Temporal dynamics in photosynthetic electron transfer rate of <i>Artemisia ordosica</i> in growing season and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land of northwestern China

Luo Yu; Ma Li; Jin Chuan; Li Xinhao; Li Cheng; Jia Xin; Zha Tianshan

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200154

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(2): 54-62. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200154

Luo Yu, Ma Li, Jin Chuan, Li Xinhao, Li Cheng, Jia Xin, Zha Tianshan. Temporal dynamics in photosynthetic electron transfer rate of Artemisia ordosica in growing season and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(2): 54-62. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200154

Citation:

PDF (935 KB)

Temporal dynamics in photosynthetic electron transfer rate of Artemisia ordosica in growing season and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land of northwestern China

Luo Yu^{1, 2, 3,},
Ma Li⁴,
Jin Chuan^{1, 2},
Li Xinhao^{1, 2},
Li Cheng^{1, 2},
Jia Xin^{1, 2, 3},
Zha Tianshan^{1, 2, 3, ,}

1.
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Yanchi Ecology Research Station of the Mu Us Desert, Beijing 100083, China
3.
Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
4.
Beijing Landscape Design Engineering Limited Company, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: May 19, 2020
Revised Date: September 03, 2020
Available Online: January 24, 2021
Published Date: February 23, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Understanding the dynamics of electron transfer rate of typical sandy speices Artemisia ordosica and its response mechanism to environmental factors in desert area is very important to manage desert ecosystem to adapt to the fluctuating environment.
Method This study conducted a long-term in situ continuous monitoring of photosynthetic electron transfer rate (ETR) in Artemisia ordosica in May−September of 2019 using chlorophyll fluorescence observation method. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), air temperature (T_a), chlorophyll content (SPAD) were simultaneously measured.
Result ETR was significantly correlated with PAR, T_a and SPAD at a significant level of 0.05, with the monthly average reaching the maximum in July and the smallest in September. The change of ETR with light intensity showed an upward trend, and the response intensity to light under low light condition of PAR ≤ 800 μmol/(m²·s) was greater than that of strong light. The change of ETR with T_a showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The thresholds of high and low temperature stress in May (leaf-leaning stage) and September (deciduous stage) were 5 ℃ and 20 ℃, respectively, and June−August (mature stage) was 10 ℃ and 25 ℃. The relationship between ETR and SPAD was linear and positive, and the stability of ETR in mature stage was less than that in leaf-expansion stage and leaf-falling stage.
Conclusion Through the above research, it was found that PAR, T_a, and SPAD were the three main factors affecting ETR. ETR was mainly affected by SPAD during the leaf-expansion stage, temperature and light intensity during the mature stage, and plant physiology during the defoliation stage. We found that Artemisia ordosica ETR showed a good adaptability under the alternating effect of the main influencing factors. Besides proper temperature increase can promote the transfer of photosynthetic electrons, thus enhance the photosynthetic capacity of plants. The results can not only provide some theoretical guidance for the response of plants’ photosynthetic physiology to the environment under global warming, but also a reference for the restoration of desert vegetation.

FullText(HTML)

References (29)

