Phenotypic difference and comprehensive evaluation of <i>Sophora japonica</i> in Beijing urban area

Li Jiahui; Peng Zuodeng; Liu Yong

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210013

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2022 > 44(6): 23-33. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210013

Li Jiahui, Peng Zuodeng, Liu Yong. Phenotypic difference and comprehensive evaluation of Sophora japonica in Beijing urban area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(6): 23-33. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210013

Citation:

PDF (581 KB)

Phenotypic difference and comprehensive evaluation of Sophora japonica in Beijing urban area

Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: January 11, 2021
Revised Date: June 06, 2021
Accepted Date: May 08, 2022
Available Online: May 12, 2022
Published Date: June 24, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective This paper aims to explore the degree of variation of phenotypic traits and main source of phenotypic diversity of Sophora japonica resources in Beijing urban area, comprehensively evaluate S. japonica and directly select the best germplasm, then provide theoretical support and breeding materials for the breeding of improved varieties of S. japonica.
Method In this study, 135 seedlings of S. japonica with DBH of 20 − 30 cm and tree age of about 23 years old were used as materials. According to their 26 phenotypic traits such as leaf position characteristics, fruit characteristics and crown width characteristics, the variation degree of phenotypic traits and the main sources of trait variation were analyzed by statistical methods such as analysis of variance, multiple comparison and principal component analysis, and the excellent S. japonica individuals were selected by quantitative evaluation and orientation.
Result The average coefficient of variation of the phenotypic traits of S. japonica was 25.08%, and the variation range of the coefficient of variation was 7.01% − 264.44%, among them, the variation coefficients of dorsal fluff, number of lenticels, leaf size and shape and leaf color were larger, and the variation coefficients of fruit size and thousand-grain mass were smaller. From the analysis of variance and multiple comparisons, it can be seen that, except for the basal leaf length to width, crown round rate, dorsal fluff, the other phenotypic traits of the S. japonica among populations reached significant or extremely significant levels, it showed that there were wide variations in phenotypic traits in different populations of S. japonicus, and the degree of variation was different. The results of principal component analysis showed that the first eight principal components represented 81.93% of the morphological diversity of S. japonica, among which, leaf size, leaf color, leaf shape and fruit fullness were the main factors causing differences in phenotypic traits among varied populations. Targeted screening of different types of ornamental traits of S. japonica by means of comprehensive evaluation of principal components, 10 excellent germplasms for each of 3 types of S. japonica were screened out, and the best germplasm came from 2 populations of Xingfu Street (XFDJ) and Aolin West Road (ALXL) in Chaoyang District of Beijing.
Conclusion The phenotypic traits of S. japonica germplasm resources in Beijing urban area are rich in phenotypic variation, and the degree of variation is high. Among them, the variation of leaf positions is the main source of phenotypic diversity, in addition, the variation degree of leaf and other vegetative organs of S. japonicus is greater than that of fruit reproductive organs, which provides abundant resources and great space for the selection and breeding of S. japonica varieties. In each of the three categories, 10 optimal germplasms were selected, which provide excellent propagation materials for the further collection, preservation and genetic improvement of the germplasm resources of S. japonica.
- Sophora japonica,
- phenotypic difference,
- principal component analysis,
- comprehensive evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References (28)

