Comprehensive benefit evaluation method and application of water landscape construction in urban built-up area: a case study of Weifang City, Shandong Province of eastern China

Wu Tong; Wang Liesheng; Sun Yihao; Zhang Ziyu; Liu Yu; Yao Peng

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200167

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2020 > 42(11): 105-117. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200167

Wu Tong, Wang Liesheng, Sun Yihao, Zhang Ziyu, Liu Yu, Yao Peng. Comprehensive benefit evaluation method and application of water landscape construction in urban built-up area: a case study of Weifang City, Shandong Province of eastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 105-117. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200167

Citation:

PDF (1010 KB)

Comprehensive benefit evaluation method and application of water landscape construction in urban built-up area: a case study of Weifang City, Shandong Province of eastern China

1.
School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Weifang Planning Development Research Center, Weifang 261000, Shandong, China

More Information

Received Date: May 31, 2020
Revised Date: October 10, 2020
Available Online: October 23, 2020
Published Date: December 13, 2020

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective The construction of water landscape in urban built-up area is an important ecological project that has the closest relationship with town development and people’s life, as well as having the most obvious effect. In the context of urban ecological construction progressing from high-speed growth to high-quality development in the new era, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to construct a comprehensive benefit evaluation method for the water landscape construction in urban built-up area from a multidisciplinary perspective.
Method Based on the analysis of connotation of water landscape construction, this paper takes the water landscape in urban built-up area as the research scope, and puts forward ecological construction, life recreation and production development as the criterion layers for the comprehensive benefit evaluation. Meanwhile, relevant element layers were determined. Typical indicators were selected by the frequency statistics method, theoretical analysis method and expert consultation method, and an evaluation index system of the comprehensive benefit for water landscape construction in urban built-up area was constructed. On this basis, the weights were calculated by the analytic hierarchy process, the single index quantitative evaluation and multi-index comprehensive evaluation were carried out, the results of comprehensive benefit evaluation obtained by multi-criteria integration were graded, and a systematic evaluation method of the comprehensive benefit was formed. Finally, Weifang City was taken as an example for applied research.
Result (1) In 2004, the comprehensive benefit score of water landscape construction in the built-up area of Weifang City was 17.11, which provided rare benefit, and all three sub-benefits were at the level of rare benefit. (2) From 2004 to 2012, the comprehensive benefit score increased rapidly, the score of life recreation benefit among the sub-benefits increased most significantly. In 2012, the comprehensive benefit score reached 53.46, which provided moderate benefit, and all three sub-benefits reached the level of moderate benefit. (3) From 2012 to 2018, the growth rate of comprehensive benefit score and scores of sub-benefits slowed down. In 2018, the comprehensive benefit score was 76.54, which provided major benefit. Among the scores of sub-benefits, the scores of life recreation benefit and ecological construction benefit increased rapidly, the score of life recreation benefit was the highest, and all three sub-benefits reached the level of major benefit. (4) From 2004 to 2018, the score of environmental improvement in the ecological construction benefit increased significantly, the scores of cultural load and activity support in the life recreation benefit increased significantly, and the score of economic benefit in the production development benefit increased the most, which were the main factors driving the growth of corresponding sub-benefits.
Conclusion The evaluation method proposed in this study can scientifically quantify and compare the comprehensive benefit of water landscape construction in urban built-up area, discover the existing problems in the current construction and clarify future construction directions, providing the necessary evaluation standard and technical reference for the urban water ecological construction in China.
- built-up area,
- water landscape,
- ecological construction,
- life recreation,
- production development

FullText(HTML)

References (40)

