Effects of different management methods on growth and plant diversity in mature <i>Pinus tabuliformis</i> plantations

Xiao Jun; Lei Lei; Li Zhaochen; Ma Chenggong; Yu Shengli; Xiao Wenfa

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220302

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2023 > 45(12): 1-10. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220302

Xiao Jun, Lei Lei, Li Zhaochen, Ma Chenggong, Yu Shengli, Xiao Wenfa. Effects of different management methods on growth and plant diversity in mature Pinus tabuliformis plantations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(12): 1-10. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220302

Citation:

PDF (1644 KB)

Effects of different management methods on growth and plant diversity in mature Pinus tabuliformis plantations

1.
Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
2.
Asia-Pacific Network for Sustainable Forest Management and Rehabilitation, Beijing 100102, China
3.
Wangyedian Experimental Forest Farm, Chifeng 024423, Inner Mongolia, China

More Information

Received Date: July 24, 2022
Revised Date: November 26, 2022
Accepted Date: June 24, 2023
Available Online: June 27, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
This paper aims to explore a management method that takes into account the cultivation of large-diameter tree and ecological benefits based on the mature Pinus tabuliformis plantation, as well as to provide a reference for mature plantation management in China.
Method
Taking 47- and 56-year-old P. tabuliformis plantations in Wangyedian Experimental Forest Farm in Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia of northern China as the research object, the data of sample plots under close-to-nature management (CTNM), conventional management (CM) and no human intervention (NHI) were collected in 2013 and 2019. Two-factor variance analysis was used to compare the effects of three management methods on mean DBH growth rate, mortality, seedling regeneration and diversity of trees, shrubs and herbs.
Result
There were significant differences in mean DBH growth rate and 6-year mortality of mature P. tabuliformis plantations under three management methods (P < 0.05), CTNM was 0.40 cm/year and 0.51%, respectively, CM was 0.36 cm/year and 1.44%, and NHI was 0.31 cm/year and 3.55%. Over a span of 6 years, the number of understory plants species under CTNM increased by 3, while CM and NHI decreased by 5 and 9 species respectively. The increase of Shannon-Wiener index and Simpson index of trees in 47- and 56-year-old stands in 6 years was CTNM > CM > NHI, while the decrease of tree seedling mortality and the Shannon-Wiener index and Simpson index of herbs in 47-year-old stands was CM < CTNM < NHI. The effects on tree growth, mortality and plant diversity under three management methods disappeared over time. The mean DBH growth rate, Shannon-Wiener indices and Simpson index of trees and shrubs in 56-year-old stands were higher than those in 47-year-old stands under three management methods. However, the Shannon-Wiener and Simpson indices of herbs were higher in the 47-year-old stands compared to the 56-year-old stands.
Conclusion
Forest management can increase the mean DBH growth rate, reduce the tree mortality and delay the decline of plant diversity of mature P. tabuliformis plantations, suggesting that mature plantation should be managed regularly to improve the economic and ecological benefits. Compared with CM and NHI, CTNM is the best to maintain the plant diversity of mature P. tabuliformis plantation as well as to cultivate large-diameter tree.
- Pinus tabuliformis plantation,
- mature forest,
- plant diversity,
- close-to-nature management,
- Wangyedian Experimental Forest Farm

FullText(HTML)

References (49)

