Comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem service functions in Yunnan Province of southwestern China based on InVEST model

Wang Zhuoyao; Ren Yufei; Jiang Qunou; Zhen Ziyun; Xie Chen

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240123

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2024 > 46(11): 103-112. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240123

Wang Zhuoyao, Ren Yufei, Jiang Qunou, Zhen Ziyun, Xie Chen. Comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem service functions in Yunnan Province of southwestern China based on InVEST model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(11): 103-112. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240123

Citation:

PDF (5342 KB)

Comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem service functions in Yunnan Province of southwestern China based on InVEST model

Wang Zhuoyao^1,,
Ren Yufei^{1, 2, ,},
Jiang Qunou^{1, 2},
Zhen Ziyun¹,
Xie Chen¹

1.
School of Water and Soil Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation & Desertification Combating of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: April 21, 2024
Revised Date: June 06, 2024
Available Online: November 11, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the ecosystem service values in Yunnan Province of southwestern China and examine their spatial distribution and temporal changes.
Method
Utilizing the InVEST model, we evaluated soil conservation, carbon storage, water conservation, and water purification services in Yunnan Province for year 2010 and 2020. Quantile segmentation was employed to identify service boundaries, and fitting methods were used to determine constraints between services. Space scale, time scale were analyzed to comprehend the spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem functions. The value of these services was estimated using cost replacement and other methods.
Result
(1) Except for water purification, ecosystem services in Yunnan Province generally exhibited a west-high-east-low quality pattern. Most areas had low nitrogen and phosphorus outputs, with high-output zones being sporadically distributed. (2) High-quality service areas, excluding water purification, were predominantly located at altitudes between 2 400−2 800 m. (3) Compared with 2010, soil conservation and carbon storage were improved in 2020, whereas water retention and purification services were degraded. (4) In 2010, except for a negative linear relationship between nitrogen load and soil conservation concerning water purification, other service constraints displayed hump-shaped and double camel-hump patterns with increased sensitivity to constraint variables. The overall threshold showed a left shift trend. (5) From 2010 to 2020, the overall value of ecosystem services in Yunnan Province decreased, mainly due to water retention. In 2010, the total service value was 1.79 × 10¹² CNY (4.54 × 10⁶ CNY/km²), dropping to 1.71 × 10¹² CNY (4.33 × 10⁶ CNY/km²) in 2020.
Conclusion
Ecosystem service value in Yunnan Province is substantial. Over the past decade, soil conservation and carbon storage have improved, water retention and purification have declined.
- land use,
- soil conservation,
- carbon storage,
- water yield,
- water purification,
- Yunnan Province,
- ecosystem

