Effects of tending intensity on carbon source/sink of Korean pine forests with different forest types by planting coniferous forest and reserving broadleaved forest

Yang Zhihui; Mu Changcheng; Wang Yahui; Li Xuannan; Liu Ting

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220033

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2023 > 45(6): 19-32. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220033

Yang Zhihui, Mu Changcheng, Wang Yahui, Li Xuannan, Liu Ting. Effects of tending intensity on carbon source/sink of Korean pine forests with different forest types by planting coniferous forest and reserving broadleaved forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(6): 19-32. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220033

Citation:

PDF (787 KB)

Effects of tending intensity on carbon source/sink of Korean pine forests with different forest types by planting coniferous forest and reserving broadleaved forest

Center for Ecological Research, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China

More Information

Received Date: January 19, 2022
Revised Date: April 17, 2022
Accepted Date: May 10, 2022
Available Online: May 13, 2022
Published Date: June 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective This paper aims to reveal the influencing rule of forest type and light-felling intensity on the carbon source and sink of Korean pine forests by planting coniferous forest and reserving broadleaved forest (PCRBT), and to provide basis for the restoration of zonal climax vegetation broadleaved Korean pine forest.
Method The annual net carbon sequestration of vegetation, net carbon emission (CH₄, CO₂) of soil heterotrophic respiration with related environmental factors (temperature, water content of soil, organic carbon, total nitrogen, etc.) under different light-felling intensities (control, low-intensity, heavy-intensity) were measured simultaneously by static chamber-gas chromatograph and relative growth equation in three types of Korean pine forests by PCRB (Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest and white birch-Korean pine forest, and Korean pine was planted under secondary crown for 25−35 years and light-felling for 25−30 years) in temperate in Xiaoxing’an Mountains of northeastern China, in order to reveal the influence of forest type and light-felling intensity on the carbon source/sink of Korean pine forest according to the net carbon balance of ecosystem.
Result (1) The annual average efflux of soil CO₂ (159.94−207.43 mg/(m²·h)) in three forest types was influenced by both the intensity of light-felling (heavy-intensity light-felling significantly increased by 18.9% from Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest), and the forest type (control was white birch-Korean pine forest, which was significantly higher than aspen-Korean pine forest and Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest, low and heavy light-felling had no significant impacts among three forest types); low and heavy light-felling had no significant impacts on the annual average flux of soil CH₄ uptake (−0.047 − −0.028 mg/(m²·h)) from three forest types but white birch-Korean pine forest and aspen-Korean pine forest were significantly higher than Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest. (2) Low and heavy-intensity light-felling made the annual net carbon sequestration of vegetation (1.66−3.99 t/(ha·year)) from three forest types had no significant effect, but white birch-Korean pine forest was significantly higher (105.4%−124.1% and 31.0%−32.6%) than aspen-Korean pine forest and Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest , aspen-Korean pine forest was significantly higher(55.7%−71.1%) than Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest. (3) Low-intensity light-felling had no significant impacts on carbon sink in Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest (−1.93 − −1.12 t/(ha·year)) and aspen-Korean pine forest (−1.03 − −0.65 t/(ha·year)) and White birch-Korean pine forest (−0.13−0.46 t/(ha·year)), but the level and direction of the effect of heavy-intensity light-felling were closely related to the forest type, Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest had significantly increased by 72.3%, white birch-Korean pine forest converted into carbon source, aspen-Korean pine forest had slightly increased carbon source.
Conclusion Therefore, considering the maintenance of forest carbon sink in Korean pine forests by PCRBT, the faster recovering white birch-Korean pine forest and aspen-Korean pine forest is more appropriate to take heavy-intensity light-felling, while the slower recovering Mongolian oak-Korean pine forest is suitable to be low-intensity light-felling.

