<i>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</i>-mediated transformation of hybrid sweetgum embryogenic callus

Jiang Shuaifei; Cui Ying; Zhao Ruirui; Qi Shuaizheng; Kong Lisheng; Zhao Jian; Li Shanshan; Zhang Jinfeng

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210032

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(8): 9-17. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210032

Jiang Shuaifei, Cui Ying, Zhao Ruirui, Qi Shuaizheng, Kong Lisheng, Zhao Jian, Li Shanshan, Zhang Jinfeng. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of hybrid sweetgum embryogenic callus[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(8): 9-17. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210032

Citation:

PDF (19866 KB)

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of hybrid sweetgum embryogenic callus

1.
National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants Biological Engineering of State Forestry Administration, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria BC V8P5C2, Canada
3.
Shenzhou Lüpeng Agricultural Technology, Beijing 101105, China

More Information

Received Date: January 28, 2021
Revised Date: February 21, 2021
Available Online: July 14, 2021
Published Date: August 30, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Hybrid sweetgum is an important timber and ornamental tree resources in China, but its genetic transformation system has not been established yet. Establishing genetic transformation system of hybrid sweetgum provides a useful approach for trait improvement and allows us to conduct a functional identification of gene in hybrid sweetgum.
Method Based on the efficient somatic embryogenesis of hybrid sweetgum, the embryogenic calluses were transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation. Factors influencing transformation were studied by orthogonal experiment, including hygromycin selective pressure, concentration of Agrobacterium, infection time, co-culture time and co-culture temperature.
Result Results showed that the minimum lethal concentration of hygromycin to embryogenic callus was 10 mg/L. The number of Gus positive spots was highest when bacterium solution (OD₆₀₀) was 0.8, co-culture time was 3 d, infection time was 10 min, co-culture temperature was 25 ℃. The most transgenic positive resistant calluses were obtained when bacterium solution (OD₆₀₀) was 0.2, co-culture time was 2 d, infection time was 10 min, co-culture temperature was 23 ℃. And the optimal treatment combination was 0.2 bacterium solution (OD₆₀₀), 2 d co-culture time, 20 min infection time, 23 ℃ co-culture temperature.
Conclusion A total of 210 positive transgenic callus were obtained by molecular identification. The genetic transformation system was established, which provides more feasible foundation for the transformation of broadleaf tree callus.
- hybrid sweetgum,
- embryogenic callus,
- Agrobacterium tumefaciens,
- genetic transformation

