Research on optimization method for low impact development (LID) controls distribution of greenspace in shallow mountain based on D8 and NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm

Chen Hongyu; Dong Yuxiang; Lin Chensong

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210313

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2022 > 44(9): 116-126. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210313

Chen Hongyu, Dong Yuxiang, Lin Chensong. Research on optimization method for low impact development (LID) controls distribution of greenspace in shallow mountain based on D8 and NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(9): 116-126. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210313

Citation:

PDF (4430 KB)

Research on optimization method for low impact development (LID) controls distribution of greenspace in shallow mountain based on D8 and NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm

1.
School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

More Information

Received Date: August 15, 2021
Revised Date: April 10, 2022
Available Online: June 10, 2022
Published Date: September 24, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective The stormwater problem has become a key restrictive factor for the development of shallow mountain areas and the low impact development (LID) of greenspace is an important means to solve such problem in shallow mountain areas. Forming an optimization method for distribution of LID controls for multi-objectives, such as runoff control and cost, can provide important technical support for the efficient solution of stormwater problems in shallow mountain areas, and contribute to the future high-quality development of these areas.
Method Based on the characteristics of greenspace planning and design and runoff in shallow mountain area, the study formed a platform for optimal distribution of LID controls by D8 and NSGA-Ⅱ coupled algorithm, which realized spatial quantitative optimization of the type and scale of LID controls based on collaborative optimization of runoff control and cost. In addition, Westmount Country Park in Shijiazhuang City was taken as the experimental object to verify the feasibility of the method.
Result 24, 30 and 30 optimal solution sets for the optimal distribution of LID controls of the study area were obtained in the simulated 2-h rainfall event under return periods of 5-year, 10-year and 20-year; the ‘ideal investment upper limit point’ of each simulated rainfall event was 75.141 million CNY, 66.344 million CNY and 60.651 million CNY, respectively; visual results of the distribution of most efficient cost based on ArcGIS showed that raingarden, permeable pavement and water were scattered, and vegetative swale was scattered in small-scale linear distribution.
Conclusion D8 and NSGA-Ⅱ coupled algorithm can well match the LID of greenspace in shallow mountain area, and simplify the cumbersome design process of LID in traditional greenspace; there is a diminishing marginal benefit between peak flow of runoff and LID controls cost, which accelerates with the increase of rainfall return period; the permeable pavement and raingarden have more cost performance than other LID controls; the visual simulation results of the experimental object basically accord with the principle and pattern in real design, which verifies the feasibility and rationality of the method; in order to improve the rationality and guidance of simulated results of distribution, the further research should focus on the collaborative method for optimal distribution of LID controls and greenspace planning and design.
- shallow mountain area,
- low impact development (LID),
- multi-objective optimization method,
- NSGA-Ⅱ,
- landscape architecture

