Effects of <i>Crucibulum laeve</i> inoculation on photosynthesis of <i>Salix viminalis</i> cultivated in PAHs-contaminated soil

Ma Xiaodong; Li Xia; Liu Junxiang; Zhai Feifei; Sun Zhenyuan; Han Lei

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190340

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2020 > 42(5): 80-87. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190340

Ma Xiaodong, Li Xia, Liu Junxiang, Zhai Feifei, Sun Zhenyuan, Han Lei. Effects of Crucibulum laeve inoculation on photosynthesis of Salix viminalis cultivated in PAHs-contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 80-87. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190340

Citation:

PDF (860 KB)

Effects of Crucibulum laeve inoculation on photosynthesis of Salix viminalis cultivated in PAHs-contaminated soil

1.
Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2.
College of Agriculture and Bioengineering, Heze University, Heze 274000, Shandong, China
3.
School of Architectural and Artistic Design, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China

More Information

Received Date: August 20, 2019
Revised Date: September 09, 2019
Available Online: April 20, 2020
Published Date: June 30, 2020

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Although the study has shown that plant-white rot fungi (WRF) combined remediation is a more efficient remediation strategy for PAHs-contaminated soil, the mechanism of this strategy is still unclear, and its application prospects remain questionable. Photosynthesis is the basis of plant growth and development, and it affects the release level of root exudates, which in turn alters the growth of rhizosphere microorganisms and the degradation of soil-borne PAHs. Based on this, for the first time, this study reported the effects of WRF inoculation on photosynthesis of Salix viminalis cultivated in PAHs-contaminated soil.
Method In this study, a pot experiment was conducted in greenhouse for bioremediation of PAHs-contaminated soils and S. viminalis was used as phytoremediation materials. Photosynthetic pigment content, light response curve of gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were selected as the photosynthetic physiological indexes of S. viminalis and the effects of WRF inoculation on the photosynthesis of S. viminalis were reported.
Result Results showed that the inoculated WRF positively promoted photosynthetic pigment content, net photosynthetic rate (P_n) and transpiration rate (T_r), maximum photochemical efficiency (F_v/F_m), potential activity of PSII (F_v/F₀) of S. viminalis, but reduced their stomatal conductance (G_s) and intercellular CO₂ concentrations (C_i), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and photochemical quenching (qP). Different inoculation methods changed variation trend of light response curve of G_s and T_r. Besides, the combination of S. viminalis and WRF significantly increased the removal rate of soil-borne phenanthrene and pyrene.
Conclusion In this study, WRF increases the photosynthetic rate and transpiration efficiency of S. viminalis, enhances the removal of soil-borne PHE and PYR. In general, our study is significant to reveal the mechanism of plant-WRF combined remediation.
- Salix viminalis,
- white-rot fungi (WRF),
- photosynthesis,
- PAHs-contaminated soil

FullText(HTML)

References (35)