References

[1]	Iram S, Sajad H, Muhammad A R, et al. Crop photosynthetic response to light quality and light intensity[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(1): 4−23. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63227-0.
[2]	叶子飘, 杨小龙, 冯关萍. 植物电子传递速率对光响应模型的比较研究[J]. 扬州大学学报, 2018, 39(1):97−104. Ye Z P, Yang X L, Feng G P. Comparative study on light-response models of electron transport rates of plants[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University, 2018, 39(1): 97−104.
[3]	赵则海. 遮光对三叶鬼针草光合作用和叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(1):19−22. Zhao Z H. Effects of shading on the photosynthesis and chlorophyll content of Bidens pilosa[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(1): 19−22.
[4]	周玉霞, 巨天珍, 王引弟, 等. 3种旱生植物的叶绿素荧光参数日变化研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(5):164−170. Zhou Y X, Ju T Z, Wang Y D, et al. Diurnal variation of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of three xerophytes[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(5): 164−170.
[5]	吴敏, 邓平, 赵英, 等. 喀斯特干旱环境对青冈栎叶片生长及叶绿素荧光动力学参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12):4071−4081. Wu M, Deng P, Zhao Y, et al. Effect of drought on leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters in Cyclobalanopsis glauca seedling of karst areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4071−4081.
[6]	苏金, 方炎明, 张强, 等. 遮阴对紫珠光合特性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(11):47−51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2019.11.010. Su J, Fang Y M, Zhang Q, et al. Effect of shading on photosynthetic characteristics of Callicarpa bodinieri[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2019, 47(11): 47−51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2019.11.010.
[7]	Berdugo M, Delgado B M, Soliveres S, et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity[J]. Science, 2020, 367: 787−790. doi: 10.1126/science.aay5958.
[8]	Lin W, Gang H, Wen C, et al. Wet-to-dry shift over Southwest China in 1994 tied to the warming of tropical warm pool[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2018, 51: 3111−3123. doi: 10.1007/s00382-018-4068-8.
[9]	吴雅娟, 查天山, 贾昕, 等. 油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)光化学量子效率和非光化学淬灭的动态及其影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(2):319−325. Wu Y J, Zha T S, Jia X, et al. Temporal variation and controlling factors of photochemical efficiency and non-photochemical quenching in Artemisia ordosica[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(2): 319−325.
[10]	韩旖旎. 两种沙生灌木适应波动环境的非光化学淬灭调节[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. Han Y N. Regulation of non-photochemical quenching in photosynthetica acclimation of two xerophytic shrubs to fluctuating environment[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[11]	张明艳. 两种沙生灌木昼夜光化学效率光响应的季节敏感性[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. Zhang M Y. Seasonal sensitivity in light response of diurnal photochemical efficiency for two desert shrub species[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[12]	张景波, 张金鑫, 卢琦, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠油蒿叶片PSⅡ叶绿素荧光动力学参数及其光响应曲线动态[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3):713−719. Zhang J B, Zhang J X, Lu Q, et al. Dynamic changes of leaf parameters of PS II fluorescence kinetics and fast photosynthetic response curves in Artemisia ordosica[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(3): 713−719.
[13]	Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R, et al. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA): General Subjects, 1989, 990(1): 87−92.
[14]	刘晓晴, 常宗强, 马亚丽, 等. 胡杨(Populus euphratica)异形叶叶绿素荧光动力学[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(3):704−711. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00007. Liu X Q, Chang Z Q, Ma Y L, et al. Characteristics of the fast chlorophyll flourescence induction kinetics of heteromorphic leaves in Populus euphratica[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2014, 34(3): 704−711. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00007.
[15]	徐祥增, 张金燕, 张广辉, 等. 光强对三七光合能力及能量分配的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1):193−204. Xu X Z, Zhang J Y, Zhang G H, et al. Effects of light intensity on photosynthetic capacity and light energy allocation in Panax notoginseng[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(1): 193−204.
[16]	蔡建国, 韦孟琪, 章毅, 等. 遮阴对绣球光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(5): 570−576. Cai J G, Wei M Q, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of Hydrangea macrophylla[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(5): 570−576.
[17]	崔波, 周一冉, 王喜蒙, 等. 不同光照强度下白及光合生理特性的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2020, 54(2):276−284. Cui B, Zhou Y R, Wang X M, et al. Effects of different light intensities on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of Bletilla striata[J]. Journal of Henan University, 2020, 54(2): 276−284.
[18]	冯志立, 冯玉龙, 曹坤芳. 光强对砂仁叶片光合作用光抑制及热耗散的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(1):77−82. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2002.01.013 Feng Z L, Feng Y L, Cao K F. Effects of light intensity on photoinhibition of photosynthesis and thermal dissipation in Amomum villosum Lour.[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2002, 26(1): 77−82. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2002.01.013
[19]	Renata S, Ireneusz S, Aleksandra O, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses to high light and temperature stress in plants[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 139: 165−177. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.05.002.
[20]	Zha T S, Wu Y J, Jia X, et al. Diurnal response of effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry to irradiance as an indicator of photosynthetic acclimation to stressed environments revealed in a xerophytic species[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 74: 191−197. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.027.
[21]	Seyyedeh-Sanam K S, Reza M A. Global insights of protein responses to cold stress in plants: signaling, defence, and degradation[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2018, 226: 123−135. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.03.022
[22]	郝向春, 周帅, 翟瑜, 等. 温度变化对南极假山毛榉光合系统的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(9):1−7. Hao X C, Zhou S, Qu Y, et al. Influence of temperature stress on photosystem of Nothofagus antarctica[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(9): 1−7.
[23]	Phillip O W, Justin L S, Anthony S D. Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of dehydration stress in American chestnut seedlings[J]. Native Plants Journal, 2010, 11(1): 27−31. doi: 10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.1.27.
[24]	杨威, 朱建强, 吴启侠, 等. 花铃期短期渍水和高温对棉花叶片光合特性、膜脂过氧化代谢及产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(5):504−512. doi: 10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201605010. Yang W, Zhu J Q, Wu Q X, et al. The effect of short-term waterlogging and high temperature on photosynthesis, membrane lid peroxidation metabolism, and yield during cotton flowering and boll-forming[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(5): 504−512. doi: 10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201605010.
[25]	衡丽, 王俊, 花明明, 等. 高温胁迫对Bt棉铃壳Bt蛋白含量及氮代谢影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(1):27−33. doi: 10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201601004. Heng L, Wang J, Hua M M, et al. The Effect of high-temperature stress on Bt protein content and nitrogen metabolism in the boll shell of Bt cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(1): 27−33. doi: 10.11963/issn.1002-7807.201601004.
[26]	武宝玕, 韩志国, 藏汝波. 热胁对海洋红藻及绿藻叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版), 2002, 23(1):108−112. Wu B G, Han Z G, Zang R B. Effects of heat stress in marine red and green algae by chlorophyll fluorescence method[J]. Journal of Jinan University, 2002, 23(1): 108−112.
[27]	Neil R B. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59: 89−113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759.
[28]	俞华先, 田春艳, 经艳芬, 等. 水分胁迫对4份含大茎野生种57NG208血缘F₂代甘蔗材料叶绿素荧光动力参数的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(28):17−24. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18070058. Yu H X, Tian C Y, Jing Y F, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic parameters of saccharum robustum 57NG208 F₂ hybrids under water stress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(28): 17−24. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18070058.
[29]	Zhang D Y, Zhu F, Yuan M, et al. Light intensity affects chlorophyll synthesis during greening process by metabolite signal from mitochondrial alternative oxidase in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2016, 39(1): 12−25.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(13)

