Precipitation redistribution characteristics and its correlation analysis of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forests in the Liaodong Peninsula of northeastern China

Li Lianqiang; Yang Huixia; Ding Guoquan; Li Chun

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200009

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2020 > 42(11): 47-55. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200009

Li Lianqiang, Yang Huixia, Ding Guoquan, Li Chun. Precipitation redistribution characteristics and its correlation analysis of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forests in the Liaodong Peninsula of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 47-55. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200009

Citation:

PDF (985 KB)

Precipitation redistribution characteristics and its correlation analysis of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forests in the Liaodong Peninsula of northeastern China

Liaoning Research Institute of Forest Management, Liaodong Peninsula Forest EcosystemPositioning Observation Station, Dandong 118003, Liaoning, China

More Information

Received Date: January 06, 2020
Revised Date: May 13, 2020
Available Online: November 06, 2020
Published Date: December 13, 2020

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Precipitation redistribution is an important hydrological process in forest ecosystems. Analyzing the precipitation redistribution characteristics of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica can provide a reference for the analysis of ecological hydrological parameters and model establishment of typical forest stands in eastern Liaoning Province of northeastern China.
Method Taking the Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forests in the Xianrendong Nature Reserve as the survey and observation objects, the selection of precipitation outside the forest (POF), throughfall (TF), stem flow (SF) and canopy interception (IF) were used as indicators. The regression analysis method was used to establish the equations of POF and various indicators, and the precipitation characteristics and their changes of the two forests were analyzed.
Result (1) In the Pinus densiflora forest, TF, IF and SF were 388.5, 215.3 and 66.5 mm, accounting for 57.96%, 32.12% and 9.92% of the POF, respectively. In the Quercus mongolica forest, TF, IF, and SF were 421.7, 119.0 and 55.5 mm, accounting for 70.73%, 19.96% and 9.31% of the POF, respectively. (2) At low intensity precipitation, the initial lag time of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forest was about 1 h, while for medium and high intensity rainfall, the lag time was shorter, significantly less than 1 h; and the canopy interception time of the Pinus densiflora forest was longer, the hysteresis was stronger, and the interception effect was better. (3) The rainfall outside the forest was significantly and linearly positively correlated with the penetration rainfall and stem flow (P < 0.001). The minimum rainfall producing TF and SF by Pinus densiflora forest and Quercus mongolica forest was 4.2 , 5.8 mm and 2.0, 2.5 mm. respectively. (4) The canopy interception of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica showed a significant quadratic function relationship with rainfall (P < 0.001). Canopy interception occurs simultaneously with rain outside the forest. When the rainfall was greater than 90.0 and 70 mm, the canopy interception of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica tended to be stable at about 10 and 7 mm, respectively. (5) The rainfall outside the forest had a very significant negative correlation with canopy interception rate (P < 0.001), showing a power function relationship. When the rainfall outside the forest was greater than 90.0 and 70 mm, the canopy interception rates of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forest tended to be stable, decreasing to about 20% and 10%, respectively.
Conclusion In the process of precipitation redistribution, the SF and IF of the Pinus densiflora forest is greater than Quercus mongolica forest, while the TF of Pinus densiflora forest is smaller than Quercus mongolica forest. Redistribution of Pinus densiflora forest is stronger. There is a significant delay in TF in the forest, the lag time is affected by rainfall intensity and stand type, and the lag time of Pinus densiflora forest is greater than Quercus mongolica forest. The POF is significantly positively correlated with SF, TF and IF, and it has a linear function relationship with tree SF and TF. It has a quadratic function relationship with the IF. There is a significant negative correlation between the POF and canopy interception rate, and it is a power function relationship.
- Liaodong Peninsula,
- precipitation redistribution,
- change trend,
- correlation

FullText(HTML)

References (39)

