• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Li Yuting, Ma Aiyun, Miao Zheng, Hao Yuanshuo, Dong Lihu. Effects of neighborhood competition on biomass and its allocation of Larix olgensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230322
Citation: Li Yuting, Ma Aiyun, Miao Zheng, Hao Yuanshuo, Dong Lihu. Effects of neighborhood competition on biomass and its allocation of Larix olgensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230322

Effects of neighborhood competition on biomass and its allocation of Larix olgensis

More Information
  • Received Date: November 12, 2023
  • Revised Date: February 21, 2024
  • Accepted Date: February 23, 2025
  • Available Online: February 27, 2025
  • Objective 

    This paper explores the influence of different methods of competing trees on the calculation of neighborhood competition index, analyzes the corresponding rules of Larix olgensis biomass on neighborhood competition, so as to provide a theoretical basis for the research on competition mechanism of planted forests.

    Method 

    Based on the analytical wood data of 147 sample trees of L. olgensis in Mengjiagang Forest Farm, Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China, this study analyzed the effects of neighborhood competition on the biomass and its allocation of tree wood, bark, branch, leaf and root. Four methods for selecting competing trees (fixed radius method, dynamic radius method, adjacent tree method and control tree number method) were adoped. Based on the existing nine competition indexes (CI1−CI9), through correlation analysis and random forest importance ranking, the optimal neighborhood competition index was screened, and the relationship between biomass of L. olgensis and its distribution and neighborhood competition was analyzed.

    Result 

    The optimal competition index varied with different methods. When the fixed radius method was used to select competing trees, the competition index (CI3) related to the object trees and DBH of competing trees had the strongest correlation with biomass. When the dynamic radius method was adopted, the competition index (CI1) related to DBH of competing trees and the object trees, as well as the distance between them had the strongest correlation with biomass. When the adjacent tree method was adopted, the competition index (CI9) related to DBH and tree height of the object trees and competing trees, as well as the distance between them had the strongest correlation with biomass. When the method of controlling the number of plants was adopted, the correlation between competition index CI1 and biomass was the strongest. The results of random forests showed that the competition index selected by method of controlling the number of plants had the strongest correlation with biomass of L. olgensis. There was a significant negative correlation between biomass of each component of L. olgensis and neighborhood competition index (P < 0.001). The biomass distribution ratio of each component was wood (63.6%) > root (17.8%) > branch (10.0%) > bark (6.6%) > leaf (2.0%). The neighborhood competition index was significantly negatively correlated with biomass allocation ratios of tree wood and root (P < 0.001), while it was significantly positively correlated with biomass allocation ratios of bark, branch and leaf (P < 0.001).

    Conclusion 

    Neighborhood competition significantly affects the biomass and distribution of each component of L. olgensis. The influence of competition should be considered in the biomass model estimation. This study provides theoretical support for accurate estimation of biomass of L. olgensis plantation in northeastern China.

  • [1]
    Bazzaz F. Plant resource allocation[J]. Ecology, 1998, 79(2): 746−747.
    [2]
    高杰, 郭子健, 刘艳红. 北京松山不同龄级天然油松林生物量分配格局及其影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(6): 1475−1480.

    Gao J, Guo Z J, Liu Y H. Biomass allocation pattern and its influencing factors across natural Chinese pine forests of different ages in Songshan, Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(6): 1475−1480.
    [3]
    Zhou W S, Cheng X Q, Wu R, et al. Effect of intraspecific competition on biomass partitioning of Larix principis-rupprechtii[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2018, 13(1): 1−8. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2017.1406999
    [4]
    董利虎, 李凤日, 贾炜玮. 林木竞争对红松人工林立木生物量影响及模型研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(6): 15−22.

    Dong L H, Li F R, Jia W W. Effects of tree competition on biomass and biomass models of Pinus koraiensis plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(6): 15−22.
    [5]
    陈东升, 孙晓梅, 金英博, 等. 林龄和竞争对日本落叶松各组分生物量异速关系的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(3): 843−853.

