• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Hao Minhui, Dai Ying, Yue Qingmin, Fan Chunyu, Zhang Chunyu. Relationship between functional diversity of broadleaved Korean pine forest and forest carbon sink function[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(10): 68-76. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220237
Citation: Hao Minhui, Dai Ying, Yue Qingmin, Fan Chunyu, Zhang Chunyu. Relationship between functional diversity of broadleaved Korean pine forest and forest carbon sink function[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(10): 68-76. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220237
shu

Relationship between functional diversity of broadleaved Korean pine forest and forest carbon sink function

  • 1.

    Research Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

  • 2.

    Greening Management Center of Changchun City, Changchun 136200, Jilin, China

More Information
  • Received Date: June 12, 2022
  • Revised Date: August 06, 2022
  • Available Online: September 12, 2022
  • Published Date: October 24, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  Exploring the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEF) was proposed to be a central issue in ecology and a key prerequisite for multi-functional forest management. However, the specific mechanisms regulating biodiversity and forest carbon sink function relationship in broadleaved Korean pine forests were still not understood very well. Based on the observations from a 30 ha broadleaved Korean pine forest sample plot in Jiaohe, northeastern China, this study aimed to clarify how different facets of biodiversity (i.e., functional diversity and composition) influence forest carbon sink functions.
      Method  Functional diversity and composition were obtained from seven plant functional traits. A structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to test three alternative hypothesized mechanisms, including niche complementary effect, biomass ratio effect and vegetation quantity effect, which had the potential to regulate the biodiversity and carbon sink relationship.
      Result  (1) Biodiversity is an important influencing factor of forest carbon sink function. Improving functional diversity will help to increase forest carbon increment, and increasing the proportion of slow growth conservative traits will help to increase forest carbon storage. Maintaining a certain stand density will also help to fully utilize resources and improve forest carbon fixation capacity. (2) The results also verified the hypothesis of niche complementary effect, biomass ratio effect and vegetation quantity effect. The explanatory variables together explained the change of 13% forest carbon stock and 36% forest carbon increment.
      Conclusion  Carbon storage and carbon increment are important reflection and direct embodiment of carbon sink function of forest ecosystem. This study has revealed the mechanism of the relationship between biodiversity and forest carbon sink function to a certain extent, indicating that the relationship pattern between biodiversity and carbon sink function in broadleaved Korean pine forest is the result of multiple ecological mechanisms. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the realization of “carbon fixation and sink enhancement” and “simultaneous enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem functions” of broadleaved Korean pine forests.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (61)
  • [1]
    吴征镒. 中国植被[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1980.

    Wu Z Y. Vegetation of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1980.
    [2]
    Peng C, Zhou X, Zhao S, et al. Quantifying the response of forest carbon balance to future climate change in Northeastern China: model validation and prediction[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2009, 66(3): 179−194.
    [3]
    王晓峰, 勒斯木初, 张明明. “两屏三带”生态系统格局变化及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(7): 2138−2148. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201907.024

    Wang X F, Lesimuchu, Zhang M M. Ecosystem pattern change and its influencing factors of “two barriers and three belts”[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(7): 2138−2148. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201907.024
    [4]
    张斯屿. 东北天然林保护工程森林态系统服务功能变化评估(1992—2015)[D]. 长春: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所), 2019.

    Zhang S Y. Evaluation of forest ecosystem service change in NFPP area in northeast China from 1992 to 2015 [D]. Changchun: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2019.
    [5]
    Luo W, Kim H S, Zhao X, et al. New forest biomass carbon stock estimates in Northeast Asia based on multisource data[J]. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(12): 7045−7066. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15376
    [6]
    郝珉辉, 李晓宇, 夏梦洁, 等. 抚育采伐对蛟河次生针阔混交林功能结构和谱系结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 1−9. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180501

    Hao M H, Li X Y, Xia M J, et al. Effects of tending felling on functional and phylogenetic structures in a multi-species temperate secondary forest at Jiaohe in Jilin Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(5): 1−9. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180501
    [7]
    郝占庆, 王庆礼, 代力民. 天然林保护工程在东北林区生物多样性保护中的意义[C]// 中国科学院生物多样性委员会. 面向 21 世纪的中国生物多样性保护: 第三届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1998: 30−35.