References

[1]	Crockford R H, Richardson D P. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception effect of forest type, ground cover and climate[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2000, 14(16−17): 2903−2920. doi: 10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2903::AID-HYP126>3.0.CO;2-6.
[2]	陈书军, 陈存根, 曹田健, 等. 降雨特征及小气候对秦岭油松林降雨再分配的影响[J]. 水科学进展, 2013, 24(4):513−521. Chen S J, Chen C G, Cao T J, et al. Effects of rainfall characteristics and micrometeorology on rainfall redistribution within Chinese red pine forest[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2013, 24(4): 513−521.
[3]	Owens M K, Lyons R K, Alejandro C L. Rainfall partitioning within semiarid juniper communities: effects of event size and canopy cover[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2006, 20(15): 3179−3189. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6326.
[4]	Pérez-Suárez M, Arredondo-Moreno J T, Huber-Sannwald E, et al. Forest structure, species traits and rain characteristics influences on horizontal and vertical rainfall partitioning in a semiarid pine-oak forest from Central Mexico[J]. Ecohydrology, 2014, 7(2): 532−543. doi: 10.1002/eco.1372.
[5]	孙忠林, 王传宽, 王兴昌, 等. 两种温带落叶阔叶林降雨再分配格局及其影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(14):3978−3986. Sun Z L, Wang C K, Wang X C, et al. Rainfall redistribution patterns and their influencing factors of two temperate deciduous forests[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(14): 3978−3986.
[6]	王云霓, 王晓江, 高孝威, 等. 内蒙古大青山白茬子沟小流域典型森林植被的冠层降水再分配特征[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2017, 43(4):6−9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2017.04.002 Wang Y N, Wang X J, Gao X W, et al. Canopy precipitation redistribution of typical forest vegetation in Baichazigou Watershed, Daqing Mountains of Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science & Technology, 2017, 43(4): 6−9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2017.04.002
[7]	陈书军, 陈存根, 邹伯才, 等. 秦岭天然次生油松林冠层降雨再分配特征及延滞效应[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(4):1142−1150. doi: 10.5846/stxb201012271854. Chen S J, Chen C G, Zou B C, et al. Time lag effects and rainfall redistribution traits of the canopy of natural secondary Pinus tabulaeformison precipitation in the Qinling Mountains, China[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2012, 32(4): 1142−1150. doi: 10.5846/stxb201012271854.
[8]	Carlyle-Moses D E. Throughfall, stemflow, and canopy interception loss fluxes in a semi-arid Sierra Madre Oriental matorral community[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004, 58(2): 181−202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00125-3.
[9]	鲜靖苹, 张家洋, 胡海波. 森林冠层水文研究进展[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(3):96−104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2014.03.20. Xian J P, Zhang J Y, Hu H B. Forest canopy hydrology: a review[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2014, 29(3): 96−104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2014.03.20.
[10]	Guevara E A, González S E, Véliz C C, et al. Rainfall interception and distribution patterns of gross precipitation around an isolated Ficus benjamina tree in an urban area[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 333(2−4): 532−541. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.017
[11]	李佳, 饶良懿, 鲁绍伟, 等. 北京密云油松与刺槐林降雨再分配过程研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(12):169−174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2012.12.053. Li J, Rao L Y, Lu S W, et al. Pine and locust forest on rainfall redistribution in Miyun of Beijing[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 39(12): 169−174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2012.12.053.
[12]	高儒学, 高华端, 孙泉忠, 等. 关岭县蚂蝗田小流域降雨年内分配特征研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(2):152−155. Gao R X, Gao H D, Sun Q Z, et al. Study on annual distribution characteristics of rainfall in mahuangtian catchment of Guanling County[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(2): 152−155.