FullText(HTML)

References (49)

References

[1]	IPCC. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group Ⅰ to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[2]	Pan Y, Birdsey R A, Fang J, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333: 988−993. doi: 10.1126/science.1201609
[3]	Denman K L, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, et al. Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry[M]// Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[4]	Dixon R K, Solomon A, Brown S, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems[J]. Science, 1994, 263: 185−190. doi: 10.1126/science.263.5144.185
[5]	Vayreda J, Martinez-Vilalta J, Gracia M, et al. Recent climate changes interact with stand structure and management to determine changes in tree carbon stocks in Spanish forests[J]. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18(3): 1028−1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02606.x
[6]	Alvarez S, Ortiz C, Díaz-Pinés E, et al. Influence of tree species composition, thinning intensity and climate change on carbon sequestration in Mediterranean Mountain forests: a case study using the CO₂ fix model[J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016, 21(7): 1045−1058.
[7]	Fernandez I, Älvarez-Gonzalez J G, Carrasco B, et al. Post-thinning soil organic matter evolution and soil CO₂ effluxes in temperate radiata pine plantations: impacts of moderate thinning regimes on the forest C cycle[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2012, 42(11): 1953−1964. doi: 10.1139/x2012-137
[8]	Boncina A, Kadunc A, Robic D. Effects of selective thinning on growth and development of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest stands in south-Eastern Slovenia[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2007, 64(1): 47−57. doi: 10.1051/forest:2006087
[9]	Olajuyigbe S, Tobin B, Saunders M, et al. Forest thinning and soil respiration in a Sitka spruce forest in Ireland[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 157: 86−95. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.016
[10]	Lena G, Baker S C, Jürgen B, et al. Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective[J]. BioScience, 2012, 7: 633−645.
[11]	Lei L, Xiao W, Zeng L, et al. Thinning but not understory removal increased heterotrophic respiration and total soil respiration in Pinus massoniana stands[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 621: 1360−1369. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.092
[12]	Doukalianou F, Radoglou K, Agnelli A E, et al. Annual greenhouse-gas emissions from forest soil of a peri-urban conifer forest in greece under different thinning intensities and their climate-change mitigation potential[J]. Forest Science, 2019, 65(4): 387−400. doi: 10.1093/forsci/fxy069
[13]	Han M G, Gao W F, Shi B K, et al. Long-term (42 years) effect of thinning on soil CO₂ emission in a mixed broadleaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest in northeast China[J]. Pedosphere, 2021, 31(2): 353−362. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60066-2
[14]	Sullivan B W, Kolb T E, Hart S C, et al. Thinning reduces soil carbon dioxide but not methane flux from southwestern USA ponderosa pine forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255(12): 4047−4055. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.051
[15]	Yang L, Niu S L, Tian D S, et al. A global synthesis reveals increases in soil greenhouse gas emissions under forest thinning[J/OL]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 804: 150225[2022−01−18]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150225.
[16]	Chiang J M, Mcewan R W, Yaussy D A, et al. The effects of prescribed fire and silvicultural thinning on the aboveground carbon stocks and net primary production of overstory trees in an oak-hickory ecosystem in southern Ohio[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255(5−6): 1584−1594. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.016
[17]	Saunders M, Tobin B, Black K, et al. Thinning effects on the net ecosystem carbon exchange of a Sitka spruce forest are temperature-dependent[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 157: 1−10. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.008
[18]	Ogaya R, Escolà A, Liu D, et al. Effects of thinning in a water-limited holm oak forest[J]. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2020, 39(4): 365−378. doi: 10.1080/10549811.2019.1673179
[19]	Dore S, Kolb T E, Montes-Helu M, et al. Carbon and water fluxes from ponderosa pine forests disturbed by wildfire and thinning[J]. Ecological Applications, 2010, 20(3): 663−683. doi: 10.1890/09-0934.1