    Hao Z Q, Wang Q L, Dai L M. The importance of the national programme for natural forests conservation on biodiversity conservation in northeast state owned forest areas of China[C]//Biodiversity Committee, the Chinese Academy of Sciences. China’s biodiversity conservation torward the 21st century: proceedings of the third national symposium on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1998: 30−35.
    [8]
    于大炮, 周旺明, 周莉, 等. 长白山区阔叶红松林经营历史与研究历程[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5): 1426−1434. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.004

    Yu D P, Zhou W M, Zhou L, et al. Exploring the history of the management theory and technology of broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) forest in Changbai Mountain Region, Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(5): 1426−1434. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.004
    [9]
    张会儒, 雷相东, 张春雨, 等. 森林质量评价及精准提升理论与技术研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 1−18.

    Zhang H R, Lei X D, Zhang C Y, et al. Research on theory and technology of forest quality evaluation and precision improvement[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 1−18.
    [10]
    Zhang Y, Chen H Y H, Reich P B. Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(3): 742−749. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x
    [11]
    Liang J, Crowther T W, Picard N, et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests[J/OL]. Science, 2016, 354: aaf8957 [2022−02−19]. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaf8957.
    [12]
    Forrester D I, Bauhus J. A review of processes behind diversity-productivity relationships in forests[J]. Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2(1): 45−61. doi: 10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2
    [13]
    van der Plas F. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities[J]. Biological Reviews, 2019, 94(4): 1220−1245.
    [14]
    Loreau M. Does functional redundancy exist?[J]. Oikos, 2004, 104(3): 606−611. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12685.x
    [15]
    Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, et al. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes[J]. Science, 1997, 277: 1300−1302. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1300
    [16]
    Díaz S, Cabido M, Zak M, et al. Plant functional traits, ecosystem structure and land-use history along a climatic gradient in central-western Argentina[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10(5): 651−660. doi: 10.2307/3237080
    [17]
    Petchey O L, Gaston K J. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition[J]. Ecology Letters, 2002, 5(3): 402−411. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00339.x
    [18]
    Reich P B, Wright I J, Cavender-Bares J, et al. The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies[J]. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003, 164(S3): S143−S164.
    [19]
    Cornelissen J H C, Lavorel S, Garnier E, et al. Handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurements of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2003, 51(4): 335−380. doi: 10.1071/BT02124
    [20]
    Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Gamier E, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2013, 61(3): 167−234. doi: 10.1071/BT12225
    [21]
    刘晓娟, 马克平. 植物功能性状研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2015, 45(4): 325−339.

    Liu X J, Ma K P. Plant functional traits: concepts, applications and future directions[J]. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 2015, 45(4): 325−339.
    [22]
    夏梦洁, 王晓霞, 郝珉辉, 等. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林功能性状分布格局及其对地形因素的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(7): 2794−2802.

    Xia M J, Wang X X, Hao M H, et al. Distribution pattern of functional traits and its response to topographic factors in a conifer and broad-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(7): 2794−2802.
    [23]
    Violle C, Navas M L, Vile D, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional![J]. Oikos, 2007, 116(5): 882−892. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x
    [24]
    Villéger S, Mason N W H, Mouillot D. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology[J]. Ecology, 2008, 89(8): 2290−2301. doi: 10.1890/07-1206.1
    [25]
    Laliberté E, Legendre P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits[J]. Ecology, 2010, 91(1): 299−305. doi: 10.1890/08-2244.1
    [26]
    Tobner C M, Paquette A, Gravel D, et al. Functional identity is the main driver of diversity effects in young tree communities[J]. Ecology Letters, 2016, 19(6): 638−647. doi: 10.1111/ele.12600
    [27]
    Hao M, Messier C, Gen Y, et al. Functional traits drive biomass and productivity through multiple mechanisms in a temperate secondary forest[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2020, 139(6): 1−10.
    [28]
    Grime J P. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86(6): 902−910. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x
    [29]
    Lohbeck M, Poorter L, Paz H, et al. Functional diversity changes during tropical forest succession[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution & Systematics, 2012, 14(2): 89−96.
    [30]
    Lamlom S H, Savidge R A. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003, 25(4): 381−388. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00033-3
    [31]
    郝珉辉, 张忠辉, 赵珊珊, 等. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林树木生长的空间关联格局[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(6): 1922−1930.

