• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
He Peng, Chen Zhenxiong, Peng Jiangui. Development of a compatible biomass model system for individual trees of major tree species in Hunan Province of central China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47(3): 61-72. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240436
Citation: He Peng, Chen Zhenxiong, Peng Jiangui. Development of a compatible biomass model system for individual trees of major tree species in Hunan Province of central China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47(3): 61-72. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240436

Development of a compatible biomass model system for individual trees of major tree species in Hunan Province of central China

More Information
  • Received Date: December 15, 2024
  • Revised Date: January 18, 2025
  • Available Online: March 02, 2025
  • Objective 

    This paper aims to establish a compatible biomass model system for individual tree components of Cunninghamia lanceolata, Pinus massoniana, and Quercus species, so as to provide technical support for the scientific and standardized modeling of main tree species in Hunan Province of central China and the accurate prediction of forest biomass.

    Method 

    Based on the felling data of 468 individual trees of three main tree species in Hunan Province (160 of Cunninghamia lanceolata, 153 of Pinus massoniana, and 155 of Quercus species), the basic models of biomass for six individual tree components (aboveground, underground, trunk, bark, branch, and leaf biomass) were compared respectively, and the optimal model with the best fitting indicators was sought. Further, the biomass models of different origins (natural forests and plantations) were compared. Dummy variable models were established by selecting parameters adding origin as variable with significant differences, and the biomass of individual tree components was predicted by constructing nonlinear simultaneous equations with proportion control.

    Result 

    The fitting results of basic biomass models for individual tree components of three tree species showed that for four components of aboveground biomass B1, underground biomass B2, trunk biomass B3, and bark biomass B4, the independent variables selected were DBH and tree height, while for the biomass models of branches B5 and leaves B6, DBH, tree height (H), and crown width (CW) were selected. The models with origin as a dummy variable indicated that for aboveground biomass B1 (the mean prediction error MPE was reduced by 1.16% compared with the base model) of Cunninghamia lanceolata, underground biomass B2 (MPE was reduced by 4.65%) of Pinus massoniana, and aboveground biomass B1 (MPE was reduced by 3.24%) and underground biomass B2 (MPE was reduced by 29.13%) of Quercus species, the biomass in natural forests was significantly higher than that in plantations. The fitting effect of individual tree biomass model system with origin as a dummy variable was better, with the determination coefficients (R2) of aboveground biomass models of three tree species all above 0.90, and the average predicted error MPE was below 4%, while the underground biomass models also showed R² above 0.90 and MPE below 14%.

    Conclusion 

    The individual tree component biomass model with origin as a dummy variable has the best fitting effect, followed by the nonlinear simultaneous equation compatibility model system, and the basic model has the worst fitting effect. Although the fitting effects of model systems are slightly worse than the dummy variable model, these model systems can solve the compatibility and additivity of individual tree component biomass, and the differences among their parameters are not significant. Therefore, it is recommended to use compatibility model systems to predict the biomass of individual tree components of Cunninghamia lanceolata, Pinus massoniana, and Quercus species in Hunan Province of central China.

  • [1]
    董利虎, 李凤日. 大兴安岭东部主要林分类型乔木层生物量估算模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(9): 2825−2834.

    Dong L H, Li F R. Stand-level biomass estimation models for the tree layer of main forest types in East Daxing’an Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(9): 2825−2834.
    [2]
    Asrat Z, Eid T, Gobakken T, et al. Aboveground tree biomass prediction options for the dry Afromontane forests in south-central Ethiopia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 473: 118335. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118335
    [3]
    Fehrmann L, Kleinn C. General consideration about the use of allometric equations for biomass estimation on the example of Norway spruce in central Europe[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 236(2): 412−421.
    [4]
    罗云建, 张小全, 王效科, 等. 森林生物量的估算方法及其研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(8): 129−134. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.08.023

    Luo Y J, Zhang X Q, Wang X K, et al. Forest biomass estimation methods and their prospects[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(8): 129−134. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.08.023
    [5]
    赵菡, 雷渊才, 符利勇. 江西省不同立地等级的马尾松林生物量估计和不确定性度量[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(8): 81−93. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170810

    Zhao H, Lei Y C, Fu L Y. Biomass and uncertainty estimates of Pinus massoniana forest for different site classes in Jiangxi Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(8): 81−93. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170810
    [6]
    曾伟生, 唐守正. 东北落叶松和南方马尾松地下生物量模型研建[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(2): 1−6.

    Zeng W S, Tang S Z. Establishment of below-ground biomass equations for larch in northeastern and Masson pine in southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(2): 1−6.
    [7]
    曹磊, 刘晓彤, 李海奎, 等. 广东省常绿阔叶林生物量生长模型[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(5): 61−67.

    Cao L, Liu X T, Li H K, et al. Biomass growth models for evergreen broad-leaved forests in Guangdong[J]. Forest Research, 2020, 33(5): 61−67.
    [8]
    王佳慧, 李凤日, 董利虎. 基于不同预测变量的天然椴树可加性地上生物量模型构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3685−3695.

    Wang J H, Li F R, Dong L H. Additive aboveground biomass equations based on different predictors for natural Tilia Linn[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(11): 3685−3695.
    [9]
    王金池, 邓华锋, 黄国胜, 等. 天然云杉相容性生物量估算模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(10): 3189−3196.