References

[1]	FAO. Global forest resources assessment 2020-key findings[M/OL]. Rome: FAO, 2020[2022−05−14]. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8753en.
[2]	Hua F, Bruijnzeel L A, Meli P, et al. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches[J]. Science, 2022, 376: 839−844. doi: 10.1126/science.abl4649
[3]	Brockerhoff E G, Jactel H, Parrotta J A, et al. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17: 925−951. doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x
[4]	刘世荣, 杨予静, 王晖. 中国人工林经营发展战略与对策: 从追求木材产量的单一目标经营转向提升生态系统服务质量和效益的多目标经营[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(1): 1−10. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2017.02.003 Liu S R, Yang Y J, Wang H. Development strategy and management countermeasures of planted forests in China: transforming from timber-centered single objective management towards multi-purpose management for enhancing quality and benefits of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(1): 1−10. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2017.02.003
[5]	张可欣, 刘宪钊, 雷相东, 等. 马尾松人工林不同经营方式短期经济效益分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(5): 43−54. Zhang K X, Liu X Z, Lei X D, et al. Short-term economic benefit analysis under different management modes of Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(5): 43−54.
[6]	张会儒, 雷相东, 李凤日. 中国森林经理学研究进展与展望[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(9): 130−142. Zhang H R, Lei X D, Li F R. Research progress and prospects of forest management science in China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(9): 130−142.
[7]	Wang C, Zhang W, Li X, et al. A global meta-analysis of the impacts of tree plantations on biodiversity[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2022, 31: 576−587. doi: 10.1111/geb.13440
[8]	Kawamura K, Yamaura Y, Soga M, et al. Effects of planted tree species on biodiversity of conifer plantations in Japan: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2021, 26(3): 237−246.
[9]	Mitschka J H. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 155(1–3): 81−95.
[10]	Pawson S M, Brin A, Brockerhoff E G, et al. Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2013, 22: 1203−1227. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8
[11]	张英豪, 毛炎新, 奉国强. 不同密度控制下油松人工林的生态效益评估[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(4): 80−85. Zhang Y H, Mao Y X, Feng G Q. Evaluation of ecological benefits in Pinus tabulaeformis plantation with different stand densities[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 13(4): 80−85.
[12]	周芳萍, 徐建民, 陆海飞, 等. 利用珍贵树种改造尾巨桉纯林的混交模式研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(1): 10−19. Zhou F P, Xu J M, Lu H F, et al. Transformation of Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis clone plantation into mixed-species forest using precious tree species[J]. Forest Research, 2022, 35(1): 10−19.
[13]	National Forestry and Grassland Administration. Forest resources in China: the 9th national forest inventory[M]. Beijing: National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 2019: 25.
[14]	郭浩, 王兵, 马向前, 等. 中国油松林生态服务功能评估[J]. 中国科学C辑: 生命科学, 2008, 38(6): 565−572. Guo H, Wang B, Ma X Q, et al. Evaluation on ecological service value of Pinus tabulaeformis in China[J]. Science in China Series C: Life Science, 2008, 38(6): 565−572.
[15]	马履一, 李春义, 王希群, 等. 不同强度间伐对北京山区油松生长及其林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(5): 1−9. Ma L Y, Li C Y, Wang X Q, et al. Effects of thinning on the growth and the diversity of undergrowth of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in Beijing mountainous areas[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007, 43(5): 1−9.
[16]	修勤绪, 陆元昌, 曹旭平, 等. 目标树林分作业对黄土高原油松人工林天然更新的影响[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2009, 29(2): 13−19. Xiu Q X, Lu Y C, Cao X P, et al. Effect of target tree stand management on natural regeneration of Pinus tabulaeformis plantations on Loess Plateau Area[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2009, 29(2): 13−19.
[17]	高云昌, 张文辉, 何景峰, 等. 黄龙山油松人工林间伐效果的综合评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(5): 1313−1319. Gao Y C, Zhang W H, HE J F, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in Huanglong Mountain, Northwest China: a comprehensive evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(5): 1313−1319.
