• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Wen Haoyu, Zhang Jie, Li Huiyu, Gao Caiqiu, Wang Chao, Zhang Qingzhu, Jiang Jing, Liu Guifeng. Analysis of fast-growing and stability characteristics of Betula platyphylla progeny at multiple locations based on BLUP-GGE biplot[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(10): 53-62. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240010
Citation: Wen Haoyu, Zhang Jie, Li Huiyu, Gao Caiqiu, Wang Chao, Zhang Qingzhu, Jiang Jing, Liu Guifeng. Analysis of fast-growing and stability characteristics of Betula platyphylla progeny at multiple locations based on BLUP-GGE biplot[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(10): 53-62. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240010

Analysis of fast-growing and stability characteristics of Betula platyphylla progeny at multiple locations based on BLUP-GGE biplot

More Information
  • Received Date: January 07, 2024
  • Revised Date: March 17, 2024
  • Accepted Date: October 13, 2024
  • Available Online: October 13, 2024
  • Objective 

    Through multi-location trials of birch progeny, this paper analyzes their fast-growing and stability characteristics, selects excellent genotypes, and provides a scientific basis for renovation and reconstruction of seed orchard.

    Method 

    The study focused on the progeny test forest of 8-year-old half-sibling families of birch at three experimental sites. Traits such as tree height, DBH, wood volume, straightness, and survival rate were investigated. The ASReml-R4.0 software package in the R language was employed to fit a mixed linear model with heterogeneous variance. Breeding values for each family at different trial locations were obtained through best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation and selection of trial sites and families were conducted using the GGE biplot method.

    Result 

    (1) In the mixed linear model analysis with location as a fixed effect, differences in the offsprings of half-sib family lines of birch reached significant levels (P < 0.05, Z ratio > 1.5) for all five traits among locations, among family lines, and among location × family line interactions. (2) Based on BLUP values of each trait, the GGE biplot revealed that Shangzhi Trial Site had the optimal discrimination and representativeness. Qing’an and Shangzhi trial sites showed the strongest correlation, while Yongji was almost uncorrelated with Shangzhi and negatively correlated with Qing’an. (3) Progeny from birch family 16 and 15 exhibited the best fast-growing characteristics, and family 4 and 32 demonstrated the highest stability. Considering a comprehensive ranking based on stability and fast-growing characteristics of each family, four excellent families, including family 16, 40, 15, and 38 were selected with a 20% inclusion rate.

    Conclusion 

    There are significant differences in growth performance of birch half-sibling families at different trial locations, and growth performance also varies among different families within the same trial location. The interaction between genotype (family) and environment (site) significantly influences the growth of birch. Based on comprehensive traits of stability and fast-growing for each family, family 16, 40, 15, and 38 have been selected as excellent half-sibling families of birch.

  • [1]
    关文彬. 中国东北地区白桦林植被生态学的研究──桦属植物与中国白桦林的地理分布[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1998, 20(4): 107−112.

    Guan W B. Vegetation ecology on communities dominated by Betula platyphylla in northeast of China distribution of communities dominated by Betula platyphylla[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1998, 20(4): 107−112.
    [2]
    张建龙. 中国森林资源报告[R]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019.

    Zhang J L. China forest resources report[R]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2019.
    [3]
    杨传平, 刘桂丰, 魏志刚, 等. 白桦强化促进提早开花结实技术的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 50(6): 75−78. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20040613

    Yang C P, Liu G F, Wei Z G, et al. Study on intensive breeding technique of accelerating Betula platyphylla flowering and seeding early[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 50(6): 75−78. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20040613
    [4]
    杨传平, 杨晶, 寇晓东, 等. 白桦木材纤维与生长特性的遗传差异[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1992, 36(6): 6−14.

    Yang C P, Yang J, Kou X D, et al. Genetic differences in fiber and growth characteristics of Betula platyphylla wood[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 1992, 36(6): 6−14.
    [5]
    苏显峰, 林代斌, 李莉, 等. 白桦不同嫁接方法与成活率的关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1993, 37(6): 6−12.

    Su X F, Lin D B, Li L, et al. The relationship between different grafting methods and survival rate of Betula platyphylla[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 1993, 37(6): 6−12.
    [6]
    詹亚光, 李景云, 刘吉春, 等. 白桦嫩枝扦插繁殖技术的研究(Ⅰ)[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1994, 38(2): 6−10.

    Zhan Y G, Li J Y, Liu J C, et al. A study on the propagation technology of Birch twig cutting(Ⅰ)[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 1994, 38(2): 6−10.
    [7]
    刘宇, 徐焕文, 尚福强, 等. 3个地点白桦种源试验生长稳定性分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(5): 50−57.