References

[1]	朱衍杰, 张秀省, 穆红梅. 国槐的研究进展[J]. 林业实用技术, 2013, 16(3): 11−15. Zhu Y J, Zhang X S, Mu H M. Research progress of Sophora japonica[J]. Practical Forestry Technology, 2013, 16(3): 11−15.
[2]	孙昱, 彭祚登. 国槐的历史文化与价值研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 56(2): 23−31. Sun Y, Peng Z D. Insights into history culture and value of Sophora japonica[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences), 2018, 56(2): 23−31.
[3]	Buhyoff G J, Wellman J D. The specification of an on linear psychophysical function for visual landscape dimensions[J]. Journal of Leisure, 1980, 12(14): 97−99.
[4]	Mok J H, Harlow C, Landphair B, et al. Landscape improvement impacts on roadside safety in Texas[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 78(3): 263−274. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.09.002
[5]	张楠, 董丽, 郝培尧, 等. 北京市中心城区行道树结构的研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(5): 101−106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2014.05.022 Zhang N, Dong L, Hao P Y, et al. Study on structure of street trees in central districts of Beijing[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(5): 101−106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2014.05.022
[6]	刘忠香. 国槐主要病虫害综合防治措施[J]. 林业科技情报, 2018, 50(1): 16−17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3303.2018.01.007 Liu Z X. Comprehensive protection technology for the main pests of Sophora japonica[J]. Forestry Science and Technology Information, 2018, 50(1): 16−17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3303.2018.01.007
[7]	孟祥涛. 关于国槐行道树栽培技术研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2018, 38(2): 198. Meng X T. Research on Sophora japonica street tree cultivation technology[J]. Agriculture & Technology, 2018, 38(2): 198.
[8]	孟庆杰, 王光全, 孟庆军, 等. 蝴蝶槐的组织培养和快速繁殖技术[J]. 林业科技, 2006, 31(3): 63−64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9499.2006.03.023 Meng Q J, Wang G Q, Meng Q J, et al. Studies on rapid in vitro propagation of Sophora japonica var. oligophylla[J]. Forestry Science & Technology, 2006, 31(3): 63−64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9499.2006.03.023
[9]	Howe G T, Aitken S N, Neale D B, et al. From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 2003, 81(12): 1247−1266. doi: 10.1139/b03-141
[10]	顾万春. 统计遗传学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004. Gu W C. Statistical genetics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
[11]	张翠琴, 姬志峰, 林丽丽, 等. 五角枫种群表型多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(16): 5343−5352. Zhang C Q, Ji Z F, Lin L L, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Acer mono maxim population[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(16): 5343−5352.
[12]	顾万春, 王棋, 游应天. 森林遗传资源学概论[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1998. Gu W C, Wang Q, You Y T. Introduction to forest genetic resources[M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 1998.
[13]	宋琼. 国槐实生后代优良单株选择与组织培养繁殖[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017. Song Q. Superior individuals selection and propagation of seedings in Sophora japonicus[D]. Yangling: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2017.
[14]	史宝胜. 紫叶李叶色生理变化及影响因素研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2006. Shi B S. The research on physiological characters and the influence factors on leave color of purple leaf cherry plum [D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2006.
[15]	王改萍, 张磊, 姚雪冰, 等. 金叶银杏叶色变化特性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5): 41−48. Wang G P, Zhang L, Yao X B, et al. An analysis of color variation characteristics of golden leaf ginkgo[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(5): 41−48.
[16]	吕婷, 刘涛, 梁瑞芳, 等. 沙生植物沙鞭不同居群形态变异研究[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(1): 60−66. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.01.008 Lü T, Liu T, Liang R F, et al. Morphological variation of different populations from Psammochloa villosa, a peculiar sandy plant[J]. Bulletin of Botanica Research, 2021, 41(1): 60−66. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.01.008
[17]	林玲, 王军辉, 罗建, 等. 砂生槐天然群体种实性状的表型多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(4): 137−143. Lin L, Wang J H, Luo J, et al. Phenotypic diversity of seed and fruit traits in natural population of Sophora moorcroftiana[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(4): 137−143.
[18]	童跃伟, 唐杨, 陈红, 等. 红松种子园种群表型多样性研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6341−6348. Tong Y W, Tang Y, Chen H, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Pinus koraiensis populations in a seed orchard[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6341−6348.
[19]	贺丹, 唐婉, 刘阳, 等. 尾叶紫薇与紫薇F1代群体主要表型性状与SSR标记的连锁分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(6): 121−125. He D, Tang W, Liu Y, et al. Linkage analysis of phonotypic traits of Lagerstroemia caudata and L. indica F1 population using SSR markers[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(6): 121−125.
[20]	Li Y G, Liu X H, Ma J W, et al. Phenotypic variation in Phoebe bournei populations preserved in the primary distribution area[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 29(1): 35−44. doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0409-4
[21]	Kazuma K, Noda N, Suzuki M. Flavonoid composition re-lated to petal color in different lines of Clitoria ternatea[J]. Phytochemistry, 2003, 64(6): 1133−1139. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00504-1
[22]	童冉, 吴小龙, 姜丽娜, 等. 野生玫瑰种群表型变异[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11): 3706−3715. Tong R, Wu X L, Jiang L N, et al. Phenotypic variations in populations of Rosa rugosa[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(11): 3706−3715.
[23]	井振华, 李皓, 邵文豪, 等. 浙江柿天然群体表型多样性研究[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(3): 325−331. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2010.03.013 Jing Z H, Li H, Shao W H, et al. Phenotypic diversity of natural populations in Diospyros glaucifolia[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2010, 30(3): 325−331. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2010.03.013
[24]	徐永杰, 韩华柏, 王滑, 等. 大巴山区核桃实生居群的坚果表型和遗传多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5): 111−119. Xu Y J, Han H B, Wang H, et al. Nut phenotype and genetic diversity of Carya cathayensis seedling populations in Daba Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5): 111−119.
[25]	王永康, 吴国良, 赵爱玲, 等. 枣种质资源的表型遗传多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 33−41. Wang Y K, Wu G L, Zhao A L, et al. Phenotypic genetic diversity of Ziziphus jujuba germplasm resources[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 33−41.
[26]	张欣怡. 竹节草种资源遗传多样性研究及抗性评价[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2016. Zhang X Y. Study on genetic diversity and tolerant evaluation of Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retz.) Trin. germplasm[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2016.
[27]	孙荣喜, 郑勇奇, 张川红, 等. 不同群体国槐种子表型变异研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2011, 34(3): 65−70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2011.03.014 Sun R X, Zheng Y Q, Zhang C H, et al. Study on the seed phenotypic variation of Sophora japonica L. in different populations[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2011, 34(3): 65−70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2011.03.014
[28]	刘济铭, 陈仲, 孙操稳, 等. 无患子属种质资源种实性状变异及综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 44−54. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190606 Liu J M, Chen Z, Sun C W, et al. Variation in fruit and seed properties and comprehensive assessment of germplasm resources of the genus Sapindus[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(6): 44−54. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190606

