• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
DANG Xiao-hong, GAO Yong, YU Yi, LI Qian, WANG Shan, WU Hao, WANG Hong-xia, ZHAO Peng-yu. Windproof efficiency with new biodegradable PLA sand barrier and traditional straw sand barrier[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(3): 118-125. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140245
Citation: DANG Xiao-hong, GAO Yong, YU Yi, LI Qian, WANG Shan, WU Hao, WANG Hong-xia, ZHAO Peng-yu. Windproof efficiency with new biodegradable PLA sand barrier and traditional straw sand barrier[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(3): 118-125. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140245

Windproof efficiency with new biodegradable PLA sand barrier and traditional straw sand barrier

More Information
  • Received Date: July 10, 2014
  • Revised Date: October 07, 2014
  • Published Date: March 30, 2015
  • To understand the windproof benefit of new biodegradable PLA sand barrier, we studied respectively the windproof efficiency, roughness of ground surface and wind speed profile characteristics of 1 m×1 m, 2 m×2 m, 3 m×3 m PLA sand barriers by measuring the wind speeds in different heights in PLA sand barrier sample plots. At the same time we took the traditional half hidden straw sand barrier sample plots and shifting dunes as contrast, and studied the difference of windproof efficiency between PLA and straw sand barrier. The results showed that wind speed efficiency could be reduced by PLA sand barrier more significantly than straw sand barrier with the biggest difference 10.3%, the windproof efficiency with 1 m×1 m was better than other two for both PLA and straw sand barriers. Increasing the surface roughness ranked in PLA sand barrier straw sand barrier shifting dune. With the increasing of sand barrier size, the surface roughness showed the decreasing trend. Under the same terrain condition, the average surface roughness in PLA sand barrier sample plots was 1.4 times of that in straw sand barrier. The differences of surface roughness in PLA sand barrier and straw sand barrier on the bottom of upwind slope, mesoslope, slope top and leeward slope were not obvious with its average surface roughness 0.7 cm. The wind speed profile for both 1 m×1 m PLA sand barrier and straw sand barrier appeared as “S” type, while sand barriers of other sizes were as similar as shifting dunes with wind speed profile of exponential distribution. Comparing three sizes sand barriers by both two different materials, the effect of decreasing wind speed became less with the size increase, and the “S” characteristic of wind speed profile was less and less obvious until close to exponential distribution.
  • [1]
    LÜ J,ZHANG Q. Performance and application of PLA composite fiber[J].Technical Textiles,2004(9):1-5.
    [1]
    吕晶,张泉.聚乳酸复合纤维的性能及应用[J].产业用纺织品, 2004(9): 1-5.
    [2]
    SUN J. Research on performance degradation property of PLA fabrics[D].Shanghai:Donghua University,2014.
    [2]
    孙嘉. 含聚乳酸纤维针织物服用性能与降解性能研究[D].上海:东华大学,2014.
    [3]
    ZHOU D D. A study on the application of biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) material for combating desertification[D].Huhhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2009.
    [3]
    周丹丹. 生物可降解聚乳酸(PLA)材料在防沙治沙中的应用研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2009
    [4]
    CHANG G, ZHANG Y, DENG B Y, et al. Study on physical ageing properties of PLA fiber[J].New Chemical Materials,2013(2):129-131.
    [4]
    常过,张越,邓炳耀,等. 聚乳酸纤维的物理老化性能研究[J]. 化工新型材料,2013(2):129-131.
    [5]
    YUAN L M,GAO Y,YU Y, et al. Effects of poly lactic acid sand barrier on soil hardness [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 8(3):172-177.
    [5]
    袁立敏,高永,虞毅,等. PLA沙障对土壤硬度的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):172-177.
    [6]
    李谦. PLA沙障防风固沙效益的变化过程[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012
    [6]
    LI Q. The change process of wind-break and sand-fixing benefits on PLA sand barrier [D].Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2012.
    [7]
    YUAN L M. Study on effects of soil physical properties and protection benefits by PLA sand barrier[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2010.
    [7]
    袁立敏. PLA沙障对土壤物理性质影响及其防护效益研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010.
    [8]
    原伟杰,虞毅,王戈,等. 可降解聚乳酸沙障降解性能研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012, 32(3): 107-110.
    [8]
    YUAN W J,YU Y,WANG G, et al. Degradation characteristics of degradable polylatic acid sand barrier [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 32(3): 107-110.
    [9]
    QI Y X,ZHAO T N.The summation of combating and controlling desertification in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University: Social Sciences, 2006, 5(Suppl.1):51-58.
    [9]
    祁有祥,赵廷宁.我国防沙治沙综述[J]. 北京林业大学学报:社会科学版,2006, 5(增刊1):51-58.
    [10]
    李朝生,杨晓晖,张克斌,等. 沙漠-绿洲系统中降雨、土壤水分与地下水位的响应特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2007,29(4):129-135.
    [10]
    LI C S,YANG X H, ZHANG K B, et al.Response characteristics of precipitation, soil moisture and groundwater level in desert-oasis system [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2007, 29(4):129-135.
    [11]
    孙显科,郭志中. 沙障固沙原理的研究[J]. 甘肃林业科技,1999(2):8-13.
    [11]
    SUN X K, GUO Z Z. Study on principals of fixing sand with sand control hedge [J]. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 1999(2):8-13.
    [12]
    赵廷宁,曹子龙,郑翠玲,等. 平行高立式沙障对严重沙化草地植被及土壤种子库的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(2):34-37.
    [12]
    ZHAO T N,CAO Z L, ZHENG C L, et al. Impacts of high-parallel sand-barrier on vegetation and soil seed bank in the seriously desertified grassland[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005,27(2):34-37.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(33)