    Liu Y, Xu H W, Shang F Q, et al. Growth stability of Betula platyphylla provenances from three sites[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(5): 50−57.
    [8]
    郑聪慧, 张鸿景, 王玉忠, 等. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的华北落叶松家系区域试验分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 73−83. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190809

    Zheng C H, Zhang H J, Wang Y Z, et al. An analysis of a regional trial of Larix principis-rupprechtii families based on BLUP and GGE biplot[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(8): 73−83. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190809
    [9]
    Rae A M, Pinel M P, Bastien C, et al. QTL for yield in bioenergy Populus: identifying G × E interactions from growth at three contrasting sites[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2008, 4(1): 97−112.
    [10]
    林元震. R与ASReml-R统计学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.

    Lin Y Z. R and ASReml-R statistics[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2016.
    [11]
    孟宪宇. 测树学[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1996.

    Meng X Y. Tree measurement [M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1996.
    [12]
    解懿妮, 莫晓勇, 彭仕尧, 等. 粤西21个桉树无性系早期性状遗传变异分析和无性系综合选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(3): 73−80.

    Xie Y N, Mo X Y, Peng S Y, et al. Genetic variation analysis and early comprehensive selection of 21 Eucalyptus clones in western Guangdong Province, China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(3): 73−80.
    [13]
    李金花. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的黑杨派无性系生长性状基因型与环境互作效应[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(6): 64−73. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210607

    Li J H. Genotype by environment interaction for growth traits of clones of Populus Section Aigeiros based on BLUP and GGE biplot[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(6): 64−73. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210607
    [14]
    林元震. 林木基因型与环境互作的研究方法及其应用[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 142−151. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190516

    Lin Y Z. Research methods and applications of the interaction between forest genotype and environment[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(5): 142−151. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190516
    [15]
    刘宇, 徐焕文, 滕文华, 等. 白桦全同胞子代测定及优良家系早期选择[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(2): 1−8.

    Liu Y, Xu H W, Teng W H, et al. Determination of whole sibling offspring of Betula platyphylla and early selection of superior families[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(2): 1−8.
    [16]
    李春旭, 刘桂丰, 刘宇, 等. 盆栽白桦优良无性系苗期的初步选择[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(2): 16−23.

    Li C X, Liu G F, Liu Y, et al. Preliminary seedling selection of superior clones of pot culture Betula platyphylla[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(2): 16−23.
    [17]
    Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q L, et al. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot[J]. Crop Science, 2000, 40(3): 597−605. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x
    [18]
    刘宁, 丁昌俊, 李波, 等. 12个欧美杨无性系生长初期基因型与环境的互作效应[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(8): 63−72. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200808

    Liu N, Ding C J , Li B, et al. Effects of genotype by environment interaction of 12 Populus × euramericana clones in their early growth[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(8): 63−72. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200808
    [19]
    王德源, 童春发. 林木多地点半同胞子代测定遗传分析R语言程序包及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(5): 45−51.

    Wang D Y, Tong C F. Halfsib MS: an R package for genetic analysis of half-sib progeny test at multiple sites in forest trees[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(5): 45−51.
    [20]
    任建中, 刘长青, 汪清锐, 等. 杨树纸浆材优良无性系选择方法的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2003, 25(4): 25−29. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2003.04.006

    Ren J Z, Liu C Q, Wang Q R, et al. Methods to select superior clones of poplar pulpwood[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2003, 25(4): 25−29. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2003.04.006
    [21]
    吴炜. 红锥家系在永安市的适应性与多性状评价选择[J]. 福建林业科技, 2023, 50(4): 28−35.

    Wu W. Adaptability and multi trait evaluation and selection of Castanopsis hystri families in Yong’an[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 50(4): 28−35.
    [22]
    何彝敏, 张英, 王瑞, 等. 378份油茶种质资源表型遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(8): 2732−2749.

    He Y M, Zhang Y, Wang R, et al. Phenotypic genetic diversity analysis of 378 oil-tea camellia germplasm resources[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2024, 22(8): 2732−2749.
    [23]
    李岩, 朱嘉瑶, 王喜和, 等. 红松优树无性系及其子代的生长评价与选择研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(10): 38−46. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210080

    Li Y, Zhu J Y, Wang X H, et al. Growth evaluation and selection study of elite clones and its offspring families in Pinus koraiensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(10): 38−46. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210080
    [24]
    刘宇, 徐焕文, 张广波, 等. 白桦半同胞子代多点生长性状测定及优良家系选择[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(3): 7−15.

    Liu Y, Xu H W, Zhang G B, et al. Multipoint growth trait test of half-sibling offspring and excellent family selection of Betula platyphylla[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(3): 7−15.
    [25]
    徐焕文, 刘宇, 李志新, 等. 5年生白桦杂种子代多点稳定性分析及优良家系选择[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(12): 24−31.

