Evaluation of potential water conservation function of the soil of three land use types in Huoditang of Qinling Mountains, northwestern China

LIU Yu; GUO Jian-bin; DENG Xiu-xiu; LIU Ze-bin

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150372

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2016 > 38(3): 73-80. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150372

LIU Yu, GUO Jian-bin, DENG Xiu-xiu, LIU Ze-bin. Evaluation of potential water conservation function of the soil of three land use types in Huoditang of Qinling Mountains, northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(3): 73-80. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150372

Citation:

PDF (898 KB)

Evaluation of potential water conservation function of the soil of three land use types in Huoditang of Qinling Mountains, northwestern China

1.
1 School of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing,100083,P. R. China;
2.
2 College of Forestry,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha,Hunan, 410004,P. R. China;
3.
3 Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: October 25, 2015
Published Date: March 30, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the potential water conservation function of the soil of pine-oak mixed forest, the profiles were dug on the plots of three land use types in May of 2011, with the grassland and farmland as contrast. Then the soil physical properties, water-holding capacity and infiltration capacity were analyzed, and the potential water conservation capacity of soil was quantitatively evaluated by the method of comprehensive coordinate. Results showed that the order of soil bulk density from high to low was grassland (1.25 g/cm3)＞farmland (1.22 g/cm3)＞pine-oak mixed forest land (0.82 g/cm3). The rank of soil total porosity from high to low was pine-oak mixed forest land (87.40%)＞grassland (45.87%)＞farmland (38.95%). The pine-oak mixed forest land had the best water-holding capacity and infiltration capacity, and the farmland had the worst. The result using the method of comprehensive coordinate showed that the potential water conservation function of the soil of pine-oak mixed forest land was the best while the farmland was the worst, suggesting that the Reversion of Farmland to Forest Program should be kept on so as to raise the soil water conservation capacity in this region. This study provides basic data for cognizing and comprehensively evaluating the ecological service function of the pine-oak mixed forest in Huoditang forest region of Qinling Mountains, northwestern China, and offer theoretical basis for the water source protection of the Project of Diversion of Water from South to North.
- Qinling Mountains,
- mixed forest,
- forest soil,
- water conservation

FullText(HTML)

References (47)

