Niche and interspecific association of dominant species in herb layer of burned <i>Pinus tabuliformis</i> forest in the southern Taihang Mountain of northern China

Jin Shan; Wu Shuaikai

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210044

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(4): 35-46. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210044

Jin Shan, Wu Shuaikai. Niche and interspecific association of dominant species in herb layer of burned Pinus tabuliformis forest in the southern Taihang Mountain of northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(4): 35-46. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210044

Citation:

PDF (865 KB)

Niche and interspecific association of dominant species in herb layer of burned Pinus tabuliformis forest in the southern Taihang Mountain of northern China

Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, Changzhi University, Ecological and Environmental Research Institute of Taihang Mountain, Changzhi 046011, Shanxi, China

More Information

Received Date: February 04, 2021
Revised Date: March 17, 2021
Available Online: March 22, 2021
Published Date: April 29, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Niche and interspecific association are the basis and main method to study community structure. The purpose of this paper was to study the structural characteristics and dynamic changes in herb layer of burned Pinus tabuliformis forest in the southern Taihang Mountains at different restoration stages.
Method We focus on the niche characteristics and interspecific associations of the dominant species of herb layer plants in four burned areas of 13 years (S1), 7 years (S2), 6 years (S3) and 1 year (S4), then we calculated the niche width and niche overlap, and studied the interspecific association through the overall association test, χ²test and Spearman rank correlation test. Then the ecological species groups were divided.
Result The dominance, niche width, and niche overlap of dominant species Carex lanceolata, Chrysanthemum chanetii and Artemisia stechmanniana were larger in different restoration periods. The overall association test showed that S1 was a significantly positive association, S2 and S4 were a significantly negative association, and S3 was an insignificantly positive association. χ² test showed that the positive and negative association ratios of S1, S2, S3 and S4 were 2.33, 0.69, 0.84 and 0.63. Spearman rank correlation test showed that the number of positive association pairs in S1was greater than that of negative association pairs, while the number of positive association pairs in S2, S3 and S4 was less than the number of negative association pairs. The dominant species in S1, S2 and S3 can be divided into three ecological species groups represented by Carex lanceolata + Chrysanthemum chanetii, Artemisia stechmanniana and other dominant species. And 10 dominant species in S4 can be divided into three ecological species groups represented by Carex lanceolata, Chrysanthemum chanetii and Artemisia stechmanniana.
Conclusion Herb plant community in the burned area of southern Taihang Mountain has the greatest stability after 13 years of recovery. The niche and interspecific association may illuminate the interaction mechanisms such as species coexistence, distribution, structure changes in burned area, which could provide theoretical support in burned area management and plant distribution.
- niche width,
- niche overlap,
- χ²test,
- Spearman rank correlation test,
- ecological species group