References

[1]	吴梦媛. 北方干旱地区小城市水景观规划方法研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2012. Wu M Y. Research on small city water landscape of arid region of North China[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2012.
[2]	Everard M, Moggridge H L. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2012, 15(2): 293−314. doi: 10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7.
[3]	胡凯富, 郑曦. 基于CiteSpace计量分析的景观绩效研究重点领域和前沿趋势的文献述评[J]. 风景园林, 2018, 25(11):84−89. Hu K F, Zheng X. Literature review of key areas and frontier trends in landscape performance research based on citespace bibliometric analysis[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2018, 25(11): 84−89.
[4]	中华人民共和国水利部. 水资源司石秋池副司长解读《水生态文明城市建设评价导则》[EB/OL]. (2016–07–22) [2020–04–02]. http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zw/zcjd/201806/t20180608_1039391.html. Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. The deputy director of the department of water resources Shi Qiuchi interprets the “guidelines for the evaluation of the construction of a water ecological civilized city”[EB/OL]. (2016–07 –22) [2020 –04 –02]. http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zw/zcjd/201806/t20180608_1039391.html.
[5]	左其亭, 罗增良. 水生态文明定量评价方法及应用[J]. 水利水电技术, 2016, 47(5):94−100. Zuo Q T, Luo Z L. Quantified evaluation method of water eco-civilization and its application[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2016, 47(5): 94−100.
[6]	郭巧玲, 杨云松, 韩瑶瑶. 人水和谐视角下的水生态文明城市评价:以焦作市为例[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 38(4):82−89. Guo Q L, Yang Y S, Han Y Y. Evaluation of water ecological civilization city from the perspective of harmony between human and water: a case study of Jiaozuo City[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science), 2019, 38(4): 82−89.
[7]	刘姝芳, 毛豪林, 张丹, 等. 西安市水生态文明城市试点建设成效评价[J]. 人民黄河, 2019, 41(5):82−85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2019.05.018. Liu S F, Mao H L, Zhang D, et al. Effectiveness evaluation for pilot city of water ecological civilization in Xi’an City[J]. Yellow River, 2019, 41(5): 82−85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2019.05.018.
[8]	王富强, 刘沛衡, 魏怀斌. 郑州市水生态文明城市建设成效评价[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 40(5):58−63. Wang F Q, Liu P H, Wei H B. Evaluation on the construction effect of water ecological civilization city in Zhengzhou[J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 40(5): 58−63.
[9]	虞未江, 贾超, 袁涵, 等. 基于改进AHP和物元可拓法的水生态文明建设评价[J]. 水科学与工程技术, 2018(1):1−6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9900.2018.01.001. Yu W J, Jia C, Yuan H, et al. The evaluation of construction of aquatic ecological civilization based on improved AHP and matter-element extension method[J]. Water Sciences and Engineering Technology, 2018(1): 1−6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9900.2018.01.001.
[10]	刘海娇, 黄继文, 仕玉治, 等. 黄河下游典型城市水生态文明评价[J]. 人民黄河, 2013, 35(12):64−67. Liu H J, Huang J W, Shi Y Z, et al. Water ecological civilization evaluation on the typical urban of the lower Yellow River[J]. Yellow River, 2013, 35(12): 64−67.
[11]	左其亭, 张云, 林平. 人水和谐评价指标及量化方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 2008, 39(4):440−447. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2008.04.008. Zuo Q T, Zhang Y, Lin P. Index system and quantification method for human-water harmony[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(4): 440−447. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2008.04.008.
[12]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 住房城乡建设部办公厅关于印发海绵城市建设绩效评价与考核办法(试行)的通知[EB/OL]. (2015 –07–10) [2020 –05 –04]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201507/t20150715_222947.html. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. The notice of the general office of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development on printing and distributing the measures for performance evaluation and assessment of sponge city construction (trial)[EB/OL]. (2015–07–10) [2020–05–04]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201507/t20150715_222947.html.
[13]	王亚丽. 固原市海绵城市建设综合绩效评价体系的构建[J]. 宁夏师范学院学报, 2019, 40(2):101−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1331.2019.02.019. Wang Y L. Construction of comprehensive performance evaluation system for the construction of sponge city in Guyuan City[J]. Journal of Ningxia Normal University, 2019, 40(2): 101−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1331.2019.02.019.
[14]	沈洁, 龙若愚, 陈静. 美国LEED-ND/SITES/LPS雨水管理评价标准对中国海绵城市绩效评价的启示[J]. 风景园林, 2019, 26(3):81−86. Shen J, Long R Y, Chen J. The enlightenment of American stormwater management evaluation criteria (LEED-ND, SITES, LPS) on performance assessment of sponge cities in China[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(3): 81−86.
[15]	吴杰超. 杭州城市河道综合整治成效评价体系构建研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2019. Wu J C. Hangzhou City river comprehensive improvement effect evaluation system[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2019.
[16]	罗毅, 李明翰, 段诗乐, 等. 已建成项目的景观绩效:美国风景园林基金会公布的指标及方法对比[J]. 风景园林, 2015, 22(1):52−69. Luo Y, Li M H, Duan S L, et al. Landscape performance of built projects: comparing landscape architecture foundation’s published metrics and methods[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2015, 22(1): 52−69.
[17]	M ·艾伦·戴明, 税梦. 社会及文化的度量:景观设计中无形效益的测衡[J]. 风景园林, 2015, 22(1):99−109. Deming M E, Shui M. Social & cultural metrics: measuring the intangible benefits of designed landscapes[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2015, 22(1): 99−109.
