• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Qin Suitao, Long Cuiling, Wu Bangli. Effects of topographic sites on the community structure and species diversity of karst forest in Maolan, Guizhou Province of southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(7): 18-26. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170466
Citation: Qin Suitao, Long Cuiling, Wu Bangli. Effects of topographic sites on the community structure and species diversity of karst forest in Maolan, Guizhou Province of southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(7): 18-26. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170466

Effects of topographic sites on the community structure and species diversity of karst forest in Maolan, Guizhou Province of southwestern China

More Information
  • Received Date: December 24, 2017
  • Revised Date: March 19, 2018
  • Published Date: June 30, 2018
  • ObjectiveTopography is an important factor leading to the heterogeneity of plant community structure. In order to know the difference of community structure and species diversity of woody plants in karst forest at different topographic sites, studies were carried out in woody plant communities of Maolan Natural Reserve, Guizhou Province of southwestern China. Studies about topographic difference of community structure and species diversity of Maolan karst forest had great significance to reveal the mechanism of species maintenance in karst forest.
    MethodCommunity survey method was used to analyse plant community structure. The species diversity of tree and shrub layers at different topography sites (funnel, hillside and valley) was analyzed using Margalef diversity index(D), Pielou evenness index(J), Simpson dominance index(M) and Shannon-Wiener diversity index(H).
    ResultThe results showed that: (1) There were 81 species of woody plants in valley forest and they belong to 39 families and 63 genera; there were 80 species of woody plants in funnel forest and they belong to 39 families and 61 genera; there were 69 species of woody plants in hillside forest and they belong to 35 families and 58 genera; in the research area, species floristic composition of valley forest was the most complex, that of funnel forest was the second and floristic composition of hillside forest was the simplest. The dominant species in three topography sites mainly belong to Lauraceae, Rosaceae, Anacardiaceae and Cornaceae plant. The PCA ordination results of 30 plots reflected the relationship between the community type and the environmental gradient, and the main environmental factors affecting the diversity of the species were light, water and soil. (2) The important value of Litsea verticillata was the highest in the tree layer and it was the dominant species of community. The important values of Cyclobalanopsis glauca, Cornus japonica var. chinensis and Cladrastis platycarpa were lower than that of Litsea verticillata, and they were the sub-dominant species of the arbor layer of the community. Pittosporum crispulum was the dominant species of shrub layer. (3)The main life form composition of woody plant at different topography sites was mesophanerophyte and microphanerophyte, and megaphanerophyte was the least. Microphanerophyte was the dominant life form in the hillside forest and mesophanerophyte was the dominant life form in funnel and valley forest. (4)Among three topography sites, species diversity indexes of the arbor layer were valley > funnel > hillside, but species diversity indexes of the shrub layer were valley > hillside > funnel.
    ConclusionAmong three kinds of topographic sites, species floristic composition and species diversity of valley forest were the most complex and the most abundant, the dominant species were Litsea verticillata and Pittosporum crispulum, woody plant life forms were phaenerophytes and microphanerophytes in valley forest. Light, moisture and soil are the main environmental factors affecting the community distribution pattern at different terrain sites.
  • [1]
    刘万德, 臧润国, 丁易.海南岛霸王岭两种典型热带季雨林群落特征[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(7):3465-3476. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.07.003

    Liu W D, Zang R G, Ding Y. Community features of two types of typical tropical monsoon forests in Bawangling Nature Reserve, Hainan Island[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(7): 3465-3476. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.07.003
    [2]
    沈燕, 罗江平, 王旭, 等.湖南莽山华南五针松群落特征[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(2):1-7, 24. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/znlxyxb201602001

    Shen Y, Luo J P, Wang X, et al. Characteristics of Pinus kwangtungensis community at Mangshan, Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016, 36(2): 1-7, 24. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/znlxyxb201602001
    [3]
    沈泽昊, 张新时, 金义兴.三峡大老岭地区主要木本植物分布的地形格局[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(5):581-589. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2000.05.012