    Hao M H, Zhang Z H, Zhao S S, et al. Spatial autocorrelation patterns of tree growth in a coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe of Jilin Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(6): 1922−1930.
    [32]
    郝珉辉, 张忠辉, 赵珊珊, 等. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林树木生长与生境的关联性[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3437−3444.

    Hao M H, Zhang Z H, Zhao S S, et al. Habitat associations of tree growth in a coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(10): 3437−3444.
    [33]
    Harms K E, Condit R, Hubbell S P, et al. Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2001, 89(6): 947−959. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00615.x
    [34]
    Hao M, Ganeshaiah K N, Zhang C, et al. Discriminating among forest communities based on taxonomic, phylogenetic and trait distances[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, 440: 40−47. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.006
    [35]
    何怀江, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 张春雨, 等. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林12个树种生物量分配规律[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 53−62. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150430

    He H J, Yeerjiang·Baiketuerhan, Zhang C Y, et al. Biomass allocation of twelve tree species in coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province, northeast China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 53−62. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150430
    [36]
    He H, Zhang C, Zhao X, et al. Allometric biomass equations for 12 tree species in coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests, Northeastern China[J]. Plos One, 2018, 13(1): e0186226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186226
    [37]
    van der Sande M T, Arets E J M M, Pena-Claros M, et al. Soil fertility and species traits, but not diversity, drive productivity and biomass stocks in a Guyanese tropical rainforest[J]. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32(2): 461−474. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12968
    [38]
    van der Sande M T, Pena-Claros M, Ascarrunz N, et al. Abiotic and biotic drivers of biomass change in a Neotropical forest[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2017, 105(5): 1223−1234. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12756
    [39]
    Ruiz-Benito P, Gomez-Aparicio L, Paquette A, et al. Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spanish forests[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23(3): 311−322. doi: 10.1111/geb.12126
    [40]
    Garcia-Palacios P, Shaw E A, Wall D H, et al. Contrasting mass-ratio vs. niche complementarity effects on litter C and N loss during decomposition along a regional climatic gradient[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2017, 105(4): 968−978. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12730
    [41]
    Liu X, Swenson N G, Zhang J, et al. The environment and space, not phylogeny, determine trait dispersion in a subtropical forest[J]. Functional Ecology, 2013, 27(1): 264−272. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12018
    [42]
    Ratcliffe S, Wirth C, Jucker T, et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context[J]. Ecology Letters, 2017, 20(11): 1414−1426. doi: 10.1111/ele.12849
    [43]
    Finegan B, Pena-Claros M, Oliveira A D, et al. Does functional trait diversity predict above-ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2015, 103(1): 191−201. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12346
    [44]
    Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P. Numerical ecology with R[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2018.
    [45]
    Tan L, Fan C, Zhang C, et al. Understanding and protecting forest biodiversity in relation to species and local contributions to beta diversity[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2019, 138(6): 1005−1013. doi: 10.1007/s10342-019-01220-3
    [46]
    Hoyle R H. Handbook of structural equation modeling[M]. New York: Guilford Press, 2012.
    [47]
    Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling[J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012, 48(2): 1−36.
    [48]
    Stephenson N L, van Mantgem P J. Forest turnover rates follow global and regional patterns of productivity[J]. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8(5): 524−531. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00746.x
    [49]
    Keeling H C, Phillips O L. The global relationship between forest productivity and biomass[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2007, 16(5): 618−631. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00314.x
    [50]
    Díaz S, Hector A, Wardle D A. Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: not just a side benefit[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2009, 1(1): 55−60. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.08.001
    [51]
    Searle E B, Chen H Y, Paquette A. Higher tree diversity is linked to higher tree mortality[J/OL]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119(19): e2013171119 [2022−08−20]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013171119.
    [52]
