Key indexes and characteristics of soil anti-erodibility of <i>Robinia pseudoacacia</i> with different densities in loess region of western Shanxi Province, northern China

Wang Shanshan; Bi Huaxing; Cui Yanhong; Yun Huiya; Ma Xiaozhi; Zhao Danyang; Hou Guirong

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200226

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2022 > 44(5): 94-104. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200226

Wang Shanshan, Bi Huaxing, Cui Yanhong, Yun Huiya, Ma Xiaozhi, Zhao Danyang, Hou Guirong. Key indexes and characteristics of soil anti-erodibility of Robinia pseudoacacia with different densities in loess region of western Shanxi Province, northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(5): 94-104. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200226

Citation:

PDF (960 KB)

Key indexes and characteristics of soil anti-erodibility of Robinia pseudoacacia with different densities in loess region of western Shanxi Province, northern China

1.
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Jixian County Station, Chinese National Ecosystem Research Network (CNERN), Jixian 042200, Shanxi, China
3.
Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Engineering Research Center of Forestry Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
4.
Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-Environmental Improvement withForestry and Fruit Trees, Beijing 102206, China
5.
College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China

More Information

Received Date: July 21, 2020
Revised Date: April 13, 2021
Accepted Date: March 02, 2022
Available Online: March 06, 2022
Published Date: May 24, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective This paper aims to study the key evaluation indexes of soil anti-erodibility of Robinia pseudoacacia forest (16 years), and discuss the effects of stand density on soil anti-erodibility in the loess region of western Shanxi Province of northern China, which could provide functional guidance for the precise improvement of stand structure.
Method The research objects were five density gradients (1 025, 1 300, 1 575, 1 800, 2 150 tree/ha) of R. pseudoacacia forest. Based on field sampling and laboratory tests, 12 indexes about soil anti-erodibility had been analyzed.
Result (1) Principal component analysis showed that the soil bulk density, organic matter, > 0.25 mm water-stable aggregate, mean mass diameter, geometric mean diameter, fractal dimension and soil dispersion coefficient were key indexes to evaluate soil anti-erodibility of R. pseudoacacia forest, these factor loads were −0.776, 0.864, 0.747, 0.960, 0.779, −0.736 and −0.873, respectively. (2) Anti-erodibility of surface soil of R. pseudoacacia forest was stronger than that of deep soil under the same stand density, the comprehensive index of soil anti-erodibility: 0−10 cm (0.548) > 10−20 cm (−0.070) > 20−30 cm (−0.477). In the same soil layer, soil anti-erodibility increased with the increase of stand density (1 025−1 575 tree/ha) of R. pseudoacacia forest, and decreased when the stand density was higher than 1 575 tree/ha. (3) Taking the stand density of R. pseudoacacia forest as the x-axis and the comprehensive index of soil anti-erodibility as the y-axis, the parabolic function relationship with opening downward was established: y = −2.683 × 10⁻⁶x² + 0.009x − 6.375 (R² = 0.77), soil anti-erodibility was the strongest when the stand density of R. pseudoacacia was 1 590 tree/ha, and the comprehensive index was 0.403.
Conclusion Soil anti-erodibility of medium density R. pseudoacacia forest is strong. From the perspective of soil anti-erodibility, the management density of R. pseudoacacia forest (16 years) should be 1 590 tree/ha in the loess region of western Shanxi Province. For the stand with too low or too high density, scientific replanting or thinning should be carried out in time while meeting the forestry production. Attention should also be paid to the protection of topsoil, so as to give full play to the water and soil conservation function of forest land and effectively control soil erosion.
- loess region of western Shanxi Province,
- soil anti-erodibility,
- Robinia pseudoacacia,
- stand density

