Underground self-sealing pressure injection equipment for forest and fruit trees

Xu Jianwei; Luo Haifeng; Kan Jiangming; Li Wenbin; Tong Siyuan

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220514

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2023 > 45(6): 137-144. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220514

Xu Jianwei, Luo Haifeng, Kan Jiangming, Li Wenbin, Tong Siyuan. Underground self-sealing pressure injection equipment for forest and fruit trees[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(6): 137-144. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220514

Citation:

PDF (2903 KB)

Underground self-sealing pressure injection equipment for forest and fruit trees

School of Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration onForestry Equipment and Automation, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: December 19, 2022
Revised Date: April 18, 2023
Available Online: May 30, 2023
Published Date: June 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective In forest and fruit irrigation operations, the commonly used water-saving irrigation methods, such as dropper and sprinkler irrigation, are easy to produce evaporation loss and salinization because the water and fertilizer are poured on the surface. It is urgent to effectively and directly irrigate the underground roots of fruit trees and ensure the water and fertilizer not overflow to the surface.
Method According to the actual application scenario, the design requirements of the device were analyzed, and an underground self-sealing pressure irrigation device was designed, which can guarantee the pressure self-sealing structure to the surface. Single-factor and multi-factor test on this device was designed. Soil type, water supply pressure and injection depth were selected as the influencing factors, with the target of the injection amount. Origin software was used for single-factor test analysis. Design-Expert software was used for multi-factor test analysis, and a regression model was established. The actual appropriate parameters and the parameters of the influence of injection amount were explored. The reliability of the model was verified by comparing the actual trial with the obtained regression model formula.
Result The single-factor test results showed that the injection amount increased with the water supply pressure, and decreased with the water injection depth. In multi-factor test, the regression model was optimized, and the suitable water supply pressure of the common soil was 287 kPa, the suitable water injection depth was30 cm, and the deviation between predicted value and the actual value of the injection amount was less than 5%. The parameter optimization results were reliable.
Conclusion The device can meet the initial design requirements, realize the effective direct irrigation of fruit trees underground root, and ensure no overflow to the surface. The reliability of the model can support data for the subsequent device practical application, further development, and the development of underground pressure irrigation technology.
- forest and fruit irrigation,
- deep underground irrigation,
- self-sealing,
- pressure filling and injection,
- device design,
- parameter optimization

FullText(HTML)

References (14)

References

[1]	王芳芳, 郭素娟, 廖逸宁, 等. 覆草–施肥模式对板栗叶片功能性状与果实产量品质的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(4): 36−46. Wang F F, Guo S J, Liao Y N, et al. Effects of grass mulching-fertilization mode on leaf functional characters and fruit yield as well as quality of Castanea mollissima[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(4): 36−46.
[2]	张亮, 周薇, 李道西. 农业高效节水灌溉模式选择研究进展[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37(5): 447−453. Zhang L, Zhou W, Li D X. Research progress in irrigation mode selection of high-efficiency water-saving agriculture[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2019, 37(5): 447−453.
[3]	袁小环, 武菊英, 孙璐, 等. 不同灌溉水平下石竹的水分蒸散研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(2): 77−81. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2008.02.013 Yuan X H, Wu J Y, Sun L, et al. Evapotranspiration of Dianthus chinensis at different irrigation levels[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(2): 77−81. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2008.02.013
[4]	孙钦航, 成中余, 齐贺荣, 等. 枣树根蘖苗根系的分布与形态[J]. 陕西林业科技, 1996(2): 5. Sun Q H, Cheng Z Y, Qi H R, et al. Distribution and morphology of tiller seedling roots in jujube trees[J]. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 1996(2): 5.
[5]	秦昌旭. 简析农业渗灌技术进展与应用[J]. 南方农机, 2021, 52(11): 78−79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3872.2021.11.034 Qin C X. Brief analysis of the progress and application of agricultural seepage irrigation technology[J]. Southern Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(11): 78−79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3872.2021.11.034
[6]	何振嘉, 范王涛, 杜宜春, 等. 涌泉根灌节水灌溉技术特点、应用及展望[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(8): 287−298. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.08.035 He Z J, Fan W T, Du Y C, et al. Characteristics, application and prospects of bubbled-root irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(8): 287−298. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.08.035
[7]	杜虎林, 冯起, 石新根, 等. 直插式根灌节水装置设计及应用示例[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(增刊 1): 65−71. Du H L, Feng Q, Shi X G, et al. Water-saving device design and application examples of straight-tube root irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(Suppl. 1): 65−71.
[8]	盛国成, 王博炜, 袁明华. GZQ-A1L/A1N7系列节水注灌器[J]. 农业机械, 2009(8): 53. doi: 10.16167/j.cnki.1000-9868.2009.08.003 Sheng G C, Wang B W, Yuan M H. GZQ-A1L/A1N7 series water-saving irrigation device[J]. Farm Machinery, 2009(8): 53. doi: 10.16167/j.cnki.1000-9868.2009.08.003
[9]	孙彦君, 周宙, 李芳花, 等. 8ZS-2型中耕作物注水机[J]. 农业机械, 2000(1): 29. doi: 10.16167/j.cnki.1000-9868.2000.01.012 Sun Y J, Zhou Z, Li F H, et al. 8ZS-2 type tillage crop water injection machine[J]. Farm Machinery, 2000(1): 29. doi: 10.16167/j.cnki.1000-9868.2000.01.012
[10]	王伟, 唐传茵, 张宏. 果树根区补水注灌器设计[J]. 中国农机化, 2010, 227(1): 75−78. Wang W, Tang C Y, Zhang H. Design of variable-rate spraying system[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2010, 227(1): 75−78.
[11]	邓文君, 王蓉, 王磊, 等. 中国南方地区10 cm土壤湿度分析[J]. 广东气象, 2011, 33(6): 51−53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6190.2011.06.015 Deng W J, Wang R, Wang L, et al. Analysis of 10 cm soil moisture in southern China[J]. Guangdong Meteorology, 2011, 33(6): 51−53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6190.2011.06.015
[12]	阎凌云. 农业气象[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001: 854−855. Yan L Y. Agricultural forecast[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 2001: 854−855.
[13]	孙三民, 安巧霞, 杨培岭, 等. 间接地下滴灌灌溉深度对枣树根系和水分的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(8): 81−90. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.08.012 Sun S M, An Q X, Yang P L, et al. Effect of irrigation depth on root distribution and water use efficiency of jujube under indirect subsurface drip irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(8): 81−90. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.08.012
[14]	康峰, 仝思源, 张汉石, 等. 苹果枝条往复式切割剪枝参数分析与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(16): 8. Kang F, Tong S Y, Zhang H S, et al. Analysis and experiments of reciprocating cutting parameters for apple tree branches[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(16): 8.

