Research on applying new materials for Pinus tabuliformis plantations in barren sites of plain in Beijing

LI Mei; JIA Li-ming; YU Dan-dan; MA Lü-yi; JIA Zhong-kui

doi:DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140346

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2015 > 37(4): 64-73. > DOI: DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140346

LI Mei, JIA Li-ming, YU Dan-dan, MA Lü-yi, JIA Zhong-kui. Research on applying new materials for Pinus tabuliformis plantations in barren sites of plain in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(4): 64-73. DOI: DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140346

Citation:

PDF (1028 KB)

Research on applying new materials for Pinus tabuliformis plantations in barren sites of plain in Beijing

Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: September 18, 2014
Revised Date: October 31, 2014
Published Date: April 29, 2015

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

To seek the implementation solutions of using new materials for the seedling survival, growth and health of large size coniferous forest such as Pinus tabuliformis under barren site condition in the Beijing Plain Afforestation Project, three new materials (i.e., antitranspirant, Suillus grevillei and GGR 6 plant growth regulator) were used to form eight different treatments. The survival rate, new shoot number, new shoot length, new shoot diameter, the content of chlorophyll and leaf nutrient elements were investigated. Results were as follows: 1) the survival rates of P. tabuliformis seedlings treated with new materials were all higher than control (78%), especially with HSK (Suillus grevillei+GGR 6 plant growth regulator+antitranspirant) treatment it was the highest (89%); 2) under the HSK treatment, the new shoots of P. tabuliformis grew best from may to July in 2013, the average increasing rate of new shoots number was greatest, and the average increasing number of individual tree was 6.48, which was 2 times of control. The average increase of new shoot diameter was 2.36 mm, which increased by 117% compared with control. The increasing amount of new shoot length increased by 251% compared with that of control; 3) the average of total chlorophyll content with HSK in 2013 was the highest of 6.96 mg/L, and the lowest of 5.76 mg/L with control. There were obvious mutual promoted effects among three new materials; 4) regarding the contents of leaf nutrient elements, under HSK treatment the average total content of element P was 0.81 g/kg, N 10.01 mg/kg and K 5.41 g/kg in 2013, which was better than the other treatments. HSK treatment could keep the contents of 3 elements stable and in high levels; 5) because dead seedlings should be replanted in order to keep the forest stand structure stable, the increase of survival rate compared with control could save the cost from replanting, then compensate the cost by applying new materials in afforestation. HSK treatment (100 plants in 0.17 hm2)can save the maximum replanting cost (810 RMB Yuan), that is 4 764 RMB Yuan/hm2. Therefore, considering all the indicators, HSK treatment can both ensure the higher survival rate and promote the growth and development of seedlings.
- Pinus tabuliformis plantations,
- antitranspirant,
- GGR 6 plant growth regulator,
- Suillus grevillei

FullText(HTML)

References (60)