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	余晓章, 魏鹏, 范川, 等. 两种巨桉人工林地土壤抗蚀性的比较研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(2): 58−63. Yu X Z, Wei P, Fan C, et al. Comparatives study of soil anti-erodibility between two kinds of Eucalyptus grandis plantations[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 58−63.
[2]	赵辉. 南方花岗岩地区红壤侵蚀与径流输沙规律研究: 以湖南武水流域为例[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008. Zhao H. Study on the law of red soil erosion and runoff & sediment transport in granite region of South China: a case study on Wushui Watershed of Hunan Province[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2008.
[3]	薛萐, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 不同植被恢复模式对黄土丘陵区土壤抗蚀性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(增刊1): 69−72. Xue S, Li Z B, Li P, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration models on soil anti-erodibility in loess hilly area[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009, 25(Suppl.1): 69−72.
[4]	杨玉梅. 不同土地利用方式下土壤抗蚀与抗冲性研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2010. Yang Y M. Study on soil anti-erodibility and anti-scour ability under different land use[D]. Ya ’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2010.
[5]	唐夫凯. 岩溶峡谷区不同土地利用方式土壤抗蚀性研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2016. Tang F K. Study of soil anti-erodibility of different land use types in karst valley region[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2016.
[6]	邱陆旸, 张丽萍, 陆芳春, 等. 基于熵权法的林下土壤抗蚀性评价及影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(4): 74−79. Qiu L Y, Zhang L P, Liu F C, et al. Evaluation of forest soil anti-erodibility and influencing factors analysis based on entropy method[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(4): 74−79.
[7]	郭天雷, 史东梅, 胡雪琴, 等. 三峡库区消落带不同高程桑树林地土壤抗蚀性及影响因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(2): 191−198. Guo T L, Shi D M, Hu X Q, et al. Characteristics and soil anti-erodibility effects of mulberry forest lands at different altitudes of water-level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(2): 191−198.
[8]	刘宽梅, 周秋文. 典型喀斯特森林土壤的抗蚀性[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2): 568−577. Liu K M, Zhou Q W. Study on soil anti-erodibility of typical karst forests[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 568−577.
[9]	刘旦旦, 张鹏辉, 王健, 等. 黄土坡面不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性对比[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(9): 102−106. Liu D D, Zhang P H, Wang J, et al. A comparison on soil anti-erodibility over different land use types on loess slope[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(9): 102−106.
[10]	薛萐, 刘国彬, 张超, 等. 黄土丘陵区人工灌木林土壤抗蚀性演变特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15): 3143−3190. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.15.011 Xue S, Liu G B, Zhang C, et al. Change of soil anti-erodibility of artificial shrubs in loess hilly area[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(15): 3143−3190. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.15.011
[11]	刘相兵, 刘亚茜, 李兵兵, 等. 生态疏伐对林分密度及直径结构的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(3): 145−149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.03.30 Liu X B, Liu Y X, Li B B, et al. Influences of ecological thinning on the stand density and diameter structure[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012, 27(3): 145−149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.03.30
[12]	邵英男, 刘延坤, 李云红, 等. 不同林分密度长白落叶松人工林土壤养分特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(9): 27−31. Shao Y N, Liu Y K, Li Y H, et al. Soil nutrient characteristics in Larix olgensis plantation with different stand densities[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(9): 27−31.
[13]	聂泽旭, 齐实, 马曦瑶, 等. 华蓥市山区侧柏人工林土壤特性及水源涵养能力对林分密度的响应[J]. 地球与环境, 2020, 48(3): 318−326. Nie Z X, Qi S, Ma X Y, et al. Responses of soil characteristics and water conservation capacity to stand densities of planted Platycladus orientalis in mountainous areas of the Huaying City[J]. Earth and Environment, 2020, 48(3): 318−326.
[14]	吕刚, 吕向楠, 王磊, 等. 辽西低山丘陵区不同密度荆条下表层土壤抗蚀性特征[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2019, 50(4): 487−493. Lü G, Lü X N, Wang L, et al. Soil anti-erosion characteristics of surface soil under Vitex negundo L. with different densities in low mountainous upland region of western Liaoning Province[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2019, 50(4): 487−493.
[15]	周玮, 查同刚, 孙怀宁, 等. 北京八达岭地区典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(4): 84−93. Zhou W, Zha T G, Sun H N, et al. Analysis of anti-erodibility of forest soil at 4 typical forest stands in Beijing Badaling Area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 14(4): 84−93.
[16]	崔江辉, 崔福柱, 薛建福, 等. 化肥减施对小麦−高粱系统土壤团聚体分布及其稳定性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(1): 126−132. Cui J H, Cui F Z, Xue J F, et al. Effects of fertilizer reduction on distribution and stability of soil aggregates based on wheat-sorghum system[J]. Crops, 2018(1): 126−132.