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	冯艺佳. 风景园林视角下的北京市浅山区绿色空间理想格局构建策略研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. Feng Y J. Study on the ideal pattern construction strategy of green space in shallow mountain of Beijing through the view of landscape architecture[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[2]	时薏, 李运远, 戈晓宇, 等. 华北地区城市浅山区海绵绿道设计方法研究: 以石家庄鹿泉区山前大道为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(11): 82−91. Shi Y, Li Y Y, Ge X Y, et al. Design methods of sponge greenway in urban shallow mountainous area in northern China: taking the greenway of Luquan District in Shijiazhuang as an example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(11): 82−91.
[3]	陈泓宇. 雨洪调控视角下的北京浅山区森林湿地公园规划设计研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020. Chen H Y. Research on the planning and design of forest-wetland park in foothill area in Beijing from the perspective of rainwater management[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020.
[4]	林俏, 刘喆, 吕英烁, 等. 基于水文模型的北京浅山区雨洪管理措施探究: 以夹括河上游为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(5): 132−142. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190116 Lin Q, Liu Z, Lü Y S, et al. Stormwater management measures in Beijing suburban hilly area based on hydrological model: taking the upper reaches of Jiakuohe River as an example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry, 2020, 42(5): 132−142. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190116
[5]	丁佳. 基于雨洪管理的“青岛小镇”浅山区冲沟公共绿地景观设计[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014. Ding J. Research on landscape architecture design of gully landform green space in peri-urban of ‘Tsingtao Village’ project base on stormwater management[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2014.
[6]	牛思亚, 刘志成. 雨洪管理视角下的浅山区冲沟公共绿地设计策略研究[J]. 中国城市林业, 2019, 17(2): 92−95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2019.02.003 Niu S Y, Liu Z C. Research on design strategy of gully landform green space in hillside area from stromwater management perspective[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2019, 17(2): 92−95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2019.02.003
[7]	冯梦珂, 王思思, 苏毅, 等. 北方浅山区冲沟景观生态规划与设计[J]. 北京规划建设, 2019, 184(1): 108−112. Feng M K, Wang S S, Su Y, et al. Ecological planning and design of gully landscape in northern shallow mountainous area[J]. Beijing Planning and Construction, 2019, 184(1): 108−112.
[8]	刘颂, 赖思琪. 国外雨洪管理绩效评估研究进展及启示[J]. 南方建筑, 2018, 185(3): 46−52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2018.03.046 Liu S, Lai S Q. Review of and inspiration from overseas stormwater management performance evaluation[J]. South Architecture, 2018, 185(3): 46−52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2018.03.046
[9]	沈洁, 龙若愚, 陈静. 基于景观绩效系列(LPS)的中美雨水管理绩效评价比较研究[J]. 风景园林, 2017, 149(12): 107−116. Shen J, Long R Y, Chen J. Comparative research on performance assessment of stormwater management between China and America based on landscape performance series (LPS)[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2017, 149(12): 107−116.
[10]	Wang J, Liu J, Wang H, et al. Approaches to multi-objective optimization and assessment of green infrastructure and their multi-functional effectiveness: a review[J]. Water, 2020, 12(10): 2714. doi: 10.3390/w12102714
[11]	李旦, 叶长青. 基于耦合SWMM模型和NSGA-Ⅱ算法的多目标低影响开发措施优化设计方法及应用[J]. 水电能源科学, 2019, 226(6): 64−67. Li D, Ye C Q. Multi-objective optimization of low impact development using SWMM model and NSGA-Ⅱ method and its application[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2019, 226(6): 64−67.
[12]	Martin-Mikle C J, de Beurs K M, Julian J P, et al. Identifying priority sites for low impact development (LID) in a mixed-use watershed[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 140(4): 29−41.
[13]	Johnson R D, Sample D J. A semi-distributed model for locating stormwater best management practices in coastal environments[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2017, 91(5): 70−86.
[14]	林辰松, 董宇翔, 陈泓宇, 等. 基于NSGA-Ⅱ算法的集雨型绿地低影响开发设施规模优化计算方法及应用:以南阳院士小镇为例[J]. 风景园林, 2020, 27(12): 92−97. Lin C S, Dong Y X, Chen H Y, et al. Optimal calculation method of size of LID facilities for rainwater harvesting green space based on NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm and application: a case study of Nanyang Academician Town[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 27(12): 92−97.
[15]	Ghodsi S H, Kerachian R, Zahmatkesh Z. A multi-stakeholder framework for urban runoff quality management: application of social choice and bargaining techniques[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 550: 574−585. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.052