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	余新晓, 鲁绍伟, 靳芳, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(8): 2096−2102. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.08.038 Yu X X, Lu S W, Jin F, et al. Assessment of the value of forest ecosystem services in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(8): 2096−2102. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.08.038
[2]	Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1): 3−15.
[3]	欧阳志云. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607−613. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1999.05.004 Ouyang Z Y. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 607−613. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1999.05.004
[4]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740−1746. Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1740−1746.
[5]	谢高地, 张钇锂, 鲁春霞, 等. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值[J]. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(1): 47−53. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2001.01.009 Xie G D, Zhang Y L, Lu C X, et al. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2001, 16(1): 47−53. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2001.01.009
[6]	肖强, 肖洋, 欧阳志云, 等. 重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1): 216−223. Xiao Q, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z Y, et al. Value assessment of the function of the forest ecosystem services in Chongqing[J] Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(1): 216−223.
[7]	Vigerstol K L, Aukema J E. A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92(10): 2403−2409. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040
[8]	Zhang C Q, Li W H, Zhang B, et al. Water yield of Xitiaoxi River Basin based on InVEST modeling[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012, 3(1): 50−54. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.01.008
[9]	Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J, Ancona Z H, et al. Analyzing land-use change scenarios for trade-offs among cultural ecosystem services in the Southern Rocky Mountains[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 431−444. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.003
[10]	时光. 基于SolVES模型下岳麓山风景名胜区生态系统服务社会价值评估[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2023. Shi G. Evaluation of social value of ecosystem service in Yuelu Mountain scenic area based on solVES model[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2023.
[11]	唐尧, 祝炜平, 张慧, 等. InVEST模型原理及其应用研究进展[J]. 生态科学, 2015, 34(3): 204−208. Tang Y, Zhu W P, Zhang H, et al. A review on principle and application of the InVEST model[J]. Ecological Science, 2015, 34(3): 204−208.
[12]	刘涛, 张雪梅, 林长存. 基于InVEST与FLUS模型的准格尔旗水源涵养功能分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3831−3840. Liu T, Zhang X M, Lin Z C. Functional analysis of water conservation in Zhungeer Banner based on InVEST and FLUS models[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3831−3840.
[13]	许澳康, 胡梦珺, 石晶, 等. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的石羊河流域生态系统碳储量时空变化及多情景模拟[J/OL]. 中国环境科学, 2023: 1−11[2024−01−23]. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20231211.016. Xu A K, Hu M J, Shi J, et al. Spatial and temporal variability of ecosystem carbon storages and multi-scenario simulation Based on the PLUS-InVEST model in the Shiyang River Basin[J/OL]. China Environmental Science, 2023: 1−11[2024−01−23]. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20231211.016.
[14]	吴则禹, 刘星根, 曾金凤. 基于InVEST-PLUS模型的东江源流域碳储量时空演变与预测[J]. 环境科学学报, 2024, 44(3): 419−430. Wu Z Y, Liu X G, Zeng J F. Spatio-temporal change and prediction of carbon storage in Dongjiang River source watershed based on InVEST-PLUS model[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2024, 44(3): 419−430.
[15]	张欣蓉, 王晓峰, 程昌武, 等. 基于供需关系的西南喀斯特区生态系统服务空间流动研究[J], 生态学报, 2021, 41(9): 3368−3380. Zhang X R, Wang X F, Cheng C W, et al. Ecosystem service flows in karst area of China based on the relationship between supply and demand[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(9): 3368−3380.
[16]	张钰莹, 孙美莹, 杨荣金, 等. 西南地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(1): 207−214. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210159 Zhang Y Y, Sun M Y, Yang R J, et al. Impact of land-use change on ecosystem service value in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022, 12(1): 207−214. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210159