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	Harpole W S, Tilman D. Grassland species loss resulting from reduced niche dimension[J]. Nature, 2007, 446: 791−793. doi: 10.1038/nature05684
[2]	Walker C L R. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities[J]. Ecology, 1997, 78(7): 1958−1965. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1958:CAFASA]2.0.CO;2
[3]	Tilman D. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2000, 405: 208−211. doi: 10.1038/35012217
[4]	Moloney K A, Levin S A. The effects of disturbance architecture on landscape-level population dynamics[J]. Ecology, 1996, 77(2): 375−394. doi: 10.2307/2265616
[5]	张东梅, 赵文智, 罗维成. 荒漠草原带盐碱地优势植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5):1307−1315. Zhang D M, Zhao W Z, Luo W C. Niche and interspecific association of dominant plant species in saline-alkaline soils of desert steppe zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(5): 1307−1315.
[6]	郭水良, 于晶, 陈国奇. 生态学数据分析: 方法、程序与软件[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015. Guo S L, Yu J, Chen G Q. Ecological data analyses: methods, programs and software[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
[7]	Pielou E C. Niche width and niche overlap: a method for measuring them[J]. Ecology, 1972, 53(4): 687−692.
[8]	Rousset O, Lepart J. Positive and negative interactions at different life stages of a colonizing species (Quercus humilis)[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88(3): 400−412.
[9]	Li Y I, Xu H, Chen D X, et al. Division of ecological species groups and functional groups based on interspecific association: a case study of the tree layer in the tropical lowland rainforest of Jianfenling in Hainan Island, China[J]. Frontiers of Forestry in China, 2008, 3(4): 407−415. doi: 10.1007/s11461-008-0049-0
[10]	Mangla S, Sheley R L, James J J, et al. Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth[J]. Plant Ecology, 2011, 212(4): 531−542. doi: 10.1007/s11258-011-9909-z
[11]	武帅楷. 三峡水库消落带植物群落生态学研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019. Wu S K. Studies on ecology of plant communities in the drawdown zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019.
[12]	王健铭, 董芳宇, 巴海·那斯拉, 等. 中国黑戈壁植物多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(12):3488−3498. Wang J M, Dong F Y, Nasina B, et al. Plant distribution patterns and the factors influencing plant diversity in the Black Gobi Desert of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(12): 3488−3498.
[13]	奚为民. 怀柔山区灌丛群落优势种群生态位的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1993, 17(4):324−330. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.1993.04.009 Xi W M. Niche research of scrub dominant population in Huairou Mountainous Region of Beijing Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 1993, 17(4): 324−330. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.1993.04.009
[14]	何芳兰, 刘世增, 李昌龙, 等. 甘肃河西戈壁植物群落组成特征及其多样性研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(4):74−78. He F L, Liu S Z, Li C L, et al. Study on composition and diversity of phytocoenosium in Gobi region of Hexi, Gansu[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(4): 74−78.
[15]	Chasw J M, Belovsky G E. Experimental evidence for the included niche[J]. American Naturalist, 1994, 143(3): 514−527. doi: 10.1086/285617
[16]	蓝俊杰. 漠河地区火烧迹地落叶松林群落物种组成及多样性研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019. Lan J J. Study on community species composition and diversity of Larix gmelinii burned area in Mohe[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019.
[17]	Roscher C, Schumacher J, Lipowsky A. Functional groups differ in trait means, but not in trait plasticity to species richness in local grassland communities[J]. Ecology, 2018, 99(10): 2295−2307. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2447
[18]	吴志庄, 厉月桥, 汪泽军, 等. 太行山黄连木天然群落物种多样性的研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(12):15−18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2013.12.004 Wu Z Z, Li Y Q, Wang Z J, et al. Study on species diversity of Pistacia chinensis natural communities in Taihang Mountains[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2013, 33(12): 15−18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2013.12.004
[19]	Kikvidze Z, Ohsawa M. Measuring the number of co-dominants in ecological communities[J]. Ecological Research, 2010, 17(4): 519−525.
[20]	张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011. Zhang J T. Quantitative ecology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.
[21]	Miura M, Manabe T, Nishimura N, et al. Forest canopy and community dynamics in a temperate old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest, south-western Japan: a 7-year study of a 4-ha plot[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2001, 89(5): 841−849. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00603.x
[22]	陈林, 辛佳宁, 苏莹, 等. 异质生境对荒漠草原植物群落组成和种群生态位的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17):6187−6025. Chen L, Xin J N, Su Y, et al. Effects of heterogeneous habitats on community composition and niche characteristics of different plant populations in the desert steppe of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6187−6025.
[23]	Gu L, Gong Z W, Li W Z. Niches and interspecific associations of dominant populations in three changed stages of natural secondary forests on Loess Plateau, P. R. China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 6604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06689-9
[24]	Zhang M T, Kang X G, Meng J H, et al. Distribution patterns and associations of dominant tree species in a mixed coniferous-broadleaf forest in the Changbai Mountains[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2015, 12(3): 659−670. doi: 10.1007/s11629-013-2795-1
[25]	张苗苗, 王咏雪, 田阔, 等. 台州玉环北部沿岸海域主要游泳动物生态位和种间联结性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11):3867−3875. Zhang M M, Wang Y X, Tian K, et al. Niche and interspecific associations of major nekton in northern coastal waters in Yuhuan, Taizhou, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(11): 3867−3875.
[26]	Pickett S T A. Population patterns through twenty years of old field succession[J]. Vegetatio, 1982, 49(1): 45−59. doi: 10.1007/BF00051566
[27]	Fesl C. Biodiversity and resource use of larval chironomids in relation to environmental factors in a large river[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2002, 47(6): 1065−1087. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00833.x
[28]	奇凯, 张春雨, 侯继华, 等. 赤峰市沙地油松林草本植物多样性及种间关联动态[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(18):5106−5112. Ji K, Zhang C Y, Hou J H, et al. Dynamics of species diversity and interspecific associations of herbaceous plants in a Pinus tabulaeformis forest on a sandy site in Chifeng, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(18): 5106−5112.
[29]	周先叶, 王伯荪, 李鸣光, 等. 广东黑石顶自然保护区森林次生演替过程中群落的种间联结性分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(3):332−339. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2000.03.015 Zhou X Y, Wang B S, Li M G, et al. An analysis of interspecific associations in secondary succession forest communities in Heishiding Natural Reserve, Guangdong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2000, 24(3): 332−339. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2000.03.015
[30]	Su S J, Liu J F, He Z S, et al. Ecological species groups and interspecific association of dominant tree species in Daiyun Mountain National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2015, 12(3): 637−646. doi: 10.1007/s11629-013-2935-7

