• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Chen Beibei, Jiang Jun, Lu Yuanchang, Liu Xianzhao, Jia Hongyan, Ming Angang, Zhang Xianqiang. Effects of thinning intensity on the growth of interplanting broadleaved trees under Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(1): 58-65. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200086
Citation: Chen Beibei, Jiang Jun, Lu Yuanchang, Liu Xianzhao, Jia Hongyan, Ming Angang, Zhang Xianqiang. Effects of thinning intensity on the growth of interplanting broadleaved trees under Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(1): 58-65. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200086

Effects of thinning intensity on the growth of interplanting broadleaved trees under Pinus massoniana plantation

More Information
  • Received Date: March 29, 2020
  • Revised Date: May 08, 2020
  • Available Online: January 05, 2021
  • Published Date: February 04, 2021
  •   Objective  This paper analyzes the thinning effect of replanting tree species of Pinus massoniana plantation in southwestern Guangxi, southern China in order to provide a better guidance and theoretical basis for scientific and reasonable management.
      Method  Four kinds of artificial replanting tree species were used as the research objects to study the growth of replanting tree species under Pinus massoniana plantation after three thinning intensities (80%, 50%, 30%), and to analyze the influence of stand and habitat factors.
      Result  The thinning intensity had a significant impact on the growth of interplanting broadleaved trees. The thinning intensity significantly affected the growth of broadleaf trees, and the growth of Castanopsis fissa and Manglietia glauca increased with thinning intensity increasing, but the influence of cutting intensity on Erythrophleum fordii was not significant. The DBH growth of Castanopsis fissa was higher than that of other three tree species, and the peak appeared in the third year or so. The effect of thinning intensity on the growth of Erythrophleum fordii was accelerated in 30% thinning intensity after nineth years. Castanopsis fissa and Castanopsis hystrix were suitable to grow under 50% thinning intensity, and the increase of DBH appeared in the fifth year. The main factors affecting the growth of replanted trees were tree density, organic matter and soil thickness, showing significant differences in replanted trees (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Different tree species have better growth rate under medium and high intensity thinning. Castanopsis fissa and Castanopsis hystrix can make full use of the space left behind by high-intensity thinning, give full play to the advantages of rapid growth and improvement of forest soil, while Erythrophleum fordii and Castanopsis hystrix can keep the growth rate continuously by the environmental conditions created by Castanopsis fissa and Manglietia glauca. It is suggested that Quercus griffithii and Manglietia glauca are suitable tree species in the thinning intensity (80% or 50%), Castanopsis hystrix and Erythrophleum fordii are suitable tree species under the 30% thinning intensity of Pinus massoniana plantation.
  • [1]
    盛炜彤. 中国人工林及其育林体系[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2014.

    Sheng W T. Plantation forest and their silvicature systems in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2014.
    [2]
    陆元昌, 张守攻, 雷相东, 等. 人工林近自然化改造的理论基础和实施技术[J]. 世界林业研究, 2009, 22(1):20−27.

    Lu Y C, Zhang S G, Lei X D, et al. Theoretical basis and implementation techniques on close-to-nature transformation of plantations[J]. World Forestry Research, 2009, 22(1): 20−27.
    [3]
    国家林业局. 全国森林经营规划 (2016—2050年)[R]. 北京: 国家林业局, 2016: 1−2.

    State Forestry Administration. National forest management plan (2016−2050)[R]. Beijing: State Forestry Administration, 2016: 1−2.
    [4]
    王晓荣, 曾立雄, 雷蕾, 等. 抚育择伐对马尾松林主要树种空间分布格局及其关联性的短期影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12):4421−4431.

    Wang X R, Zeng L X, Lei L, et al. Short-term effects of selective cutting on the spatial distribution and association of dominant tree species in Pinus massoniana stands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 4421−4431.
    [5]
    Franklin J F, Spies T A, van Pelt R, et al. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2002, 155(1): 399−423.
    [6]
    丁敏, 倪荣新, 毛轩平. 马尾松林下套种阔叶树生长状况初报[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3):463−466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.023.

    Ding M, Ni R X, Mao X P. Growth of Pinus massoniana and broad-leaved tree mixed forest[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 463−466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.023.
    [7]
    Jiang J, Lu Y C, Wang L, et al. Facilitation by tree species in variable retention harvesting for the restoration of monoculture plantations in southern China[J]. Tropical Conservation Science, 2019, 12(7): 1−12.
    [8]
    谢锦, 闫巧玲, 张婷. 间伐对日本落叶松人工林林下更新木本植物组成和生长影响的时间效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8):2481−2490.

    Xie J, Yan Q L, Zhang T. Temporal effects of thinning on the composition and growth of regenerated woody plants in Larix kaempferi plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(8): 2481−2490.
    [9]
    樊后保, 李燕燕, 苏兵强, 等. 马尾松-阔叶树混交异龄林生物量与生产力分配格局[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(8):2463−2473. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.08.007.