    Shen Z H, Zhang X S, Jin Y X. An analysis of the topographical patterns of the chief woody species at Dalaoling Mountain in the Three Gorges Region[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24(5): 581-589. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2000.05.012
    [4]
    胡志伟, 沈泽昊, 吕楠, 等.地形对森林群落年龄及其空间格局的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2007, 31(5):814-824. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwstxb200705008

    Hu Z W, Shen Z H, Lü N, et al. Impacts of topography on the spatial pattern of the age of forest community[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(5): 814-824. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwstxb200705008
    [5]
    霍萌萌, 郭东罡, 张婕, 等.灵空山油松-辽东栎林乔木树种群落学特征及空间分布格局[J].生态学报, 2014, 34(20):5925-5935. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201420027

    Huo M M, Guo D G, Zhang J, et al. Tree community characteristics and spatial patterns of the forms Pinus tabuliformis-Quercus wutaishanica in Lingkong Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(20): 5925-5935. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201420027
    [6]
    熊斌梅, 汪正祥, 田凯, 等.七姊妹山自然保护区黄杉林群落学特征[J].广西植物, 2017, 37(4):434-441. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gxzw201704004

    Xiong B M, Wang Z X, Tian K, et al. Coenological characteristics of Pseudotsuga sinensis forests in Qizimei Mountains Nature Reserve[J]. Guihaia, 2017, 37(4): 434-441. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gxzw201704004
    [7]
    李大东, 董廷发, 陈坚, 等.四川米仓山自然保护区台湾水青冈群落学特征及多样性研究[J].西北植物学报, 2016, 36(1):174-182. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbzwxb201601023

    Li D D, Dong T F, Chen J, et al. Characteristics of Fagus hayatae community and species diversity in Micangshan Nature Reserve, Sichuan[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2016, 36(1): 174-182. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbzwxb201601023
    [8]
    张志祥, 刘鹏, 刘春生, 等.浙江九龙山南方铁杉(Tsuga tchekiangensis)群落结构及优势种群更新类型[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(9):4547-4558. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.09.057

    Zhang Z X, Liu P, Liu C S, et al. The structure characteristics and dominant population regeneration types of Tsuga tchekiangensis communities in the Jiulongshan National Natural Reserve of Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(9): 4547-4558. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.09.057
    [9]
    周政贤.茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察综合报告[C]//周政贤.茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集.贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1987: 1-23.

    Zhou Z X. A comprehensive report on the survey of Maolan karst forest[C]//Zhou Z X. Scientific survey of the Maolan karst forest. Guiyang: Guizhou People's Publishing House, 1987: 1-23.
    [10]
    张忠华, 胡刚, 倪健.茂兰喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林树种的空间分布格局及其分形特征[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(24):8221-8230. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201524030

    Zhang Z H, Hu G, Ni J. Spatial distribution patterns and their fractal properties for trees in a subtropical mixed evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved karst forest in Maolan, southwestern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(24): 8221-8230. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201524030
    [11]
    俞国松, 王世杰, 容丽, 等.茂兰喀斯特森林主要演替群落的凋落物动态[J].植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10):1019-1028. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwstxb201110004

    Yu G S, Wang S J, Rong L, et al. Litter dynamics of major successional communities in Maolan karst forest of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(10): 1019-1028. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwstxb201110004
    [12]
    张忠华, 胡刚, 倪健.茂兰喀斯特森林群落的种间分离特征[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(9):2235-2245. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201009001

    Zhang Z H, Hu G, Ni J. Interspecific segregation of old-growth karst forests in Maolan, southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(9): 2235-2245. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201009001
    [13]
    龙翠玲, 余世孝, 魏鲁明, 等.茂兰喀斯特森林干扰状况与林隙特征[J].林业科学, 2005, 41(4):13-19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2005.04.003

    Long C L, Yu S X, Wei L M, et al. Disturbance regimes and the characteristics of gaps in Maolan karst forest, Guizhou Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(4): 13-19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2005.04.003
    [14]
    李兴中, 李双岱.茂兰喀斯特森林区地貌景观[C]//周政贤.茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集.贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1987: 42-73.