    Xu H W, Liu Y, Li Z X, et al. Analysis of the stability and superiority of five-year-old birch crossbreed families based on a multi-site test[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(12): 24−31.
    [26]
    程玲, 张心菲, 张鑫鑫, 等. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的林木多地点试验分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(3): 87−93.

    Cheng L, Zhang X F, Zhang X X, et al. Forestry multi-environment trial analysis based on BLUP and GGE biplot[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(3): 87−93.
    [27]
    沈熙环. 林木育种学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1990.

    Shen X H. Forest tree breeding[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1990.
    [28]
    Henderson C R, Quaas R L. Multiple trait evaluation using relatives records[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1976, 43(6): 1188−1197. doi: 10.2527/jas1976.4361188x
    [29]
    Persson T, Andersson B. Accuracy of single- and multiple-trait REML evaluation of data including non-random missing records[J]. Silvae Genet, 2004, 53(3): 135−139.
    [30]
    周文戈, 孙越, 张杰, 等. 应用混合线性模型对白桦家系速生性及稳定性分析与选择[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52(9): 1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2024.09.001

    Zhou W G, Sun Y, Zhang J, et al. Analysis and selection of fast-growing and stable of Betula platyphylla families using mixed linear models[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2024, 52(9): 1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2024.09.001
    [31]
    魏志刚, 刘关君, 高玉池, 等. 白桦优良家系及单株配合选择[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37(9): 1−3, 11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2009.09.001

    Wei Z G, Liu G J, Gao Y C, et al. Combination selection of excellent families and plus trees of Betula platyphylla[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2009, 37(9): 1−3, 11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2009.09.001
    [32]
    周明慧, 张婷, 李荣平, 等. 光温水对树木初生生长和次生生长影响的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(9): 2455−2462.

    Zhou M H, Zhang T, Li R P, et al. Research progresses on the effects of light, temperature and water conditions on primary and secondary growth of trees[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(9): 2455−2462.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 郭来珍,陈虹,赵善超,陈凤,陈兵权,陈鑫悦. 天山花楸不同种源种子表型变异分析. 种子. 2022(10): 50-57+2 .
    2. 孙永玉,李昆,雷晨雨,田瑞杰,张春华,冯德枫,刘方炎,唐国勇. 干热河谷小桐子不同种源的光合生理及生长性状. 应用与环境生物学报. 2021(02): 351-356 .
    3. 刘莉,王磊,吴丹,赵永军,庄振杰,王震,鲁仪增,刘立江,陆璐,解孝满. 不同种源文冠果种子的表型变异. 经济林研究. 2021(04): 97-105 .
    4. 郭国业,徐莺,唐琳,陈放,韩学琴. 不同地理种源麻疯树表型变异研究. 四川农业大学学报. 2020(02): 143-151+160 .
    5. 句娇,毕泉鑫,赵阳,于丹,崔艺凡,傅光辉,范思琪,陈梦园,于海燕,王利兵. 不同种源文冠果种子及苗期性状地理变异. 江西农业大学学报. 2019(03): 529-540 .
    6. 张毅,敖妍,刘觉非,赵磊磊,张永明. 文冠果种实性状变异规律及优良单株选择. 东北林业大学学报. 2019(09): 1-5 .
    7. 张毅,敖妍,刘觉非,赵磊磊,由海德. 不同分布区文冠果种实性状对生态因子的响应. 西北林学院学报. 2019(05): 85-90 .
    8. 赵海鹄,梁文汇,李宝财,梁忠云. 广西细子龙核仁油化学成分分析. 广西林业科学. 2019(04): 531-534 .
    9. 惠文凯,王益,陈晓阳. 麻疯树种子含油量近红外光谱定标模型的建立. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(01): 1-7 . 本站查看
    10. 何霞,邓成,杨嘉麒,张登,张梦洁,廖柏勇,王芳,陈晓阳. 苦楝种源间生长性状的早期地理变异分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(07): 45-54 . 本站查看
    11. 覃敏,尹光天,杨锦昌,李荣生,邹文涛. 米老排不同种源的表型性状变异分析. 浙江农林大学学报. 2017(01): 112-119 .
    12. 许洋,李迎超,冯慧,王迪,丁可君,郭超,刘国军,厉月桥,宁超,贺磊,郭芳. 不同种源栓皮栎种子表型性状的变异分析. 安徽农业科学. 2015(25): 164-167 .
    13. 许洋,李迎超,冯慧,王迪,丁可君,郭超,刘国军,厉月桥,宁超,贺磊,郭芳. 不同种源麻栎种子表型性状的变异分析. 林业科技通讯. 2015(09): 8-12 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (199) PDF downloads (28) Cited by(18)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return