Short-term effects of tending felling on ecological services of mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forests at Jiaohe in Jilin Province, northeastern China

Li Minglu; Wu Zhaofei; Qiu Hua; Zhang Chunyu; Zhao Xiuhai

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180442

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2019 > 41(9): 40-49. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180442

Li Minglu, Wu Zhaofei, Qiu Hua, Zhang Chunyu, Zhao Xiuhai. Short-term effects of tending felling on ecological services of mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forests at Jiaohe in Jilin Province, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(9): 40-49. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180442

Citation:

PDF (774 KB)

Short-term effects of tending felling on ecological services of mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forests at Jiaohe in Jilin Province, northeastern China

Research Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: December 29, 2018
Revised Date: June 30, 2019
Available Online: September 08, 2019
Published Date: August 31, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the effects of tending felling on forest ecological services, to provide advice for the establishment of forest ecological function evaluation system and for the management of mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in the future.
MethodTaking the mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forests of Forestry Experimental Administration in Jiaohe, Jilin Province, northeastern China as the research object,establishing four different harvesting intensity plots of 0 (control, CK), 15% (light treatment, LT), 35% (moderate treatment, MT) and 50% (high treatment, HT). Based on the evaluation factors and criteria of forest ecological function of the State Forestry Administration, eight factors, including forest volume stock, forest naturalness, forest community structure, tree species structure, average height of stand, total vegetation coverage, canopy closure and litter layer thickness, were selected as evaluation criteria of forest ecological function. The differences of ecological services of four plots before harvesting, after harvesting and four years later after restoration were compared.
ResultBefore harvesting, the forest ecological function index (FEFI) of each plot was 0.83. After harvesting, there were significant differences in the FEFI of the four forest plots with different cutting intensity: control (0.83) > light treatment (0.71) > moderate treatment (0.67) > high treatment (0.53). After four years’ restoration, the difference of FEFI between each plot decreased gradually. The ecological function of the light treatment plot returned to the origional state (FEFI = 0.83), the forest ecological function of the moderate and high treatment plots also restored in varying degrees, with the FEFI was 0.77 and 0.61, respectively. (2) The annual average growth rate of forest increased first and then decreased with the cutting intensity. (3) Harvesting promotes the growth of dominant species in mixed broadleaved Korean pine forest, but has insignificant effects on the growth of stand height.
ConclusionTending felling with light or moderate intensity can optimize the function of forest ecosystem, promote the growth of trees, improve the utilization of timber resources, and improve the ecological benefits of forests. High-intensity harvesting can seriously destroy the stability of forest ecosystem, affect the function of ecosystem, and make it unable to recover in a short time. Considering comprehensively, the cutting intensity at 15% is reasonable, and it is suggested that the cutting intensity should not exceed 25%.
- tending felling,
- ecological evaluation,
- mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest,
- ecological function index

FullText(HTML)

References (41)

