• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Pan Yanyan, Liang Deyang, Guo Jing, Wang Fang, Wang Fuwei, Li Shuchun, Zhao Xiyang. Variance analyses on growth traits of Larix kaempferi in different seed sources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(11): 19-27. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170478
Citation: Pan Yanyan, Liang Deyang, Guo Jing, Wang Fang, Wang Fuwei, Li Shuchun, Zhao Xiyang. Variance analyses on growth traits of Larix kaempferi in different seed sources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(11): 19-27. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170478

Variance analyses on growth traits of Larix kaempferi in different seed sources

More Information
  • Received Date: December 28, 2017
  • Revised Date: April 19, 2018
  • Published Date: October 31, 2018
  • ObjectiveTo determine the genetic variation of growth traits of different seed sources and families of Larix kaempferi could provide basis for the genetic improvement of Larix kaempferi.
    Method169 Larix kaempferi half-sib families in 4 seed sources were taken as materials, the ANOVA analysis, genetic parameter analysis, correlation analysis and family selection were carried out for the tree height and DBH in different growth years.
    ResultThe results of ANOVA showed that all the traits were significantly different (P < 0.01) among varied families and seed sources. The phenotype variation coefficients of tree height and DBH ranged from 4.00% to 37.37% and 24.89% to 26.48%, and genetic variation coefficients of tree height and DBH ranged from 1.94% to 20.93% and 8.93% to 13.68%, respectively, which all decreased with the increase of time. The family heritability of tree height and DBH of families ranged from 0.881 to 0.972 and 0.877 to 0.879, respectively. The high variation coefficients and high heritability were beneficial to evaluate and select the elite families and plants. Correlation analysis results showed that there existed significantly positive correlation among all traits in different seed sources. By the multiple-traits comprehensive method, when evaluated the families with the selected rate of 10%, 17 families were selected as elite families. The average of tree height and DBH of the elite families were 11.10 m and 13.82 cm and the genetic gains were 11.35% and 15.80%, respectively. When evaluated with the selected rate of 5%, 25 plants were selected as elite trees. The average of tree height and DBH of the elite single plants were 12.58 m and 17.72 cm, and the genetic gains were 8.54% and 12.50%, respectively.
    ConclusionIn this study, the abundant variations among seed sources and families are beneficial to select the elite seed sources, families and single trees, respectively. The elite families and single trees can provide superior materials for the establishment of improved seed orchard and the second generation seed orchard. The study can provide basis for the genetic improvement of Larix kaempferi.
  • [1]
    王亚南, 王军辉, 张守攻, 等.日本落叶松种源对树高生长模型参数的影响[J].东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(9):1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2016.09.001

    Wang Y N, Wang J H, Zhang S G, et al. Parameters of height-age models for Larix kaempferi provenances[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44(9):1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2016.09.001
    [2]
    Fukatus E, Tsubomura M, Fujisawa Y, et al. Genetic improvement of wood density and radial growth in Larix kaempferi: results from a diallel mating test[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2013, 70(5): 451-459. doi: 10.1007/s13595-013-0278-8
    [3]
    董健, 尤文忠, 黄国学, 等.日本落叶松良种选育的现状及发展对策[J].辽宁林业科技, 2003(6):27-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2003.06.013

    Dong J, You W Z, Huang G X, et al. Present situation and development strategy of Larix kaempferi seed breeding[J]. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology, 2003(6):27-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2003.06.013
    [4]
    Paques L E, Miller F, Rozenberg P. Selection perspectives for genetic improvement of wood stiffness in hybrid larch (Larix×eurolepis Henry)[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2010, 6(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s11295-009-0230-0
    [5]
    Nagemitsu T, Nagesaka K, Youshimaru H, et al. Provenance tests for survival and growth of 50-year-old Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) trees related to climatic conditions in central Japan[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2014, 10(1):87-99. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=a4f051a8dc88e25359e2b4c365bde397
    [6]
    Pan Y, Li S, Wang C, et al. Early evaluation of growth traits of Larix kaempferi clones[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 29(4): 1031-1039 doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0492-6
    [7]
    Cáceres C B, Hernández R E, Fortin Y, et al. Wood density and extractive content variation among Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi[Lamb.] Carr.) progenies/provenances trials in eastern Canada[J]. Wood & Fiber Science Journal of the Society of Wood Science & Technology, 2017, 49(4):363-372.
    [8]
    朱景乐, 王军辉, 张守攻, 等. Pilodyn在日本落叶松活立木材性指标预测中的应用[J].林业科学研究, 2009, 22(1): 75-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.01.013