[18]	陆元昌, 张守攻, 雷相东, 等. 人工林近自然化改造的理论基础和实施技术[J]. 世界林业研究, 2009, 22(1): 20−27. Lu Y C, Zhang S G, Lei X D, et al. Theoretical basis and implementation techniques on close-to-nature transformation of plantations[J]. World Forestry Research, 2009, 22(1): 20−27.
[19]	林同龙. 杉木人工林近自然经营技术的应用效果研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(3): 11−16. Lin T L. Application effect research on intimate natural forestry management techniques for Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2012, 32(3): 11−16.
[20]	Wang X, Lu Y, Xing H, et al. Effects of close-to-nature conversion on Pinus massoniana plantations at different stand developmental stages[J]. Tropical Conservation Science, 2018, 2: 1−16.
[21]	Fang X, Tan W, Gao X, et al. Close-to-nature management positively improves the spatial structure of Masson pine forest stands[J]. Web Ecology, 2021, 21: 45−54. doi: 10.5194/we-21-45-2021
[22]	李国雷, 刘勇, 徐扬, 等. 间伐强度对油松人工林植被发育的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2007, 29(2): 70−75. Li G L, Liu Y, Xu Y, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on the development of undergrowth in Pinus tabulaeformis plantations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(2): 70−75.
[23]	方精云, 王襄平, 沈泽昊, 等. 植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(6): 533−548. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09253 Fang J Y, Wang X P, Shen Z H, et al. Methods and protocols for plant community inventory[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(6): 533−548. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09253
[24]	国家林业局调查规划设计院, 黑龙江省林业监测规划院. 主要树种龄级与龄组划分: LY/T 2908—2017[S]. 北京: 国家林业局, 2017: 4. Academy of Inventory and Planning, State Forestry Administration, Heilongjiang Forestry Monitoring and Planning Institute. Regulations for age-class and age-group division of main tree-species: LY/T 2908−2017[S]. Beijing: State Forestry Administration, 2017: 4.
[25]	Holyoak M, Leibold M A, Holt R D. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
[26]	杨晓聪, 陈晓蔷, 窦松傲, 等. 林龄和立地条件对冀北山地油松单木生长量和生长率的影响[J]. 林业与生态科学, 2022, 37(4): 363−369. Yang X C, Cheng X Q, Dou S A, et al. Influence of age and site factors on the growth of Pinus tabulaeformis in mountain areas of northern Hebei Province[J]. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2022, 37(4): 363−369.
[27]	Juliette C, Matteo T, David F, et al. Forest diversity promotes individual tree growth in central European forest stands[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54: 71−79. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12783
[28]	胡雪凡, 段光爽, 张会儒, 等. 蒙古栎次生林林木竞争对不同抚育间伐方式的响应[J]. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(1): 1−9. Hu X F, Duan G S, Zhang H T, et al. Response of tree competition in natural secondary Quercus mongolica forest to thinning treatment[J]. Forest Research, 2021, 34(1): 1−9.
[29]	原志坚, 王孝安, 王丽娟, 等. 抚育对黄土高原油松人工林林下植被功能多样性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(2): 339−346. Yuan Z J, Wang X A, Wang L J, et al. Effects of tending on functional diversity of understory vegetation in Pinus tabuliformis plantation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(2): 339−346.
[30]	朱教君, 李凤芹, 松崎健, 等. 间伐对日本黑松海岸林更新的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(11): 1361−1367. Zhu J J, Li F Q, Matsuzaki T, et al. Influence of thinning on regeneration in a coastal Pinus thunbergii forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(11): 1361−1367.
[31]	陈辉荣, 周新年, 蔡瑞添, 等. 天然林不同强度择伐后林分空间结构变化动态[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012, 30(3): 230−237. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.30230 Chen H R, Zhou X N, Cai R T, et al. Tracking analysis of forest spatial structure change after different selective cutting intensities in a natural forest[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(3): 230−237. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.30230
[32]	Li Y F, He J A, Lu L H, et al. The long-term effects of thinning and mixing on species and structural diversity of Chinese fir plantations[J]. New Forests, 2021, 52: 285−302. doi: 10.1007/s11056-020-09794-2
[33]	郭婧, 喻林华, 方晰, 等. 中亚热带4种森林凋落物量、组成、动态及其周转期[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14): 4668−4677. Guo J, Yu L H, Fang X, et al. Litter production and turnover in four types of subtropical forests in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(14): 4668−4677.