References

[1]	赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(4):480−491. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2004.04.010 Zhao T Q, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, et al. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resouces, 2004, 19(4): 480−491. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2004.04.010
[2]	朱教君, 刘足根. 森林干扰生态研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(10):1703−1710. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.10.003 Zhu J J, Liu Z G. A review on disturbance ecology of forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(10): 1703−1710. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.10.003
[3]	Liu G L, Han S J. Long-term forest management and timely transfer of carbon into wood products help reduce atmospheric carbon[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2009, 220(13−14): 1719−1723. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.005
[4]	米爽, 宋子龙, 秦江环, 等. 抚育采伐对吉林蛟河针阔混交林幼苗更新的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5):159−169. Mi S, Song Z L, Qin J H, et al. Effects of tending thinning on seedling regeneration in a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 159−169.
[5]	傅伯杰, 吕一河, 高光耀. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务与生态安全研究的重要进展[J]. 自然杂志, 2012, 34(5):261−272. Fu B J, Lü Y H, Gao G Y. Major research progresses on the ecosystem service and ecological safety of main terrestrial ecosystems in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2012, 34(5): 261−272.
[6]	靳芳, 鲁绍伟, 余新晓, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(8):1531−1536. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.08.029 Jin F, Lu S W, Yu X X, et al. Forest ecosystem service and its evaluation in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology[J]. 2005, 2005, 16(8): 1531−1536. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.08.029
[7]	Wortley L, Herd J M, Howes M. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2013, 21(5): 537−543. doi: 10.1111/rec.12028
[8]	Bai Y, Xu H, Ling H. Eco-service value evaluation based on eco-economic functional regionalization in a typical basin of northwest arid area, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 71(8): 3715−3726.
[9]	Westman W E. How much are nature’s services worth?[J]. Science, 1977, 197: 960−964. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4307.960
[10]	Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of New Jerseys ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 252−260. doi: 10.1038/387252a0
[11]	Dally G C, Power M. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems[J]. Nature, 1997, 388: 529.
[12]	Fisher B, Turner K, Zylstra M, et al. Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research[J]. Ecological Applications, 2008, 18(8): 2050−2067. doi: 10.1890/07-1537.1
[13]	侯元兆. 中国森林资源核算研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1995. Hou Y Z. Study on the accounting of forest resources in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1995.
[14]	薛达元. 生物多样性经济价值评估: 长白山自然保护区案例研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1997. Xu D Y. Economic value assessment of biodiversity: a case study of changbai mountain nature reserve[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1997.
[15]	De Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393−408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
[16]	Farber S, Costanza R, Childers D L, et al. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management[J]. Bioscience, 2006, 56: 121−133.
[17]	国家林业局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范(LY/T1721-2008)[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008. State Forestry Bureau. The specifications of assessment of forest ecosystem services in China (LY/T1721-2008)[S].Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008.
[18]	Costanza R, De Groot R, Braat L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 1−16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
[19]	刘婷婷. 金沙江上游流域生态承载力及人与生态系统关系研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012. Liu T T. Ecological carrying capacity and coupling model of human and ecosystem: a case study of upstream watershed of Jinsha River[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012.
[20]	秦伟, 朱清科, 张学霞, 等. 植被覆盖度及其测算方法研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(9):163−170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2006.09.031 Qin W, Zhu Q K, Zhang X X, et al. Review of vegetation covering and its measuring and calculating method[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry(Natural Science Edition), 2006, 34(9): 163−170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2006.09.031
[21]	李永宁, 张宾兰, 秦淑英, 等. 郁闭度及其测定方法研究与应用[J]. 世界林业研究, 2008, 21(1):40−46. Li Y N, Zhang B L, Qin S Y, et al. Review of research and application of forest canopy closure and its measuring methods[J]. World Forestry Research, 2008, 21(1): 40−46.
[22]	国家林业局. 国家森林资源连续清查技术规定(2014)[S]. 北京: 国家林业局, 2014. State Forestry Administration. National forest inventory technical regulations(2014)[S]. Beijing: State Forestry Administration, 2014.
[23]	吉林省林业厅. 吉林省立木材积、出材率表[S]. 吉林: 吉林省林业厅, 2015. Jilin Provincial Forestry Department. Jilin Province standing volume, out-put table[S]. Jilin: Jilin Provincial Forestry Department, 2015.
[24]	Thorpe H C, Thomas S C, Caspersen J P. Residual-tree growth responses to partial stand harvest in the black spruce (Picea mariana) boreal forest[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 37(9): 1563−1571. doi: 10.1139/X07-148
[25]	Zhang C, Zhao X, Gadow K. Analyzing selective harvest events in three large forest observational studies in Northeastern China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 316: 100−109. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.018
[26]	郝珉辉, 李晓宇, 夏梦洁, 等. 抚育采伐对蛟河次生针阔混交林功能结构和谱系结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5):1−9. Hao M H, Li X Y, Xia M J, et al. ffects of tending felling on functional and phylogenetic structures in a multi-species temperate secondary forest at Jiaohe in Jilin Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(5): 1−9.
[27]	Weiskittel A R, Garber S M, Johnson G P, et al. Annualized diameter and height growth equations for Pacific northwest plantation-grown Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and red alder[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 250(3): 266−278. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.026
[28]	Von Gadow K, Schmidt M. Periodische inventuren und eingriffsinventuren[J]. Forst und Holz, 1998, 53: 667−671.
[29]	Bladon K D, Silins U, Landhäusser S M, et al. Differential transpiration by three boreal tree species in response to increased evaporative demand after variable retention harvesting[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006, 138(1−4): 104−119. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.015
[30]	Wehenkel C, Corral-Rivas J J, Gadow K V. Quantifying differences between ecosystems with particular reference to selection forests in Durango, Mexico[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 316: 117−124. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.056
[31]	吴兆飞, 张雨秋, 张忠辉, 等. 东北温带森林林分结构与生产力关系研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5):48−55. Wu Z F, Zhang Y Q, Zhang Z H, et al. Study on the relationship between forest structure and productivity of temperate forests in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 48−55.
[32]	Burgess D, Robinson C, Wetzel S. Eastern white pine response to release 30 years after partial harvesting in pine mixedwood forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 209(1/2): 117−129.
[33]	巫志龙, 陈金太, 周新年, 等. 择伐强度对天然次生林乔木层6种优势种群生态位的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2013, 21(2):161−167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2013.02.010 Wu Z L, Chen J T, Zhou X N, et al. Effects of selective cutting intensities on niche of six dominant species populations on arbor layer in natural secondary forest[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2013, 21(2): 161−167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2013.02.010
[34]	徐文茹, 贺红士, 罗旭, 等. 停止商业性采伐对大兴安岭森林结构与地上生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(4):1203−1215. Xu W R, He H S, Luo X, et al. Long-term effects of commercial harvest exclusion on forest structure and aboveground biomass in the Great Xing’an Mountains, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(4): 1203−1215.
[35]	王敏, 贺红士, 梁宇, 等. 采伐强度对长白山森林地上生物量和景观格局的长期影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(10):2581−2587. Wang M, He H S, Liang Y, et al. Long-term effects of harvest intensity on forest above-ground biomass and landscape pattern of Changbai Mountain[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(10): 2581−2587.
[36]	巫志龙. 闽北杉木人工林择伐后生态恢复动态与择伐强度选优[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2018. Wu Z L. Dynamic of ecological restoration and optimal selection of harvesting intensity after the selective harvesting for Chinese fir plantations in northern Fujian Province[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2018.
[37]	周新年, 巫志龙, 郑丽凤, 等. 天然林择伐10年后凋落物现存量及其养分含量[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(10):25−28. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.10.005 Zhou X N, Wu Z L, Zheng L F, et al. Biomass and nutrient content of forest litter in natural forest of different intensity harvesting after ten years[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(10): 25−28. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.10.005
[38]	郑丽凤, 周媛, 周新年, 等. 山地森林采伐后生态服务功能恢复动态[J]. 林业经济问题, 2015, 35(1):1−6, 12. Zheng L F, Zhou Y, Zhou X N, et al. Recovery dynamics after cutting of forest ecosystem services in mountain[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2015, 35(1): 1−6, 12.
[39]	何怀江, 张忠辉, 张春雨, 等. 采伐强度对东北针阔混交林林分生长和物种多样性的短期影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2):1−12. He H J, Zhang Z H, Zhang C Y, et al. Short-term effects of thinning intensity on stand growth and species diversity of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest in northeastern China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(2): 1−12.
[40]	王妮, 彭世揆. 基于3S技术和AHP的南京市城市森林生态服务功能评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2011(6):98−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2011.06.021 Wang N, Peng S K. Evaluation onecological service functions of Nanjing urban forest based on 3S technology and AHP method[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2011(6): 98−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2011.06.021
[41]	米锋, 李吉跃, 杨家伟. 森林生态效益评价的研究进展[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2003, 25(6):77−83. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2003.06.017 Mi F, Li J Y, Yang J W. Review on research of evaluation on forest ecological benefits[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2003, 25(6): 77−83. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2003.06.017