[1]	Lou Minghua, Zhang Huiru, Lei Xiangdong, Bai Chao, Yang Tonghui. Relationship model between stand mean height and mean DBH for natural Quercus spp. broadleaved mixed stands[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(9): 37-50. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190463
[2]	PENG Mi, GUO Qing-xi.. Minimum area of the community spatial structure of broadleaf-Korean pine forest in Shengshan Mountain, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(12): 21-27. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150519
[3]	CAO Shan, JIANG Lu-yao, LI Li-hong, YAO Xiao-yun, ZHANG Qiang, HAN Jing-yi, WANG Ying, LI Hui, LU Hai.. Cloning and enzymatic analysis of medium-chain acyl coenzyme A synthetase in Populus trichocarpa.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(7): 9-15. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160121
[4]	PAN Chen, REN Bai-guang, GAI Ying. Method of enzymatic synthesis and purification of p-coumaroyl-CoA[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(3): 120-124. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150366
[5]	SHI Jun-na, LIU Mei-qin, LIU Jie, CHEN Yu-zhen, LU Cun-fu. Sequence analysis and expression pattern of AmSTZF encoding an A20/AN1 zinc finger protein in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(2): 103-108.
[6]	FANG Lu-ming, CHAI Hong-ling, TANG Li-hua, XU Ai-jun. An extraction algorithm of a DEM based video visualization domain.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(3): 27-32.
[7]	GAO Lin, GU Hong-bo, LI Wen-bin, WANG Nai-kang, WU Xiao-lan. Intelligent control of seeding system based on SPCE061A[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(5): 126-130.
[8]	WANG Ji-jun, , PEI Tie-fan, WANG An-zhi, GUAN De-xin, JIN Chang-jie. Changes in the mean maximum and minimum temperatures in Changbai Mountain, northeastern China in the past 50 years.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(2): 50-57.
[9]	XU Ji-liang, CUI Guo-fa, LI Zhong. Approaches for setting the minimum area of nature reserve[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(5): 129-132.
[10]	HUI Gang-ying, XU Hai, HU Yan-bo. Model for forecasting the distribution of the minimum tree-to-tree distances[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(5): 18-21.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	崔恒久，曾教科，李雯，黄海杰，彭世清，郭冬，蒲金基，周永凯，李辉亮. 腰果CBF基因家族的鉴定及响应冷胁迫的表达模式. 热带作物学报. 2024(03): 473-480 .
2.	韩立群，张捷，赵钰，梅闯，马凯. 新疆野生核桃JfDREB1A基因的克隆与原核表达分析. 西北农业学报. 2023(07): 1050-1057 .
3.	赵淑玲，王永斌，蹇小勇，郭兴贵，朱福民，杨静静，霍发喜. 平欧杂交榛研究进展. 现代化农业. 2023(09): 46-49 .
4.	夏蕴，巢建国，谷巍，盛业龙，王玉卓，惠西珂，王凯，王圆圆. 倒春寒胁迫与恢复对茅苍术生长、生理及关键酶基因的影响. 中成药. 2020(08): 2187-2191 .
5.	宋静武，彭磊. 核桃CBF基因在低温胁迫中表达. 湖北林业科技. 2019(02): 7-13 .
6.	刘晓丹，王霞，杨祥波. 非生物胁迫下山腊梅CpCBF基因的表达模式分析. 黑龙江农业科学. 2017(12): 18-21 .

Other cited types(3)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (364) PDF downloads (56) Cited by(9)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Underground self-sealing pressure injection equipment for forest and fruit trees