[16]	Lei X, Zhang J, Wang H, et al. Deriving mixed reservoir operating rules for flood control based on weighted non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm Ⅱ[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 564: 967−983. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.075
[17]	Raei E, Alizadeh M R, Nikoo M R, et al. Multi-objective decision-making for green infrastructure planning (LID-BMPs) in urban storm water management under uncertainty[J/OL]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 579: 124091[2021−05−16]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124091.
[18]	张维, 杨昕, 汤国安, 等. 基于DEM的平缓地区水系提取和流域分割的流向算法分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2012, 37(2): 94−96. Zhang W, Yang X, Tang G A, et al. DEM-based flow direction algorithms study of stream extraction and watershed delineation in the low relief areas[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2012, 37(2): 94−96.
[19]	武静, 李梦婷. 基于景观地形的小流域单元减灾调控评价研究[J]. 风景园林, 2020, 27(1): 110−114. Wu J, Li M T. Evaluation of risk regulation and reduction of small watershed units based on landscape topography[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 27(1): 110−114.
[20]	毛华松, 罗评, 沙田. 响应山地水文特征的冲沟地段城市设计策略研究[J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(2): 34−38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2017.02.007 Mao H S, Luo P, Sha T. Study on urban design strategy of gully area in response to mountain hydrological characteristics[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2017, 33(2): 34−38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2017.02.007
[21]	卢奕芸, 戈晓宇. 基于水安全目标的城市绿地水体设计方法研究: 以第二届河北省园林博览会(秦皇岛)园区为例[J]. 风景园林, 2020, 27(11): 64−69. Lu Y Y, Ge X Y. Method for designing urban green space water system based on water security: a case study of 2^nd Hebei Garden Expo (Qinhuangdao) Park[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 27(11): 64−69.
[22]	陈泓宇, 董宇翔, 闫娜, 等. 石家庄某郊野公园雨洪调控效益研究[J]. 给水排水, 2019, 55(12): 13−17, 23. Chen H Y, Dong Y X, Yan N, et al. Research of stormwater management performance in suburban park in Shijiazhuang[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2019, 55(12): 13−17, 23.
[23]	Blank J, Deb K. Pymoo: multi-objective optimization in python[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 89497−89509. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567
[24]	刘欣, 朱苏加, 赵艳霞, 等. 河北浅山区土地利用时空演变图谱特征及地形效应[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2020, 36(4): 94−101. Liu X, Zhu S J, Zhao Y X, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution and terrain effects of land use based on geo-informatic Tupu in Hebei shallow mountainous areas[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2020, 36(4): 94−101.
[25]	任凯珍, 韩建超, 季为. 北京地区突发地质灾害分布规律研究[J]. 城市地质, 2015(增刊1): 46−49, 84. Ren K Z, Han J C, Ji W. Present situation and study on the warning method of the debris flow calamity in Beijing[J]. Urban Geology, 2015(Suppl.1): 46−49, 84.
[26]	刘家琳, 李媛媛, 张建林. 重庆山地公园子汇水区产流特征与雨洪利用改造策略[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2019, 34(6): 42−49. Liu J L, Li Y Y, Zhang J L. Analysis on surface runoff property and stormwater utilization in urban mountain parks in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2019, 34(6): 42−49.
[27]	康嘉奇, 戈晓宇. 半湿润地区外源径流型海绵绿地设计方法研究: 以迁安市滨湖东路绿地为例[J]. 风景园林, 2019, 26(8): 77−82. Kang J Q, Ge X Y. Method for designing exogenous runoff sponge green space in semi-humid region:a case study of the green space of east Binhu Road in Qian’an City[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(8): 77−82.
[28]	林辰松, 邵明, 葛韵宇, 等. 基于SWMM情境模拟的外源雨水型公园绿地雨洪调控效果研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(12): 92−103. Lin C S, Shao M, Ge Y Y, et al. Research of stormflood regulation efficiency of the low impact development of exogenous-rainwater park based on the SWMM simulation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(12): 92−103.
[29]	孙会航, 李俐频, 田禹, 等. 基于多目标优化与综合评价的海绵城市规划设计[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(10): 3605−3614. Sun H H, Li L P, Tian Y, et al. Sponge city planning and design based on multi-objective optimization and comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020, 40(10): 3605−3614.
[30]	邵明, 李雄, 戈晓宇, 等. 海绵城市视角下SUSTAIN模型在城市绿地设计中的应用[J]. 工业建筑, 2017, 47(5): 56−61. Shao M, Li X, Ge X Y, et al. Application of SUSTAIN model in urban green space construction from the perspective of sponge city[J]. Industrial Building, 2017, 47(5): 56−61.
[31]	Deb K, Sindhya K, Okabe T. Self-adaptive simulated binary crossover for real-parameter optimization[C]// GECCO '07: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2007: 1187−1194.

