• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Zhao Bingting, Wang Weifeng, Ruan Honghua, Ning Zhuo, Yan Ke, Chen Zhili. Assessment of habitat quality and ecological red line in southern Jiangsu Province of eastern China based on land use changes[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(10): 100-111. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240121
Citation: Zhao Bingting, Wang Weifeng, Ruan Honghua, Ning Zhuo, Yan Ke, Chen Zhili. Assessment of habitat quality and ecological red line in southern Jiangsu Province of eastern China based on land use changes[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(10): 100-111. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240121

Assessment of habitat quality and ecological red line in southern Jiangsu Province of eastern China based on land use changes

More Information
  • Received Date: April 20, 2024
  • Revised Date: May 20, 2024
  • Available Online: October 06, 2024
  • Objective 

    In the context of rapid urbanization, the assessment and simulation of impact of rapid urbanization on habitat quality can provide suggestions for adjusting ecological red line areas and ecologically sensitive areas, so as to improve territorial spatial planning and strengthen ecological spatial control.

    Method 

    In this study, the spatial and temporal evolution of land use changes, habitat quality, and habitat degradation degree in 2000, 2010, and 2020 were assessed using the InVEST model and hotspot analysis in southern Jiangsu Province of eastern China. The PLUS model was used to simulate land use changes from 2020 to 2030 and the InVEST model was used to assess habitat quality according to scenarios.

    Result 

    (1) From 2000 to 2020, land use in southern Jiangsu Province underwent significant changes, mainly characterized by the transfer of cultivated land to construction land and waters. The average value of habitat quality showed a decreasing trend. Additionally, a spatial distribution pattern emerged, characterized by high quality in the east and west, and low quality in the middle. The degree of habitat degradation showed a radial structure of “low center-high outside”. (2) Among the three land use simulation scenarios in 2030, the urban expansion scenario showed the largest decrease in cultivated land area. Under the ecological protection scenario, forests and lakes were strictly protected; the expansion of construction land was controlled under the sustainable development scenario. The ranking of mean values of habitat quality was ecological protection scenario > sustainable development scenario > urban expansion scenario. (3) The hotspot analysis revealed that in 2020, habitat quality and habitat degradation in southern Jiangsu Province showed a concentrated distribution at the township scale, with the town centers being the cold spots, hotspots mainly in forests and mountains, and watersheds being the hotspot areas of habitat quality. (4) Habitat quality within the ecological red line area was overall high and relatively stable. In future projections, the ecological protection scenario expanded the mismatch area, and the sustainable development scenario decreased the mismatch area.

    Conclusion 

    Rapid urbanization and intense human activities are the main reasons for decline of habitat quality in southern Jiangsu Province and low habitat quality in the part of ecological red line area. Therefore, optimizing the spatial structure of territory and reducing the impact of human activities on sensitive ecological environment areas are of great significance for improving the habitat quality in southern Jiangsu Province of eastern China.

  • [1]
    Costanzar R, d’Arge R, Droot de R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253−260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
    [2]
    Tillensor D P, Ittensor D P, Walpole M, et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets[J]. Science, 2014, 346: 241−244. doi: 10.1126/science.1257484
    [3]
    侯焱臻, 赵文武, 刘焱序. 自然衰退“史无前例”, 物种灭绝率“加速”——IPBES全球评估报告简述[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(18): 6943−6949.

    Hou Y Z, Zhao W W, Liu Y X. Natural decline “Unprecedented”, species extinction rate “Accelerated”--IPBES Global Assessment Report Brief description[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(18): 6943−6949.
    [4]
    Liu X P, Liang X, Li X, et al. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects[J]. Landscape Urban Planning, 2017, 168: 94−116. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
    [5]
    Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17−29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
    [6]
    岳文泽, 夏皓轩, 吴桐, 等. 浙江省生境质量时空演变与生态红线评估[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(15): 6406−6417.

    Yue W Z, Xia H X, Wu T, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution of habitat quality and ecological red line assessment in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(15): 6406−6417.
    [7]
    Zhang K L, Liu T, Feng R R, et al. Coupling coordination relationship and driving mechanism between urbanization and ecosystem service value in large regions: a case study of urban agglomeration in Yellow River Basin, China[J/OL]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(15): 26[2024−01−23]. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7836.
    [8]
    张徐, 李云霞, 吕春娟, 等. 基于InVEST模型的生态系统服务功能应用研究进展[J]. 生态科学, 2022, 41(1): 237−242.

    Zhang X, Li Y X, Lü C J, et al. Research progress of ecosystem service function application based on the InVEST model[J]. Ecological Sciences, 2022, 41(1): 237−242.
    [9]
    高周冰, 王晓瑞, 隋雪艳, 等. 基于FLUS和InVEST模型的南京市生境质量多情景预测[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5): 1001−1013.

    Gao Z B, Wang X R, Sui X Y, et al. Multi-scenario prediction of habitat quality in Nanjing based on FLUS and InVEST model[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 39(5): 1001−1013.
    [10]
    黄木易, 岳文泽, 冯少茹, 等. 基于InVEST模型的皖西大别山区生境质量时空演化及景观格局分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(9): 2895−2906.

    Huang M Y, Yue W Z, Feng S R, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and landscape pattern of habitat quality in Dabie Mountain area of West Anhui Province based on InVEST model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 2895−2906.
    [11]
    夏楚瑜, 国淏, 赵晶, 等. 京津冀地区生态系统服务对城镇化的多空间尺度动态响应[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(7): 2756−2769.