[17]	杨月圆, 王金亮, 杨丙丰. 云南省土地生态敏感性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 2253−2260. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.05.042 Yang Y Y, Wang J L, Yang B F. Eco-sensitivity assessment of land in Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(5): 2253−2260. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.05.042
[18]	孙兴齐. 基于InVEST模型的香格里拉市生态系统服务功能评估[D]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2017. Sun X Q. Evaluation of ecosystem services in Shangri-La based on InVEST model[D]. Kunming: Yunnan Normal University, 2017.
[19]	蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华, 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(2): 19−24. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.02.005 Cai C F, Ding S W, Shi Z H, et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(2): 19−24. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.02.005
[20]	Zhu E, Deng J, Zhou M, et al. Carbon emissions induced by land-use and land-cover change from 1970 to 2010 in Zhejiang, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 646: 930−939. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.317
[21]	吴瑞, 刘桂环, 文一惠. 基于InVEST模型的官厅水库流域产水和水质净化服务时空变化[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30(3): 406−414. Wu R, Liu G H, Wen Y H. Spatiotemporal variations of water yield and water quality purification service functions in Guanting Reservoir Basin based on InVEST model[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(3): 406−414.
[22]	黄和平, 杨劼, 智颖飙. 皇甫川流域封育植被土壤保持功能及服务价值研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(3): 173−177. Huang H P, Yang J, Zhi Y B. Assessment for soil conservation functions and service values of afforested vegetation by enclosure in Huangfuchuan Watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 28(3): 173−177.
[23]	伍格致, 周妮笛. 湖南省森林碳储量及其经济价值测算研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(8): 127−132. Wu G Z, Zhou N D. Forest carbon reserves and its economic value estimation in Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015, 35(8): 127−132.
[24]	刘菊, 傅斌, 张成虎, 等. 基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(3): 577−585. Liu J, Fu B, Zhang C H, et al. Assessment of ecosystem water retention and its value in the upper reaches of Minjiang River based on InVEST Model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(3): 577−585.
[25]	陈昳. 基于InVEST模型的舟山群岛生态系统服务能值研究[D]. 舟山: 浙江海洋大学, 2020. Chen Y. An emergy research on Zhoushan Archipelago ecosystem services based on the InVEST model[D]. Zhoushan: Zhejiang Ocean University, 2020.
[26]	官冬杰, 李子辉, 周李磊, 等. 生态系统服务约束关系界定及影响机制分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(12): 5837−5848. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2021.12.040 Guan D J, Li Z H, Zhou L L, et al. The definition of ecosystem service constraint relations and analysis of influence mechanism[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(12): 5837−5848. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2021.12.040
[27]	潘炳猷, 姚宗文. 云南省种植业区划[M]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 1992: 26−35. Pan B Y, Yao Z W. Yunnan Province planting division [M] Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press, 1992: 26−35.
[28]	张秀, 张璇, 崔磊, 等. 金沙江中游水电开发区生态系统服务综合功能时空变化与归因[J/OL]. 环境科学, 2024[2024−07−21]. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202402105. Zhang X, Zhang X, Cui L, et al. Comprehensive ecosystem service changes and their drivers in the middle reaches of Jinsha River[J/OL] Environmental Science, 2024[2024−07−21]. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202402105.
[29]	李子辉, 张亚, 巴永, 等. 云南省植被固碳能力与产水、土壤保持服务冷热点识别[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024, 44(2): 1007−1019. Li Z H, Zhang Y, Ba Y, et al. Cold and hot spots identification for carbon sequestration capacity, water yield and soil conservation services of vegetation in Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2024, 44(2): 1007−1019.
[30]	张钰莹. 西南地区景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值综合分区研究[D]. 北京: 中国环境科学研究院, 2021. Zhang Y Y. Comprehensive partitions based on landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service value in Southwest China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, 2021.
[31]	郭佳晖, 刘晓煌, 张文博, 等. 基于InVEST模型和PLUS模型的云贵高原产水量时空变化特征分析[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(8): 624−635. Guo J H, Liu X H, Zhang W B, et al. Characterization of spatial and temporal variations in water yield on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau based on the InVEST and PLUS models[J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(8): 624−635.