    Lasky J R, Uriarte M, Boukili V K, et al. Trait-mediated assembly processes predict successional changes in community diversity of tropical forests[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(15): 5616−5621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319342111
    [53]
    Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J]. Nature, 2004, 428: 821−827. doi: 10.1038/nature02403
    [54]
    Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum[J]. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12(4): 351−366. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x
    [55]
    Prado-Junior J A, Schiavini I, Vale V S, et al. Conservative species drive biomass productivity in tropical dry forests[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2016, 104(3): 817−827. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12543
    [56]
    Ali A, Mattsson E. Wood density is a sustainability indicator for the management of dry zone homegarden agroforests: evidences from biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 105: 474−482. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.024
    [57]
    Roscher C, Schumacher J, Gubsch M, et al. Using plant functional traits to explain diversity-productivity relationships[J]. Plos One, 2012, 7(5): e36760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036760
    [58]
    Aleixo I, Norris D, Hemerik L, et al. Amazonian rainforest tree mortality driven by climate and functional traits[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9(5): 384−388. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0458-0
    [59]
    Morin X. Species richness promotes canopy packing: a promising step towards a better understanding of the mechanisms driving the diversity effects on forest functioning[J]. Functional Ecology, 2015, 29(8): 993−994. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12473
    [60]
    Jucker T, Bouriaud O, Coomes D A. Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests[J]. Functional Ecology, 2015, 29(8): 1078−1086. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12428
    [61]
    Ouyang S, Xiang W, Wang X, et al. Effects of stand age, richness and density on productivity in subtropical forests in China[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2019, 107(5): 2266−2277. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13194
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Fan Chunnan, Liu Qiang, Zheng Jinping, Guo Zhongling, Zhang Wentao, Liu Yinglong, Xie Zunjun, Ren Zengjun. Effects of logging intensity on restoration of carbon density in broadleaved Korean pine forest ecosystem[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(10): 33-42. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220190
    [2]Chen Keyi, Zhang Huiru, Zhang Bo, He Youjun. Spatial distribution simulation of recruitment trees of natural secondary forest based on geographically weighted regression[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(2): 1-9. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200157
    [3]Hu Haiqing, Luo Sisheng, Luo Bizhen, Wei Shujing, Wang Zhenshi, Wu Zepeng. Effects of forest fire disturbance on soil organic carbon and its components of Cunninghamia lanceolata forest in Guangdong Province, southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(12): 108-118. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190179
    [4]SUN Xiang-nan, YANG Hua, LI Shi-ming, ZHANG Heng, SHANG Xu-yang, ZHANG Yong-fu. Application of road disturbance index in forest landscape protection[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(5): 65-72. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160349
    [5]ZHU Liang-jun, JIN Guang-ze, DU Wen-xian, WANG Xiao-chun. Characteristics of canopy disturbance for a typical broadleaf-Korean pine mixed forest in Xiaoxing'an Mountains, Liangshui, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6): 17-27. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150458
    [6]KONG Bo, DENG Wei, TAO He-ping, YU Huan, LI Ai-nong. Patterns of human disturbance at multiple scales in the wetland of Sanjiang Plain, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(2): 100-105.
    [7]SONG Xin-zhang, ZHANG Hui-ling, XIAO Wen-fa, GUO Zhong-ling, HUANG Zhi-lin, LEI Jing-pin. Seed bank in the logging gaps of broadleavedKorean pine mixed forests in Changbai Mountain, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(2): 17-24.
    [8]HU Wan-liang, TAN Xue-ren, KONG Xiang-wen, DING Lei, XU Qing-xiang, JIN Xin, DING Guo-quan. Effects of disturbance on community structure and higher plant diversity of artificially inducing broad-leaved Korean pine forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(6): 72-78. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.06.015
    [9]WANG Xu-gao, LI Xiu-zhen, HE Hong-shi. Spatial simulation of forest succession under different fire disturbances and planting strategies in northern slopes of Great Xing'anling Mountains[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(1): 14-22.
    [10]LIU Yun, HOU Shi-quan, LI Ming-hui, PAN Cun-de, SUN Dan-feng, LIU Yun-hui. Regeneration pattern of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica forest under two different disturbances.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(1): 47-50.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (878) PDF downloads (221) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337673 Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return