    Zhu J L, Wang J H, Zhang S G, et al. Using the Pilodyn to assess wood traits of standing trees Larix kempferi[J]. Forest Research, 2009, 22(1): 75-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.01.013
    [9]
    Watanabe M, Watanabe Y, Kitaoka S, et al. Growth and photosynthetic traits of hybrid larch F1 (Larix gmelinii var. japonica×L. kaempferi) under elevated CO2 concentration with low nutrient availability[J]. Tree Physiology, 2011, 31(9): 965-975. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr059
    [10]
    Han H, Sun X, Xie Y, et al. Transcriptome and proteome profiling of adventitious root development in hybrid larch (Larix kaempferi×Larix olgensis)[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2014, 14(1): 305. doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0305-4
    [11]
    汪成成.利用SRAP标记分析日本落叶松2代优树的遗传多样性[J].辽宁林业科技, 2017(2): 19-24, 37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2017.02.006

    Wang C C.Analysis of genetic diversity of second-generation tree of Larix kaempferi by SRAP[J]. Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology, 2017(2): 19-24, 37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2017.02.006
    [12]
    Kaushik N, Deswal R P, Malik S, et al. Genetic variation and heritability estimation in Jatropha curcas L. progenies for seed yield and vegetative traits[J]. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 2015, 7(2): 567-573. doi: 10.31018/jans.v7i2.646
    [13]
    Zas A R, Merlo E, Fernández L J. Genetic parameter estimates for Maritime pine in the Atlantic coast of North-west Spain[J]. International Journal of Forest Genetics, 2004, 11(1): 45-53. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=b5b2039adb30bf9c492e9d84a2a722be
    [14]
    Pinyopusarerk K, Williams E R. Range-wide provenance variation in growth and morphological characteristics of Casuarina equisetifolia grown in Northern Australia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 134(1-3): 219-232. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00260-1
    [15]
    Vizcaíno P N, Ibáñez I, Benito G M, et al.Climate and population origin shape pine tree height-diameter allometry[J]. New Forests, 2017, 48(3): 363-379. doi: 10.1007/s11056-016-9562-4
    [16]
    李艳霞. 长白落叶松优树子代生长与材质的遗传及多性状联合选择[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2012. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10225-1013359180.htm

    Li Y X. The genetic variation and multi-trait associated selection of the growth traits and material quality traits of the excellent progenies of Larix olgensis[D]. Haerbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2012. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10225-1013359180.htm
    [17]
    朱于勤, 侯义梅.日本落叶松原生种质资源及优良林分选择[J].湖北林业科技, 2015(4):9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3020.2015.04.003

    Zhu Y Q, Hou Y M. Selection of provenance and superior stand of Larix kaempferi[J]. Hubei Forestry Science and Technology, 2015(4):9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3020.2015.04.003
    [18]
    陈晓阳, 沈熙环.林木育种学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2005.

    Chen X Y, Shen X H. Forest tree breeding[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2005.
    [19]
    续九如.林木数量遗传学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006: 31, 55.

    Xu J R. Quantitative genetics in forestry[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006:31, 55.
    [20]
    朱之悌.林木遗传学基础[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 1989: 190-191.

    Zhu Z T. Foundation of tree genetic[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1989:190-191.
    [21]
    Safavi S A, Pourdad S A, Mohmmad T, et al. Assessment of genetic variation among safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) accessions using agro-morphological traits and molecular markers[J]. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 2010, 8(3):616-625. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=e3e8afdce73e213b6ddbcc7ad6e3dcb6
    [22]
    Nakada R, Fujisawa Y, Taniguchi T. Variations of wood properties between plus-tree clones in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carrière[J]. Bulletin of the Forest Tree Breeding Center (Japan), 2005, 21: 85-105.
    [23]
    许鲁平.枫香优良家系和单株选择研究[J].福建林业科技, 2002, 29(2): 26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2002.02.007

    Xu L P. Studies on the selection of Liquidambar formosana fine families and individuals[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2002, 29(2):26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2002.02.007
    [24]
    Wright J. Introduction to forest genetics[M]. New York:Academic Press, 1976: 427-438.
    [25]
    Weng Y H, Lu P, Adams G W, et al. Genetic parameters of growth and stem quality traits for jack pine second-generation progeny tested in New Brunswick[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2015, 45(1):36-43. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0106
    [26]
    Pliura A, Zhang S Y, Mackay J, et al. Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trials[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 238(1-3): 92-106. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.082
    [27]
    Lepoittevin C, Rousseau J P, Guillemin A, et al. Genetic parameters of growth, straightness and wood chemistry traits in Pinus pinaster[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2011, 68(4): 873-884. doi: 10.1007/s13595-011-0084-0
    [28]
    杜超群, 许业洲, 孙晓梅, 等.鄂西亚高山区日本落叶松无性系生长性状变异分析与早期选择[J].华中农业大学学报, 2015, 34(3):19-23. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hznydx201503004

    Du C Q, Xu Y Z, Sun X M, et al. Variation of growth traits and early selection of Larix kaempferi clones in sub-alpine area of western Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2015, 34(3):19-23. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hznydx201503004
    [29]
    白天道, 徐立安, 王章荣, 等.马尾松实生种子园自由授粉子代测定及亲本家系选择增益估算化[J].林业科学研究, 2012, 25(4):449-455. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2012.04.007