    Fan H B, Li Y Y, Su B Q, et al. Allocation pattern of biomass and productivity in the mixed uneven-aged stands of Masson’s pine and hardwood species[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(8): 2463−2473. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.08.007.
    [10]
    林德喜, 樊后保. 马尾松林下补植阔叶树后森林凋落物量、养分含量及周转时间的变化[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(6):7−15. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2005.06.002.

    Lin D X, Fan H B. Changes in amount, nutrient contents and turnover time of forest litter after inter planting hardwood species under Masson pine stand[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(6): 7−15. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2005.06.002.
    [11]
    Bezemer T M, Harvey J A, Kowalchuk G A, et al. Interplay between Senecio jacobaea and plant, soil, and aboveground insect community composition[J]. Ecology, 2006, 87: 2002−2013. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2002:IBSJAP]2.0.CO;2.
    [12]
    郭丽玲, 潘萍, 欧阳勋志, 等. 间伐补植对马尾松低效林生长及林分碳密度的短期影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2019, 39(3):48−54. doi: 10.11929/j.swfu.201811029

    Guo L L, Pan P, Ouyang X Z, et al. Short-term effects of thinning and replanting measures on tree growth and stand carbon density of low-efficiency Pinus massoniana forest[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2019, 39(3): 48−54. doi: 10.11929/j.swfu.201811029
    [13]
    曾冀, 雷渊才, 贾宏炎, 等. 桂西南马尾松人工林生长对不同强度采伐的动态响应[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(2):335−341.

    Zeng J, Lei Y C, Jia H Y, et al. Dynamic growth response of Pinus massoniana plantation on intensive thinning in southwestern Guangxi, China[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(2): 335−341.
    [14]
    吕倩, 尹海锋, 何朋俊, 等. 马尾松人工林目标树经营初期对土壤理化性质与植物多样性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(3):500−507.

    Lü Q, Yin H F, He P J, et al. Effects of early management of Pinus massoniana plantation target trees on soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2018, 24(3): 500−507.
    [15]
    刘思泽, 尹海锋, 沈逸, 等. 间伐强度对马尾松人工林间伐初期林下植被群落物种组成和多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9):2866−2874.

    Liu S Z, Yin H F, Shen Y, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on species composition and diversity of undergrowth vegetation community in Pinus massoniana plantation at initial stage of thinning[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(9): 2866−2874.
    [16]
    翟凯燕, 马婷瑶, 金雪梅, 等. 间伐对马尾松人工林土壤活性有机碳的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(3):609−615.

    Zhai K Y, Ma T Y, Jin X M, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on soil active organic carbon in Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(3): 609−615.
    [17]
    曾冀. 广西大青山杉木马尾松人工林近自然化改造试验研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2017.

    Zeng J. Studies on close-to-nature transformation of Cunninghamia lanceolate and Pinus massoniana plantations in Daqingshan, Guangxi of China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017.
    [18]
    Jiang J, Lu Y C, Pang L F, et al. Structure of different stand layers and management optimization strategies in a Masson pine plantation in southern subtropical, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 5(3): 44−50.
    [19]
    卢军, 李凤日, 张会儒, 等. 帽儿山天然次生林主要树种冠长率模型[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(6):70−76. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110611.

    Lu J, Li F R, Zhang H R, et al. A crown ratio model for dominant species in secondary forests in Mao’er Mountain[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(6): 70−76. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110611.
    [20]
    詹学齐. 马尾松林冠下套种阔叶树20年间土壤肥力变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(6):55−62.

    Zhan X Q. Changes in soil fertility after interplanting pure Pinus massioniana plantations with broadleaved forest under the canopy during 20 years[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(6): 55−62.
    [21]
    周志春, 徐高福, 金国庆, 等. 择伐经营后马尾松次生林阔叶树的生长与群落恢复[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004(4):420−426. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2004.04.003.

    Zhou Z C, Xu G F, Jin G Q, et al. Growth of broad-leaved species and community restoration of secondary Masson Pine forest after selective cutting[J]. Forest Research, 2004(4): 420−426. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2004.04.003.
    [22]
    曾冀, 雷渊才, 唐继新, 等. 马尾松人工林强度采伐后套种阔叶树种的生长动态[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(3):64−69, 81.

    Zeng J, Lei Y C, Tang J X, et al. Growth dynamics of hardwood species inter-planted under intensively thinned Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(3): 64−69, 81.
    [23]
    黄庆青. 大叶栎引种适应性及培育技术研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2018.

    Huang Q Q. Study on adaptability and cultivation technique of Castanopsis fissa[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2018.
    [24]
    陈昌雄, 陈平留, 肖才生, 等. 人工马尾松复层混交林林分结构规律的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2001, 37(增刊1):205−207.