[20]	Aun K, Kukumgi M, Varik M, et al. Short-term effect of thinning on the carbon budget of young and middle-aged silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) stands[J/OL]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 11: 118660[2022−01−12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118660.
[21]	Dore S, Fry D L, Collins B M, et al. Management impacts on carbon dynamics in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(2): e0150256[2022−01−17]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150256.
[22]	Davis S C, Hessl A E, Scott C J, et al. Forest carbon sequestration changes in response to timber harvest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258(9): 2101−2109. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.08.009
[23]	Moreno-Fernández D, Díaz-Pinés E, Barbeito I, et al. Temporal carbon dynamics over the rotation period of two alternative management systems in Mediterranean Mountain Scots pine forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2015, 348: 186−195. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.043
[24]	Pukkala T. Does management improve the carbon balance of forestry? [J]. Forestry, 2017, 90(1): 125−135.
[25]	Thornton P E, Law B E, Gholz H L, et al. Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113(1−4): 185−222. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00108-9
[26]	Pregitzer K S, Euskirchen E S. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 10(12): 2052−2077.
[27]	李俊清, 王业蘧. 天然林内红松种群数量变化的波动性[J]. 生态学杂志, 1986, 5(5): 1−5. Li J Q, Wang Y J. Wave features of population changes of Pinus koraiensis in natural forest[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1986, 5(5): 1−5.
[28]	李景文. 红松混交林生态与经营[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社, 1997. Li J W. Ecology and management of Korean pine mixed forest[M]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University Press, 1997.
[29]	特喜铁, 邓庆华, 戎可. 红松资源的合理开发与东北地区生态安全[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(23): 14082−14083,14132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.23.071 Te X T, Deng Q H, Rong K. Rational exploitation of Korean pines resources and ecological security in northeast China[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(23): 14082−14083,14132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.23.071
[30]	于大炮, 周莉, 代力民. 长白山区阔叶红松林经营历史与研究历程[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5): 1426−1434. Yu D P, Zhou L, Dai L M. Exploring the history of the management theory and technology of broadleaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain Region, Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(5): 1426−1434.
[31]	陈大珂, 周晓峰, 丁宝永, 等. 黑龙江省天然次生林研究(Ⅰ)-栽针保阔的经营途径[J]. 东北林学院学报, 1984, 12(4): 1−12. Chen D K, Zhou X F, Ding B Y, et al. Research on natural secondary forest in Heilongjiang Province: the management way of Korean pine forest restored by planting conifer and reserving broad-leaved tree[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 1984, 12(4): 1−12.
[32]	牟长城, 庄宸, 韩阳瑞, 等. 透光抚育对长白山"栽针保阔"红松林植被碳储量影响[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(4): 529−536. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2014.04.017 Mu C C, Zhuang C, Han Y R, et al. Effect of liberation cutting on the vegetation carbon storage of Korean pine forests by planting conifer and reserving broad-leaved tree in Changbai Mountains of China[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2014, 34(4): 529−536. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2014.04.017
[33]	韩丽冬, 牟长城, 张军辉. 透光抚育对长白山阔叶红松林冠下红松光合作用的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 33(4): 38−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2016.04.008 Han L D, Mu C C, Zhang J H. Effect of crown thinning on photosynthesis of understory Korean pine of broadleaved Korean pine mixed forests in Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 33(4): 38−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2016.04.008
[34]	韩阳瑞, 牟长城, 张晓亮, 等. 透光抚育对“栽针保阔”红松林中红松生长过程的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(8): 2365−2367. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.08.057 Han Y R, Mu C C, Zhang X L, et al. The influence of light transmittance felling on Pinus Koraiensis growth process in the “preserving deciduous while planting coniferous” Korean pine[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(8): 2365−2367. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.08.057