    Bai T D, Xu L A, Wang Z R, et al. Estimation of parents genetic gain by open-pollinated progeny test of seedling seed orchard of Masson pine[J]. Forest Research, 2012, 25(4): 449-455. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2012.04.007
    [30]
    杨秀艳, 张守攻, 孙晓梅, 等.北亚热带高山区日本落叶松自由授粉家系遗传测定与二代优树选择[J].林业科学, 2010, 46(8):45-50. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx201008007

    Yang X Y, Zhang S G, Sun X M, et al. Genetic test of open-pollinated Larix kaempferi families and selection for the second generation elite trees in northern sub-tropical alpine area[J]. Scientia Sillvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(8):45-50. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx201008007
    [31]
    梁德洋, 金允哲, 赵光浩, 等.50个红松无性系生长与木材性状变异研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(6):51-59. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150465

    Liang D Y, Jin Y Z, Zhao G H, et al. Variance analyses of growth and wood characters of 50 Pinus koraiensis clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6):51-59. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150465
    [32]
    邓继峰, 张含国, 张磊, 等.17年生杂种落叶松遗传变异及优良家系选择[J].东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(1):8-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2010.01.003

    Deng J F, Zhang H G, Zhang L, et al. Genetic variation of 17-year-old hybrid larch and its superior family selection[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010, 38(1):8-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2010.01.003
    [33]
    韩泽群, 姜波.加工番茄品种多性状综合评价方法研究[J].中国农业科学, 2014, 47(2):357-365. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201402015

    Han Z Q, Jiang B. A study on comprehensive evaluation of the tomato varieties multiple traits processing[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(2):357-365. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201402015
    [34]
    潘琼荣.马尾松自由授粉18年生子代生长状况比较及家系选择[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 43(6):592-595. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fjnydxxb201406006

    Pan Q R. Comparisons of the growth of open-pollinated progeny of 18 year-old Pinus massoniana seed orchard and its family selection[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 43(6): 592-595. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fjnydxxb201406006
    [35]
    Ruotsalainen S, Lindgren D. Predicting genetic gain of backward and forward selection in forest tree breeding[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1998, 47(1): 42-50.
    [36]
    苏顺德, 黄德龙, 魏永平, 等.马尾松自由授粉家系产脂力遗传变异及选择[J].福建林业科技, 2017, 44(2):1-6, 50. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fjlykj201702001

    Su S D, Huang D L, Wei Y P, et al. Genetic variation and selection of the resin-yielding capacity of open-pollinated families of Masson pine[J]. Journal of Fujian Science and Technology, 2017, 44(2):1-6, 50. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fjlykj201702001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 赵钰婷,陈冬瑶,杨柳,李晶楠,宁广亮,姜静. 白桦四倍体×紫雨桦二倍体杂交种子活力及杂种子代生长特性分析. 温带林业研究. 2025(01): 1-8 .
    2. 任亚超,张军,王进茂,杨敏生. 科研反哺教学在林木育种学教学中的探索与实践. 安徽农业科学. 2024(10): 278-282 .
    3. 杨琦,王湘莹,王晓明,乔中全,唐丽. 大花紫薇ב丹红紫叶’紫薇杂交F_1代不育株转录组测序. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(09): 25-29 .
    4. 赵一帆,孔博,程雪桐,李亮,凌傲宇,李智群,康向阳,张平冬. 赤霉素喷洒处理诱导新疆杨2n花粉产生及其对微管骨架的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2023(01): 40-50 . 本站查看
    5. 李智群,孔博,程雪桐,李亮,张平冬. 高温诱导银灰杨花粉败育的细胞学机理研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2023(05): 25-34 . 本站查看
    6. 刘春洋,彭朝凤,程世平,姚鹏强,耿喜宁,谢丽华. 高温诱导‘凤丹’牡丹2n雌配子创制三倍体. 园艺学报. 2023(07): 1455-1466 .
    7. 刘宣晨,刘彩霞,张世凯,李开隆,曲冠证. 大青杨×小黑杨异源三倍体新种质创制. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(10): 19-27 .
    8. 周炳秀,刘勇,彭玉信,张劲,赵建松,朱轶超,赵巧玲,王硕,陶靖,孟路. 雄性毛白杨无性系苗期表型和生理变异的早期综合评价. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(11): 1-9 .
    9. 吴婷,贾瑞冬,杨树华,赵鑫,于晓南,国圆,葛红. 蝴蝶兰多倍体育种研究进展与展望. 园艺学报. 2022(02): 448-462 .
    10. 张新宇,董阳,王梦蕾,孙照斌. 银腺杨解剖及理化性能研究. 林业科技. 2022(05): 33-36 .
    11. 陈赢男,韦素云,曲冠正,胡建军,王军辉,尹佟明,潘惠新,卢孟柱,康向阳,李来庚,黄敏仁,王明庥. 现代林木育种关键核心技术研究现状与展望. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 1-9 .

    Other cited types(14)

Catalog

    Article views (1674) PDF downloads (34) Cited by(25)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return