[1]	Li Yuting, Ma Aiyun, Miao Zheng, Hao Yuanshuo, Dong Lihu. Effects of neighborhood competition on biomass and distribution of Larix olgensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230322
[2]	Zhao Qingxia, Xia Yufang. Effects of mowing modes on biomass, crude protein and crude fat contents of Broussonetia papyrifera in karst area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(6): 62-68. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210425
[3]	Song Runxian, Li Xiang, Mao Xiuhong, Wang Li, Chen Xiangli, Yao Junxiu, Zhao Xiyang, Li Shanwen. Transcriptome analysis of clone Populus deltoides ‘Zhonghe 1’ under cadmium stress[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(7): 12-21. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210037
[4]	Yao Junxiu, Chen Ganniu, Li Shanwen, Qiao Yanhui, Zhong Weiguo, Li Qinghua, Dong Yufeng, Wu Dejun. Physiological and biochemical properties and growth of Aigeiros clones under cadmium stress[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(4): 12-20. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190462
[5]	Xing Lei, Xue Hai-xia, Li Qing-he, Gao Ting-ting. Scaling from leaf to whole plant in biomass and nitrogen content of Nitraria tangutorum seedlings[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(2): 76-81. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170338
[6]	LIU Kun, CAO Lin, WANG Gui-bin, CAO Fu-liang. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Ginkgo biloba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(4): 12-20. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160374
[7]	DONG Dian, LIN Tian-xi, TANG Jing-yi, LIU Jing-chen, SUN Guo-wen, YAO Jie, CHENG Yan-xia. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Tilia amurensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 54-63. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.013
[8]	ZHAO Xi-yang, WANG Jun-hui, ZHANG Jin-feng, ZHANG Shou-gong, ZHANG Zeng-shun, MA Jian-wei, YUN Hui-ling, LI Kui-you. Variation analysis on chlorophyll fluorescence and growth traits of Catalpa bungei clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(3): 41-47.
[9]	DUAN Wen-xia, ZHU Bo, LIU Rui, CHEN Shi, ZHOU Yu-ping, CHEN Fang. Biomass and soil carbon dynamics in Cryptomeria fortunei plantations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(2): 55-59.
[10]	CHENG Tang-ren, MA Qin-yan, FENG Zhong-ke, LUO Xu. Research on forest biomass in Xiaolong Mountains, Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(1): 31-36. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.01.006

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	苏芝凤，黄德周，朱芷仪，陈荣枢，代廷皓，梁建宏，朱婧. 亚热带森林不同土壤类型团聚体酶活性及化学计量特征的差异. 环境科学. 2025(03): 1716-1728 .
2.	陈荣枢，王汝儒，孙佳豪，黄玲，杨思娴，蒲纪龙，黄慧敏，朱婧. 漓江流域海拔、土壤及植被对土壤养分和酶化学计量比的影响. 广西植物. 2023(02): 242-252 .
3.	王吕，马庆兵，姜华，寸兴刚，段新慧，何承刚. 云南寻甸县湿地草甸植被、土壤因子和微生物的特征. 草业科学. 2023(07): 1754-1765 .
4.	郑武扬，王艳霞，王月江，冯刚刚. 石漠化治理区不同优势树种根际土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质和微生物数量的关系. 东北林业大学学报. 2021(01): 96-100 .
5.	张艳，王冬梅. 北方土石山区不同植被恢复模式土壤酶活性研究. 农业研究与应用. 2021(01): 42-46 .
6.	涂志华，周凌峰，黄艳萍，陈夙怡，陈金辉，李胜男. 海南岛黎母山国家自然保护区热带云雾林土壤酶活性的根际效应. 水土保持通报. 2021(03): 1-7 .
7.	Zhouzhou Fan，Shuyu Lu，Shuang Liu，Zhaorong Li，Jiaxin Hong，Jinxing Zhou，Xiawei Peng. The effects of vegetation restoration strategies and seasons on soil enzyme activities in the Karst landscapes of Yunnan, southwest China. Journal of Forestry Research. 2020(05): 1949-1957 .
8.	郑武扬，王艳霞，王月江，冯刚刚. 喀斯特石漠化区不同植被治理模式对土壤质量的影响. 西部林业科学. 2020(04): 41-47 .
9.	李永双，范周周，国辉，周金星，彭霞薇. 菌剂添加对不同树种根际土壤微生物及碳酸钙溶蚀的影响. 中国岩溶. 2020(06): 854-862 .
10.	魏安琪，魏天兴，刘海燕，王莎. 黄土区刺槐和油松人工林土壤微生物PLFA分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(04): 88-98 . 本站查看

Other cited types(12)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (702) PDF downloads (63) Cited by(22)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Phenotypic difference and comprehensive evaluation of Sophora japonica in Beijing urban area

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

Other cited types(12)

Catalog

Phenotypic difference and comprehensive evaluation of Sophora japonica in Beijing urban area

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

Other cited types(12)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content