    Chen C X, Chen P L, Xiao C S, et al. Study on the stand structure of multi-stories mixed unevenaged Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2001, 37(Suppl.1): 205−207.
    [25]
    Cannon C H, Peart D R, Leighton M. Tree species diversity in commercially logged Bornean rainforest[J]. Science, 1998, 281: 1366−1368. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5381.1366.
    [26]
    Brown K A, Gurevitch J. Long-term impacts of logging on forest diversity in Madagascar[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(16): 6045−6049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401456101.
    [27]
    Chazdon R L. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution & Systematics, 2003, 6(1−2): 51−71.
    [28]
    Bruno J F, Stachowicz J J, Bertness M D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003, 18: 119−125.
    [29]
    陆元昌, 刘宪钊. 多功能人工林经营技术指南[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2014.

    Lu Y C, Liu X Z. Technical guideline for multi-functional plantation forest management[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2014.
    [30]
    邢海涛, 陆元昌, 刘宪钊, 等. 基于近自然改造的马尾松林分竞争强度研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(9):42−54.

    Xing H T, Lu Y C, Liu X Z, et al. Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(9): 42−54.
    [31]
    王晓明, 陆元昌, 邢海涛, 等. 马尾松−大叶栎混交林皆伐作业法的设计[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(6):47−53.

    Wang X M, Lu Y C, Xing H T, et al. The design of the Pinus massoniana-Quercus griffithii mixed forest clear-cutting silviculture system[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2017(6): 47−53.
    [32]
    陈金林, 俞元春, 罗汝英, 等. 杉木、马尾松、甜槠等林分下土壤养分状况研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1998, 11(6):25−30.

    Chen J L, Yu Y C, Luo R Y, et al. Nutrient status of soils under Cunninghamia lanceolata, Pinus massoniana and Castanopsis eyrei stands[J]. Forest Research, 1998, 11(6): 25−30.
    [33]
    Kelly J, Jose S, Nichols J D, et al. Growth and physiological response of six Australian rainforest tree species to a light gradient[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 257: 287−293. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.008.
    [34]
    Padilla F M, Pugnaire F I. The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2006, 4: 196−202. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0196:TRONPI]2.0.CO;2.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 吕坤,班以琛,坝仕宏,刘洋,文剑. 基于抚育整枝目标的毛白杨枝条冲击切割性能适应性分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(04): 158-166 . 本站查看
    2. 阮颖超,苏比·热西塔洪,林熙,李明,范少辉,冯随起,陈志云,马祥庆,何宗明. 修枝强度对杉木人工林无节材形成及质量的影响. 林业科学. 2024(06): 50-59 .
    3. 陈明旭,吴雅琳,刘雨晖,李明,吴鹏飞,马祥庆. 修枝对杉木节子发育和无节材比例的影响. 森林与环境学报. 2024(05): 449-456 .
    4. 谭长强,杨丽萍,梁星星,彭玉华,莫雅芳,何峰,申文辉,钟瑜. 不同修枝强度及配方施肥对红锥幼林生长的影响. 广西林业科学. 2023(02): 167-172 .
    5. 卢翠香,李桂兰,任世奇,刘媛,蒋小波,黄明军,韦振道. 人工修枝对尾巨桉胶合板性能的影响. 广西林业科学. 2023(04): 522-527 .
    6. 张士韬,欧阳林男,陈少雄,杨嘉麒. 间伐与修枝对人工林木材质量影响的研究进展. 广西林业科学. 2023(06): 803-811 .
    7. 谢耀坚. 科技创新引领中国桉树研究和产业迅猛发展. 桉树科技. 2022(01): 35-42 .
    8. 白卫国,黎世鑫,李蔷薇,熊涛,赵佳宁,任世奇. 不同种植密度与修枝强度对幼龄尾巨桉生长量的影响. 桉树科技. 2022(02): 20-24 .
    9. 苏福聪,李书玲,黄慧敏,刘杰钊,罗克展,梁志诚,刘媛,任世奇. 修枝对尾巨桉生长量的影响. 桉树科技. 2021(01): 31-35 .
    10. 刘罗新,罗建中,王楚彪,卢万鸿,林彦,邢晓文. 桉树旋切单板用材质量研究现状. 桉树科技. 2021(03): 63-68 .
    11. 莫柳园,李秋荔,周鑫,温晓毅,刘资华,任世奇. 施肥和修枝对巨尾桉幼林生长的影响. 桉树科技. 2021(03): 44-46 .
    12. 李国新,黎颖锋,邓炳权,龚益广,杨锦昌. 广东郁南尾巨桉人工林密度效应. 林业与环境科学. 2017(04): 9-13 .
    13. 任世奇,卢翠香,邓紫宇,郭东强,伍琪. 修枝对大花序桉幼林生长和木材密度的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(11): 45-50 .
    14. 王杰,钟志兴. 修枝对巨尾桉生长动态及单板质量的影响. 花卉. 2015(17): 102-103 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (1744) PDF downloads (107) Cited by(18)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return