References

[1]	JIANG Q Y. Water capacity of aerial part biomass and its effects on hydrological characters in the forest land [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 1989, 6(2): 176-181.
[1]	ANDREASSIAN V. Water and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 29(1): 1-27.
[2]	ZHENG Y S, GUO H T, XU F L, et al. Hydrologic effect of mixed stands of Michelia fujianensis with Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 1997, 17(2): 126-130.
[2]	蒋秋怡. 林木地上部分的持水性能及其对林地水文学性质的影响[J]. 浙江林学院学报,1989,6(2):176-181.
[3]	郑郁善,郭海涛,徐凤兰,等.福建含笑杉木混交林水源涵养功能差异研究[J].福建林学院学报, 1997, 17(2):126-130.
[3]	ZHAO J S, WANG Y M, YANG X B. Hydrological effects of forest soil in mountain area of northern Hebei [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 20(3):201-205.
[4]	赵建生,王永明,杨新兵.冀北山地森林土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):201-205.
[4]	HUANG Q P. Research on stand structure of the pine-oak mixed forest in Huoditang Region of Qinling Mountains [D]. Yangling: Northwest A F University, 2012.
[5]	黄青平.秦岭火地塘水源涵养型松栎混交林空间结构特征研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[5]	WU H, WANG D X, HUANG Q P, et al. Influence of environmental factors on species diversity of pine-oak mixed forest in the middle part of south Qinling Mountains [J]. Journal of Northwest A F University(Nature Science), 2012, 40(9): 41-50.
[6]	吴昊,王得祥,黄青平,等. 环境因子对秦岭南坡中段松栎混交林物种多样性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(9):41-50.
[6]	WU H. The relationship between terrain factors and spatial variability of soil nutrients for pine-oak mixed forest in Qinling Mountains [J]. Journal of Natural and Resources, 2015, 30(5): 858-869.
[7]	GAO G,QIN F C, YAO Y F, et al. Study on water conservation function of protective forest in watershed of farming-pastoral zone [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2009, 23(8): 180-185.
[7]	吴昊. 秦岭山地松栎混交林土壤养分空间变异及其与地形因子的关系[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(5): 858-869.
[8]	WANG Y Y, DUAN W B. Evaluation on water conservation capacity of three main forest types in southern slope of Xiaoxing’anling Mountains [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(5): 31-36.
[8]	高岗,琴富仓,姚云峰,等.农牧交错带小流域防护林水源涵养功能研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23( 8): 180-185.
[9]	JIANG W W, JIANG Z L, YU S Q, et al. Analysis and evaluation on water-holding function of main forest types in Anji Region [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2002, 26(4): 71-74.
[9]	汪永英,段文标. 小兴安岭南坡3种林型林地水源涵养功能评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(5):31-36.
[10]	LI S S. Research on soil characteristics and taxonomic classification at Huoditang forest region in the Qinling Mountains [D]. Yangling: Northwest A F University, 2011.
[10]	蒋文伟,姜志林,余树全,等. 安吉主要森林类型水源涵养功能的分析与评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(4):71-74.
[11]	李珊珊. 秦岭火地塘林区土壤特性及系统分类研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011.
[11]	LIU H, ZHANG R Q, HAO J M, et al. Tupu analysis of land use intensity using semi-variance in Yinchuan Plain [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(23): 225-231.
[12]	刘欢,张荣群,郝晋民,等. 基于半方差函数的银川平原土地利用强度图谱分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(23):225-231.
[12]	CHEN L L. Soil properties and water conservation function of pine and oak mixed forest [D]. Yangling:Northwest A F University, 2013.
[13]	ZHANG Q M, WANG D X, GONG M G, et al. Changes in physicochemical properties of forest soil along different altitudes in Huoditang of Qinling mountains [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(5): 69-73.
[13]	陈莉莉. 松栎混交林土壤特性及林地水源涵养功能研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.
[14]	张巧明,王得祥,龚明贵,等. 秦岭火地塘林区不同海拔森林土壤理化性质[J]. 水土保持学报,2011,25(5):69-73.
[14]	MA X H, WANG S Y. Methods of long-term research on forest ecosystems [M].Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 1994: 91-94.
[15]	马雪华,王淑元. 森林生态系统定位研究方法[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994:91-94.
[15]	CHEN Y Z, CHENG J H, ZHANG H J, et al. Evaluation of soil and water conservation capacity of several forest in Jinyun Mountain [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(2): 66-70.
[16]	陈引珍,程金花,张洪江,等. 缙云山几种林分水源涵养和保土功能评价[J]. 水土保持学报,2009,23(2):66-70.
[16]	SUN Y H, ZHANG H J, CHENG J H, et al. Soil characteristics and water conservation of different forest types in Jinyun Mountain [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(2): 106-109.
[17]	WEI Q, ZHANG Q L, DAI H Y, et al. Soil characteristics and water conservation of different forest types in Daqing Mountain [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(2): 111-115.
[17]	MCCULLOCH J S G , ROBINSON M .History of forest hydrology [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1993, 150:189-216.
[18]	WANG L, L>Ü J. Function of water and soil conservation of mixed forest of Pinus tabulaeformis [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15(4): 44-46.
[18]	孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等. 缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
[19]	GU Y S, XING Z K, HAN Y Z, et al. Soil physical properties and water conservation function of four typical conservation forest in upper reaches of Hunhe River [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2013, 41(1): 37-41.
[19]	巍强,张秋良,代海燕,等. 大青山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持学报,2008,22(2):111-115.
[20]	王棣,吕皎. 油松混交林的水土保持及水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(4):44-46.
[20]	SHI X L, ZHANG Y, SHAN Y J, et al. Study on water conservation function of typical forest vegetation in Yunnan Plateau [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(8): 1366-1372.
[21]	ZHANG X B, SHANGGUAN Z P. Effect of human-induced disturbance on physical properties of soil in artificial Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. forests of the Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(11): 3685-3695.
[21]	顾宇书,邢兆凯,韩友志,等. 浑河上游4种典型水源林土壤物理性质及其水源涵养功能[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2013,41(1):37-41.
[22]	PAN Z W, LIU Q, ZHONG D H. Water penetration rate of soil in main forest types in the eastern mountainous area of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2002, 30(5): 24-26.
[22]	石小亮,张颖,单永娟,等. 云南省高原典型森林植被涵养水源功能研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(8):1366-1372.
[23]	张希彪, 上官周平. 人为干扰对黄土高原子午岭油松人工林土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3685-3695.
[24]	潘紫文,刘强,终得海. 黑龙江省东部山区主要森林类型土壤水分的入渗速率[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2002,30(5):24-26.
[25]	HELALIA A M. The relation between soil infiltration and effective porosity in different soils [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 1993, 24(8): 39-47.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

