Development stage division and stand structure characteristics of natural hard broadleaved forest in Maor Mountain, Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China

Zhang Lingfeng; Liu Zhaogang; Dong Lingbo

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240169

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2025 > 47(2): 10-22. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240169

Zhang Lingfeng, Liu Zhaogang, Dong Lingbo. Development stage division and stand structure characteristics of natural hard broadleaved forest in Maor Mountain, Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47(2): 10-22. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240169

Citation:

PDF (1789 KB)

Development stage division and stand structure characteristics of natural hard broadleaved forest in Maor Mountain, Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China

School of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management of Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China

More Information

Received Date: May 29, 2024
Revised Date: June 18, 2024
Accepted Date: January 09, 2025
Available Online: December 09, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
This paper analyzes the development stages and stand structure characteristics of hard broadleaved forest in Maor Mountain, Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China, identifies stand index changes at different stages, and provides scientific basis for the growth prediction and multifunctional sustainable management of natural secondary forests.
Method
Taking the natural hard broadleaved forest of Maor Mountain Experimental Forest Farm in Heilongjiang Province as the research object, we used TWINSPAN bidirectional indicator species analysis method, interspecific linkage cluster analysis method, and discriminant analysis method to divide the development stages of hard broadleaved forests; selected different forest stand indicators from the aspects of age structure, diameter structure and tree species diversity, and analyzed the structural characteristics of stands at different developmental stages; and 11 parameters, including forest stability, target tree species diversity index and simpson diversity index, were combined through entropy weight method-AHP method, and a phased composite index was constructed.
Result
The development process of natural hard broadleaved forest in Maor Mountain can be divided into group establishment stage, competition growth stage and near natural forest stage. At different stages, the age structure shows an increasing pattern, while the diameter structure generally shows an anti J-shaped pattern and the species composition is rich and relatively stable. Based on the three developmental stages, combined with the selected 11 parameters, the range of developmental stages divided by composite index F was given.
Conclusion
The TWINSPAN classification method can effectively divide the developmental stages of natural hard broadleaved forests in Maor Mountain, and reveal the characteristics of their age structure, diameter structure, and species diversity at different stages. It provides a reference for the development targeted management measures in the study area.
- developmental stage division,
- TWINSPAN,
- interspecific association,
- discriminant analysis,
- stand structure characteristics

FullText(HTML)

References (47)