    Li X Z, Li S D. The geomorphologic landscape of the Maolan karst forest[C]//Zhou Z X. Scientific survey of the Maolan karst forest. Guiyang: Guizhou People's Publishing House, 1987: 42-73.
    [15]
    郑振宇, 龙翠玲.茂兰喀斯特森林不同地形部位木本植物种间联结性分析[J].林业资源管理, 2014(4):78-84, 91. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyzygl201404016

    Zheng Z Y, Long C L. Interspecific association of woody plant species at different topography sites in Maolan karst forest[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2014(4):78-84, 91. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyzygl201404016
    [16]
    朱守谦, 魏鲁明.茂兰喀斯特森林群落结构研究[C]//朱守谦.喀斯特森林生态研究(I).贵阳: 贵州科技出版社, 1993: 12-21.

    Zhu S Q, Wei L M. Studies on structure of Maolan karst forest communities[C]//Zhu S Q. Ecological research on karst forest(Ⅰ). Guiyang: Guizhou Publishing House of Science and Technology, 1993: 12-21.
    [17]
    杨允菲, 祝廷成.植物生态学[M]. 2版.北京:高等教育出版社, 2011:29-31.

    Yang Y F, Zhu T C. Plant ecology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2011: 29-31.
    [18]
    马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ:α多样性的测度方法(上)[J].生物多样性, 1994, 2(3):162-168. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.1994.03.007

    Ma K P. Biological diversity measure (Ⅰ) :α diversity measure method[J]. Biodiversity Science, 1994, 2(3): 162-168. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.1994.03.007
    [19]
    项小燕, 吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 等.大别山五针松种群结构及动态研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(1):55-62. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601007

    Xiang X Y, Wu G L, Duan R Y, et al. Studies on population structure and dynamics of Pinus dabeshanensis[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(1): 55-62. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601007
    [20]
    朱守谦, 魏鲁明.茂兰喀斯特森林的群落学特点[C]//朱守谦.喀斯特森林生态研究(I).贵阳: 贵州科技出版社, 1993: 1-11.

    Zhu S Q, Wei L M. Phytocoenological character of Maolan karst forest[C]//Zhu S Q. Ecological research on karst forest(Ⅰ). Guiyang: Guizhou Publishing House of Science and Technology, 1993: 1-11.
    [21]
    江洪.东灵山植物群落生活型谱的比较研究[J].植物学报, 1994, 36(11):884-894. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWXB199411011.htm

    Jiang H. Study on life-form spectrum of plant community in Dongling Mountain[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1994, 36(11): 884-894. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWXB199411011.htm
    [22]
    Xiang W S, Ding T, Lu S H, et al. A comparison of tree species diversity in two subtropical forests, Guangxi, Southwest China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6(4):208-216. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764X.2015.04.003
    [23]
    韩玉杰, 徐志防, 叶万辉, 等.不同类型喀斯特植物的荧光特征及抗旱性比较[J].广西植物, 2007, 27(6):918-922. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2007.06.022