[18]	塔纳尔·奥兹迪尔, 迪伦·斯图瓦特, 冯艺佳, 等. 风景园林设计项目的经济绩效评估德克萨斯州案例研究的经验与教训[J]. 风景园林, 2015, 22(1):70−86. Ozdil T R, Stewart D M, Feng Y J, et al. Assessing economic performance of landscape architecture projects: lessons learned from Texas case studies[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2015, 22(1): 70−86.
[19]	克里斯托弗·D·埃利斯, 权炳淑, 莎拉·阿尔瓦德, 等. 景观绩效多功能景观的度量和评估[J]. 风景园林, 2015, 22(1):32−39. Ellis C D, Kweon B S, Alward S, et al. Landscape performance: measurement and assessment of multifunctional landscapes[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2015, 22(1): 32−39.
[20]	戴代新, 李明翰. 美国景观绩效评价研究进展[J]. 风景园林, 2015, 22(1):25−31. Dai D X, Li M H. Research development of landscape performance assessment in America[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2015, 22(1): 25−31.
[21]	吴忠军, 曹宏丽, 侯玉霞. 景观旅游绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2019, 39(1):225−232. Wu Z J, Cao H L, Hou Y X. Evaluation index system of landscape tourism performance[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2019, 39(1): 225−232.
[22]	罗毅, 李明翰, 孙一鹤. 景观绩效研究:社会、经济和环境效益是否总是相得益彰?[J]. 景观设计学, 2014, 2(1):42−56. Luo Y, Li M H, Sun Y H. A study of landscape performance: do social, economic and environmental benefits always complement each other?[J]. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2014, 2(1): 42−56.
[23]	李春晖, 刘颂, 周腾, 等. 美国景观绩效系列(LPS)工具应用进展[C]//中国风景园林学会2016年会论文集. 北京: 中国风景园林学会, 2016: 22−27. Li C H, Liu S, Zhou T, et al. Review on landscape performance series’ benefit tooklit in America[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference of Chinese Society of Landscape Architecture. Beijing: Chinese Society of Landscape Architecture, 2016: 22−27.
[24]	汪洁琼, 李心蕊, 王敏. 城市滨水空间生态系统服务供需匹配的空间智慧[J]. 风景园林, 2019, 26(6):47−52. Wang J Q, Li X R, Wang M. Spatial wisdom of matching ecosystem services supply and demand in urban waterfront areas[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(6): 47−52.
[25]	Palmer M A, Bernhardt E S, Allan J D, et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration[J]. Journal of applied ecology, 2005, 42(2): 208−217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x.
[26]	Logar I, Brouwer R, Paillex A. Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost-benefit analysis[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2019, 232: 1075−1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.098.
[27]	Sakici C. Assessing landscape perceptions of urban waterscapes[J]. The Anthropologist, 2015, 21(1−2): 182−196. doi: 10.1080/09720073.2015.11891807.
[28]	Åberg E U, Tapsell S. Revisiting the river skerne: the long-term social benefits of river rehabilitation[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 113: 94−103. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.009.
[29]	Vermaat J E, Wagtendonk A J, Brouwer R, et al. Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2016, 769(1): 121−135. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z.
[30]	Özgüner H, Eraslan Ş, Yilmaz S. Public perception of landscape restoration along a degraded urban streamside[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2012, 23(1): 24−33.
[31]	Garcia X, Benages-Albert M, Pavón D, et al. Public participation GIS for assessing landscape values and improvement preferences in urban stream corridors[J]. Applied Geography, 2017, 87: 184−196. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.08.009.
[32]	Bulut Z, Yilmaz H. Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009, 154(1−4): 459−468. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0412-5.
[33]	Bulut Z, Karahan F, Sezen I. Determining visual beauties of natural waterscapes: a case study for Tortum Valley (Erzurum/Turkey)[J]. Scientific Research and Essay, 2010, 5(2): 170−182.
[34]	Daud S Z, Sipan I, Ali H M, et al. Economic sustainability assessment for urban riverfront development: a concept paper on development of spatial-based model[J]. Advanced Science Letters, 2018, 24(6): 4245−4249. doi: 10.1166/asl.2018.11581.
[35]	Lee H S. A study on analysis of importance weights of riverfront assessment items using analytic hierarchy process-focused on the Gyeong: an stream in Gyeonggi Province[J]. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 2014, 20(1): 27−36. doi: 10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.1.027.
[36]	李后强. 公园城市美丽河网体系构建研究:以成都市为例[J]. 中国西部, 2019(3):1−9. Li H Q. Research on the construction of park city beautiful river network system: take Chengdu City as an example[J]. Western China, 2019(3): 1−9.
[37]	胡其昌. 生态水利定量评价研究:以浙江省为例[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2014(10):19−23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2014.10.005. Hu Q C. Quantitative evaluation research on eco-hydrology: taking Zhejiang Province for example[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2014(10): 19−23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2014.10.005.
[38]	徐鹏, 林永红, 栾胜基. 低碳生态城市建设效应评估方法构建及在深圳市的应用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(4):1457−1467. Xu P, Lin Y H, Luan S J. Establishment of approach to assess the effects of low-carbon eco-city development and its application in Shenzhen City[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2016, 36(4): 1457−1467.
[39]	段瑜, 黄川壑, 罗捷. 水润天府活水成都: 以水战略为导向的公园城市规划与建设模式[J]. 城市道桥与防洪, 2018(9):54−57, 75. Duan Y, Huang C H, Luo J. Elementary discussion on planning and construction of garden city oriented by water strategy[J]. Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control, 2018(9): 54−57, 75.
[40]	Hua J, Chen W Y. Prioritizing urban rivers’ ecosystem services: an importance-performance analysis[J]. Cities, 2019, 94: 11−23. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.014.