[13]	Staelens J, Schrijver A D, Verheyen K, et al. Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow, and interception within a single beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) canopy: influence of foliation, rain event characteristics, and meteorology[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2008, 22(1): 33−45. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6610.
[14]	宗桦. 森林乔木冠层雨水再分配特征及机制研究综述[J]. 世界林业研究, 2019, 32(1):31−38. Zong H. A review of characteristics and mechanisms of rainfall interception and redistribution in forest canopy[J]. World Forestry Research, 2019, 32(1): 31−38.
[15]	Aydin M, Sen S G, Celik S. Throughfall, stemflow, and interception characteristics of coniferous forest ecosystems in the western black sea region of Turkey (Daday example)[J/OL]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2018, 190(5): 316 (2018−04−30)[2019−03−18]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6657-8.
[16]	赵明扬, 孙长忠, 康磊. 降雨再分配的回归模型差异性分析:以黄土高原半干旱区油松人工林为例[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(5):85−90. Zhao M Y, Sun C Z, Kang L. Difference analysis of rainfall redistribution of Pinus tabulaeformis artificial forests in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2013, 33(5): 85−90.
[17]	Fathizadeh O, Attarod P, Pypker T, et al. Seasonal variability of rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity under individual oak (Quercus brantii) trees of western Iran[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013, 15(1): 175−188.
[18]	江淼华, 吕茂奎, 胥超, 等. 亚热带米槠次生林和杉木人工林林冠截留特征比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1):119−124, 129. Jiang M H, Lü M K, Xu C, et al. Study on the canopy interception of secondary forest of Castanopsis carlesii and Chinese fir plantation in subtropical China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(1): 119−124, 129.
[19]	邱治军, 周光益, 吴仲民, 等. 粤北杨东山常绿阔叶次生林林冠截留特征[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(6):157−161. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110623. Qiu Z J. Zhou G Y, Wu Z M, et al. Characteristics of the canopy interception in an evergreen broad-leaved secondary forest in Yangdongshan, North Guangdong[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(6): 157−161. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110623.
[20]	梁文俊, 丁国栋, 臧荫桐, 等. 华北土石山区油松林对降雨再分配的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(4):77−80. Liang W J, Ding G D, Zang Y T, et al. Study on effect of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation on rainfall redistribution processes in the mountainous area of North China[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(4): 77−80.
[21]	艾长江, 高光耀, 袁川, 等. 陕北黄土高原柠条灌丛穿透雨特征与影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(17):6063−6073. Ai C J, Gao G Y, Yuan C, et al. Throughfall and its influential factors of a typical xerophytic shrub (Caragana korshinskii) in northern Shaanxi in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(17): 6063−6073.
[22]	张梅. 辽东半岛仙人洞自然保护区植物区系多样性分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(8):1693−1698. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2014.08.1693 Zhang M. Plant floristic diversity in xianrendong natural reserve from Liaodong Peninsula[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34(8): 1693−1698. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2014.08.1693
[23]	郭凤, 陈建刚, 杨军, 等. 植草沟对北京市道路地表径流的调控效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(3):182−187. Guo F, Chen J G, Yang J, et al. Regulatory effect of grassed swales on road surface runoff in Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soil & Water Conservation, 2015, 35(3): 182−187.
[24]	杨会侠, 温亮, 李淳, 等. 辽东山区人工红松林降雨截留分配效应[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2017, 46(2):12−15. Yang H X, Wen L, Li C, et al. The rainfall retention distribution effect of artificial Pinus koraiensis forest in Liaodong mountain area[J]. Journal of Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 46(2): 12−15.
[25]	冯亚琦, 郭娜, 蔡体久, 等. 蒙古栎林对大气降雨的再分配规律[J]. 森林工程, 2017, 33(5):24−28, 34. Feng Y Q, Guo N, Cai T J, et al. Rainfall redistribution of mongolian oak plantation in Harbin[J]. Forest Engineering, 2017, 33(5): 24−28, 34.
