Characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors of typical plantations in South Subtropical Zone

Xu Zhenxin; Deng Yusong; Lin Liwen; Liu Deyang; Jiang Daihua; Huang Zhigang; Wei Guoyu

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200124

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(4): 100-107. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200124

Xu Zhenxin, Deng Yusong, Lin Liwen, Liu Deyang, Jiang Daihua, Huang Zhigang, Wei Guoyu. Characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors of typical plantations in South Subtropical Zone[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(4): 100-107. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200124

Citation:

PDF (628 KB)

Characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors of typical plantations in South Subtropical Zone

1.
Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China
2.
Forestry College of Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China
3.
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4.
State-Owned Gaofeng Forest Farm of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China

More Information

Received Date: May 06, 2020
Revised Date: June 19, 2020
Available Online: March 05, 2021
Published Date: April 29, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective The changing characteristics and influencing factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in typical plantations were analyzed in South Subtropical Zone, the soil moisture movement law in the soil was studied, which provides basic scientific theoretical support for further study of soil moisture movement law in plantations in this area.
Method Taking the soils of Pinus massoniana, Cunninghamia lanceolata, Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis, Mytilaria laosensis and Castanopsis hystrix located in the state-owned Gaofeng Forest Farm of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of southern China as the research objects, the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (K_s) of plantations was determined by the constant water head method, and mathematical analysis methods such as correlation analysis and grey correlation analysis were used to explore the characteristics and influencing factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity of plantation soils in South Subtropical Zone.
Result (1) The average saturated hydraulic conductivity of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Pinus massoniana was relatively higher, and the average saturated hydraulic conductivity of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis was the lowest. The soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil depth of different plantations had the changing rule of decreasing first and then increasing, in which the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the surface soils was significantly higher than that of deep soils. (2) Correlation analysis result showed that content of organic matter, water stable aggregate content greater than 0.2 mm, total porosity, non-capillary porosity, capillary porosity, saturated water content and content of clay were positively correlated with soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, while soil density was significantly negatively correlated with soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. (3) Grey correlation analysis result showed that content of organic matter, water stable aggregate content greater than 0.2 mm, soil density, total porosity, saturated water content, non-capillary porosity and capillary porosity were important factors, content of sand, content of silt and content of clay were the secondary important factors.
Conclusion In comparison to Castanopsis hystrix, Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis and Mytilaria laosensis, Cunninghamia lanceolata and Pinus massoniana can significantly increase soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, delay the generation of surface runoff and reduce incidence of soil erosion. Scientific management measures should be paid more attention to effectively improve soil water carrying capacity and water storage capacity.
- saturated hydraulic conductivity,
- South Subtropical Zone,
- plantation,
- grey correlation analysis,
- soil basic property

FullText(HTML)

References (27)