    Chen D S, Sun X M, Jin Y B, et al. Effects of stand age and competition on allometric relationships for biomass partitioning in Larix kaempferi plantation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(3): 843−853.
    [6]
    汪金松, 范秀华, 范娟, 等. 地上竞争对林下红松生物量分配的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(8): 2447−2457. doi: 10.5846/stxb201103140312

    Wang J S, Fan X H, Fan J, et al. Effect of aboveground competition on biomass partitioning of understory Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(8): 2447−2457. doi: 10.5846/stxb201103140312
    [7]
    Lin Y, Huth F, Berger U, et al. The role of belowground competition and plastic biomass allocation in altering plant mass-density relationships[J]. Oikos, 2014, 123(2): 248−256. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00921.x
    [8]
    Yang X Z, Zhang W H, He Q Y. Effects of intraspecific competition on growth, architecture and biomass allocation of Quercus liaotungensis[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2019, 14(1): 284−294. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2019.1629656
    [9]
    Men X L, Yue Y, Gu H Y, et al. Effects of tree competition on biomass allocation of stump and coarse roots of Larix olgensis of different site classes[J]. Forests, 2023, 14(7): 1431. doi: 10.3390/f14071431
    [10]
    Corona P, Ferrara A. Individual competition indices for conifer plantations[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 1989, 27(1−4): 429−437. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(89)90103-5
    [11]
    龙时胜, 曾思齐, 肖化顺, 等. 基于Hegyi改进模型的青冈栎次生林竞争分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(1): 50−56.

    Long S S, Zeng S Q, Xiao H S, et al. Analysis on the competitive status of Cyclobalanopsis glauca secondary forest based on the improved Hegyi model[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2018(1): 50−56.
    [12]
    Bhandari S K, Veneklaas E J, Mccaw L, et al. Individual tree growth in jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest is explained by size and distance of neighbouring trees in thinned and non-thinned plots[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 494: 119364. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119364
    [13]
    Sun Z, Wang Y F, Pan L, et al. Hegyi competition index decomposition to improve estimation accuracy of Larix olgensis crown radius[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 143: 109322. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109322
    [14]
    宋天阳. 杉木径向生长随林龄变化及其对气候和竞争的响应[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2022.

    Song T Y. Effects of competition and climate on monthly radial growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata trees at different stand ages[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2022.
    [15]
    Weber P, Bugmann H, Fonti P, et al. Using a retrospective dynamic competition index to reconstruct forest succession[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 254(1): 96−106. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.031
    [16]
    潘磊. 长白落叶松人工林树冠形态及其与径向生长关系研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2021.

    Pan L. Crown morphology and its relationship with radial growth of Larix olgensis plantation[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2021.
    [17]
    徐建. 天目山针阔混交林竞争及其碳储量效应研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2014.

    Xu J. Research on competition and carbon storage of conifer and broad-leaves mixed forest in Tianmu Mountain[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2014.
    [18]
    李宜科, 赵成义, 杨瑞红. 准噶尔盆地南缘梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)群落种内竞争关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(2): 335−341.

    Li Y K, Zhao C Y, Yang R H. Intraspecific competition of Haloxylon ammodendron in the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(2): 335−341.
    [19]
    Enno U, Peter B, Matthias U. Analysing the effect of stand density and site conditions on structure and growth of oak species using Nelder trials along an environmental gradient: experimental design, evaluation methods, and results[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2015, 3: 243−261.
    [20]
    惠刚盈, 胡艳波. 混交林树种空间隔离程度表达方式的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(1): 23−27.

    Hui G Y, Hu Y B. Measuring species spatial isolation in mixed forests[J]. Forest Research, 2001, 14(1): 23−27.
    [21]
    Mensah S, Kaka R G, Seifert T. Patterns of biomass allocation between foliage and woody structure: the effects of tree size and specific functional traits[J]. Annals of Forest Research, 2016, 59(1): 49−60.
    [22]
    Xiao C W, Ceulemans R. Allometric relationships for below-and aboveground biomass of young Scots pines[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 203(1−3): 177−186. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.062
    [23]
    Peichl M, Arain M A. Allometry and partitioning of above-and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 253(1−3): 68−80. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.003
    [24]
    Kajimoto T, Matsuura Y, Osawa A, et al. Size-mass allometry and biomass allocation of two larch species growing on the continuous permafrost region in Siberia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 222(1−3): 314−325. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.031

Catalog

    Article views (119) PDF downloads (44) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return