[26]	石磊, 盛后财, 满秀玲, 等. 兴安落叶松林降雨再分配及其穿透雨的空间异质性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(2):90−96. Shi L, Sheng H C, Man X L, et al. Rainfall redistribution and the spatial heterogeneity of throughfall in Larix gmelinii forest, northeast China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(2): 90−96.
[27]	董玲玲, 康峰峰, 韩海荣, 等. 辽河源3种林分降雨再分配特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(4):147−152. Dong L L, Kang F F, Han H S, et al. Traitsand influencing factors of rainfall redistribution in three types of forest in Liaoheyuan[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(4): 147−152.
[28]	陈丽华, 杨新兵, 鲁绍伟, 等. 华北土石山区油松人工林耗水分配规律[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(9):182−187. Chen L H, Yang X B, Lu S W, et al. Distribution of water consumption of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in rocky mountain areas in northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(9): 182−187.
[29]	刘玉杰, 满秀玲, 盛后财. 大兴安岭北部兴安落叶松林穿透雨延滞效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(11):3285−3292. Liu Y J, Man X L, Sheng H C. Time lag effects of throughfall in natural Larix gmelinii forest in the north of Great Xing ’an Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(11): 3285−3292.
[30]	周秋文, 马龙生, 颜红, 等. 贵州省喀斯特阔叶林降雨截留分配特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(6):321−325. Zhou Q W, Ma L S, Yan H, et al. Distribution characteristics of rainfall interception by broadleaved forest in typical karst area of Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 321−325.
[31]	Holwerda F, Bruijnzeel L A, Muñoz-Villers L E, et al. Rainfall and cloud water interception in mature and secondary lower montane cloud forests of central Veracruz, Mexico[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 384(1−2): 84−96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.012.
[32]	Levia D F, Frost E E. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems[J]. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2003, 274(1−4): 1−29. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00399-2.
[33]	王艳萍, 王力, 卫三平. Gash模型在黄土区人工刺槐林冠降雨截留研究中的应用[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17):5445−5453. doi: 10.5846/stxb201203190374. Wang Y P, Wang L, Wei S P. Modeling canopy rainfall interception of a replanted Robinia pseudoacacia forest in the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(17): 5445−5453. doi: 10.5846/stxb201203190374.
[34]	Macinnis-Ng C M O, Flores E E, Henry M, et al. Throughfall and stemflow vary seasonally in different land-use types in a lower montane tropical region of Panama[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2014, 26(4): 2174−2184.
[35]	万艳芳, 刘贤德, 王顺利, 等. 祁连山青海云杉林冠降雨再分配特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(5):224−229. Wan Y F, Liu X D, Wang S L, et al. Rainfall canopy partitioning and its influencing factors of Picea crassifolia forest in the Qilian Mountains[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(5): 224−229.
[36]	张宁, 郭宾良, 张国强, 等. 沿坝地区天然次生林对降雨再分配的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(6):104−107, 114. Zhang N, Guo B L , Zhang G Q, et al. Study on effect of natural secondary forest on rainfall redistribution processes along the dam area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 22(6): 104−107, 114.
[37]	何常清, 薛建辉, 吴永波, 等. 岷江上游亚高山川滇高山栎林的降雨再分配[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(9):1871−1876. He C Q, Xue J H, Wu Y B, et al. Rainfall redistribution in subalpine Quercus aquifolioides forest in upper reaches of Minjiang River[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(9): 1871−1876.
[38]	温远光, 刘世荣. 我国主要森林生态系统类型降水截留规律的数量分析[J]. 林业科学, 1995, 31(4):289−298. Wen Y G, Liu S R. Quantitative analysis of the characteristics of rainfall interception of main forest ecosystems China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1995, 31(4): 289−298.
[39]	任世奇, 项东云, 肖文发, 等. 广西南宁桉树人工林降雨再分配特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(6):1473−1480. Ren S Q, Xiang D Y, Xiao W F, et al. Rainfall redistribution of eucalypt plantation in Nanning, Guangxi, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(6): 1473−1480.