[34]	武朋辉, 白高平, 党坤良, 等. 抚育间伐对秦岭南坡油松中龄林生长的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(1): 20−26. Wu P H, Bai G P, Dang K L, et al. Thinning effects on growth of Pinus tabulaeformis middle-age forest on southern slope of Qinling Mountains[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(1): 20−26.
[35]	Suzanne W S, Trevor B H, Ian R C. Pre-commercial thinning effects on growth, yield and mortality in even-aged paper birch stands in British Columbia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 190(2): 163−178.
[36]	Ding Y, Zang R G. Effects of thinning on the demography and functional community structure of a secondary tropical lowland rain forest[J/OL]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 279: 111805[2022−09−10]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111805.
[37]	林思祖, 黄世国. 论中国南方近自然混交林营造[J]. 世界林业研究, 2001, 14(2): 73−79. Lin S Z, Huang S G. An establishment and management of nature-approximating mixed forests in South China[J]. World Forestry Research, 2001, 14(2): 73−79.
[38]	刘钦, 邓洪平, 李宗峰, 等. 贵州赤水桫椤国家级自然保护区植物群落特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(1): 19−31. Liu Q, Deng H P, Li Z F, et al. Characteristics of plant community in the Guizhou Chishui Alsophila spinulata National Nature Reserve, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(1): 19−31.
[39]	陈肖. 半干旱地区油松纯林改造成混交林效益分析[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2008(6): 31−32. Chen X. Analysis of mixed transformation of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in semi-arid area of Northwest China[J]. Agricultural Science-Technology and Information, 2008(6): 31−32.
[40]	Luiz F S D, Gustavo S, José C L, et al. Growth, mortality, and recruitment of tree species in an Amazonian rainforest over 13 years of reduced impact logging[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 430: 150−156. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.024
[41]	方升佐, 田野. 人工林生态系统生物多样性与生产力的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 55(4): 1−6. Fang S Z, Tian Y. The relationship between biodiversity and productivity in the artificial plantation ecosystem[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 55(4): 1−6.
[42]	陆晓明. 马尾松人工林近自然化改造对物种多样性及生物量的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2014. Lu X M. The effects of near nature transformation on species diversity and biomass in Pinus massoniana plantation[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2014.
[43]	Ming A G, Yang Y J, Liu S R, et al. A decade of close-to-nature transformation alters species composition and increases plant community diversity in two coniferous plantations[J/OL]. Frontier in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 01141[2022−10−14]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01141.
[44]	刘俊杰, 吕倩, 沈逸, 等. 目标树初期经营对杉木人工林林下植物多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(2): 408−415. Liu J J, Lü Q, Shen Y, et al. Early effects of target tree management on plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27(2): 408−415.
[45]	张甜. 抚育间伐对小兴安岭天然针阔混交林生态功能的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2019. Zhang T. Effect of thinning on the ecological function of natural mixed broadleaf-conifer secondary forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2019.
[46]	江萍. 不同林龄油松人工林抚育间伐效应研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015. Jiang P. Studies on thinning effects of different aged Pinus tabulaeformis plantations[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015.
[47]	罗毓明, 谭向平, 邹晓君, 等. 我国南方4种常见人工林林下植物多样性特征及影响因素[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2022, 30(1): 1−10. Luo Y M, Tan X P, Zou X J, et al. Understory plant diversity characteristics and influencing factors of four common plantations in South China[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2022, 30(1): 1−10.
[48]	Haughian S R, Frego K A. Short-term effects of three commercial thinning treatments on diversity of understory vascular plants in white spruce plantations of northern New Brunswick[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 370: 45−55. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.055
[49]	郭海沣, 王涛, 贾炜玮. 抚育间伐对林口林业局主要针叶树种生长结构及生物多样性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(12): 1−6. Guo H F, Wang T, Jia W W. Effects of thinning on growth, structure and biodiversity of main coniferous species in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2019, 47(12): 1−6.