    1. 王文舒,甘晓雪,张斌武,贾晓鹏,谭天逸,王智,杨旭. 不同材料沙障的防风固沙效果与成本效益分析. 北京农学院学报. 2025(01): 5-12 .
    2. 丛龙宇,许丽,张春良,陈翔,刘瑞瑶. 内蒙古草原煤矿区排土场不同规格树枝沙障的防风效益. 西北林学院学报. 2024(02): 141-147 .
    3. 马泽,蒙仲举,罗建国,阿拉腾陶格苏,赵东颖. 乌兰布和沙漠典型沿黄段格状沙障防风固沙效应. 水土保持通报. 2024(02): 1-10+21 .
    4. 姚正毅,屈建军,肖建华,王茹燕,韩胜利,陆文赋. 刷状沙柳沙障固沙性能风洞模拟. 中国沙漠. 2024(03): 290-297 .
    5. 苏宇,袁立敏,党晓宏,蒙仲举,辛静,郭强. 风滚植物高立式沙障防风效应研究. 内蒙古林业科技. 2024(03): 7-13 .
    6. 朱泊年,党晓宏,蒙仲举,蔺博,刘平. 乌珠穆沁沙地生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙障防风固沙效益. 水土保持研究. 2023(02): 431-437 .
    7. 田美荣,田雨欣,杨伟超,冯朝阳,高吉喜,王世曦. 不同规格芦苇沙障生态保护成效研究. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(02): 753-759 .
    8. 周炎广,李红悦,武子丰,王卓然,殷婕,青达木尼,哈斯额尔敦. 毛乌素沙地沙障固沙机制与效益评估. 科学通报. 2023(11): 1312-1329 .
    9. 邴丹珲,谈嫣蓉,陈文业,朱丽,马超,王斌杰,张洋东,肖云飞,吕斌燕. 我国沙障的研究进展与应用综述. 中国水土保持. 2023(07): 37-40+69 .
    10. 吴青山,朱棉豪,万宏强,张雨暄,申青松,杨莹. 基于沙漠治理的沙漠草方格铺设机设计与分析. 科学技术创新. 2023(20): 195-198 .
    11. 丛龙宇,许丽,张春良,王银龙,胡努斯吐,齐海涵. 草原矿区排土场沙障的生态保护成效. 水土保持通报. 2023(06): 193-199 .
    12. 崔健,党晓宏,汪季,张超,李婉娇,靳灵娜. 不同规格可降解沙障铺设5年后土壤粒度及有机质特征. 水土保持研究. 2022(02): 92-98 .
    13. 李双立,黄海广,党晓宏,郭跃,万俊华. 基于CNKI数据库文献计量视角下沙障研究现状. 防护林科技. 2022(05): 75-78+85 .
    14. 王永珍,林永一,冯怡琳,赵文智,董六文,刘继亮. 沙障对流动沙丘区地表节肢动物分布及多样性的影响. 生态学报. 2022(16): 6768-6777 .
    15. 池政,徐先英,刘开琳,刘虎俊,孟瑞玲,李亚琦,富丽,李雪宁. 2种沙障内积砂粒径特征及其空间格局观测研究. 水土保持学报. 2021(02): 113-121 .
    16. 李镯,汪季,焦宏远,郭彧. 基于破损规律及植物保存率的沙障选择. 西北林学院学报. 2021(02): 130-135 .
    17. 祁帅,汪季,党晓宏,魏亚娟,丁奋谦. 3种低立式沙障内表层沉积物粒度特征研究. 干旱区研究. 2021(03): 875-881 .
    18. 邓友生,彭程谱,刘俊聪,付云博,李令涛. 沙漠公路灾害防治方法及其工程应用. 公路. 2021(06): 345-351 .
    19. 靳灵娜,党晓宏,高永,韩彦隆,雷虹娟,张超. 库布齐沙漠北缘机械沙障对地表土壤可蚀性的影响. 水土保持通报. 2021(03): 50-55 .