References

[1]	Fodor N, Sandor R, Orfanus T, et al. Evaluation method dependency of measured saturated hydraulic conductivity[J]. Geoderma, 2011, 165(1): 60−68. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.004
[2]	Xu C H, Xu X L, Liu M X, et al. Enhancing pedotransfer functions(PTFs) using soil spectral reflectance data for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity in southwestern China[J]. Catena, 2017, 158: 350−356. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.07.014
[3]	Klopp H, Arriaga F, Daigh A, et al. Analysis of pedotransfer functions to predict the effects of salinity and sodicity on saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 362: 1−6.
[4]	Becker R, Gebremichael M, Märker M. Impact of soil surface and subsurface properties on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in the semi-arid walnut gulch experimental watershed, Arizona, USA[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 322: 112−120. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.023
[5]	孟晨, 牛健植, 骆紫藤, 等. 鹫峰地区不同植被群落土壤性质及饱和导水率特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3):156−160. Meng C, Niu J Z, Luo Z T, et al. Soil properties and saturated hydraulic conductivity under different plant communities in Jiufeng area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(3): 156−160.
[6]	王贤, 张洪江, 程金花, 等. 重庆市四面山典型林分土壤饱和导水率研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012, 32(2):29−34. Wang X, Zhang H J, Cheng J H, et al. Saturated hydraulic conductivity in soils under typical forests in Simian Mountains of Chongqing City[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 32(2): 29−34.
[7]	胡传旺, 王辉, 刘常, 等. 南方典型土壤水力特征差异性分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(2):97−102. Hu C W, Wang H, Liu C, et al. Difference analysis of hydraulic characteristics of typical soils in south China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(2): 97−102.
[8]	张一璇, 史常青, 杨浩, 等. 永定河流域官厅水库南岸典型林分土壤饱和导水率研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(18):6681−6689. Zhang Y X, Shi C Q, Yang H, et al. Saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils of typical forest of the south coast of Guanting Reservoir in Yongding River Watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(18): 6681−6689.
[9]	马思文, 张洪江, 程金花, 等. 三峡库区典型城郊防护林土壤饱和导水率特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(5):99−106. Ma S W, Zhang H J, Cheng J H, et al. Characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in classic suburb shelter forests in the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(5): 99−106.
[10]	杨倩, 刘目兴, 王苗苗, 等. 武汉市典型绿地植被类型对表层土壤入渗和持水性能的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(6):1324−1333. Yang Q, Liu M X, Wang M M, et al. Characterization of surface soil water infiltration and retention capacity in urban green space of Wuhan City[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(6): 1324−1333.
[11]	覃淼, 翟禄新, 周正朝. 桂北地区土地利用类型对土壤饱和导水率和持水能力的影响研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(3):28−39. Qin M, Zhai L X, Zhou Z Z. Influence of land use types on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and water retention in northern Guangxi[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 22(3): 28−39.
[12]	朱积余, 廖培来. 广西名优经济树种[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006. Zhu J Y, Liao P L. Famous and high-quality economic tree species in Guangxi[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2006.
[13]	Bissonnais Y L. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: theory and methodology[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1996, 47: 425−437. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01843.x
[14]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001. Bao S D. Soil agrochemical analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001.
[15]	Zhang Y J, Zhang X. Grey correlation analysis between strength of slag cement and particle fractions of slag powder[J]. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2007, 29(6): 498−504.
[16]	孙林凯, 金家善, 耿俊豹. 基于修正邓氏灰色关联度的设备费用影响因素分析[J]. 数学实践与认识, 2012, 42(8):140−145. Sun L K, Jin J S, Geng J B. Research on the influence factors of the equipment’s expense based on the amend grey correlation[J]. Journal of Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(8): 140−145.
[17]	金晓, 陈丽华. 晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):120−126. Jin X, Chen L H. Soil anti-scourability and root distribution characteristics in surface soil under different vegetation types in the loess region of western Shanxi Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(6): 120−126.
[18]	李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 等. 三峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(8):1809−1818. Li X F, Liu M X, Yi J, et al. Soil hydrological function of different altitudinal hillslopes of the Three Gorges Mountain and its impact factors[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(8): 1809−1818.
[19]	刘目兴, 吴丹, 吴四平, 等. 三峡库区森林土壤大孔隙特征及对饱和导水率的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(11):3189−3196. Liu M X, Wu D, Wu S P, et al. Characteristic of soil macropores under various types of forest coverage and their influence on saturated hydraulic conductivity in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(11): 3189−3196.
[20]	骆紫藤, 牛健植, 孟晨, 等. 华北土石山区森林土壤中石砾分布特征对土壤大孔隙及导水性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):305−316. Luo Z T, Niu J Z, Meng C, et al. Effect of distribution of rock fragment on macropores and hydraulic conductivity in forest soil in rocky mountain area of northern China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(3): 305−316.
[21]	阮芯竹, 程金花, 张洪江, 等. 重庆市四面山不同土地利用类型饱和导水率[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(1):79−84. Ruan X Z, Cheng J H, Zhang H J, et al. Saturated hydraulic conductivity of different land use types in Simian Mountain of Chongqing City[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 79−84.
[22]	毛娜, 黄来明, 邵明安. 黄土区坡面尺度不同植被类型土壤饱和导水率剖面分布及影响因素[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(2):381−389. Mao N, Huang L M, Shao M A. Profile distribution of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and controlling factors under different vegetations on slope in loess region[J]. Soils, 2019, 51(2): 381−389.
[23]	李平, 王冬梅, 丁聪, 等. 黄土高寒区小流域土壤饱和导水率和土壤密度的分布特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4):10−17. Li P, Wang D M, Ding C, et al. Distributions characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil bulk density in a small watershed in the alpine zone of the Loess Plateau[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(4): 10−17.
[24]	陈雪, 宋娅丽, 王克勤, 等. 布设等高反坡阶对滇中松华坝水源区坡耕地土壤饱和导水率的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 48(5):649−655. Chen X, Song Y L, Wang K Q, et al. Effect contour reverse slope terrace on the saturated water conductivity of sloping farmland in Songhuaba water source area in central Yunnan[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 48(5): 649−655.
[25]	王子龙, 赵勇刚, 赵世伟, 等. 退耕典型草地土壤饱和导水率及其影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6):1254−1262. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.06.015 Wang Z L, Zhao Y G, Zhao S W, et al. Study on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors in typical grassland of farmland conservation[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(6): 1254−1262. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.06.015
[26]	刘宇, 张洪江. 张友燚, 等. 晋西黄土丘陵区主要人工林土壤饱和导水率研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(4):131−135. Liu Y, Zhang H J, Zhang Y Y, et al. Saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil under main planted forests in loess hilly region of western Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(4): 131−135.
[27]	李建兴, 何丙辉, 谌芸. 不同护坡草本植物的根系特征及对土壤渗透性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(5):1535−1547. doi: 10.5846/stxb201205170737 Li J X, He B H, Chen Y. Root features of typical herb plants for hillslope protection and their effects on soil infiltration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(5): 1535−1547. doi: 10.5846/stxb201205170737