[1]	Li Yan, Xu Hang, Wu Xiaoyun, Zhang Zhiqiang. Response of soil respiration and its components to different rainfall patterns in riparian poplar plantations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(7): 9-17. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240027
[2]	Xu Yixuan, Tong Xiaojuan, Zhang Jinsong, Meng Ping, Li Jun. Time lag between soil respiration and soil temperature in a Robinia pseudoacacia plantation in the south of the Taihang Mountains[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(4): 78-87. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180398
[3]	Wu Jianzhao, Yan Siwei, Cui Yu, Luo Qinghu, Lin Yongming, Wang Daojie, Wu Chengzhen. Dynamics of soil respiration and its influencing factors at the early stage of ecological restoration of two kinds of climate in earthquake-affected area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(3): 93-104. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180192
[4]	SHAO Ying-nan, TIAN Song-yan, LIU Yan-kun, CHEN Yao, SUN Zhi-hu. Effects of density control on soil respiration in Larix olgensis plantation.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(6): 51-59. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170029
[5]	LI Si-si, HE Kang-ning, TIAN Yun, ZUO Wei, WANG Wei-lu, TANG Da, ZHANG Tan, LI Qian.. Seasonal changes and the driving factors of soil respiration among five typical forest types in the high-elevation-cold region, Qinghai, northwestern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 95-103. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160073
[6]	LIU Bo-qi, MOU Chang-cheng, XING Ya-juan, HAN Shi-jie, JIANG Si-ling, WANG Qing-gui. Effect of strong rainfalls on soil respiration in a typical temperate forest in Lesser Xing’an Mountains,northeast China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 77-85. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150431
[7]	WU Peng, CUI Ying-chun, ZHAO Wen-jun, SHU De-yuan, YANG Wen-bin, DING Fang-jun. Effects of litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration of major forest communities at two successional stages in Maolan karst forest of southwestern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
[8]	WANG Xiao-guo, , HU Bo, AO Mei-rong, ANG Yan-qiang, HENG Xun-hua. Soil CO2 efflux and simulation of Forest-DNDC model in the mixed plantation of alder and cypress in hilly areas of the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(2): 27-32.
[9]	FENG Chao-yang, , L Shi-hai, GAO Ji-xi, LIU Shang-hua, LIN Dong. Soil respiration characteristics of different vegetation types in the mountain areas of north China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(2): 20-26.
[10]	ZHOU Cun-yu, ZHOU Guo-yi, WANG Ying-hong, ZHANG De-qiang, LIU Shi-zhong, WANG Yue-si, SUN Yang. Soil respiration of a coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Dinghushan Mountain, Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(4): 23-27.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(20)