References

[1]	吴凤,郭建斌,李志洪,等. 不同种类抗蒸腾叶面肥对山杏水分利用效率的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2013,20(2):156-159.
[1]	WU F,GUO J B,LI Z H,et al. Impact of types of antitranspirant foliar fertilizer on the water use efficiency of Prunus armeniaca[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(2):156-159.
[2]	FENG J C,ZHENG G B,HE W,et al. Progress and prospects for application of antitranspirant in forestry[J]. Forest Research,2005,18(6):755-760.
[2]	冯建灿,郑根宝,何威,等. 抗蒸腾剂在林业上的应用研究进展与展望[J]. 林业科学研究,2005,18(6):755-760.
[3]	CHEN Q Q. Soil water contents and antitranspirant on stomatal development and physiological metabolism of maize[D]. Yangling:Northwest AF University,2011.
[3]	陈倩倩. 土壤水分含量和抗蒸腾剂对玉米气孔发育及生理过程的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011.
[4]	何茜,李吉跃,齐涛. GGR6号和“施丰乐”溶液浸根对银杏生长、光合特性及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2006,28(增刊1):55-58.
[4]	HE Q,LI J Y,QI T. Influence of phytohorm one“Shifengle”and GGR6 on the growth, photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency in seedlings of Ginkgo biloba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2006,28(Suppl.1):55-58.
[5]	尹丹丹,薛泽云,徐迎春,等. GGR6号生根粉对石蒜子球发育的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2012,40(11):194-196.
[5]	YIN D D,XUE Z Y,XU Y C, et al. Influence of GGR6 to the development of Lycoris radiate cormel[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agti,2012,40(11):194-196.
[6]	LI H,QIN Y S,WANG Y C, et al. Effcet of inoculating with the ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi on the Quercus variabilis seeding growth[J]. Journal of Anhui Agti,2013,41(6):2536-2538.
[6]	李皓,秦永胜,王永超,等. 接种菌根菌对栓皮栎幼苗生长的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(6):2536-2538.
[7]	ZHANG Q Y,LI F D,LIU M Y. Changing laws of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate in winter wheat leaves[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco Agriculture,2005,13(3):95-98.
[7]	张秋英,李发东,刘孟雨. 冬小麦叶片叶绿素含量及光合速率变化规律的研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):95-98.
[8]	ZHANG S,ZHAO K T,WANG J,et al. Influence of antitranspirant to the Sophora moorcroftiana physiological property under the sress of natural drought[J]. Shandong Forestry Science and Technology,2010(3):65-67.
[8]	张胜,赵垦田,王景,等. 自然干旱胁迫下喷施抗蒸腾剂对砂生槐生理特性的影响[J]. 山东林业科技,2010(3):65-67.
[9]	王斌,杨秀珍,戴思兰. 4种园林树木抗旱性的综合分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2013,35(1):95-102.
[9]	WANG B,YANG X Z,DAI S L. Comprehensive analysis in drought resistance of four landscape trees[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2013,35(1):95-102.
[10]	田赟,王海燕,孙向阳,等. 三倍体毛白杨人工林施肥与营养诊断研究进展[J]. 西北林学院学报,2009,24(6):83-87.
[10]	TIAN Y,WANG H Y,SUN X Y,et al. Advances in the study of fertilization and nutrient diagnosis of triploid Populus tomentosa plantation[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2009,24(6):83-87.
[11]	GUO S H,ZHENG L J. Studies on content and relation of nutritional element of leaf of Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences,2007,11(2):26-29.
[11]	郭书花,郑丽锦. 三倍体毛白杨叶片营养元素含量及相互关系研究[J]. 河北农业科学,2007,11(2):26-29.
[12]	QU T Z,SUN X Y,ZHANG Y,et al. Annual changes of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg leaf nutrients in triploid Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College ,2008,25(4):538-542.
[12]	曲天竹,孙向阳,张颖,等. 三倍体毛白杨叶片营养年变化规律初探[J]. 浙江林学院学报,2008,25(4):538-542.
[13]	CHEN T,SUN X Y. Seasonal and annual variation of mineral elements concentration in leaves of Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2009,24(2):42-45.
[13]	陈甜,孙向阳. 毛白杨叶片营养元素含量季节变化及年变化研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2009,24(2):42-45.
[14]	杨腾,段劼,马履一,等. 不同氮素用量对文冠果生长、养分积累及转运的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2014,36(3):58-62.
[14]	YANG T,DUAN J,MA L Y,et al. Effect of N application rates on growth,nutrient accumulation and translocation of Xanthoceras sorbifolia[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2014,36(3):58-62.
[15]	DENG C J,GUO J B,GAO C D. Effects of new antitranspiration foliar fertilizer on transpiration rate[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,30(1):113-116.
[15]	邓春娟,郭建斌,高程达. 新型抗蒸腾叶面肥对叶片蒸腾速率的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2010,30(1):113-116.
[16]	LI W B,GUO J B,JIANG K Y,et al. Effects on new anti-transpiration foliar fertilizer on transpiration rate of forestation tree species[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,30(6):32-35.