[1]	Deng Xiangpeng, Xu Fangze, Zhao Shanchao, Xiang Wei. Tree height-DBH model for Picea schrenkiana in Tianshan Mountain, Xinjiang of northwestern China based on Bayesian method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(1): 11-20. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220318
[2]	Liang Ruiting, Sun Yujun, Zhou Lai. Modeling variable exponential taper function for Cunninghamia lanceolata based on quantile regression[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(7): 70-78. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200253
[3]	Ge Huishuo, Song Yuepeng, Su Xuehui, Zhang Deqiang, Zhang Xiaoyu. Optimal growth model of Populus simonii seedling combination based on Logistic and Gompertz models[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 59-70. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190296
[4]	Yao Dandan, Xu Qigang, Yan Xiaowang, Li Yutang. Individual-tree mortality model of Mongolian oak forests based on Bayesian method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(9): 1-8. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180260
[5]	Gong Da-peng, Kang Feng-feng, Liu Xiao-dong. Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of grassland fire and its response to meteorological factors in XinBarag Prairie of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(2): 82-89. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170402
[6]	YAO Dan-dan, LEI Xiang-dong, ZHANG Ze-lu. Bayesian parameter estimation of dominant height growth model for Changbai larch (Larix olgensis Henry) plantations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(3): 94-100. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140221
[7]	YAN Wei, ZONG Shi-xiang, LUO You-qing, CAO Chuan-jian, , LI Zhan-wen, GUO Qi-lin. Application of stepwise regression model in predicting the movement of Artemisia ordosica boring insects.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(3): 140-144.
[8]	MA You-ping, , FENG Zhong-ke, DONG Bin, AI Xun-ru. Genetic algorithm solution for Logistic model parameters.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(增刊1): 192-195.
[9]	XIANG Wei, LEI Xiang-dong, LIU Gang, XU Guang, CHEN Guang-fa. Individual tree mortality models for seminatural larchsprucefir forests in Jilin Province, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(6): 90-98.
[10]	TIAN Yong-chen, LIU Shao-gang, ZHAO Gang, CHEN Jie-yuan, LI Wen-bin. Intelligent decision-making model for forest fire suppression[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(4): 46-48. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.04.011

