Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management.

XING Hai-tao; LU Yuan-chang; LIU Xian-zhao; WANG Xiao-ming; JIA Hong-yan; ZENG Ji

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160023

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2016 > 38(9): 42-54. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160023

XING Hai-tao, LU Yuan-chang, LIU Xian-zhao, WANG Xiao-ming, JIA Hong-yan, ZENG Ji. Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(9): 42-54. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160023

Citation:

PDF (933 KB)

Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management.

1.
1 Research Institute of Forest Resources Information Techniques,Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, P.R. China;
2.
2 Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Pingxiang, Guangxi, 532600, P. R. China.

More Information

Received Date: January 17, 2016
Published Date: September 29, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide reference and theoretical basis of mixed forest afforestation and close-to-nature silvicultural system. Relationship of tree species in close-to-nature operation was revealed by analyzing intra- and inter-species competition intensity. We took 20 permanent sample plots of 5 kinds of close-to-nature transformation forests as research object in the Center of Tropical Forestry which is sited at Pingxiang County of Guangxi Province (A1-A4: mixed forest with different cutting intensities and enrichment plantations in operation, A5: monoculture forest in control, 4 permanent sample plots in each operation model). Tree growth space and neighbors were determined by using Voronoi diagram. Heygi individual competition indices (CI) were used to analyze the competition of mingled forest, intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus massoniana in mingled and monoculture forest. The results showed that 1) the competition of P. massoniana and the main planting species in mixed forest were ranked as: Castanopsis hystrix Manglietia glauca Quercus griffithii Pinus massoniana Michelia hedyosperma Erythrophleum fordii, and average competition index in different transformation modes was ranked as: A1 A3 A4 A2. 2) The number of objective and competitive trees was 212 and 336, respectively in mixed stand. The number of P. massoniana was 190 in monoculture stand. The competition index in monoculture forest (359.51) was larger than in mixed forest (166.98). It meant that the appropriate intensity of logging effectively reduced the pressure of competition. The intraspecific competition only existed in monoculture forest. The intraspecific and interspecific competition index of P. massoniana was each accounted for 54.65% and 45.35% in the mixed forests. 3) The intraspecific competition index of Pinus massoniana had significant difference among mixed forest and monoculture forest. It decreased gradually with the increase of diameter at breast height (DBH), and the average competition indices with diameter grade in mixed forest were less than in control monoculture forest. 4) The interspecific competition pressure came from fast-growing trees firstly. The relationship of Pinus massoniana and main species (CI1) followed as: Quercus griffithii Manglietia glauca Castanopsis hystrix Michelia hedyosperma Schefflera octophylla Trema cannabina Styrax tonkinensis Erythrophleum fordii Ficus esquiroliana. The interspecific competition between each model had no difference. 5) The index of Pinus massoniana decreased with the increase of DBH. The relationship between total and intraspecific competition index and DBH accorded with power and hyperbola function respectively in mixed forest. The relationship between competition index and DBH conformed to logarithmic function in monoculture forest. It showed a stronger competition intensity at DBH of 25 cm and appeared weaker at DBH over 25 cm. According to analysis of competition of close-to-nature transformation forest, we know that cutting disturbance trees and enriching species could reduce competitive pressure of Pinus massoniana and facilitate growth of enrichment species and natural regeneration. As well as it could guide positive succession to form multiple layer, uneven-aged and mixed forest. This study proved the rationality and feasibility of transformation from monoculture plantation to close-to-nature forest.
- Pinus massoniana,
- close-to-nature transformation,
- intraspecific competition,
- interspecific competition

FullText(HTML)

References (50)

References

[1]	MA Z X. Fundamentals of ecology [M]. Beijing: Economic Publishing House of China, 2002.
[1]	马振兴.生态学基础[M]. 北京:中国时代经济出版社,2002.
[2]	项小燕,吴甘霖,段仁燕,等.大别山五针松种内和种间竞争强度[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):389-395.
[3]	XIANG X Y, WU G L, DUAN R Y, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus dabeshanesis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(2):389-395.
[4]	惠刚盈,胡艳波,赵中华,等.基于交角的林木竞争研究[J].林业科学,2013,49(6):68-73.
[5]	HUI G Y, HU Y B, ZHAO Z H, et al. A forest competition index based on intersection angle [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2013,49(6):68-73.
[6]	TOME M,BURKHART H E. Distance dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees[J]. Forestry Science,1989, 35(3):816-831.
[7]	关毓秀,张守攻.竞争指标的分类及评价[J].北京林业大学学报,1992,14(4):1-8.
[8]	GUAN Y X, ZHANG S G. Classification and evaluation of competition index [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,1992,14(4):1-8.
[9]	HEGYI F. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands[M]∥ FRIES J. Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Stockholm:Royal College of Forestry,1974: 74-90.
[10]	董利虎,李凤日,贾炜玮.林木竞争对红松人工林立木生物量影响及模型研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2013,35(6) :15-22.
[11]	DONG L H, LI F R, JIA W W. Effects of tree competition on biomass and biomass models of Pinus koraiensis plantation [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013,35(6):15-22.
[12]	张思玉,郑世群.笔架山常绿阔叶林优势种群种内种间竞争的数量研究[J]. 林业科学,2004,37(1) :185-188.
[13]	ZHANG S Y, ZHENG S Q. Quantitive study on intraspecific and interspecific competition for dominant population of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Bijia Mountain[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004,37(1):185-188.
[14]	汤孟平,陈永刚,施拥军,等. 基于Voronoi图的群落优势树种种内种间竞争[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(11):4707-4716.
[15]	TANG M P, CHEN Y G,SHI Y J, et al. Intraspecific and Interspecific competition analysis of community dominant plant populations based on Voronoi diagram [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007,27(11):4707-4716.
[16]	郝月兰.基于林分空间结构优化的采伐木确定方法研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2012.
[17]	HAO Y L. Study on cutting tree determining method based on forest stand spatial structure optimization [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2012.
[18]	李际平,封尧,赵春燕,等.基于Voronoi图的杉木生态公益林空间结构量化分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2014,36(4) :1-7.
[19]	LI J P, FENG Y, ZHAO C Y,et al. Quantitative analysis of stand spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata non-commercial forest based on Voronoi diagram [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014,36(4):1-7.
[20]	陆元昌.近自然森林经营的理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[21]	LU Y C. The theory and practice of close to nature management [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
[22]	陆元昌,雷相东,洪玲霞,等.近自然森林经理计划体系技术应用示范[J]. 西南林学院学报,2010,30(2):1-6.
[23]	LU Y C, LEI X D, HONG L X,et al. Demonstrative application of the close-to-nature forest management planning system to forestry practice [J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University,2010,30(2):1-6.
[24]	LU Y C, LEI X D. Close-to-nature forest management in China:technical framework and models in practice[C]∥Proceedings of ⅩⅢ World Forestry Congress. Buenos Aires: FAO Forestry Department, 2009: 18-23.
[25]	陆元昌,张守攻,雷相东,等. 人工林近自然化改造的理论基础和实施技术[J].世界林业研究,2009,22(1):20-27.
[26]	LU Y C,ZHANG S G, LEI X D, et al. Theoretical Basis and Implementation techniques on close- to- nature transformation of plantations [J].World Forestry Research,2009,22(1):20-27.
[27]	沈国舫,翟明普. 混交林研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997.
[28]	SHEN G F, ZHAI M P. Research on mixed forest plantations [M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 1997.
[29]	BI H. Competition in mixed stands of Pinus radiate and Eucalyptus obliqa[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(1):87-99.
[30]	李婷婷,陆元昌,庞丽峰,等.杉木人工林近自然经营的初步效果[J].林业科学,2014,50(5):90-100.
[31]	LI T T, LU Y C, PANG L F, et al. Initial effect of close-to-nature management of Chinese fir plantation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2014,50(5):90-100.
[32]	李志洪,胡淑仪,李伟,等.粤东北马尾松-木荷混交林种内种间竞争强度分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(8):91-95.
[33]	LI Z H, HU S Y, LI W, et al. Intra-specific and inter-specific competitions among major trees species in Pinus massoniana and Schimasuperba mixed forest in northeastern Guangdong Province [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry Technology, 2013,33(8):91-95.
[34]	吴承祯,洪伟,廖金兰.马尾松中幼林种内竞争的研究[J]. 福建林学院学报,1997,17(4):289-292.
[35]	WU C Z, HONG W,LIAO J L. Research on intraspecific competition of Pinus massoniana young and middle aged forests [J]. Journal of Fujian College Forestry,1997,17(4):289-292.
[36]	车腾腾,冯益明,蔡道雄,等.热带林业实验中心人工林区景观格局变化分析[J].浙江农林大学学报,2011,28(5):706-712.
[37]	CHE T T,FENG Y M,CAI D X, et al. Dynamics analysis on landscape patterns of Chinese tropical and subtropical plantation areas [J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2011,28(5):706-712.
[38]	RENKA R J. Algorithm 751:TRIPACK:a constrained two-dimensional delaunay triangulation package[J]. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software,1996,22:1-8.
[39]	吴国玺,闫卫阳. 基于加权Voronoi图的河南省城市影响区研究[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(1):55-59.
[40]	WU G X,YAN W Y. Study of urban influenced regions of Henan province based on weighed Voronoi diagram [J].Urban Studies,2009,16(1):55-59.
[41]	殷鸣放,薛娟,宁良智,等.基于近自然林业经营的不同密度林木竞争关系比较分析[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(5):149-153.
[42]	YIN M F,XUE J,NING L Z, et al. Comparative study on competition relationship of the forests with different densities based on near-nature forestry management [J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2013,28(5):149-153.
[43]	MENG J H, LU Y C, ZENG J. Transformation of a degraded Pinus massoniana plantation into a mixed-species irregular forest: impacts on stand structure and growth in southern China [J]. Forests, 2014, 5(12): 3199-3221.
[44]	JIANG J, LU Y C, PANG L F, et al. short-term effects of the management intensities on structure dynamic in monoculture forests of southern subtropical China [J]. Tropical Conversation Science, 2015, 8(1): 187-200.
[45]	邹春静,徐文铎.沙地云杉种内、种间竞争的研究[J]. 植物生态学报,1998,22(3):269-274.
[46]	ZOU C J, XU W D. Study on intraspecific and interspecific competition of Picea mongolica[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 1998, 22(3): 269-274.
[47]	巢林,洪滔,李键,等. 不同林龄、径级杉木人工林种内竞争规律[J].浙江农林大学学报,2015,32(3):353-360.
[48]	CHAO L,HONG T,LI J, et al. Intraspecific competition in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation with different age and diameter classes[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2015,32(3):353-360.
[49]	LAUNGANI R, KNOPS J M H. Species-driven changes in nitrogen cycling can provide a mechanism for plant invasions [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(30): 12400-12405.

[1]	Zhang Yiying, Zou Xuge, Wang Yin, Wang Jianming, Li Jingwen. Effects of Tamarix ramosissima on the distribution of Populus euphratica in various soil water and salinity environments in the Ejina Oasis, Inner Mongolia of northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(3): 11-20. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210317
[2]	Liu Yue, Xu Liying, Wang Yujiao, Yu Jiangbo, Yang Lixue. Characteristics analysis of quantity and spatial structure of standing live and dead trees in Tilia amurensis secondary forest on the west slope of Zhangguangcailing, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(6): 68-79. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190305
[3]	Wang Jun, Wang Yongteng, Duan Yangbo, Xie Lei, Cui Guofa. Interspecific and intraspecific competitions of Pinus kwangtungensis in Nanling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province of southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 25-32. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20180436
[4]	Fan Xiuhua, Xu Chengyang. Formation mechanism of taxonomic structures for forest communities in different successional stages in Changbai Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(3): 24-32. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180301
[5]	Luo Mei, Chen Shaozhi. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Larix olgensis plantations in different age groups[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(9): 33-44. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180126
[6]	WANG Yan, YANG Hua, LI Yan-li, QIU Shi. Tree competition index based on the structural equation model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(4): 28-37. DOI: DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140075
[7]	ZHOU Rong-wu, AN Yu-tao, WANG Hao, REN Yun-mao, WANG Qi-feng, HE Bao-hua, CHEN Peng-fei, LIN Da-ying. Quantitative relationships of intra- and interspecific competition of Platycladus orientalis plantation in Beijing Xishan National Forest Park[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(6): 27-32.
[8]	LUO Zong-shi, XIANG Cheng-hua, ZHANG Lu, XIE Da-jun, LUO Xiao-hua. Spatial distribution of fine roots and underground competition between Chinese prickly ash (Zanthoxylum bungenum) and weeds in Chinese prickly ash plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(2): 86-91.
[9]	SHI Yu, YU Xin-xiao, YUE Yong-jie, WANG Xiao-ping, QIN Yong-sheng, CHEN Jun-qi. Intraspecific competitions in Platycladus orientalis natural forests in Beijing mountainous area.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(supp.2): 36-40.
[10]	LIN Yong-ming, , CUI Peng, GE Yong-gang, WANG Dao-jie, XIE Xian-jian. Intraspecific competition of Leucaena leucocephala plantation in the area of high frequency debris flow: Taking the Jiangjiagou Gully as an example.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(3): 13-17.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(29)

1.	兰倩，陈绍志，李婷婷. 采伐对森林发展的影响. 林业科技通讯. 2024(01): 11-16 .
2.	郭理平. 侧柏育苗密度对苗木质量的影响. 特种经济动植物. 2024(03): 55-56+76 .
3.	申鹏，白萍，朱洲，柴宗政. 基于林木株数与竞争指数的马尾松退化林种群结构及数量动态分析. 西部林业科学. 2024(01): 40-46+65 .
4.	邹丰虎，周雯，柴宗政. 近自然经营对马尾松林优势树种生态位及种间关系的影响. 西部林业科学. 2024(01): 55-65 .
5.	艾萨迪拉·玉苏甫，玉米提·哈力克，巴比尔江·迪力夏提，雷诚，魏建新，阿不都拉·阿不力孜，崔健泺，何熙祥. 基于激光雷达数据的塔里木河下游胡杨种群空间分布格局和种内竞争关系. 林业科学. 2024(04): 31-39 .
6.	李静凯，黄荣珍，朱丽琴，张腾升，刘萍渝，黄国敏，杨润，郭志娟，秦易. 中亚热带不同植被恢复期植物群落多样性特征. 南昌工程学院学报. 2024(03): 52-57 .
7.	蒋璐，张辟芳，王军，秦晓鹏，汪海伦，周世兴，黄从德. 巨桉纯林皆伐迹地营建混交林对林下灌草物种多样性的影响. 应用与环境生物学报. 2024(03): 477-484 .
8.	李清源，张发游，罗春备，孙代珍，魏丽花. 马尾松木荷混交林不同改造方式的效果分析. 绿色科技. 2024(21): 112-115+129 .
9.	卢佳毅. 马尾松采伐迹地更新马占相思的生产力与改土效果. 林业勘察设计. 2024(04): 54-57 .
10.	谢阳生，孟京辉，曾冀，明安刚，刘宪钊，贾宏炎，雷相东，陆元昌. 马尾松人工纯林近自然化改造效果分析. 林业科学研究. 2023(02): 31-38 .
11.	张明辉，尹昀洲，王珂，王树力. 水曲柳人工林空间结构特征对土壤养分含量的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2023(09): 73-82 . 本站查看
12.	王宇，易艳灵，刘海，文晓晨，李天一，尹海锋，李贤伟，范川. 两种采伐方式对马尾松人工林林分空间结构的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(05): 138-146 .
13.	方碧江. 杉木灰木莲混交林生长情况及土壤理化性质. 森林与环境学报. 2022(01): 46-52 .
14.	张可欣，刘宪钊，雷相东，贾宏炎，唐继新，国红. 马尾松人工林不同经营方式短期经济效益分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(05): 43-54 . 本站查看
15.	马学欣，周国良，王锋，侯建花. 景宁畲族自治县近30年森林资源动态变化特征分析——基于森林资源二类调查数据. 林草政策研究. 2022(04): 66-71 .
16.	汪清，潘萍，欧阳勋志，臧颢，宁金魁，冯瑞琦，徐丽. 马尾松-木荷不同比例混交林种内和种间竞争强度. 生态学杂志. 2021(01): 49-57 .
17.	陈贝贝，姜俊，陆元昌，刘宪钊，贾宏炎，明安刚，张显强. 间伐强度对马尾松人工林冠下套种树种生长的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(01): 58-65 . 本站查看
18.	张旺. 马尾松人工纯林改造成针阔混交林林下植物多样性效果评价. 河南林业科技. 2021(01): 17-19+47 .
19.	姚慧芳，王超，卢杰. 单木竞争的研究概述. 广西农学报. 2021(04): 77-81 .
20.	田卫卫，柴宗政，孙彩丽. 近自然经营对马尾松林不同发展阶段竞争关系的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2021(12): 15-20 .
21.	王从容，李守中，杨贤宇. 亚热带红壤侵蚀退化区不同恢复水平生境内先锋树种竞争特征. 应用与环境生物学报. 2019(02): 239-245 .
22.	郭丽玲，潘萍，欧阳勋志，宁金魁，李琦，吴佳昊. 间伐补植对马尾松低效林生长及林分碳密度的短期影响. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2019(03): 48-54 .
23.	谢阳生，陆元昌，雷相东，刘宪钊，王晓明，蔡道雄，国红. 多功能森林经营方案编制关键技术及辅助系统研究. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2019(08): 1-9 .
24.	李超，裴顺祥，张连金，郭嘉，辛学兵. 北京油松人工林竞争指数的适用性评价. 浙江农林大学学报. 2019(06): 1115-1124 .
25.	刘婷岩，郝龙飞，王庆成，白淑兰. 不同栽植密度对斑叶稠李苗木培育质量的影响. 植物研究. 2019(06): 863-868 .
26.	杨霞，陈丽华. 邻体干扰模型在辽东油松人工林中的应用. 中国水土保持科学. 2019(06): 93-102 .
27.	罗梅，陈绍志. 不同龄组长白落叶松种内及种间竞争研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(09): 33-44 . 本站查看
28.	高若楠，苏喜友，谢阳生，雷相东，陆元昌. 基于随机森林的杉木适生性预测研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(12): 36-43 . 本站查看
29.	王晓明，陆元昌，邢海涛，贾宏炎，刘宪钊，谢阳生，曾冀. 马尾松-大叶栎混交林皆伐作业法的设计. 林业资源管理. 2017(06): 47-53 .

Other cited types(20)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2652) PDF downloads (54) Cited by(49)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management.

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(29)

Other cited types(20)

Catalog

Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management.

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(29)

Other cited types(20)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content