[1]	Chen Xiaomeng, Wang Yuechen, Chai Xuying, Li Aining, Wang Yonglin. Deletion mutations and its phenotypic analysis of two-component genes in Lonsdalea populi[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(9): 25-37. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210007
[2]	Zhang Ping, Li Chaoyang, Zhao Qingquan, Wang Lihai, Ma Ling. Inhibition effects of biocontrol bacteria strains on the pathogen of Camellia oleifera anthracnose[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(10): 107-116. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190409
[3]	GAN Lu, SU Hao-tian, LING Xin-wen, YIN Shu-xia. Rust pathogen identification and mechanism of disease-resistance research on Kentucky bluegrass dwarf mutant[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(3): 87-92. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160315
[4]	LIU Jian-feng, ZHANG Yu-chu, LIU Ting, Celal Tuncer, CHENG Yun-qing. Screening of a highly pathogenic strain against hazelnut weevil and microscopic observation on its infection process[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(3): 32-37. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160322
[5]	CAO Feng, YANG Ling, GONG Shu-rong, ZHANG Lin, NIU Qiu-hong. Relationships between pathogenic bacterium and the endophytic bacteria isolated from Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(9): 25-33. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160082
[6]	BEN Ai-ling, ZENG Fei-li, QIAO Xue-juan, ZHENG Jing-rong, HAN Zheng-min. Colonization and pathogenicity for American and Chinese bacterial strains carried by pine wood nematodes.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(1): 83-87.
[7]	HU Ching-yu, CHEN Jan-chang, WEI Chun-hung, CHEN Chaur-tzuhn. Using MODIS image data to estimate the terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) of ecological zone in Taiwan.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(4): 33-39.
[8]	WANG Meng-chang, FAN Jun-feng, LIANG Jun, ZHOU Yong-xue, WANG Lei. Effects of canker pathogen on four antioxidase activities of poplar callus[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(2): 118-122.
[9]	SUN Dong-mei, YANG Qian, SONG Jin-zhu. Study on inhibition pathogen of Cytospora chrysosperma by Trichoderma aureoviride metabolite[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(1): 76-79.
[10]	ZHAO Bo-guang, LIANG Bo, ZHAO Lin-guo, XU Mei. Influence of pine wood nematode on production of phytotoxins of an accompanying pathogenic bacterial strain[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(6): 71-75.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(21)