    Wang J C, Deng H F, Huang G S, et al. Compatible biomass models of natural spruce (Picea asperata)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(10): 3189−3196.
    [10]
    Fu L Y, Lei Y C, Zeng W S, et al. Uncertainty assessment in aboveground biomass estimation at the regional scale using a new method considering both sampling error and model error[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 47(8): 1095−1103. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0436
    [11]
    李海奎, 宁金魁. 基于树木起源、立地分级和龄组的单木生物量模型[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3): 740−757.

    Li H K, Ning J K. Individual tree biomass model by tree origin, site classes, and age groups[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(3): 740−757.
    [12]
    曾伟生, 王雪军, 陈振雄, 等. 林分起源对立木生物量模型的影响分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(2): 40−45.

    Zeng W S, Wang X J, Chen Z X, et al. Analysis of impacts of forest origin on single tree biomass models[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2014(2): 40−45.
    [13]
    薛春泉, 徐期瑚, 林丽平, 等. 广东主要乡土阔叶树种含年龄和胸径的单木生物量模型[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 97−108. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190210

    Xue C Q, Xu Q H, Lin L P, et al. Biomass models with breast height diameter and age for main native tree Species in Guangdong Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(2): 97−108. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190210
    [14]
    欧建德, 欧家琳, 康永武. 基于树冠形态特征因子的云南红豆杉单木生物量模型拟合[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 42(4): 117−124.

    Ou J D, Ou J L, Kang Y W. Single tree biomass simulation of Taxus yunnanensis plantation based on crown morphological index[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Science), 2022, 42(4): 117−124.
    [15]
    符利勇, 雷渊才, 曾伟生. 几种相容性生物量模型及估计方法的比较[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 42−54.

    Fu L Y, Lei Y C, Zeng W S. Comparison of several compatible biomass models and estimation approaches[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(6): 42−54.
    [16]
    Fu L Y, Lei Y C, Wang G X, et al. Comparison of seemingly unrelated regressions with error in-variable models for developing a system of nonlinear additive biomass equations[J]. Trees, 2015, 30: 839−857.
    [17]
    Zeng W S, Zhang L J, Chen X Y, et al. Construction of compatible and additive individual-tree biomass models for Pinus tabulaeformis in China[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 47: 467−475. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0342
    [18]
    Dong L, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Comparison of tree biomass modeling approaches for larch (Larix olgensis Henry) trees in Northeast China[J]. Forests, 2020, 11: 202. doi: 10.3390/f11020202
    [19]
    孟延山, 孟俐君, 王静洁, 等. 青海省2种主要树种的生物量分配格局和单木生物量模型[J]. 西部林业科学, 2019, 48(6): 21−28.

    Meng Y S, Meng L J, Wang J J, et al. Models for estimating biomass and its allocation patterns in organs of two major tree species in Qinghai Province[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2019, 48(6): 21−28.
    [20]
    蔡会德, 卢峰, 徐占勇, 等. 桉树相容性可加性立木生物量模型系统研建[J]. 林业资源管理, 2023(1): 87−93.

    Cai H D, Lu F, Xu Z Y, et al. Research and development of compatible and additive individual tree biomass model systems for eucalyptus[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2023(1): 87−93.
    [21]
    梁瑞婷, 王轶夫, 邱思玉, 等. 人工神经网络与相容性生物量模型预测单木地上生物量的比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 9−16.

    Liang R T, Wang Y F, Qiu S Y, et al. Comparison of artificial neural network with compatible biomass model for predicting aboveground biomass of individual tree[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 9−16.
    [22]
    Zhu G , Hu S , Chhin S , et al. Modelling site index of Chinese fir plantations using a random effects model across regional site types in Hunan Province, China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, 446: 143−150.
    [23]
    Parresol B R. Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and, critical comparisons[J]. Forest Science, 1999, 45(4): 573−593. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/45.4.573
    [24]
    曾伟生. 全国立木生物量方程建模方法研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2011.

    Zeng W S. Methodology on modeling of single-tree biomass equations for national biomass estimation in China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2011.
    [25]
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing[M].Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2024.
    [26]
    国家林业局. 立木生物量建模方法技术规程: LY/T 2258-2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.

    State Forestry Administration. Technical regulations for tree biomass modeling: LY/T 2258-2014[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2014.
    [27]
    欧光龙, 胥辉. 森林生物量模型研究综述[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 40(1): 1−10.

    Ou G L, Xu H. A review on forest biomass models[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(1): 1−10.
    [28]
    曾伟生, 唐守正. 利用度量误差模型方法建立相容性立木生物量方程系统[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(6): 797−803.

    Zeng W S, Tang S Z. Using measurement error modeling method to establish compatible single-tree biomass equations system[J]. Forest Research, 2010, 23(6): 797−803.
    [29]
    刘秀红, 姜春前, 徐睿, 等. 相容性单木生物量模型估计方法的比较: 以青冈栎为例[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(9): 164−173.

    Liu X H, Jiang C Q, Xu R, et al. Comparison of methods to construct compatible individual tree biomass models: a case study of Cyclobalanopsis glauca[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(9): 164−173.
    [30]
    Wang X P, Fang J Y, Zhu B. Forest biomass and root shoot allocation in northeast China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255: 4007−4020. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.055
    [31]
    Luo Y J, Wang X K, Zhang X Q. Root: shoot ratios across China’s forests: forest type and climatic effects[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 269: 19−25. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.005
    [32]
    Widagdo F, Li F, Zhang L, et al. Aggregated biomass model systems and carbon concentration variations for tree carbon quantification of natural Mongolian oak in Northeast China[J]. Forests, 2020, 11: 397. doi: 10.3390/f11040397

Catalog

    Article views (46) PDF downloads (13) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return