Comparison study on characteristic analysis methods of CLT wall-to-floor T connection under shear test

Diao Yue; Jia Heran; Meng Xinmiao; Gao Ying; Zhang Jianan

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190161

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2019 > 41(8): 147-153. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190161

Diao Yue, Jia Heran, Meng Xinmiao, Gao Ying, Zhang Jianan. Comparison study on characteristic analysis methods of CLT wall-to-floor T connection under shear test[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(8): 147-153. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190161

Citation:

PDF (1159 KB)

Comparison study on characteristic analysis methods of CLT wall-to-floor T connection under shear test

1.
College of Material Science and Technology in Beijing Forestry University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Wood Science and Engineering of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Wooden Material Science and Application, Beijing 100083, China
2.
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
3.
China Construction Second Engrg Bureau LTD. Shanghai Branch, Shanghai 200135, China

More Information

Received Date: March 24, 2019
Revised Date: May 13, 2019
Available Online: June 30, 2019
Published Date: July 31, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

ObjectiveMechanical characteristic analysis method is an effective way to evaluate structure mechanical performance. In research of wood structure field, three analysis methods are widely accepted, which are method involved in ASTM E2126, EN 12512 and Y&K method. Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is considered as an important wood composite to build high-rise wood constructions in the future. Researches on CLT material properties have been launched over years, but tests on CLT connection system mechanical performance and development are still in early stage.
MethodIn this research, a T-shape metal connector was used to connect CLT wall and floor panel. Based on the shear test results, mechanical characteristic values such as stiffness, yield point and ductility ratio were determined by applying those three methods.
ResultThe comparison results between methods show that the yield point calculated from Y&K is differ from other two methods, the stiffness value and ductility ratio results of EN method are higher, and the difference between ASTM method and EN method is affected by the test curve.
ConclusionFor an overall consideration, Y&K method has more practical engineering reference meaning for the type of CLT wall-to-panel connection tested here and those wood structures that have similar test curve shape and ductile failure mode.
- characteristic analysis method,
- ASTM method,
- EN method,
- Y&K method,
- CLT wall-floor joint,
- shear test

FullText(HTML)

References (12)

References

[1]	American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM). ASTM E2126-11: Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of vertical elements of the lateral force resisting systems for buildings[S]. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2011.
[2]	European Committee for Standardization. EN 12512-2001: Timber structures–test methods–cyclic testing of joints made with mechanical fasteners[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2001.
[3]	Yasumura M, Kawai N. Estimating seismic performance of wood-framed structures: proceedings of 5th WCTE [C]. Montreux: Press Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, 1998: 564−571.
[4]	Jeong G Y, Song J K. Evaluation of structural properties of dovetail connections under tensile load using three methods of data analysis[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2017, 29(10): 06017011. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001992
[5]	刘慧芬, 何敏娟, 高承勇. 木结构销类连接的屈服点和延性定义方法比较[J]. 特种结构, 2015(3):1−5. Liu H F, He M J, Gao C Y. Comparison of determination methods of yield point and ductility for wood structure dowel type connection[J]. Special Structure, 2015(3): 1−5.
[6]	Muñoz W, Mohammad M, Salenikovich A, et al. Need for a harmonised approach for calculations of ductility of timber assemblies: proceedings of the 41th CIB W18 Meeting [C]. St. Andrews: Universität Karlsruhe, 2008.
[7]	Fragiacomo M, Dujic B, Sustersic I. Elastic and ductile design of multi-storey crosslam massive wooden buildings under seismic actions[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(11): 3043−3053. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.020
[8]	Jorissen A, Fragiacomo M. General notes on ductility in timber structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(11): 2987−2997. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.024
[9]	Brandner R, Flatscher G, Ringhofer A, et al. Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development[J]. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 2016, 74(3): 331−351. doi: 10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5
[10]	Gavric I, Fragiacomo M, Ceccotti A. Cyclic behavior of CLT wall systems: experimental tests and analytical prediction models[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(11): 04015034. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001246
[11]	贾苑, 乔菁, 张佳男, 等. CLT墙体−楼板T型连接件节点力学性能研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(10):123−130. Jia Y, Qiao J, Zhang J N, et al. Mechanical performance of CLT wall-to-floor joints with T connector[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(10): 123−130.
[12]	American National Standards Institution (ANSI)/The Engineered Wood Association(APA). PRG 320-2012: Standards for performance-rated cross-laminated timber [S]. Tacoma: ANSI/APA, 2012.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(0)

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2485) PDF downloads (40) Cited by(2)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Comparison study on characteristic analysis methods of CLT wall-to-floor T connection under shear test

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(0)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content