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(12)

1.	杨春梅，李昱成，田心池，吴方镜，魏明，吴哲. 基于筛分配比的超薄纤维板物理力学性能研究. 林业机械与木工设备. 2024(01): 20-24 .
2.	张镭，邹淼，唐启恒，郭文静. 热压时间和温度对酚醛树脂型超薄高密度纤维板性能的影响. 木材科学与技术. 2023(01): 68-73 .
3.	高黎，常亮，郭文静，范丽颖，涂松，袁旻. 轻质纤维板发展与应用探讨. 中国人造板. 2023(06): 8-11 .
4.	史振丁，贾耀芳，郭勇德. 基于不同水刺水针板缠结性能的研究. 化纤与纺织技术. 2023(05): 20-22 .
5.	陈秀兰，杜官本，范恩庆，杨龙. 工艺参数对脲基超支化聚合物改性效果的影响. 林产工业. 2022(04): 20-24 .
6.	龙慈明，覃掌吉，黎耀健，卿彦，李新功，吴义强，刘明. 脲醛树脂/异氰酸酯胶粘剂组合施胶对纤维板性能的影响. 中国胶粘剂. 2021(02): 8-13 .
7.	黄伟雄，韦盛永，陆锋，冯炳健，李立群，徐健峰. 中密度纤维板的密度稳定性分析——以广西三威林产岑溪市人造板有限公司为例. 林业科技通讯. 2021(04): 63-66 .
8.	孙萍，张健，刘红光，李黎，罗斌. UF/PMDI与PMDI胶黏剂制备轻质刨花板性能对比研究. 林产工业. 2021(06): 7-12 .
9.	伍艳梅，卢胜高，赵丽媛，唐召群，杨娜. 中密度纤维板剖面密度特征参数与主要物理力学性能相关性. 木材科学与技术. 2021(05): 31-37 .
10.	张成旭，花军，陈光伟. 纤维目数对纤维板力学性能和成本的影响研究. 林产工业. 2020(03): 19-24 .
11.	马玉峰，龚轩昂，王春鹏. 木材胶黏剂研究进展. 林产化学与工业. 2020(02): 1-15 .
12.	林国利，覃掌吉，魏云和，安超，杨守禄，刘明. 工艺因子对MDI制备无醛纤维板性能的影响. 林产工业. 2020(08): 25-28 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2136) PDF downloads (88) Cited by(17)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Short-term effects of tending felling on ecological services of mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forests at Jiaohe in Jilin Province, northeastern China