1.	郭冉，洪宗文，袁亚玲，兰婷，游成铭，徐振锋，谭波. 树种对土壤物理性质的影响——7种亚热带树种同质园试验. 四川农业大学学报. 2024(03): 606-612 .
2.	王亚萍，刘庆安，庞军柱，张淑兰，王昕婕. 秦岭南坡不同林分类型枯落物层和土壤层水文功能综合评价. 西北林学院学报. 2024(03): 50-58 .
3.	马孟良，李强，王亚萍，张明芳，刘世荣. 陕西秦岭森林水源涵养功能研究综述. 生态学杂志. 2024(11): 3478-3486 .
4.	王亚萍，张淑兰，韩勇，董新宇，赵雨薇，万格. 秦岭两种典型人工林不同密度时的枯落物持水功能差异. 林业科学研究. 2023(03): 100-108 .
5.	于忠亮，付世萃，王梓默，潘艳艳，苑景淇，杨帆，张大伟. 吉林省辽河流域不同植被类型土壤水源涵养能力分析. 中国水土保持. 2022(07): 51-55 .
6.	杨春富，张晓颖，张文杰. 巍山县重点水源林管护探析. 河南农业. 2022(20): 43-45 .
7.	王辉源，宋进喜，吴琼. 气候变化背景下秦岭水源涵养功能时空变异特征. 水土保持学报. 2022(05): 212-219 .
8.	张朋杰，杨晓锋，张涛，韩东明，陈思宇. 2000—2020年秦巴山区水源涵养量时空动态研究. 遥感技术与应用. 2022(06): 1513-1524 .
9.	李平，王冬梅，丁聪，刘若莎，张鹏，张琳琳. 黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素. 生态学报. 2020(05): 1610-1620 .
10.	郑飞龙，谭军利，王西娜，魏童，马中昇，张维江. 黄土高原水源涵养林截蓄降雨研究进展. 人民黄河. 2020(04): 89-93 .
11.	宁亚洲，张福平，冯起，魏永芬，丁家宝，张元. 秦岭水源涵养功能时空变化及其影响因素. 生态学杂志. 2020(09): 3080-3091 .
12.	江秋菊，黄兴成. 贵州赤水河流域土壤容重特征及其影响因素. 山西农经. 2020(20): 89-90+168 .
13.	盛储望，郑博福，朱锦奇，华涛，谢泽阳，朱元皓，艾彪. 脐橙种植对赣南丘陵区水源涵养功能的影响. 南昌大学学报(理科版). 2020(04): 380-387 .
14.	张晓梅，邸利，王彦辉，史再军，张曦慧，王正安，费俊娥，郭保才，唐瑜敏，杨宝宝. 黄土高原典型林分土壤水文物理性质及持水性能. 甘肃农业大学学报. 2019(03): 117-124+133 .
15.	黄乾，杨海龙，朱柱，赵嘉玮. 青海云杉造林密度与水源涵养功能的响应关系. 水土保持学报. 2019(04): 279-286 .
16.	时钟瑜，李婕. 长白山不同林型土壤水源涵养功能特征. 水土保持研究. 2019(06): 158-164 .
17.	刘顺，盛可银，刘喜帅，郭晓敏，张文元. 赣南毛竹林土壤的渗透性特征. 安徽农业大学学报. 2018(02): 252-257 .
18.	冯宜明，李毅，曹秀文，刘锦乾. 甘肃亚高山云杉人工林土壤特性及水源涵养功能对林分密度的响应特征. 自然资源学报. 2018(09): 1529-1541 .
19.	王勇，杨瑞，瞿爽，刘志，裴仪岱. 楠杆自然保护区不同植被类型土壤物理特性及涵养水源功能分析. 水土保持研究. 2018(06): 183-188 .
20.	张更权. 大通县退耕还白桦林枯枝落物和土壤持水效应. 安徽农业科学. 2018(31): 107-110 .
21.	吴林川，孙婴婴，郭航. 不同造林技术对水土保持林3种林型土壤蓄水效益的影响——以鲁中砂石山区为例. 东北林业大学学报. 2017(05): 75-79 .
22.	覃梅，罗云龙，谭长强，黄云，彭玉华，刘明霞，罗红州，梁泰昌. 福建柏不同造林模式的水源涵养功能. 广西林业科学. 2017(04): 386-390 .
23.	陈诗，袁志良，姚松，刘晓静，王婷. 宝天曼油松-锐齿槲栎混交林土壤养分研究. 河南科学. 2017(12): 1945-1951 .
24.	韩强，仲崇禄，张勇，姜清彬，陈羽，陈珍，Khongsak Pinyopusarerk. 山地木麻黄种源在海南临高的遗传变异及选择. 林业科学研究. 2017(04): 595-603 .
25.	陈文静，祁凯斌，黄俊胜，杨婷惠，包维楷，庞学勇. 川西不同树种人工林对土壤涵水能力的影响. 生态学报. 2017(15): 4998-5006 .
26.	刘凯，贺康宁，田赟，王先棒，董喆. 青海高寒山区5种林分的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能. 水土保持学报. 2017(03): 141-146 .
27.	周忠学，李梦桃. 基于农业多功能视觉的都市农业用地效益时空变化研究——以西安都市圈为例（英文）. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2017(12): 1499-1520 .
28.	陈文媛，张少妮，华瑞，徐学选. 黄土丘陵区林草恢复进程中土壤入渗特征研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(01): 62-69 . 本站查看

Other cited types(11)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1981) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(39)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Evaluation of potential water conservation function of the soil of three land use types in Huoditang of Qinling Mountains, northwestern China

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

Other cited types(11)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content