[1]	Xu Jingya, Liu Tian, Zang Guozhang, Zheng Yiqi. Prediction of suitable areas of Eremochloa ophiuroides in China under different climate scenarios based on MaxEnt model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(3): 91-102. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230022
[2]	He Xin, Ma Wenxu, Zhao Tiantian, Yang Xiaohong, Ma Qinghua, Liang Lisong, Wang Guixi, Yang Zhen. Ecological differentiation and changes in historical distribution of Corylus heterophylla species complex since the last interglacial[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(4): 11-23. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210350
[3]	Zhou Yuting, Ge Xuezhen, Zou Ya, Guo Siwei, Wang Tao, Tao Jing, Zong Shixiang. Prediction of the potential geographical distribution of Hylurgus ligniperda at the global scale and in China using the Maxent model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(11): 90-99. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210345
[4]	Liu Wei, Zhao Runan, Sheng Qianqian, Geng Xingmin, Zhu Zunling. Geographical distribution and potential distribution area prediction of Paeonia jishanensis in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(12): 83-92. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200360
[5]	Wang Yanjun, Gao Tai, Shi Juan. Prediction and analysis of the global suitability of Lymantria dispar based on MaxEnt[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(9): 59-69. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200416
[6]	Huang Ruizhi, Yu Tao, Zhao Hui, Zhang Shengkai, Jing Yang, Li Junqing. Prediction of suitable distribution area of the endangered plant Acer catalpifolium under the background of climate change in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(5): 33-43. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200254
[7]	Huang Mengyi, Zhao Jiaqiang, Shi Juan. Predicting occurrence tendency of Leptocybe invasa in China based on MaxEnt[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 64-71. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190053
[8]	Yang Furong, Qi Yaodong, Liu Haitao, Xie Caixiang, Song Jingyuan. Global potential suitable area and ecological characteristics of Moringa oleifera[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(10): 45-54. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190375
[9]	ZHANG Chao, CHEN Lei, TIAN Cheng-ming, LI Tao, WANG Rong, YANG Qi-qing. Predicting the distribution of dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium sichuanense) with GARP and MaxEnt models[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(5): 23-32. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150516
[10]	SONG Yan, JI Jing-jun, ZHU Lin-hong, ZHANG Shi-ying. Characteristics of Asian-African summer monsoon pre-and post-global warming in mid-1980s[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(2): 24-33.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	张鑫，张丹，代鹏飞，张广森，宋玫. 气候变化下反枝苋潜在中国适生区及生态位研究. 草地学报. 2024(10): 3280-3288 .
2.	陈禹衡，陆家祎，吴鹏飞，毛岭峰. 基于气候与物种扩散的破坏草入侵区域对未来气候变化的响应. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(01): 69-76 . 本站查看
3.	刘佳琪，魏广阔，史常青，赵廷宁，钱云楷. 基于MaxEnt模型的北方抗旱造林树种适宜区分布. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(07): 63-77 . 本站查看
4.	王艳君，高泰，石娟. 基于MaxEnt模型对舞毒蛾全球适生区的预测及分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(09): 59-69 . 本站查看
5.	张明珠，叶兴状，李佳慧，刘益鹏，陈世品，刘宝. 气候变化情景下长序榆在中国的潜在适生区预测. 生态学杂志. 2021(12): 3822-3835 .
6.	吕汝丹，何健，刘慧杰，姚敏，程瑾，谢磊. 羽叶铁线莲的分布区与生态位模型分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(02): 70-79 . 本站查看
7.	塞依丁·海米提，努尔巴依·阿布都沙力克，迈迪娜·吐尔逊，阿尔曼·解思斯，阿腾古丽. 外来入侵植物意大利苍耳在新疆的潜在分布及扩散趋势. 江苏农业科学. 2019(13): 126-130 .

Other cited types(3)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1165) PDF downloads (66) Cited by(10)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Precipitation redistribution characteristics and its correlation analysis of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forests in the Liaodong Peninsula of northeastern China