References

[1]	刘世荣, 马姜明, 缪宁. 中国天然林保护、生态恢复与可持续经营的理论与技术[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(1): 212−218. Liu S R, Ma J M, Liao N. Achievements in natural forest protection, ecological restoration, and sustainable management in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(1): 212−218.
[2]	周梦丽. 天然云冷杉阔叶混交林发育阶段、优势高和竞争关系研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2022. Zhou M L. Development stage, dominant height and competitive relationship of natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forest[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2022.
[3]	Podlaski R. Suitability of the selected statistical distributions for fit-ting diameter data in distinguished development stages and phases of near-natural mixed forests in the Świętokrzyski National Park (Poland)[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 236(2−3): 393−402. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.032
[4]	Král K, Vrška T, Hort L, et al. Developmental phases in a temper-ate natural spruce-fir-beech forest: determination by a supervised classification method[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2010, 129(3): 339−351. doi: 10.1007/s10342-009-0340-0
[5]	陆元昌, 雷相东, 洪玲霞, 等. 近自然森林经理计划技术体系研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2010, 30(1): 1−5. Lu Y C, Lei X D, Hong L X, et al. A preliminary study on planning technical model for close-to-nature forest management[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2010, 30(1): 1−5.
[6]	李婷婷, 陆元昌, 张显强, 等. 经营的马尾松森林类型发育演替阶段量化指标研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(3): 9−17. Li T T, Lu Y C, Zhang X Q, et al. Quantitative indices to identify succession stages of managed Pinus massoniana forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(3): 9−17.
[7]	贾珂, 王新杰, 和敬渊, 等. 基于TWINSPAN分类的汪清县温带森林发育演替阶段分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(1): 179−186. Jia K, Wang X J, He J Y, et al. Analyses of the development and succession stage of temperate forests in Wangqing Country based on TWINSPAN[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(1): 179−186.
[8]	龚直文. 长白山退化云冷杉林演替动态及恢复研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2009. Gong Z W. Dynamics of forest succession and restoration strategies for degraded spruce-fir forest in Changbai Mountain [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2009.
[9]	贾炜玮, 解希涛, 姜生伟, 等. 大兴安岭新林林业局3种林分类型天然更新幼苗幼树的空间分布格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9): 2813−2822. Jia W W, Xie X T, Jiang S W, et al. Spatial distribution pattern of seedlings and saplings of three forest types by natural regeneration in Daxin’an Mountains Xinlin Forestry Bureau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(9): 2813−2822.
[10]	胡雪凡, 张会儒, 周超凡, 等. 不同抚育间伐方式对蒙古栎次生林空间结构的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 137−147. Hu X F, Zhang H R, Zhou C F, et al. Effects of different thinning patterns on the spatial structure of Quercus mongolica secondary forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 137−147.
[11]	王智勇, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 抚育间伐强度对落叶松天然次生林林分结构及健康的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(11): 1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2018.11.001 Wang Z Y, Dong X B, Zhang T, et al. Effects of different tending intensities on stand structure and health of Larix gmelinii natural secondary forest[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(11): 1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2018.11.001
[12]	惠刚盈, 赵中华, 陈明辉. 描述森林结构的重要变量[J]. 温带林业研究, 2020, 3(1): 14−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4900.2020.01.003 Hui G Y, Zhao Z H, Chen M H. Important variables describing forest structure[J]. Journal of Temperate Forestry Research, 2020, 3(1): 14−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4900.2020.01.003
[13]	Gadow K V, Zhang C Y, Wehenkel C, et al. Forest structure and diversity[M]. Berlin: Forest Structure and Diversity, 2012.
[14]	Wang T, Gao T, Zhang H , et al. Review of Chinese atmospheric science research over the past 70 years: atmospheric physics and atmospheric environment[J]. Science China (Earth Sciences), 2019, 62(12): 1903−1945.
[15]	周梦丽. 天然林择伐强度和择伐周期的研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. Zhou M L. Study on selective cutting intensity and cycle of natural forest[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[16]	张金屯. 植被数量生态学方法[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1995. Zhang J T. Vegetation quantity ecology method[M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 1995.
[17]	张会儒, 汤孟平. 金沟岭林场混交林TWINSPAN分类及演替序列分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报 (自然科学版), 2009, 33(1): 37−42. Zhang H R, Tang M P. Classification and succession analysis of mixed forest in Jingouling Forest Farm using the TWINSPAN method[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 33(1): 37−42.
[18]	Smith G. Quantitative plant ecology[M]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1983: 105−128.
[19]	王伯荪, 彭少麟. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林种间联结测定技术研究: Ⅰ. 种间联结测式的探讨与修正[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1985, 9(4): 274−285. Wang B S, Peng S L. Studies on the measuring techniques of interspecific association of lower-subtropical evergreen-broadleaved forests--ⅰ. the exploration and the revision on the measuring formulas of interspecific association[J]. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica, 1985, 9(4): 274−285.
[20]	郭志华, 卓正大, 陈洁, 等. 庐山常绿阔叶、落叶阔叶混交林乔木种群种间联结性研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1997, 21(5): 424−432. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.1997.05.004 Guo Z H, Zhuo Z D, Chen J, et al. Interspecific association of trees in mixed evergreed and deciduous broadleaved forest in Lushan Mountain[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 1997, 21(5): 424−432. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.1997.05.004
[21]	张金屯, 焦蓉. 关帝山神尾沟森林群落木本植物种间联结性与相关性研究[J]. 植物研究, 2003, 23(4): 458−463. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5102.2003.04.020 Zhang J T, Jiao R. Interspecific association between woody plants in shenweigou of Guandi Mountains, Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2003, 23(4): 458−463. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5102.2003.04.020
[22]	张倩媚, 陈北光, 周国逸. 鼎湖山主要林型优势树种种间联结性的计算方法研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2006, 27(1): 79−83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2006.01.021 Zhang Q M, Chen B G, Zhou G Y. Interspecific association of the dominant species in two typical communities in Dinghushan, South China[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2006, 27(1): 79−83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2006.01.021
[23]	刘翔宇, 何东, 田文斌, 等. 浙江普陀山岛森林木本植物的种间关联格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(12): 1219−1227. Liu X Y, He D, Tian W B, et al. Patterns of species associations in woody plants in forest communities of Putuoshan Island, Zhejiang, China[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2017, 41(12): 1219−1227.
