婧. 火干扰对森林和草原土壤影响的研究现状及展望. 中国农学通报. 2023(35): 75-80 .
5.	王剑南，班增国，丛日征，郑鑫. 模拟林火高温对土壤有机碳及δ~(13)C的影响. 温带林业研究. 2022(02): 13-18 .
6.	董立军. 油松林间火烧迹地深层土壤物理性质及碳储量的变化研究. 湖北林业科技. 2022(03): 38-41 .
7.	孙龙，窦旭，胡同欣. 林火对森林生态系统碳氮磷生态化学计量特征影响研究进展. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(02): 1-9 .
8.	张扬，铁牛，刘洋，张晨. 大兴安岭火烧迹地土壤有机质含量的Meta分析. 中国林副特产. 2021(05): 1-4 .
9.	宫大鹏，闫淳，郭赞权. 基于遥感指数的草原火后植被恢复研究. 西北林学院学报. 2021(06): 204-210 .
10.	王希刚，孙璐，明英会，张雅奎，李华，曾凡锁. 我国偃松研究进展. 温带林业研究. 2019(02): 48-53+58 .
11.	陈韵如，杨扬，张喜亭，杨艳波，王慧梅，王文杰. 大兴安岭森林火烧恢复年限对土壤磷及其有效性的影响. 生态学报. 2019(21): 7977-7986 .
12.	龙海川，丁超，李策，包鹏程，杜杰，王卫霞. 中度火干扰下不同火烧时间对喀纳斯泰加林土壤有机碳的影响. 黑龙江农业科学. 2018(08): 35-38 .
13.	李炳怡，刘冠宏，李伟克，刘晓东. 不同火强度对河北平泉油松林土壤有机碳及土壤养分影响. 生态科学. 2018(04): 35-44 .
14.	南鹏辉，曹宁阳，齐麟，苏宝玲. 林火对北方森林深层土壤有机碳的影响. 林业资源管理. 2017(05): 52-60 .

Other cited types(18)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1731) PDF downloads (73) Cited by(32)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Characteristics analysis of quantity and spatial structure of standing live and dead trees in Tilia amurensis secondary forest on the west slope of Zhangguangcailing, northeastern China

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

Other cited types(18)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content