References

[1]	Buonanno G, Giovinco G, Morawska L, et al. Lung cancer risk of airborne particles for Italian population[J]. Environmental Research, 2015, 142: 443−451. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.07.019
[2]	Joner E J, Leyval C, Colpaert J V. Ectomycorrhizas impede phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) both within and beyond the rhizosphere[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 142(1): 34−38. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.09.007
[3]	Agnello A C, Bagard M, Van Hullebusch E D, et al. Comparative bioremediation of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons co-contaminated soil by natural attenuation, phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 563−564: 693−703. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.061
[4]	García-Sánchez M, Kosnar Z, Mercl F, et al. A comparative study to evaluate natural attenuation, mycoaugmentation, phytoremediation, and microbial-assisted phytoremediation strategies for the bioremediation of an aged PAH-polluted soil[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 147: 165−174. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.012
[5]	IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures[C]. Lyons: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010.
[6]	Bamforth S M, Singleton I. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: current knowledge and future directions[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2005, 80(7): 723−736.
[7]	Ghosal D, Ghosh S, Dutta T K, et al. Current state of knowledge in microbial degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review[J/OL]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2016, 7: 1369 (2016−11−15) [2018−08−12]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01837.
[8]	Lladó S, Gràcia E, Solanas A M, et al. Fungal and bacterial microbial community assessment during bioremediation assays in an aged creosote-polluted soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 67: 114−123. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.010
[9]	Haritash A K, Kaushik C P. Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 169(1−3): 1−15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.137
[10]	Radtke C, Cook W S, Anderson A. Factors affecting antagonism of the growth of Phanerochaete chrysosporium by bacteria isolated from soils[J]. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 1994, 41(2): 274−280.
[11]	Wiesche C I D, Martens R, Zadrazil F. The effect of interaction between white-rot fungi and indigenous microorganisms on degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil[J]. Water Air & Soil Pollution, 2003, 3(3): 73−79.
[12]	Borràs E, Caminal G, Sarrà M, et al. Effect of soil bacteria on the ability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) removal by Trametes versicolor and Irpex lacteus from contaminated soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(12): 2087−2093. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.003
[13]	Gao D, Du L, Yang J, et al. A critical review of the application of white rot fungus to environmental pollution control[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2010, 30(1): 70−77. doi: 10.3109/07388550903427272
[14]	Alagić S Č, Maluckov B S, Radojičić V B. How can plants manage polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons? May these effects represent a useful tool for an effective soil remediation? A review[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2014, 17(3): 597−614.
[15]	Huang A C, Jiang T, Liu Y X, et al. A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota[J/OL]. Science, 2019, 364(2019−05−10)[2019−07−25]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6389.
[16]	Marmiroli M, Pietrini F, Maestri E, et al. Growth, physiological and molecular traits in Salicaceae trees investigated for phytoremediation of heavy metals and organics[J]. Tree Physiology, 2011, 31(12): 1319−1334. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr090
[17]	Berndes G, Fredrikson F, Börjesson P. Cadmium accumulation and Salix-based phytoextraction on arable land in Sweden[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004, 103(1): 207−223.
[18]	Ucisik A S, Trapp S. Uptake, removal, accumulation, and phytotoxicity of 4-chlorophenol in willow trees[J]. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2008, 54(4): 619−627. doi: 10.1007/s00244-007-9065-6
[19]	Oleszczuk P, Baran S. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons content in shoots and leaves of willow (Salix viminalis) cultivated on the sewage sludge-amended soil[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2005, 168(1−4): 91−111. doi: 10.1007/s11270-005-0884-7
[20]	Oleszczuk P, Godlewska P, Reible D D, et al. Bioaccessibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in activated carbon or biochar amended vegetated (Salix viminalis) soil[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 227: 406−413. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.064
[21]	Bissonnette L, St-Arnaud M, Labrecque M. Phytoextraction of heavy metals by two Salicaceae clones in symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during the second year of a field trial[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 332(1−2): 55−67. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0273-x
[22]	Shimmen T, Nishikawa S I. Phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in manufactured gas plant-impacted soil[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2005, 34(5): 1755−1762. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.0399
[23]	Önneby K. Phytoremediation of a highly creosote-contaminated soil by means of Salix viminalis[D]. Uppsala : Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2005.
[24]	Hultgren J, Pizzul L, Castillo M D P. Degradation of PAH in a creosote-contaminated soil: a comparison between the effects of willows (Salix viminalis), wheat straw and a nonionic surfactant[J]. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2009, 12(1): 54−66. doi: 10.1080/15226510902767122
[25]	Tornberg K, Bååth E, Olsson S. Fungal growth and effects of different wood decomposing fungi on the indigenous bacterial community of polluted and unpolluted soils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2003, 37: 190−197. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0574-1
[26]	Reina R, Liers C, Ocampo J A, et al. Solid state fermentation of olive mill residues by wood- and dung-dwelling Agaricomycetes: effects on peroxidase production, biomass development and phenol phytotoxicity[J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 93(7): 1406−1412. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.006
[27]	Fellet G, Pošćić F, Licen S, et al. PAHs accumulation on leaves of six evergreen urban shrubs: a field experiment[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2016, 7(5): 915−924. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.007
[28]	Arnon D I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris[J]. Plant Physiology, 1949, 24(1): 1−15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1
[29]	Khan Z, Roman D, Kintz T, et al. Degradation, phytoprotection and phytoremediation of phenanthrene by endophyte Pseudomonas putida, PD1[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 48(20): 12221−12228. doi: 10.1021/es503880t
[30]	Rajtor M, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Prospects for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) to assist in phytoremediation of soil hydrocarbon contaminants[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 162: 105−116. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.071
[31]	宋微, 吴小芹. 外生菌根真菌对‘NL-895杨’光合作用的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(7):1474−1478. Song W, Wu X Q. Effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis of poplar NL-895[J]. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2011, 31(7): 1474−1478.
[32]	Nxele X, Klein A, Ndimba B K. Drought and salinity stress alters ROS accumulation, water retention, and osmolyte content in sorghum plants[J]. South African Journal of Botany, 2017, 108: 261−266. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.11.003
[33]	朱凌骏, 傅致远, 张金池, 等. 菌根真菌对榉树光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):121−127. Zhu L J, Fu Z Y, Zhang J C, et al. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthetic characteristics of Zelkova serrata Thunb[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(6): 121−127.
[34]	Ahammed G J, Wang M M, Zhou Y H, et al. The growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant defense responses of five vegetable crops to phenanthrene stress[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2012, 80: 132−139. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.02.015
[35]	Bilger W, Björkman O. Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3): 173−185. doi: 10.1007/BF00033159

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2060) PDF downloads (51)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of Crucibulum laeve inoculation on photosynthesis of Salix viminalis cultivated in PAHs-contaminated soil

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content