[24]	Fisher R_A. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems[J]. Annals of Human Genetics, 1936, 7(2): 179−188.
[25]	Garet G, Raulier F, Pothier D, et al. Forest age class structures as indicators of sustainability in boreal forest: are we measuring them correctly?[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 23: 202−210. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.032
[26]	Lee W K , Gadow K V , Chung D J , et al. DBH growth model for Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis mixed forests in central Korea[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 176(1−2): 187−200.
[27]	Waskiewicz J, Kenefic L, Weiskittel A, et al. Species mixture effects in northern red oak-eastern white pine stands in Maine, USA[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 298(3): 71−81.
[28]	Bin Y, Ye W H, Muller-Landau H C, et al. Unimodal tree size distributions possibly result from relatively strong conservatism in intermediate size classes[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12): e52596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052596
[29]	龚直文, 亢新刚, 顾丽, 等. 天然林林分结构研究方法综述[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2009, 26(3): 434−443. Gong Z W, Kang X G, Gu L, et al. Research methods on natural forest and structure: a review[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2009, 26(3): 434−443.
[30]	Meyer H A. Structure, growth and drain in balanced uneven-aged forests[J]. Journal of Forestry, 1952, 50: 85−92.
[31]	盘金文, 郭其强, 余大龙, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林优势种径级结构及物种多样性分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019, 39(4): 722−728. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2019.04.0722 Pan J W, Guo Q Q, Yu D L, et al. Analysis on diameter class structure of dominant species and species diversity of Pinus massoniana plantation at the different ages[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 722−728. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2019.04.0722
[32]	曹小玉, 李际平, 周永奇, 等. 杉木林林层指数及其与林下灌木物种多样性的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3): 589−595. Cao X Y, Li J P, Zhou Y Q, et al. Stand layer index and its relations with species diversity of understory shrubs of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(3): 589−595.
[33]	Duffy J E, Godwin C M, Cardinale B J. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity[J]. Nature, 2017, 549: 261−264. doi: 10.1038/nature23886
[34]	李泓莹, 董灵波, 刘兆刚. 基于系统动力学的帽儿山实验林场可持续发展水平预测[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39(1): 11−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.01.002 Li H Y, Dong L B, Liu Z G. Prediction of sustainable development level of Maoershan Forest Farm based on system dynamics[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(1): 11−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.01.002
[35]	魏红洋. 帽儿山天然次生林主要林分类型结构化经营模式[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2021. Wei H Y. Structured management model of main forest types in Maor Mountain natural secondary forest [D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2021.
[36]	朱锦迪, 韦新良, 汤孟平, 等. 林分树种组成多样性指数的构建[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(2): 262−271. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210171 Zhu J D, Wei X L, Tang M P, et al. Construction of diversity index of tree species composition[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(2): 262−271. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210171
[37]	罗扬, 佘光辉, 刘恩斌. 基于熵权重的喀斯特地区林业可持续发展评价方法[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(1): 114−118. Luo Y, She G H, Liu E B. An appraisal method of the forestry sustainable development based on entropy weight[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 31(1): 114−118.
[38]	周梦丽, 雷相东, 国红, 等. 基于TWINSPAN分类的天然云冷杉-阔叶混交林发育阶段划分[J]. 林业科学研究, 2019, 32(3): 49−55. Zhou M L, Lei X D, Guo H, et al. Determining the development stage of natural spruce-fir-broadleaved mixed forest based on TWINSPAN[J]. Forest Research, 2019, 32(3): 49−55.
[39]	马姜明, 刘世荣, 史作民, 等. 川西亚高山暗针叶林恢复过程中不同恢复阶段的定量分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(8): 1695−1701. Ma J M, Liu S R, Shi Z M, et al. Quantitative analysis of different restoration stages during natural succession processes of subalpine dark brown coniferous forests in western Sichuan, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(8): 1695−1701.
[40]	余树全. 浙江淳安天然次生林演替的定量研究[J]. 林业科学, 2003, 39(1): 17−22. Yu S Q. The quantitative study on the secondary forest succession in Chun’an County, Zhejiang Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39(1): 17−22.
[41]	Alonzo M, Roth K, Roberts D. Identifying santa barbara's urban tree species from AVIRIS imagery using canonical discriminant analysis[J]. Remote Sensing Letters, 2013, 4(5): 513−521. doi: 10.1080/2150704X.2013.764027
[42]	Liao W Z, Pizurica A, Scheunders P, et al. Semisupervised local discriminant analysis for feature extraction in hyperspectral images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(1): 184−198. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2200106
[43]	杨子铎. 湖南栎类天然林林分结构特征及其对林分生长的影响[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2023. Yang Z D. Structural characteristics of natural oak forests and their effects on forest growth in Hunan Province[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023.
[44]	杜志. 长白山退化云冷杉林不同演替阶段的林分结构研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2013. Du Z. Study on stand structure during different succession stages in degraded spruce-fir forests of Changbai Mountains[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
[45]	范秀华, 张宝权, 范春雨. 长白山典型天然林不同演替阶段物种多样性和结构多样性对生产力影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(12): 1−8. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210071 Fan X H, Zhang B Q, Fan C Y. Effects of species diversity and structural diversity on productivity in different succession stages of typical natural forest in Changbai Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(12): 1−8. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210071
[46]	闫东锋, 朱滢, 杨喜田. 宝天曼栎类天然林物种多样性与稳定性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(4): 628−633. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017 Yan D F, Zhu Y, Yang X T. Species diversity and stability of a natural Quercus forest in Baotianman, Henan Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(4): 628−633. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017
[47]	高润梅, 石晓东, 郭跃东. 山西文峪河上游河岸林群落稳定性评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(6): 491−503. Gao R M, Shi X D, Guo Y D. Community stability evaluation of riparian forest of the upper reaches of Wenyuhe in Shanxi, China[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2012, 36(6): 491−503.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (151) PDF downloads (46)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Development stage division and stand structure characteristics of natural hard broadleaved forest in Maor Mountain, Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content