[16]	李文斌,郭建斌,蒋坤云,等. 抗蒸腾型叶面肥对造林树种蒸腾速率的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2010,30(6):32-35.
[17]	DENG C J. The application of new antitranspiration foliar fertilizer on Rhus tyhina,Robinia pseudoacacia and Ulmus pumila[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University,2009.
[17]	邓春娟. 新型抗蒸腾叶面肥在火炬树、刺槐、白榆上的应用[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2009.
[18]	何威. 抗蒸腾剂对女贞、杨树、刺槐幼苗生长和几项生理指标影响的研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2005.
[18]	HE W. Study on influence on growing and several physiological indexs of seedling of Ligustrum lucidun AIT, Populus euramericana and Robinia pseudoacaci by using antitranspirant[D]. Zhengzhou:Henan Agriculturalal University,2005.
[19]	LIANG Y.The effects of new antitranspiration leaf surface fertilization on biological activity of Robinia pseudoacacia and Juglans regia[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University,2008.
[19]	梁月. 新型抗蒸腾叶面肥对刺槐、核桃苗木生理活动的影响[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2008.
[20]	LI Z N,WANG G M,ZENG Z W,et al. Research of ABA under plant drought stress[J]. Agricultural Research in the Atid Areas,2003,21(2):99-103.
[20]	李智念,王光明,曾之文,等. 植物干旱胁迫中的ABA研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(2):99-103.
[21]	沈成国,张福锁,毛达如. 植物叶片衰老过程中叶绿素降解代谢研究进展[J]. 植物学通报,1998,15(增刊):41-46.
[21]	SHEN C G,ZHANG F S,MAO D R. Advances in degradation metabolism of chlorophyll during plant leaf senecence[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany,1998,15(Suppl.):41-46.
[22]	张金荣,张斌珍,樊富花. GGR6号植物生长调节剂对华北落叶松造林的影响及作用机理[J]. 山西林业科技,2004(1):37-38.
[22]	ZHANG J R,ZHANG B Z,FAN F H. Effect and mechanism of action of the GGR6 to the Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr afforestaton[J]. Shanxi Forestry Science and Technology,2004(1):37-38.
[23]	PENG S Y,CAO Q. Effect of ABT,GGR and NAA to the rooting of Vitis vinifera Linn. [J]. Northern Fruits,2004(2):11-12.
[23]	彭世勇,曹群. ABT,GGR生根粉和NAA对葡萄插条生根的影响[J]. 北方果树,2004(2):11-12.
[24]	WANG S C. Study on softwood cutting techniques of Catalpa bungei and its rooting mechanism[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University,2007.
[24]	王顺财.楸树嫩枝扦插繁殖技术及其生根机理研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学,2007.
[25]	LI Y K,RAN F,HAN F,et al. Impact of GGR on the antioxidant physiological indices of Kobresia humilis(C.A.Mey ex Trauvt..)serg.in alpine meadow[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica,2010,18(1):56-60.
[25]	李以康,冉飞,韩发,等. 绿色植物生长调节剂(GGR)对高寒草甸矮嵩草抗氧化生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(1):56-60.
[26]	FU R,GUO S J,MA L Y. The morphology and physiological response of mycorrhizal seedlings of Quercus variabilis under different soil moisture levels[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2011,26(2):101-104.
[26]	付瑞,郭素娟,马履一. 菌根化栓皮栎苗木对不同土壤水分条件的形态和生理响应[J]. 西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):101-104.
[27]	卢丽君. 大青山外生菌根真菌栽培特性及油松菌根合成研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2005.
[27]	LU L J. Study on culture characteristic of ectomycorrihizal fungi and mycorrihizal synthesis of Pinus tabuliformis in Daqing Mountain[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2005.
[28]	WANG L.The effect of tree trunk infusion and mycorrhizal applying combination technique on urban tree transplantation[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2010.
[28]	王龙. 树体输液与菌根剂施用组合技术对城市大树移植的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010.
[29]	王琚钢,峥嵘,白淑兰,等. 外生菌根对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2012,31(6):1571-1576.
[29]	WANG J G,ZHENGRONG,BAI S L,et al. Research of ectomycorrhizal to drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(6):1571-1576.
[30]	ZHANG W Q. The study of the diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Litv and mycorrhizal biotechnology[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2013.
[30]	张文泉. 樟子松外生菌根真菌多样性及菌根生物技术研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	刘徐师. 山西省崖壁植物资源及其在难造林地的应用前景分析. 生态学杂志. 2017(07): 1785-1790 .
2.	南雪琴. 造林整地与植树造林技术. 农民致富之友. 2015(18): 128-129 .

Other cited types(3)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2218) PDF downloads (39) Cited by(5)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Research on applying new materials for Pinus tabuliformis plantations in barren sites of plain in Beijing

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

Other cited types(3)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content