[35]	张迪祥. 伊春市带岭地区自然地理条件对植物群落分布的影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 1983, 1(2): 229−236. Zhang D X. The influence of natural geographical condition of Dailing Area in Yichun City to the distribution of plant community[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1983, 1(2): 229−236.
[36]	张悦, 牟长城, 刘辉, 等. 透光抚育对温带帽儿山红松林非生长季土壤温室气体排放的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2183−2194. Zhang Y, Mu C C, Liu H, et al. Effects of light-felling on non-growing season greenhouse gas emission from soils in Korean pine forests in Maoer Mountain[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(7): 2183−2194.
[37]	姜宁, 牟长城, 韩丽冬, 等. 采伐对大兴安岭非连续冻土区毛赤杨沼泽碳源/汇的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(3): 1−13. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190074 Jiang N, Mu C C, Han L D, et al. Impact of harvesting on carbon source/sink of Alnus sibirica var. hirsuta swamps in Daxing’anling Mountains discontinuous permafrost region of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(3): 1−13. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190074
[38]	Wang C K. Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 222(1−3): 9−16. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.074
[39]	Smith K A, Ball T, Conen F, et al. Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 69(1): 10−20. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12539
[40]	Curry C L. Modeling the soil consumption of atmospheric methane at the global scale[J/OL]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2007, 21: G84012[2022−01−10]. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002818.
[41]	Borken W, Beese F. Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes of soils in pure and mixed stands of European beech and Norway spruce[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2005, 57(5): 617−625.
[42]	Henri V K, Bodelier P, Rian H A D, et al. Resistance and recovery of methane-oxidizing communities depends on stress regime and history; a microcosm study[J/OL]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 1714[2022−01−15]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01714.
[43]	Ryan M, Law B. Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2005, 73(1): 3−27. doi: 10.1007/s10533-004-5167-7
[44]	Wu X, Brüggemann N, Gasche R, et al. Long-term effects of clear-cutting and selective cutting on soil methane fluxes in a temperate spruce forest in southern Germany[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(10): 2467−2475.
[45]	潘新丽, 林波, 刘庆. 模拟增温对川西亚高山人工林土壤有机碳含量和土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(8): 1637−1643. Pan X L, Lin B, Liu Q. Effects of elevated temperature on soil organic carbon and soil respiration under subalpine coniferous forestin western Sichuan Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(8): 1637−1643.
[46]	Wei Y W, Li M H, Chen H, et al. Variation in carbon storage and its distribution by stand age and forest type in boreal and temperate forests in northeastern China[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8): e72201[2022−03−19]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072201.
[47]	岳军伟. 甘肃主要森林类型固碳动态, 潜力及影响机制 [D]. 咸阳: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2018. Yue J W. Dynamics, potential and mechanism of carbon sequestration in major forest types in Gansu Province, China[D]. Xianyang: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Research Center for Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2018.
[48]	Howard E A, Gower S T, Foley J A, et al. Effects of logging on carbon dynamics of a jack pine forest in Saskatchewan, Canada[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 10: 1267−1284.
[49]	齐麟, 于大炮, 周旺明, 等. 采伐对长白山阔叶红松林生态系统碳密度的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(10): 3065−3073. doi: 10.5846/stxb201203060303 Qi L, Yu D P, Zhou W M, et al. Impact of logging on carbon density of broadleaved-Korean pine mixed forests on Changbai Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(10): 3065−3073. doi: 10.5846/stxb201203060303

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	李辉，林沂，孟祥爽，史振伟，蔡万园. 基于地基激光雷达的栾树分形特征分析. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 475-483 .
2.	何东健，熊虹婷，芦忠忠，刘建敏. 基于多视角立体视觉的拔节期玉米水分胁迫预测模型. 农业机械学报. 2020(06): 248-257 .
3.	郭彩玲，刘刚. 基于颜色取样的苹果树枝干点云数据提取方法. 农业机械学报. 2019(10): 189-196 .

Other cited types(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (830) PDF downloads (174) Cited by(10)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of tending intensity on carbon source/sink of Korean pine forests with different forest types by planting coniferous forest and reserving broadleaved forest

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content