[1]	Hu Zhenhong, Zhao Zhuqi, He Xian, Yuan Mengfan, Cheng Lei. Research progress of impacts of tree species diversity on microbial decomposition of forest deadwood and carbon cycling[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(11): 1-9. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240233
[2]	Zhou Cheng, Liu Tong, Wang Qinggui, Han Shijie. Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on fine root morphological, anatomical structure and stoichiometry of broadleaved Korean pine forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(11): 31-40. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210212
[3]	Zhang Yichi, Guo Sujuan, Sun Chuanhao. Effects of growth retardants on anatomy and non-structural carbohydrates of chestnut leaves[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(1): 46-53. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20180437
[4]	He Jingwen, Liu Ying, Yu Hang, Wu Jianzhao, Cui Yu, Lin Yongming, Wang Daojie, Li Jian. Nutrient reabsorption efficiency of dominant shrubs in dry-hot valley and its C∶N∶P stoichiometry[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(1): 18-26. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190185
[5]	Tong Long, Zhang Lei, Li Bin, Geng Yanghui, Xie Jinzhong, Zhang Wei, Chen Lijie. Effects of different truncation treatments on the stoichiometry of C, N and P in leaves of Dendrocalamus latiflorus[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(11): 69-75. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000--1522.20180216
[6]	ZHONG Yue-ming, DONG Fang-yu, WANG Wen-juan, WANG Jian-ming, LI Jing-wen, WU Bo, JIA Xiao hong. Anatomical characteristics and adaptability plasticity of Populus euphratica in different habitats[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(10): 53-61. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170089
[7]	ZHANG Min, ZHANG Wei, GONG Zai-xin, ZHENG Cai-xia. Morphologic and anatomical observations in the process of ovulate strobilus generation and development in Pinus tabuliformis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(6): 1-12. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160411
[8]	ZHAO Yan-xia, LUO You-qing, ZONG Shi-xiang, WANG Rong1, LUO Hong-mei. Comparison in leaf anatomical structure and drought resistance of different sex and varieties of sea buckthorn[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(6): 34-41.
[9]	XIAO Yang, CHEN Li-hua, YU Xin-xiao, WANG Xiao-ping, QIN Yong-sheng, CHEN Jun-qi. Nutrient cycling of N, P and K in a plantation ecosystem of Pinus tabulaeformis in Miyun District, Beijing.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(supp.2): 72-75.
[10]	YU Zhan-yuan, CENG De-hui, JIANG Feng-qi, FAN Zhi-ping, CHEN Fu-sheng, ZHAO Qiong. Responses of key carbon cycling processes to the addition of water and fertilizers to sandy grassland in semi-arid region[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(4): 45-50.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(35)