[1]	Xiao Ling, Jiang Qun’ou, Wang Meilin, Lü Kexin. Coupling coordination and prediction analysis of ecological infrastructure, habitat quality and industrial development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(3): 96-105. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200346
[2]	XING Feng, LU Zhen-you, WANG Cui-cui, ZHANG Shuang-bao. Design and production application of MDF with low formaldehyde emission[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 152-158. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.004
[3]	LIN Yu-hong, SHEN Rong-feng, QIU Rong-zu. Development on transportation supervisory system of forest products in southern forest region of China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(5): 130-135.
[4]	ZHAO Hua, LIU Yong, JIN Xiao-qi. Quantitative classification of forestry development compartment of Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(2): 7-13.
[5]	QUAN Hai.. Evaluating index system and calculating methods for comprehensive benefit of soil and water conservation ecological construction.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(3): 64-70.
[6]	YIN Zhong-hua, SONG Wei-ming．. Changes and compositions of total factor productivity of papermaking and paper product industry in China. [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(2): 140-145.
[7]	ZHANG Zhang-de. Present situation and development policies of rosin industry in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(3): 147-152.
[8]	HUANG Xin-yuan, WANG Hai. Digital Forestry and its technology and development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(6): 142-147.
[9]	WANG Xian-pu, YU Shun-li, CHEN Hong-wei. On the development and deepening of basic implications for the concept of nature reserves[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(4): 164-168.
[10]	HE Kang-ning, LI Shi-rong, SHI Chang-qing, ZHOU Xin-cheng. Tree productivity and water production potential in Returning Farmland to Forest Project in Datong County, Qinghai Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(4): 28-32.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

杨周，张建军，赵炯昌，胡亚伟，李阳，王勃. 晋西黄土区油松林土壤碳氮磷计量特征对林龄和密度的响应. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(12): 30-40 .

本站查看

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1615) PDF downloads (76) Cited by(1)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Comprehensive benefit evaluation method and application of water landscape construction in urban built-up area: a case study of Weifang City, Shandong Province of eastern China