    Han Y J, Xu Z F, Ye W H, et al. Characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence and comparison of drought resistance among different species of karst plants[J]. Guihaia, 2007, 27(6): 918-922. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2007.06.022
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yang Dongye, Yu Xinxiao, Li Xuhong, Jiang Tao, Jia Guodong. Characteristics of sap flow of degraded Populus simonii in Bashang Area, Hebei Province of northern China and its response to environmental factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(7): 36-43. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230332
    [2]Zheng Dongsheng, Liu Qijing. Effects of environmental factors on forest community distribution in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(8): 57-64. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220086
    [3]Ma Jing, Guo Jianbin, Liu Zebin, Wang Yanhui, Zhang Ziyou. Diurnal variations of stand transpiration of Larix principis-rupprechtii forest and its response to environmental factors in Liupan Mountains of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 1-11. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190468
    [4]LI Xin-yu, LI Yan-ming, SUN Lin, XU Rui, ZHAO Song-ting, GUO Jia. Characteristics of transpiration water consumption and its relationship with environmental factors in Ginkgo biloba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 23-29. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.008
    [5]CHI Bo, CAI Ti-jiu, MAN Xiu-ling, LI Yi.. Effects of influencing factors on stem sap flow in Larix gmelinii in northern Da Hinggan Mountains, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(4): 21-26.
    [6]WANG Xiu-wei, MAO Zi-jun. Effects of conducting tissue structure on sap flow density and stem CO2 efflux.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(4): 9-15.
    [7]WANG Lian-chun, , ZHAI Ming-pu, LIU Dao-ping, ZHOU Zhi-feng. Relationship between stock sap flow rate of Zizyphus acidojujuba Hu and environmental factors.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(6): 134-138.
    [8]CHEN Chong, LI Ji-yue, , WANG Yu- tao. Variation of stem sap flow of Salix matsudana and its impact factors.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(4): 82-88.
    [9]DONG Bai_li, WANG Miao, JIANG Ping, JI Lan-zhu. Relations between water beetle diversity and environmental factors in northern slope of Changbai Mountain, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(1): 74-78.
    [10]TIAN Jing-hui, HE Kang-ning, WANG Bai-tian, ZHANG Wei-qiang, YIN Jing. Relationship between transpiration of Platycladus orientalis and environmental factors in semi-arid region on Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(3): 53-56.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(27)