1.	沈汉，郑成忠，张能军，邱勇斌，徐金良，成向荣. 间伐对杉木大径材培育林分的生长和乔木碳储量的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2025(04): 47-54+60 .
2.	高彤，宋鑫彧，任允泽，毛亮亮，高然，董希斌. 抚育间伐强度对针阔混交林碳动态变化的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2024(02): 118-128 .
3.	牛鉴祺，吕彦飞，王树力. 抚育间伐对杨桦次生林非结构性碳水化合物质量分数和碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(06): 51-57 .
4.	赵鹏，刘子玺，李得禄，张俊年，张万科，肖东，杨斌元. 祁连山国家公园典型生态系统固碳功能研究综述. 陕西林业科技. 2024(02): 127-131+134 .
5.	吴章明，唐思莹，宋思宇，李聪，刘丽鸽，朱鹏，徐红伟，张学强，张健，刘洋. 带状采伐初期对华西雨屏区杉木人工林土壤碳组分及稳定性的影响. 四川农业大学学报. 2024(04): 847-860+878 .
6.	吕彦飞，牛鉴祺，王树力. 抚育间伐对小黑杨人工林非结构性碳和氮磷钾生态化学计量特征的影响. 森林工程. 2024(05): 62-73 .
7.	邹丰虎，柴宗政. 近自然经营对马尾松人工林生态系统碳储量的影响. 广西科学. 2024(03): 405-415 .
8.	赵吉平. 不同结构落叶松天然林生物量及生产力特征. 南方农业. 2023(04): 101-104 .
9.	高谢雨，董利虎，郝元朔. 基于TLS的抚育间伐对长白落叶松干形的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 85-94 .
10.	杜雪，王海燕，邹佳何，孟海，赵晗，崔雪，董齐琪. 长白山北坡云冷杉阔叶混交林土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素. 生态环境学报. 2022(04): 663-669 .
11.	肖军，雷蕾，曾立雄，李肇晨，马成功，肖文发. 不同经营模式对华北油松人工林碳储量的影响. 生态环境学报. 2022(11): 2134-2142 .
12.	张乃暄，王韵頔，许中旗，付立华，张菲，程顺. 抚育间伐对塞罕坝地区云杉人工林碳储量及固碳速率的影响. 河北农业大学学报. 2022(06): 81-87 .
13.	王亚辉，牟长城，杨智慧，刘珽，李轩男. 透光抚育强度对小兴安岭“栽针保阔”红松林碳储量的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(10): 54-64 . 本站查看
14.	赵状，董希斌，曲杭峰，宋鑫彧，刘慧，毛亮亮. 可拓评判法在红皮云杉碳质量分数评价中的应用. 东北林业大学学报. 2021(10): 71-76 .
15.	陈俊华，张鑫，谢天资，龚固堂，王琛，慕长龙. 川中丘陵区人工柏木林不同间伐强度效果评价. 四川林业科技. 2021(06): 11-20 .
16.	南维波. 不同抚育强度对兴安落叶松人工林的影响. 农村实用技术. 2020(06): 121-122 .
17.	徐清乾，黄帆，张勰，王湘莹，梁贵明. 雪峰山区杉木大径材培育立地及密度控制研究. 湖南林业科技. 2020(03): 32-38 .
18.	龚映匀，王瑞辉，张斌，刘凯利，董凯丽，刘俊涛，赵苏亚，周钰淮. 抚育间伐对川西柳杉人工林生长和土壤有机碳的影响. 林业资源管理. 2020(06): 96-104 .
19.	宋重升，张利荣，王有良，游云飞，冯随起，林开敏. 抚育间伐对人工林生态系统影响的研究进展. 亚热带农业研究. 2020(04): 279-288 .
20.	刘泰瑞，任达，董威，覃志杰，张芸香，郭晋平. 华北落叶松天然林目标树间伐释压与胸径生长关系研究. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2019(01): 20-24+44 .
21.	廖鋆章，贲丽云. 不同间伐措施强度对杉木人工林碳储量及其分配的影响研究. 低碳世界. 2019(04): 308-309 .
22.	周焘，王传宽，周正虎，孙志虎. 抚育间伐对长白落叶松人工林土壤碳、氮及其组分的影响. 应用生态学报. 2019(05): 1651-1658 .
23.	Zhenge HUANG，Minyang XIE，Mingbao WEI，Bin HE，Shaozhuang MO，Gang ZHOU，Ji LIANG. Carbon Storage and Distribution of the Mature Pinus massoniana Plantation in Northwest Guangxi. Agricultural Biotechnology. 2019(03): 141-144 .
24.	管惠文，董希斌，张甜，曲杭峰，王智勇. 抚育间伐后落叶松天然次生林生境恢复效果的评价. 东北林业大学学报. 2019(07): 6-13+24 .
25.	戎建涛，张晓红，郜爱玲，王艳英，潘凡群. 不同间伐强度经营对柳杉人工林土壤理化性质的影响. 西北林学院学报. 2019(04): 206-211 .
26.	董莉莉，赵济川，汪成成，刘红民，高英旭，杨鹤. 抚育间伐后蒙古栎阔叶混交林径级结构及生长动态研究. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2019(06): 98-104 .
27.	董莉莉，刘红民，汪成成，赵济川，高英旭，黄夏，肖尧. 间伐对蒙古栎次生林生态系统碳储量的短期和长期影响. 沈阳农业大学学报. 2019(05): 614-620 .
28.	韦明宝，王朝健，杨正文，黄振格，王汉敢，何斌. 桂西北马尾松人工林生态系统碳贮量与分布. 亚热带农业研究. 2019(03): 152-156 .
29.	银彬吾，刘奇林，陆滟灵，何斌，黄振格，谢敏洋. 2种更新方式4年生尾巨桉人工林碳储量及其分布特征. 广西林业科学. 2019(04): 466-471 .
30.	朱子卉，杨华，张恒，王全军，孙权，杨超. 择伐后落叶松云冷杉林直径结构及生长的动态变化. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(05): 55-62 . 本站查看
31.	韦家国，周刚，刘凡胜，杨正文，莫少壮，何斌. 秃杉林和连栽杉木林生态系统C积累及其分布格局. 亚热带农业研究. 2018(01): 29-33 .
32.	Zhou Gang，He Bin，Wei Jiaguo，Liu Fansheng，Mo Shaozhuang，Yang Zhengwen. Carbon Accumulation and Distribution in Ecosystems of Taiwania flousiana Plantation and Successive Rotation Plantation of Cunninghamia lanceolata. Meteorological and Environmental Research. 2018(04): 11-14+18 .
33.	张期奇，董希斌，张甜，曲杭峰，马晓波，管惠文，王智勇，阮加甫，陈蕾. 抚育间伐强度对兴安落叶松中龄林测树因子的影响. 森林工程. 2018(05): 1-7+55 .
34.	段梦成，王国梁，史君怡，周昊翔. 间伐对油松人工林碳储量的长期影响. 水土保持学报. 2018(05): 190-196 .
35.	马长明，赵辉，牟洪香，刘炳响. 燕山山地华北落叶松人工林碳密度及分配特征. 水土保持学报. 2017(05): 208-214 .

Other cited types(35)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (189) PDF downloads (49) Cited by(70)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem service functions in Yunnan Province of southwestern China based on InVEST model