1.	郭来珍，陈虹，赵善超，陈凤，陈兵权，陈鑫悦. 天山花楸不同种源种子表型变异分析. 种子. 2022(10): 50-57+2 .
2.	孙永玉，李昆，雷晨雨，田瑞杰，张春华，冯德枫，刘方炎，唐国勇. 干热河谷小桐子不同种源的光合生理及生长性状. 应用与环境生物学报. 2021(02): 351-356 .
3.	刘莉，王磊，吴丹，赵永军，庄振杰，王震，鲁仪增，刘立江，陆璐，解孝满. 不同种源文冠果种子的表型变异. 经济林研究. 2021(04): 97-105 .
4.	郭国业，徐莺，唐琳，陈放，韩学琴. 不同地理种源麻疯树表型变异研究. 四川农业大学学报. 2020(02): 143-151+160 .
5.	句娇，毕泉鑫，赵阳，于丹，崔艺凡，傅光辉，范思琪，陈梦园，于海燕，王利兵. 不同种源文冠果种子及苗期性状地理变异. 江西农业大学学报. 2019(03): 529-540 .
6.	张毅，敖妍，刘觉非，赵磊磊，张永明. 文冠果种实性状变异规律及优良单株选择. 东北林业大学学报. 2019(09): 1-5 .
7.	张毅，敖妍，刘觉非，赵磊磊，由海德. 不同分布区文冠果种实性状对生态因子的响应. 西北林学院学报. 2019(05): 85-90 .
8.	赵海鹄，梁文汇，李宝财，梁忠云. 广西细子龙核仁油化学成分分析. 广西林业科学. 2019(04): 531-534 .
9.	惠文凯，王益，陈晓阳. 麻疯树种子含油量近红外光谱定标模型的建立. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(01): 1-7 . 本站查看
10.	何霞，邓成，杨嘉麒，张登，张梦洁，廖柏勇，王芳，陈晓阳. 苦楝种源间生长性状的早期地理变异分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(07): 45-54 . 本站查看
11.	覃敏，尹光天，杨锦昌，李荣生，邹文涛. 米老排不同种源的表型性状变异分析. 浙江农林大学学报. 2017(01): 112-119 .
12.	许洋，李迎超，冯慧，王迪，丁可君，郭超，刘国军，厉月桥，宁超，贺磊，郭芳. 不同种源栓皮栎种子表型性状的变异分析. 安徽农业科学. 2015(25): 164-167 .
13.	许洋，李迎超，冯慧，王迪，丁可君，郭超，刘国军，厉月桥，宁超，贺磊，郭芳. 不同种源麻栎种子表型性状的变异分析. 林业科技通讯. 2015(09): 8-12 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1406) PDF downloads (53) Cited by(18)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Temporal dynamics in photosynthetic electron transfer rate of Artemisia ordosica in growing season and its response to environmental factors in Mu Us Sandy Land of northwestern China

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(13)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content