Ecosystem services, trade-offs and synergy analysis in Tianjin under different land use scenarios

Wang Meng; Ti Yang; Wang Jiadong; Zhao Qiulu; Hu Zhiliang; Luan Xiaofeng

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210008

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2022 > 44(5): 77-85. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210008

Wang Meng, Ti Yang, Wang Jiadong, Zhao Qiulu, Hu Zhiliang, Luan Xiaofeng. Ecosystem services, trade-offs and synergy analysis in Tianjin under different land use scenarios[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(5): 77-85. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210008

Citation:

PDF (1414 KB)

Ecosystem services, trade-offs and synergy analysis in Tianjin under different land use scenarios

1.
School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Tianjin Urban Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300110, China

More Information

Received Date: January 08, 2021
Revised Date: April 12, 2021
Available Online: April 11, 2022
Published Date: May 24, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Land use change is an important factor leading to changes in ecosystem services and their relationships. It is significant to explore the impact of land use on ecosystem services.
Method This study is based on the land use data of Tianjin in 2000 and 2015, combined with regional development planning, using the GeoSOS-FLUS model to predict the land use structure under three different situations in 2030, and using the InVEST model to evaluate ecosystem services and trade-offs.
Result (1) From 2015 to 2030, under the business as usual, cities continued to expand, construction land increased by 27.68%, and cultivated land decreased by 11.47%. Under the ecological planning, urban expansion slowed down, construction land increased by 7.97%, and woodland, grassland, waters and shrubs increased by 2.02%. Under the rapid urban development, construction land and cultivated land remained stable, and the water area increased by 4.78%. (2) From 2015 to 2030, the comprehensive ecosystem service index of Tianjin under different situations showed a downward trend. In 2030, the total ecosystem service indexes of business as usual, ecological planning and rapid urban development were 0.172, 0.181 and 0.180, respectively. (3) From 2015 to 2030, the direction of the synergy of the four ecosystem services under different situations had not changed, but the strengths and weaknesses had undergone complicated changes. In general, the synergy relationship was stronger under the ecological planning and weaker under the business as usual.
Conclusion This study suggests that Tianjin City should slow the urban expansion, optimize the current land use structure, and enhance the ecological environment construction in the future. The research results can provide a theoretical basis of ecosystem management in Tianjin.
- Tianjin City,
- GeoSOS-FLUS model,
- InVEST model,
- ecosystem service,
- trade-offs

FullText(HTML)

References (28)

References

[1]	Costanza R, Groot R D, Braat L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28(12): 1−15.
[2]	Raymond C M, Singh G G, Karina B, et al. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships[J]. Bioscience, 2013, 63(7): 536−546. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
[3]	Kumar P. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis[J]. Future Survey, 2005, 34(9): 534.
[4]	Zhang H F, Wang S X, Hao J M, et al. Air pollution and control action in Beijing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112(2): 1519−1527.
[5]	Li B J, Chen D X, Wu S H, et al. Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: case study of Nanjing City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators Integrating Monitoring Assessment & Management, 2016, 71(12): 416−427.
[6]	Sun X, Lu Z M, Li F, et al. Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 94(6): 117−129.
[7]	Cui L L, Shi J. Urbanization and its environmental effects in Shanghai, China[J]. Urban Climate, 2012, 2(12): 1−15.
[8]	Wang Y, Li X M, Zhang Q, et al. Projections of future land use changes: multiple scenarios-based impacts analysis on ecosystem services for Wuhan City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 94(11): 430−445.
[9]	邓楚雄, 朱大美, 聂小东, 等. 生态系统服务权衡最新研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2020, 28(10): 1509−1522. Deng C X, Zhu D M, Nie X D, et al. Progress of research regarding the trade-offs of ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(10): 1509−1522.
[10]	杨志鹏, 许嘉巍, 冯兴华, 等. 基于InVEST模型的东北地区土地利用变化对生境的影响研究[J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(6): 139−147. Yang Z P, Xu J W, Feng X H, et al. Effects of land use change on habitat based on InVEST model in Northeast China[J]. Ecological Science, 2018, 37(6): 139−147.
[11]	刘华妍, 肖文发, 李奇, 等. 北京市生态系统服务时空变化与权衡分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 209−219. Liu H Y, Xiao W F, Li Q, et al. Spatiotemporal changes and trade-offs of ecosystem services in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(1): 209−219.
[12]	Leh M D K, Matlock M D, Cummings E C, et al. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 165(15): 6−18.
[13]	Igone P A, Beatriz F D M, Gloria R L, et al. Integrating stakeholders’ demands and scientific knowledge on ecosystem services in landscape planning[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29(8): 1423−1433. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-9994-1
[14]	孙艺杰, 任志远, 郝梦雅, 等. 黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素: 以延安市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(10): 3443−3454. Sun Y J, Ren Z Y, Hao M Y, et al. Spatial and temporal changes in the synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services, and its influencing factors in Yanan, Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(10): 3443−3454.
[15]	税伟, 杜勇, 王亚楠, 等. 闽三角城市群生态系统服务权衡的时空动态与情景模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(14): 5188−5197. Shui W, Du Y, Wang Y N, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics and scenarios simulation of trade-offs between ecosystem services in Min Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(14): 5188−5197.
[16]	Farrell P J O, Anderson P M. Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2010, 2(1−2): 59−65. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.005
[17]	Rebecca C K, Richard P S, Lisa M, et al. Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(24): 7402. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406485112
[18]	Zhang D, Huang Q, He C, et al. Planning urban landscape to maintain key ecosystem services in a rapidly urbanizing area: a scenario analysis in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 96(1): 559−571.
[19]	Wu Y, Tao Y, Yang G, et al. Impact of land use change on multiple ecosystem services in the rapidly urbanizing Kunshan City of China: past trajectories and future projections[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 85(4): 419−427.
[20]	Liu X, Liang X, Li X, et al. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2017, 168(12): 94−116.
[21]	Goldestein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(19): 7565−7570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201040109
[22]	付秋祺. 天津市土地利用变化及其对生态网络格局影响研究[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2020. Fu Q Q. Study on land use change and its impact on ecological network pattern in Tianjin[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Normal University, 2020.
[23]	李素晓. 京津冀生态系统服务演变规律与驱动因素研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019. Li S X. The dynamics of ecosystem services and their driving factors in the Jing-Jin-Ji region[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019.
[24]	Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(2): 195−210. doi: 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6
[25]	Li X, Chen G, Liu X, et al. A new global land-use and land-cover change product at a 1-km resolution for 2010 to 2100 based on human-environment interactions[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2017, 107(5): 1040−1059. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1303357
[26]	李龙, 吴大放, 王芳, 等. 中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究: 以佛山市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(24): 1−14. Li L, Wu D F, Wang F, et al. Prediction and trade off analysis of ecosystem service value in the rapidly urbanizing Foshan City of China: a case study[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(24): 1−14.
[27]	冉凤维, 罗志军, 吴佳平, 等. 鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3): 995−1004. Ran F W, Luo Z J, Wu J P, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of the trade-off and synergy relationship among ecosystem services in Poyang Lake Region, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(3): 995−1004.
[28]	徐建英, 陈吉星, 刘焱序, 等. “一带一路”地区生态系统服务关系的时空分异与区域响应[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3258−3270. Xu J Y, Chen J X, Liu Y X, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation of interaction of ecosystem services and regional responses in the “Belt and Road” area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 3258−3270.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (992) PDF downloads (118)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Ecosystem services, trade-offs and synergy analysis in Tianjin under different land use scenarios

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content