    1. 杨佳悦,丁国玉,田秀君. 最大熵模型在物种生境预测中的应用研究进展. 应用生态学报. 2025(02): 614-624 .
    2. 杨福成,洪兆春,丁红秀,邵明勤. 基于最大熵模型的鸳鸯潜在越冬分布区预测. 湿地科学. 2024(01): 60-71 .
    3. 陈飞,张杰京,王利繁,熊朝永,樊辉. 中国和老挝跨境区域亚洲象生境时空变化及保护成效. 生态学报. 2024(22): 10222-10233 .
    4. 刘夫仁,赛罕,贺伟,张正一,冯中华,张梓琪,鲍伟东. 内蒙古赛罕乌拉自然保护区马鹿夏季肠道菌群多样性. 野生动物学报. 2023(01): 90-97 .
    5. 张洁,王凯,张翼,严如玉,杨军飞,刘星辰,计勇. 潦河中源段水生条背萤生境适宜性评价. 安徽农业科学. 2023(03): 52-56+61 .
    6. 宋慧芳,党晓宏,高永,蒙仲举,孙艳丽. 基于MaxEnt模型的内蒙古自治区樟子松潜在分布研究. 四川农业大学学报. 2023(02): 203-208+248 .
    7. 张杰京,陈飞,谢菲,张鑫,尹文萍,樊辉. 亚洲象生境长时序变化及其对人象冲突的影响——基于融合MaxEnt与HSI模型的生境适宜性评价方法. 生态学报. 2023(09): 3807-3818 .
    8. 张旭,王玲玲,黄峰,田玉清,杨涛,张玉铭,刘亚恒. 长江中游地区麋鹿生境适宜性分析与生态廊道构建. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 404-411 .
    9. 刘伟,李旭琴,李忠伦,李英,油志远,蒋勇,阮光华,鲁碧耕,杨楠. 四川贡嘎山中华斑羚和中华鬣羚的时空分布及重叠性. 应用生态学报. 2023(06): 1630-1638 .
    10. 申立泉,吴佳忆,周鑫,吕青昕,王燕群,袁乃秀,孟秀祥. 基于MaxEnt模型的北京周边山区野生狍(Capreolus pygargus)的生境适宜性评价. 生态学杂志. 2023(10): 2555-2560 .
    11. 吕环鑫,夏少霞,顾婧婧,苏常红,王春晓,崔鹏. 基于MaxEnt模型的仙居县大型兽类和珍稀鸟类栖息地适宜性评价. 生态学杂志. 2023(11): 2797-2805 .
    12. 邹珮雯,徐昉. 生态安全格局构建及景观生态风险预测——以赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区为例. 生态学报. 2023(23): 9981-9993 .
    13. 杨超,范韦莹,蔡晓斌,王学雷,张玉铭,李鹏飞. 基于MaxEnt模型的湖北石首麋鹿国家级自然保护区散养麋鹿夏季生境适宜性评价. 长江流域资源与环境. 2022(02): 336-344 .
    14. 秦委,张虹,杨明霞,罗汉,江素萍,刘守金. 基于MaxEnt模型和ArcGIS的东南茜草潜在分布研究. 中国中医药信息杂志. 2022(05): 1-4 .
    15. 刘红彩,赵纳勋,庄钰琪,杨梅玲,赵惠茹,叶新平. 基于MaxEnt模型的秦岭山地斑羚生境适宜性评价. 生态学报. 2022(10): 4181-4188 .
    16. 滕扬,张沼,张书理,杨永昕,贺伟,王娜,张正一,鲍伟东. 大兴安岭南段马鹿生境适宜性分析与生态廊道构建. 生态学报. 2022(14): 5990-6000 .
    17. 王金凤,徐基良,李建强,周春发,邓文洪. 基于动物适宜栖息地的北京市自然保护地保护成效评估. 生态学报. 2022(19): 7807-7817 .
    18. 刘艳华,李卫东,张子栋,梁卓,杨娇,牛莹莹,周绍春. 黑龙江省老爷岭南部野猪种群现状及栖息地适宜性. 生态学杂志. 2022(11): 2208-2215 .
    19. 刘夫仁,贺伟,赛罕,冯中华,杨永昕,张正一,鲍伟东. 同域分布马鹿与中华斑羚的冬夏季食物构成比较. 动物学杂志. 2022(06): 845-854 .
    20. 孙珊,齐增湘,周敏,白瑾瑾,吕婧玮,刘鑫. 野生哺乳动物生态廊道构建——以云豹为例. 安徽农业科学. 2021(07): 81-84+96 .
    21. 陈智强,赵增辉,王远飞,韦力,丁国骅,林植华. 基于红外相机技术和MaxEnt模型的黑麂(Muntiacus crinifrons)活动节律分析和潜在适生区预测. 生态学报. 2021(09): 3535-3547 .
    22. 钟雪,杨楠,张龙,程跃红,冯茜,胡强,金义国. 卧龙国家级自然保护区绿尾虹雉种群分布和生境质量评价. 四川动物. 2021(05): 509-516 .
    23. 郭飞龙,徐刚标,卢孟柱,孟艺宏,袁承志,郭恺琦. 基于MaxEnt模型分析胡杨潜在适宜分布区. 林业科学. 2020(05): 184-192 .
    24. 龚旭,付强,王磊,杨彪,张全建,张远彬. 四川鞍子河保护地水鹿和羚牛栖息地适宜性评价与重叠性分析. 生态学报. 2020(14): 4842-4851 .
    25. 李响,张成福,贺帅,王雨晴,苗林. MaxEnt模型综合应用研究进展分析. 绿色科技. 2020(14): 14-17 .
    26. 张晓晨,邵长亮,葛炎,陈晨,徐文轩,杨维康. 新疆卡拉麦里山有蹄类野生动物自然保护区夏季蒙古野驴适宜生境与种群数量评估. 应用生态学报. 2020(09): 2993-3004 .
    27. Jing Yang,Guo-Fen Zhu,Jian Jiang,Chang-Lin Xiang,Fu-Li Gao,Wei-Dong Bao. Non-invasive genetic analysis indicates low population connectivity in vulnerable Chinese gorals:concerns for segregated population management. Zoological Research. 2019(05): 439-448 .

    Other cited types(24)

Catalog

    Article views (1599) PDF downloads (88) Cited by(51)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return