    20. 张帅,丁国栋,高广磊,孙桂丽,赵媛媛,于明含,丛智杰,包岩峰. 硬质地HDPE沙障防风效益的风洞试验. 北京林业大学学报. 2020(03): 127-133 . 本站查看
    21. 李莹,曲浩,石永强,张志军,佟布和,曹辉,张明,吴晶. 聚乳酸纤维沙障对植被生长的影响——以巴音温都尔沙漠封禁保护区为例. 内蒙古林业科技. 2020(01): 12-15 .
    22. 王逸敏,刘康,屈建军. 沙障对流沙地植被和土壤养分的影响. 中国沙漠. 2019(03): 56-65 .
    23. 居炎飞,邱明喜,朱纪康,张家铭,周杨. 我国固沙材料研究进展与应用前景. 干旱区资源与环境. 2019(10): 138-144 .
    24. 丁新辉,刘孝盈,刘广全,朱毕生,王炜炜. 京津风沙源区沙障固沙技术评价指标体系构建. 生态学报. 2019(16): 5778-5786 .
    25. 刘湘杰,党晓宏,汪季,丁延龙,焦宏远. 生物基可降解聚乳酸沙障的蚀积特征. 水土保持通报. 2019(05): 113-119 .
    26. Chang Zhaofeng,Liu Shizeng,Wang Qi,Liu Shujuan,Wang Fei. Progress and Problems of Development Research and Application of Sand Barriers. Meteorological and Environmental Research. 2018(03): 18-23+29 .
    27. 丁延龙,高永,汪季,孙晓瑞,党晓宏,韩彦隆,李鹏. 生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙障对沙丘表层沉积物粒度特征的影响. 中国沙漠. 2018(02): 262-269 .
    28. 孙浩,刘晋浩,黄青青,赵可. 多边形草沙障防风效果研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(10): 90-94 . 本站查看
    29. 魏亚娟,左小锋,汪季,党晓宏,刘湘杰. PLA沙障在荒漠化防治中的应用综述. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(06): 86-93 .
    30. 孙浩,刘晋浩,黄青青. 沙障地表形态衍化数值模拟方法研究. 农业机械学报. 2017(07): 265-271 .
    31. 李鹏,高永,赵青,韩彦隆,丁延龙,党晓宏. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘人工梭梭林防风效能分析. 水土保持通报. 2017(05): 34-39 .
    32. 李锦荣,郭建英,董智,何京丽,刘艳萍,珊丹,赵纳祺. 乌兰布和沙漠沿黄段不同治理措施的风沙运移特征及其防护效果. 干旱区资源与环境. 2016(08): 113-119 .
    33. 赵文玲. 新型生物可降解PLA沙袋沙障降解特性及其影响因子探究. 水土保持研究. 2015(06): 198-202 .

    Other cited types(27)

Catalog

    Article views (2746) PDF downloads (40) Cited by(60)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return