1.	彭小静，黄海山，严芝银，邹星晨，贺康宁，程唱，王作枭，李睿，刘婧雯，石正阳，刘仟仟. 祁连山东部地区不同林分密度白桦天然林土壤理化性质特征. 生态学报. 2025(02): 743-756 .
2.	张佳凝，张建军，赖宗锐，赵炯昌，胡亚伟，李阳，卫朝阳. 林分密度对刺槐人工林土壤养分和微生物群落的影响. 干旱区研究. 2025(02): 274-288 .
3.	武燕，李歆玉，张奕婷，丁波，张运林，符裕红，刘讯. 西南喀斯特地区不同龄组马尾松人工林枯落物碳氮磷化学计量特征及其影响因子. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(02): 87-94 . 本站查看
4.	巩大鹏，毕华兴，王劲峰，赵丹阳，黄靖涵，宋艺琳. 晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐人工林叶片-枯落物-土壤化学计量特征. 林业科学研究. 2024(02): 156-164 .
5.	陈宇，庞涛，瞿相，彭建，杨汉波，代林利，辜云杰. 造林密度对楠木幼龄林生长、土壤理化性质与酶活性的影响. 四川林业科技. 2024(03): 9-20 .
6.	龚世豪，查同刚，张晓霞，张恒硕，高连炜，于洋. 晋西黄土区典型林分凋落物-土壤养分对降雨再分配变化的响应. 生态学报. 2024(17): 7748-7759 .
7.	窦金萍，武小钢，杨秀云，陈冠光，靳雅君，吴茜. 不同类型豆科植物群落凋落物对城市土壤质量的影响. 林业调查规划. 2024(05): 198-204 .
8.	贾亚倢，杨建英，张建军，胡亚伟，张犇，赵炯昌，李阳，唐鹏. 晋西黄土区林分密度对油松人工林生物量及土壤理化性质的影响. 浙江农林大学学报. 2024(06): 1211-1221 .
9.	陈涛，王露露，王思崇，朱学灵，叶永忠. 河南省丘陵低山区刺槐人工林立地分类及立地质量评价. 西北林学院学报. 2023(01): 153-159 .
10.	高利强，刘莹，王国梁. 人工和天然油松林表层土壤不同粒径团聚体有机碳及其组分分布特征. 水土保持学报. 2023(02): 320-328 .
11.	孙阔，袁兴中，王晓锋，袁嘉，候春丽，魏丽景. 三峡水库消落带土壤养分含量及生态化学计量特征. 长江流域资源与环境. 2023(02): 403-414 .
12.	张誉. 不同造林技术对水土保持林土壤特性的影响研究. 广东蚕业. 2023(03): 50-52 .
13.	钟欢，董文渊，浦婵，谢泽轩，张炜，郑静楠，夏莉. 滇东北4种类型筇竹林分土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征研究. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2023(03): 111-119 .
14.	魏亚娟，刘美英，解云虎，李星. 吉兰泰盐湖防护体系建立38 a以来土壤养分特征. 干旱区研究. 2023(05): 747-755 .
15.	党记刚. 陕西黄土区典型人工林分结构与水土保持功能耦合关系研究. 科技创新与生产力. 2023(08): 47-50 .
16.	朱燕，翟博超，孙美美，罗伶书，王瑛，杜盛. 黄土丘陵区不同密度刺槐和油松人工林土壤理化性质与化学计量特征. 水土保持研究. 2023(06): 160-167 .
17.	兰道云，毕华兴，赵丹阳，王宁，云慧雅，王珊珊，崔艳红. 晋西黄土区不同密度油松人工林保育土壤功能评价. 水土保持学报. 2022(02): 189-196 .
18.	郭强，官凤英，辉朝茂，刘蔚漪，邹学明. 密度和施肥调控对巨龙竹新竹生长及生物量特征的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(04): 95-106 . 本站查看
19.	张恒宇，孙树臣，吴元芝，安娟，宋红丽. 黄土高原不同植被密度条件下土壤水、碳、氮分布特征. 生态环境学报. 2022(05): 875-884 .
20.	郭鑫，魏天兴，陈宇轩，沙国良，任康，于欢. 黄土丘陵区典型退耕恢复植被土壤生态化学计量特征. 干旱区地理. 2022(06): 1899-1907 .
21.	梁广国，陶建元，郭坤，王子旗，张艳明，王金颖. 不同林型、不同林分密度植被下土壤养分及其化学计量比研究. 吉林林业科技. 2021(06): 14-21 .

Other cited types(13)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1564) PDF downloads (91) Cited by(34)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors of typical plantations in South Subtropical Zone