[1]	Zhang Minghui, Yin Yunzhou, Wang Ke, Wang Shuli. Effects of spatial structure characteristics of Fraxinus mandshurica plantation on soil nutrient content[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(9): 73-82. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220476
[2]	Hui Gangying, Zhao Zhonghua, Hu Yanbo, Zhang Ganggang, Zhang Gongqiao, Cheng Shiping, Lu Yanlei. Research on the measurement method of forest spatial structure diversity based on 4 neighborhood tree relationship[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(7): 18-26. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220282
[3]	Wang Lina, Wu Junwen, Dong Qiong, Shi Zhuogong, Hu Haocheng, Wu Danzi, Li Luping. Effects of tending and thinning on non-structural carbon and stoichiometric characteristics of Pinus yunnanensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(8): 70-82. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210115
[4]	Hu Xuefan, Zhang Huiru, Zhou Chaofan, Zhang Xiaohong. Effects of different thinning patterns on the spatial structure of Quercus mongolica secondary forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 137-147. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190037
[5]	LI Jian, PENG Peng, HE Huai-jiang, TAN Ling-zhao, ZHANG Xin-na, WU Xiang-ju, LIU Zhao-gang. Effects of thinning intensity on spatial structure of multi-species temperate forest at Jiaohe in Jilin Province, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(9): 48-57. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170220
[6]	LI Ji-ping, FENG Yao, ZHAO Chun-yan, ZHANG Cai-cai. Quantitative analysis of stand spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata non-commercial forest based on Voronoi diagram.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 1-7. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.005
[7]	WANG Ping, JIA Li-ming, WEI Song-po, WANG Qi-feng. Analysis of stand spatial structure of Platycladus orientalis recreational forest based on Voronoi diagram method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(2): 39-44.
[8]	DONG Ling-bo, LIU Zhao-gang, MA Yan, NI Bao-long, LI Yuan. A new composite index of stand spatial structure for natural forest.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(1): 16-22.
[9]	DUAN Chang-sheng, WANG Jun-hui, MA Jian-wei, YUAN Shi-yun, DU Yan-chang. Evaluation of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forest at the western segment of Qinling Mountain，northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(5): 61-66.
[10]	LIU Yan, YU Xin-xiao, YUE Yong-jie, GAN Jing, WANG Xiao-ping, LI Jin-hai. Spatial structure of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation in Miyun Reservoir Watershed of Beijing.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(5): 25-28.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	张慧，燕怡帆，朱雅，陈玉婷，王菁华，崔志鹏，杨迪，任学敏. 林分密度对伏牛山南麓山茱萸人工林林下草本植物多样性和土壤性质的影响. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2025(01): 96-105 .
2.	赵金同，马俊. 刺槐扦插育苗技术与精细抚育要点. 现代园艺. 2024(08): 49-51 .
3.	何欢，康必均，尹婧，李菲，彭栋，李桂静，查同刚. 不同营林措施对川东华蓥山杉木林土壤团聚体稳定性及细根分布的影响. 土壤通报. 2024(02): 351-359 .
4.	史小鹏，苟贺然，何淑勤，刘柏廷，冉兰芳，杨琪琳，扎西拉姆，陈雨馨，骆紫藤. 成都市温江区两种绿地土壤抗蚀抗冲性及其影响因素. 水土保持通报. 2024(04): 117-125 .
5.	刘忆南，申振宏，都都，张知然，林勇明. 蒋家沟泥石流堆积扇不同植被类型区土壤抗蚀性评价. 应用与环境生物学报. 2024(05): 886-893 .
6.	王依瑞，王彦辉，段文标，李平平，于澎涛，甄理，李志鑫，尚会军. 黄土高原刺槐人工林郁闭度对林下植物多样性特征的影响. 应用生态学报. 2023(02): 305-314 .
7.	赵云鹤，钟鹏，高晗，付玉. 土地利用类型对典型黑土团聚体稳定性和抗蚀性的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(09): 112-119 .
8.	胡亚伟，施政乐，刘畅，徐勤涛，张建军. 晋西黄土区刺槐林密度对林下植物多样性及土壤理化性质的影响. 生态学杂志. 2023(09): 2072-2080 .

Other cited types(9)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (782) PDF downloads (88) Cited by(17)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Research on optimization method for low impact development (LID) controls distribution of greenspace in shallow mountain based on D8 and NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm