Advanced search
    Liu Jia-lin, Man Xiu-ling. Partitioning of water vapor flux on the ecosystem scale: a case study on larch boreal forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(1): 46-56. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170202
    Citation: Liu Jia-lin, Man Xiu-ling. Partitioning of water vapor flux on the ecosystem scale: a case study on larch boreal forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(1): 46-56. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170202

    Partitioning of water vapor flux on the ecosystem scale: a case study on larch boreal forests

    • ObjectiveEvapotranspiration (ET) including evaporation (E) and transpiration (T), was the main way that ecosystem precipitation (P) returned to the atmosphere. Under the background of climate change, understanding the characteristics and distribution of ET in a cold-temperate Larix gmelinii natural forest at permafrost region of northern part of Daxing'an Mountains, northeastern China could help to further comprehend the response modes of the boreal forest ecosystem to the climate change.
      MethodModel simulation and field experiments were applied for estimating and measuring ecosystem scale evaporation (E), transpiration (T), and evapotranspiration (ET) in a boreal larch forest. E includes forest floor evaporation (Ef) and canopy interception (Ec) which only occurred during rainfall events. Total forest transpiration (Ttot) in this study is the sum of dominant tree transpiration (Td), intermediate tree transpiration (Ti) and suppressed tree transpiration (Ts). Furthermore, we analyzed the variations and allocation proportions of ET and components under conditions of non-rainy or rainy. Then we discussed the responses of Ef, Ttot and ET to the net radiation (Rn) and the vapor pressure deficit (VPD) under different water input conditions.
      ResultDiurnal variations of ET and its components all performed as single peak patterns in both non-rainy and rainy days, and peak value in each curve at non-rainy day grouping was higher than in rainy day grouping. Ef, Td, Ti, Ts and ET in non-rainy days were 10.3, 25.6, 15.2, 10.8 and 66.3mm, respectively. Meanwhile, Ef, Ec, Td, Ti, Ts and ET in rainy days were 2.2, 24.3, 11.2, 5.1, 3.8 and 47.8mm, respectively.In non-rainy days, Ef/ET was 15.5%, and Ttot/ET was 78.0%, while Td/ET, Ti/ET and Ts/ET contributed 38.7%, 23.0% and 16.4%, respectively.In rainy days, Ef/ET could go low to 4.6%, Ec/ET reached 50.9%, and Ttot/ET decreased to 42.2%, in which Td/ET, Ti/ET and Ts/ET were 23.5%, 10.6% and 8.0%, respectively.These results represented that ET was dominated by T (specifically for Td) in non-rainy days. However, E (specifically for Ec) contributed the highest proportion of ET in rainy days. 94.7% of P returned to the atmosphere through ET during whole observation days, there into, T and E accounted for nearly 57% and 38%, respectively. Overall, without regard to rainfall events, ET had better correlation with net radiation at 23m height (Rn) than with VPD and Ttot owned similar correlations with both Rn and VPD, but Ef expressed opposite result with ET. This result demonstrated that Rn was obviously the main driver for ecosystem's energy cycle and material exchange, Ttot restrained by Rn and VPD at the same time, and Ef was more susceptible to VPD compared to Rn.
      ConclusionThe transpiration capacity of dominant trees of Larix gemelinii species was stronger than intermediate and suppressed trees. So that, forest transpiration upscale from the individual tree could be overestimated if this method only considers in situ measured Td (even including Ti with larger DBH) and ignores Ts. The actual error depends on the degree of forest differentiation and moisture income conditions. The meteorological condition of non-rainfall days is more propitious to the water-vapor exchange at vegetation-atmosphere interface, and the occurrence of rainfall will affect the distribution pattern of ecosystem ET.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return