    Xia C Y, Guo H, Zhao J, et al. Multi-spatial scale dynamic response of ecosystem services to urbanization in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(7): 2756−2769.
    [12]
    李胜鹏, 柳建玲, 林津, 等. 基于1980—2018年土地利用变化的福建省生境质量时空演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 4080−4090.

    Li S P, Liu J L, Lin J, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of habitat quality based on land use change in Fujian Province from 1980 to 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(12): 4080−4090.
    [13]
    樊应凭, 周寅康, 韩博南, 等. 国土空间治理视角下苏南地区农用地生态修复分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(1): 287−296. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.01.032

    Fan Y P, Zhou Y K, Han B N, et al. Ecological restoration zoning of agricultural land in southern Jiangsu from the perspective of territorial spatial governance[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(1): 287−296. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.01.032
    [14]
    徐丹丹, 侯光雷, 董凯凯, 等. 基于参照基准的湿地生物多样性保护成效区域对比评估[J]. 湿地科学, 2018, 16(2): 120−129.

    Xu D D, Hou G L, Dong K K, et al. Comparative assessment of wet land biodiversity conservation effectiveness based on reference criteria[J]. Wet land Science, 2018, 16(2): 120−129.
    [15]
    Veldkamp A, Lambin E F. Predicting land-use change[J]. Agricultural Ecosystem Environment, 2001, 85(1−3): 1−6. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00199-2
    [16]
    Liang X, Guan Q F, Clarke K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: a case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 2021, 85: 101569. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569
    [17]
    喇蕗梦, 勾蒙蒙, 李乐, 等. 三峡库区生态系统服务权衡时空动态与情景模拟: 以秭归县为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(11): 1368−1377.

    La L M, Gou M M, Li L, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and scenario simulation of ecosystem service trade-offs in the Three Gorges Reservoir area: a case study of Zigui County[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021, 37(11): 1368−1377.
    [18]
    荣月静, 张慧, 王岩松, 等. 基于Logistic-CA-Markov与InVEST模型对南京市土地利用与生物多样性功能模拟评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(3): 82−89 .

    Rong Y J, Zhang H, Wang Y S, et al. Evaluation of land use and biodiversity function based on Logistic-CA-Markov and InVEST model in Nanjing[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(3): 82−89.
    [19]
    王耕, 常畅, 韩冬雪, 等. 老铁山自然保护区景观格局与生境质量时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 1910−1922.

    Wang G, Chang C, Han D X, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of landscape pattern and habitat quality in Lao Tie Shan Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 1910−1922.
    [20]
    朱志强, 马晓双, 胡洪. 基于耦合FLUS-InVEST模型的广州市生态系统碳储量时空演变与预测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(2): 222−229, 239.

    Zhu Z Q, Ma X S, Hu H. Spatial-temporal evolution and prediction of ecosystem carbon storage in Guangzhou based on coupled FLUS-InVEST model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 222−229, 239.
    [21]
    Yang J, Huang X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13(8): 3907−3925. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021
    [22]
    胡俊聪, 何华贵, 陈朝霞. 基于PLUS模型的土地利用多情景模拟与时空特征分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2023(10): 28−33.

    Hu J C, He H G, Chen Z X. Multi-scenario simulation and spatiotemporal characteristics analysis of land use based on PLUS model[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2023(10): 28−33.
    [23]
    胥丽, 国朝胜, 罗绍龙. 基于PLUS模型和InVEST模型的昆明市生境质量研究[J]. 三峡生态环境监测, 2023, 8(1): 102−112.

    Xu L, Guo C S, Luo S L. Study on habitat quality in Kunming City based on PLUS model and InVEST model[J]. Ecological Environment Monitoring of Three Gorges, 2023, 8(1): 102−112.
    [24]
    刘智方, 唐立娜, 高莉洁, 等. 生态系统服务模型应用的研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(增刊1): 387−392.

    Liu Z F, Tang L N, Gao L J, et al. Research on application of ecosystem service model[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2016, 39(Suppl.1): 387−392.
    [25]
    Terrado M, Sabater S, Chaplin-Kramer B, et al. Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 540: 63−70. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.064
    [26]
    陈永国, 刘维军, 荣月静, 等. 基于土地利用与植被覆盖度的大通北川河源区自然保护区生境质量评估[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(6): 332−337, 393.

    Chen Y G, Liu W J, Rong Y J, et al. Habitat quality assessment of Datong Beichuan River Source Nature Reserve based on land use and vegetation cover[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(6): 332−337, 393.
    [27]
    唐健雄, 何庆湖, 刘雨婧. 长三角城市群城镇化质量与规模的时空错位及影响因素分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 56(4): 703−716.

    Tang J X, He Q H, Liu Y J. Spatial and temporal dislocation of urbanization quality and scale in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations and analysis of influencing factors[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 56(4): 703−716.
    [28]
    肖玲, 姜群鸥, 王美林, 等. 京津冀地区生态基础设施−生境质量−产业发展耦合协调性分析与预测[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(3): 96−105. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200346

    Xiao L, Jiang Q O, Wang M L, et al. Analysis and prediction of the coupling coordination between ecological infrastructure, habitat quality, and industrial development in the Beijing Tianjin Hebei region[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(3): 96−105. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200346
    [29]
    Liu W, Zhan J Y, Zhao F, et al. Impacts of urbanization-induced land-use changes on ecosystem services: a case study of the Pearl River Delta Metropolitan Region, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 98: 228−238. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.054

Catalog

    Article views (186) PDF downloads (30) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return