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	佘新松, 方乐金. 枫香树幼林生长节律的观察研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2001, 28(2):13−14,36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2001.02.004 She X S, Fang L J. An investigation on growth rhythm of young trees of liquidambar[J]. Journal of Forestry Science & Technology, 2001, 28(2): 13−14,36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2001.02.004
[2]	徐金林. 枫香培育技术及其在园林绿化中的应用[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(9):174−175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2020.09.106 Xu J L. Cultivation technology of sweetgum and its application in landscaping[J]. Modern Agriculture Sciences and Technology, 2020(9): 174−175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2020.09.106
[3]	江聂, 姜卫兵, 翁忙玲, 等. 枫香的园林特性及其开发利用[J]. 江西农业学报, 2008, 20(12):46−49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2008.12.016 Jiang N, Jiang W B, Weng M L, et al. Landscape characters of Liquidambar formosana and its exploitation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2008, 20(12): 46−49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2008.12.016
[4]	陈凤毛, 刘亮东, 高捍东. 美国枫香苗木培育技术研究概述[J]. 林业科技开发, 2001(4):9−11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2001.04.003 Chen F M, Liu L D, Gao H D. Study on breeding technology of Liquidambar styraciflua seedlings[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2001(4): 9−11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2001.04.003
[5]	Sullivan J, Lagrimini L M. Transformation of Liquidambar styraciflua using Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1993, 12: 303−306.
[6]	Dowda P F, Lagrimini L M, Herms D A. Differential leaf resistance to insects of transgenic sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) expressing tobacco anionic peroxidase[J]. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1998, 54: 712−720. doi: 10.1007/s000180050198
[7]	Walsh M J. Genetic transformation of sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) proembryogenic masses by microprojectile bombardment[D]. Athens: University of Georgia, 2003.
[8]	许林. 枫香基因转化体系的研究以及枫香AGAMOUS基因的初步功能分析[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2008. Xu L. Studies on Agrobacterium-medited transformation system and preliminary functional analysis of AGAMOUS gene in Liquidambar formasana Hance[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008.
[9]	刘冉冉. 枫香遗传转化体系的优化及转化PaFT基因的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2010. Liu R R. Optimization of Agrobacterium-medited transformation system and genetic transformation with PaFT genes in Liquidambar formosana Hance[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010.
[10]	雷莎. 根癌农杆菌介导不育基因转化枫香以及美国枫香再生体系的建立[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011. Lei S. Agrobacterium-medited transformation of sterility genes in Liquidambar formasana and establishment of in vivo plant regeneration of Liquidambar styraciflua[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011.
[11]	乔桂荣, 栾维江, 潘红伟, 等. 利用农杆菌介导法获得RNAi 转基因枫香的研究[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2007, 24(2):140−144. Qiao G R, Luan W J, Pan H W, et al. The LEAFY gene in RNA interference (RNAi) transgenic Liquidambar formosana mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciems[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2007, 24(2): 140−144.
[12]	Vendrame W A, Holliday C P, Merkle S A. Clonal propagation of hybrid sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua × L. formosana) by somatic embryogenesis[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2001, 20: 691−695. doi: 10.1007/s00299-001-0394-z
[13]	Scott A M, Klmeberly A N, Patricia J B, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from immature and mature tissues of sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)[J]. Plant Science, 1998(132): 169−178.
[14]	Pratheesh P T, Vineetha M, Kurup G M. An efficient protocol for the Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii[J]. Molecular Biotechnology, 2014, 56(6): 507−515. doi: 10.1007/s12033-013-9720-2
[15]	于波, 朱玉, 袁霖, 等. 金花茶花丝愈伤组织培养及其对抗生素敏感性研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(11):38−43, 2. Yu B, Zhu Y, Yuan L, et al. Calli tissue induction for Camellia nitidissima anther filaments and its sensitivity to antibiotics[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 44(11): 38−43, 2.
[16]	杨凤美, 王飞, 张雯, 等. 葡萄风信子体细胞胚再生体系的建立及抗生素敏感性试验[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(6):109−116. Yang F M, Wang F, Zhang W, et al. Plant regeneration from somatic embryogenesis in Muscari armeniacum Blue Spike and antibiotics sensitivity test[J]. Journal of North west A&F University (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 2013, 41(6): 109−116.
[17]	Brasileiro A C, Leple J C, Muzzin J, et al. An alternative approach for gene transfer in trees using wild-type Agrobacterium strains[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 1991, 17(3): 441−452. doi: 10.1007/BF00040638
[18]	Leple J C, Brasileiro A C, Michel M F, et al. Transgenic poplars: expression of chimeric genes using four different constructs[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1992, 11(3): 137−141.
[19]	陈仲, 廖维华, 王静澄, 等. 影响农杆菌介导的杨树遗传转化技术的因素[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50(8):1126−1134. Chen Z, Liao W H, Wang J C, et al. Factors influencing frequency of Agrobacterium-mediated Populus transformation[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2014, 50(8): 1126−1134.
[20]	Tzfira T, Jensen C S, Wang W, et al. Transgenic Populus tremula: a step-by-step protocol for its Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 1997, 15 (3): 219−235.
[21]	甄成. 毛果杨组培再生及遗传转化体系研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2016. Zhen C. Study on regeneration and genetic transformation system of Populus trichocarpa[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2016.
[22]	郭水欢. 桃叶片愈伤组织诱导及遗传转化体系构建[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2017. Guo S H. Callus induction and establishment of transformation system on the leaf of peach[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2017.
[23]	龚丽. 香榧体胚发生体系的优化及遗传体系的构建[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学2018, . Gong L. Optimization of somatic embryogenesis system and constructing genetic system of Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Agriculture & Forestry University, 2018.
[24]	牛淑庆, 陈丽, 李雨欣, 等. 根癌农杆菌介导苹果愈伤组织遗传转化体系的优化[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2021, 36(1):37−41. Niu S Q, Chen L, Li Y X, et al. Optimization of Agobacterium tumefaciens mediated genetic transformation system of apple callus[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2021, 36(1): 37−41.
[25]	郝贵霞, 朱祯, 朱之悌. 毛白杨遗传转化系统优化的研究[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 41(9):936−940. Hao G X, Zhu Z, Zhu Z T. Study on optimization of transformation of Populus tomentosa[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1999, 41(9): 936−940.
[26]	曾黎辉, 吕柳新. 根癌农杆菌介导荔枝遗传转化研究[J]. 果树学报, 2003, 20(4):287−290. Zeng L H, Lü L X. A preliminary report on Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated genetic transformation of litchi[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2003, 20(4): 287−290.
[27]	王关林, 方宏筠. 植物基因工程(第二版)[M]//那杰. 植物基因转化受体系统的建立. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 388−389. Wang G L, Fang H J. Plant genetic engineering (2nd ed.)[M]//Na J. Establishment of plant transformation receptor system. Beijing: Science Press, 2002: 388−389.
[28]	王关林, 方宏筠. 植物基因工程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 345−346. Wang G L, Fang H J. Plant genetic engineering[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002: 345−346.
[29]	周春丽, 郭卫东, 路梅. 农杆菌介导佛手遗传转化主要影响因素的研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2006, 14(5):374−381. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2006.05.003 Zhou C L, Guo W D, Lu M. Factors effecting the transformation of Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactlis mediated by Agrobacterium[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2006, 14(5): 374−381. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2006.05.003
[30]	王栋鑫, 彭棣, 张爽. 农杆菌介导木本植物遗传转化的研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(2):181−185. Wang D X, Peng D, Zhang S. Advances in studies on genetic transformation of woody plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(2): 181−185.
[31]	查丽燕, 宋舒晴, 王越, 等. 根癌农杆菌介导的巨大口蘑遗传转化体系的构建[J]. 菌物学报, 2020, 39(10):1897−1904. Zha L Y, Song S Q, Wang Y, et al. Construction of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system in Macrocybe gigantea[J]. Mycosystema, 2020, 39(10): 1897−1904.
[32]	农友业, 何勇强, 覃燕, 等. 影响农杆菌介导玉米愈伤组织遗传转化因素的研究[J]. 广西植物, 2005(2):142−144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2005.02.013 Nong Y Y, He Y Q, Qin Y, et al. Study of influence factors on transformation of maize embryogenic callus by Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Guihaia, 2005(2): 142−144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2005.02.013
[33]	Zhuo R Y, Qiao G R, Sun Z X. Transgene expression in Chinese sweetgum driven by the salt induced expressed promoter[J]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2007, 88(1): 101−107. doi: 10.1007/s11240-006-9162-7