1.	沈健，何宗明，董强，郜士垒，曹光球，林宇，黄政. 滨海沙地两种防护林土壤呼吸月际动态及影响因素. 应用与环境生物学报. 2023(02): 432-439 .
2.	沈健，何宗明，董强，林宇，郜士垒. 尾巨桉人工林火烧迹地土壤呼吸组分特征及其与土壤因子的关系. 生态学杂志. 2023(07): 1537-1547 .
3.	沈健，何宗明，董强，郜士垒，林宇. 轻度火烧对滨海沙地人工林土壤呼吸速率和非生物因子的影响. 植物生态学报. 2023(07): 1032-1042 .
4.	王静，杨建庆，高新磊，吕世杰，屈志强. 枯落物去除对荒漠草原功能群和生产力的影响. 中国草地学报. 2023(11): 24-32 .
5.	葛照欣，蔡体久，段北星，徐志鹏，郎明翰，满秀玲. 寒温带兴安落叶松和白桦生长季水分利用特征. 生态学报. 2023(24): 10142-10155 .
6.	张宝权，梁万君，何怀江，包广道，罗也，张忠辉. 退耕还林长白落叶松林地土壤呼吸研究. 吉林林业科技. 2022(03): 5-12 .
7.	高然，董希斌，曲杭峰，张宝山，刘慧，毛亮亮，高彤. 抚育强度对天然针阔混交林细根化学计量及根系呼吸的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2022(11): 43-46+71 .
8.	张雅琪，陈林，庞丹波，何文强，李学斌，吴梦瑶，曹萌豪. 土壤微生物群落对枯落物输入的响应. 应用生态学报. 2022(11): 2943-2953 .
9.	高明磊，满秀玲，段北星. 林下植被和凋落物对我国寒温带天然林土壤CO_2通量的短期影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(03): 55-65 . 本站查看
10.	张萌，卢杰，任毅华. 土壤呼吸影响因素及测定方法的研究进展. 山东林业科技. 2021(02): 100-106+92 .
11.	胡琛，贺云龙，黄金莲，雷静品，崔鸿侠，唐万鹏，马国飞，荣道军. 生物炭和氮沉降对落叶松人工林土壤呼吸及其理化性质的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2021(09): 77-82 .
12.	张嘉開，魏江生，海龙，杨海峰，杨宏伟，张嘉益. 毛乌素沙地杨柴人工林土壤呼吸与水热因子的关系研究. 内蒙古林业科技. 2021(04): 1-6 .
13.	高明磊，满秀玲，段北星. 林下植被和凋落物对寒温带森林生长季土壤CH_4通量的影响. 生态学报. 2021(24): 9886-9897 .
14.	李岳泰，满秀玲，喻武，陈婧，王氏明演. 不同地形樟子松天然林土壤呼吸特征及其影响因素. 森林工程. 2020(01): 1-9+24 .
15.	段北星，蔡体久，宋浩，肖瑞晗. 寒温带兴安落叶松林凋落物层对土壤呼吸的影响. 生态学报. 2020(04): 1357-1366 .
16.	王飞，满秀玲，段北星. 春季冻融期寒温带主要森林类型土壤氮矿化特征. 北京林业大学学报. 2020(03): 14-23 . 本站查看
17.	张彦军，党水纳，任媛媛，梁婷，郁科科，邹俊亮，刘方. 基于Meta分析的土壤呼吸对凋落物输入的响应. 生态环境学报. 2020(03): 447-456 .
18.	陈蕾，董希斌. 抚育间伐强度对大兴安岭落叶松天然次生林冻融后期土壤呼吸及性质的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2020(06): 152-156+162 .
19.	张剑，雷娜. 重构土体土壤呼吸及其水热影响因子日变化特征. 干旱地区农业研究. 2020(02): 251-257 .
20.	丁令智，满秀玲，肖瑞晗，蔡体久. 寒温带森林根际土壤微生物量碳氮含量生长季内动态变化. 林业科学. 2019(07): 178-186 .

Other cited types(27)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1725) PDF downloads (75) Cited by(47)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Niche and interspecific association of dominant species in herb layer of burned Pinus tabuliformis forest in the southern Taihang Mountain of northern China