[1]	Liu Zhe, Zheng Xi. Parametric design of close-to-nature forest landscape spatial structure[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(6): 100-107. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220010
[2]	Yin Hailong, Zhang Zhiwei, Song Wei, Zhang Zewen, Wu Liqin, Deng Ting, Liu Qiang. Grade evaluation of forest ecological function for Beimandian Forest Farm of Saihanba, Hebei Province of northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(1): 89-98. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210373
[3]	Zhang Xiting, Zhang Jianyu, Li Siwen, Zhong Zhaoliang, Hu Xiaoguang, Wang Wenjie. Characteristics of plant diversity and community structure in Shuanghe Nature Reserve in Daxing’anling area of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(7): 79-87. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200029
[4]	Dong Lingbo, Lin Xueying, Liu Zhaogang. Forest carbon sink-timber compound management planning of Pangu Forest Farm in Great Xing’an Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(8): 1-11. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190331
[5]	Jiang Jun, Liu Xianzhao, Jia Hongyan, Ming Angang, Chen Beibei, Lu Yuanchang. Effects of stand density on understory species diversity and soil physicochemical properties after close-to-nature transformation management of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 170-177. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190022
[6]	Liu Qin, Deng Hongping, Li Zongfeng, Liang Sheng, Li Qiulin, Ni Dongping. Characteristics of plant community in the Guizhou Chishui Alsophila spinulata National Nature Reserve, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(1): 19-31. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180165
[7]	ZHANG Tong, WANG Yu-jie, WANG Yun-qi, ZHANG Hui-lan, WANG Bin.. Plant diversity in various forest community types in the Loess Plateau of western Shanxi Province,northern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(11): 82-88. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150120
[8]	YU Pan, XU Rui, ZHAO Guo-zhu, WU Zhi-yan, LI Wen-chen, MA Cheng-gong. Resource investigation and diversity of macrofungi in Wangyedian Forest Farm of Inner Mongolia, northern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(6): 87-95.
[9]	LIU Xian-hao, LU Yuan-hang, MA Lú-yi, XUE Yang 3.. Estimation method of wood carbon storage at sacle of forest farm management unit.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(5): 144-148.
[10]	LI Li-ping, XING Shao-hua, ZHAO Bo, WANG Qing-chun, CUI Guo-fa. Comparative analysis of plant diversity of Pinus tabulaeformis forests in ten regions of Beijing mountainous areas[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(4): 12-16.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	王冰怡，张勇，吴翠蓉，王增，傅伟军. 不同造林年限马尾松林碳密度结构特征及其影响因素. 浙江农林大学学报. 2025(02): 291-301 .
2.	雷德芳，王志杰. 黔中喀斯特地区马尾松群落主要物种种间联结、生态位及群落稳定性特征. 生态学报. 2024(10): 4353-4367 .
3.	张锦琳，游巍斌，蔡新瑜，何东进. 武夷山小流域生态系统服务(簇)权衡/协同及对地形起伏度的响应. 生态学报. 2023(12): 4892-4903 .
4.	章敏，王健，韩天一，欧阳勋志，潘萍，刘冬冬. 基于CBM-CFS3模型的马尾松林碳密度特征及其影响因素. 林业资源管理. 2022(06): 44-53 .
5.	邱凤英，肖复明，郭捷，林小凡，罗坤水，曹展波，李光运. 江西金盆山林区天然常绿阔叶林生态系统碳储量研究. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2020(01): 105-113 .
6.	孙浩，赖祁华，刘晓勇，江柳春，徐昕，郑永红. 赣南地区生态公益林5种森林类型土壤有机碳特征. 南方林业科学. 2020(06): 45-48+63 .
7.	向云西，陈胜魁，潘萍，欧阳勋志，宁金魁，李琦. 马尾松叶片-凋落物-土壤的碳氮磷化学计量特征. 森林与环境学报. 2019(02): 120-126 .
8.	向云西，潘萍，陈胜魁，欧阳勋志，宁金魁，吴自荣，纪仁展. 天然马尾松林土壤碳氮磷特征及其与凋落物质量的关系. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(11): 95-103 . 本站查看
9.	胡海清，罗斯生，罗碧珍，魏书精，王振师，吴泽鹏. 林火干扰对广东省杉木林土壤有机碳及其组分的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(12): 108-118 . 本站查看

Other cited types(9)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (649) PDF downloads (129) Cited by(18)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of different management methods on growth and plant diversity in mature Pinus tabuliformis plantations