[1]	Feng Xuejing, Ma Ling, Yang Shuang, Bo Wenhao, Chen Xuexun, Pang Xiaoming. Construction of genetic transformation system of ‘Jingzao 39’ callus[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(10): 74-80. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240055
[2]	PANG Hong-dong, XIANG Lin, ZHAO Kai-ge, LI Xiang, YANG Nan, CHEN Long-qing. Genetic transformation and functional characterization of Chimonanthus praecox SAMT gene in tobacco[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(5): 117-122. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.05.019
[3]	LI Yan, ZHAO De-gang. Ipt gene promoting shoot regeneration in genetic transformation of Eucommia ulmoides Oliv[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(6): 90-93.
[4]	ZENG Xiao-fang, ZHAO De-gang. Factors affecting transformation of Zanthoxylum piperitum DC. var. inerme Makino via Agrobacterium tumefaciens.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(6): 80-85.
[5]	ZHAO Ling-li, SHI Shao-chuan, SUN Jia-qi, ZHANG Qi-xiang, GAO Yi-ke. Transformation of ground-cover Chrysanthemum with HsfA2 gene isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(5): 97-102.
[6]	LONG Cui, PANG Xiao-ming, CAO Guan-lin, LIU Ying, ZHANG Zhi-yi. A study on the efficient protocol for transforming MdSPDS1 gene into Populus tomentosa Carr.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 21-26.
[7]	YU Lai, AN Xin-min, CAO Guan-lin, CHEN Zhong, ZHANG Zhi-yi. Genetic transformation of Populus tomentosa Carr. with sterility construct of PtAP3[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 15-20.
[8]	QIN Ai-guang, LUO Xiao-fang. Transformation of transcription factor DREB1C gene into the fast-growing black locust mediated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(6): 29-34. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.06.011
[9]	LI Hui, CHEN Xiao-yang, LI Yun, LI Wei, DING Xia. Optimization of antibiotic concentration in genetic transformation of Populus alba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(5): 118-121.
[10]	GAO Li-ping, BAO Man-zhu. Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Rosa hybrida[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(4): 60-64.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	罗茂，关志华，颜幼春，柴莹莹，刘佳琪，张佳敏，王忠红. 模拟根际生境下青甘韭生长与品质的差异分析. 高原农业. 2025(01): 65-72+132 .
2.	黄小辉，吴焦焦，王玉书，冯大兰，孙向阳. 不同供氮水平的核桃幼苗生长及叶绿素荧光特性. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 119-126 .
3.	郑伟，师筝，龙美，廖允成. 黄绿叶突变体冀麦5265yg的光合生理特性分析. 中国农业科学. 2021(21): 4539-4551 .
4.	王佳敏，宋海燕，陈金艺，张静，李素慧，陶建平，刘锦春. 多年生黑麦草对干旱胁迫下喀斯特异质生境的生长响应策略. 生态学报. 2020(13): 4566-4572 .
5.	王生云，陶永明，司剑华. 不同配方轻基质对鳞皮云杉生长及光合参数的影响. 浙江林业科技. 2019(02): 50-55 .
6.	乐佳兴，田秋玲，吴焦焦，高岚，张文，刘芸. 无患子幼苗的生长和光合特性对重庆低山丘陵区不同生境的响应. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(06): 75-85 . 本站查看
7.	戴前莉，黄小辉，黄馨，唐龙波，朱恒星. 不同生境条件下凤丹生长及光合特性比较. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(09): 53-58 .
8.	陶永明，司剑华. 不同轻基质配方对川西云杉幼苗生长的影响. 浙江林业科技. 2017(04): 66-70 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1305) PDF downloads (91) Cited by(13)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of hybrid sweetgum embryogenic callus