[17]	吴嘉楠. 氮肥与生物炭配施对烤烟氮素利用和植烟土壤特性的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2018. Wu J N. Effects of biochar addition combined with nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen utilization of flue-cured tobacco and soil characteristics[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2018.
[18]	肖盛杨, 舒英格, 陈孟军. 喀斯特高原峡谷区不同植被类型的土壤抗蚀性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(4): 30−35. Xiao S Y, Shu Y G, Chen M J. Soil anti-erodibility under different vegetation types in karst plateau gorge region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4): 30−35.
[19]	王勇, 张建辉, 李富程. 耕作侵蚀对坡耕地土壤水稳定性团聚体和水分特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(1): 180−185. Wang Y, Zhang J H, Li F C. Tillage erosion influences on soil water-stable aggregate and moisture properties on the hillslope[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(1): 180−185.
[20]	李培培, 汪强, 文倩, 等. 不同还田方式对砂质潮土理化性质及微生物的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11): 3665−3672. Li P P, Wang Q, Wen Q, et al. Effects of the return of organic materials on soil physical and chemical properties and bacterial number in sandy soil[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(11): 3665−3672.
[21]	李霄云, 王益权, 孙慧敏, 等. 有机污染型灌溉水对土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(6): 1125−1132. doi: 10.11766/trxb201011080464 Li X Y, Wang Y Q, Sun H M, et al. Effects of irrigation water polluted with organic contaminants on soil aggregates[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011, 48(6): 1125−1132. doi: 10.11766/trxb201011080464
[22]	于大炮, 刘明国, 邓红兵, 等. 辽西地区林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2003, 22(5): 10−14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2003.05.003 Yu D P, Liu M G, Deng H B, et al. Analysis of soil anti-erodibility in western Liaoning[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2003, 22(5): 10−14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2003.05.003
[23]	马西军. 晋西黄土区不同类型坡面土壤抗蚀性特征[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2013. Ma X J. Soil anti-erodibility of different land use types of loess hilly areas in western Shanxi[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
[24]	宋吉红. 重庆缙云山森林水文生态功能研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008. Song J H. Research on hydrological and ecological functions of forests in Jinyun Mountain, Chongqing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2008.
[25]	范川, 周义贵, 李贤伟, 等. 柏木低效林改造不同模式土壤抗蚀性对比[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 50(6): 107−114. Fan C, Zhou Y G, Li X W, et al. Comparison of soil anti-Erodibility of different modes for reforming low efficiency stands of Cupressus funebris[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 50(6): 107−114.
[26]	陈丽梅. 人参生长的土壤理化环境及生长模型的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2007. Chen L M. Study on soil physicochemical environment and growth model of ginseng[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2007.
[27]	李萍. 松嫩草地群落植物多样性及密度对土壤抗蚀性的影响[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2012. Li P. Influence of community plant diversity and density on soil resistance in Songnen Grassland[D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2012.
[28]	周巧稚. 晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林水土保持功能评价[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019. Zhou Q Z. Evaluation of soil and water conservation function of Robinia pseudoacacia plantations with different densities in loess region of western Shanxi Province[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019.
[29]	侯贵荣, 毕华兴, 魏曦, 等. 黄土残塬沟壑区刺槐林枯落物水源涵养功能综合评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2): 251−257. Hou G R, Bi H X, Wei X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of water conservation function of litters of Robinia pseudoacacia forest lands in gully region on Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(2): 251−257.
[30]	金锁, 毕浩杰, 刘佳, 等. 林分密度对云顶山柏木人工林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(1): 10−17. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190202 Jin S, Bi H J, Liu J, et al. Effects of stand density on community structure and species diversity of Cupressus funebris plantation in Yunding Mountain, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(1): 10−17. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190202

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	张慧，燕怡帆，朱雅，陈玉婷，王菁华，崔志鹏，杨迪，任学敏. 林分密度对伏牛山南麓山茱萸人工林林下草本植物多样性和土壤性质的影响. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2025(01): 96-105 .
2.	赵金同，马俊. 刺槐扦插育苗技术与精细抚育要点. 现代园艺. 2024(08): 49-51 .
3.	何欢，康必均，尹婧，李菲，彭栋，李桂静，查同刚. 不同营林措施对川东华蓥山杉木林土壤团聚体稳定性及细根分布的影响. 土壤通报. 2024(02): 351-359 .
4.	史小鹏，苟贺然，何淑勤，刘柏廷，冉兰芳，杨琪琳，扎西拉姆，陈雨馨，骆紫藤. 成都市温江区两种绿地土壤抗蚀抗冲性及其影响因素. 水土保持通报. 2024(04): 117-125 .
5.	刘忆南，申振宏，都都，张知然，林勇明. 蒋家沟泥石流堆积扇不同植被类型区土壤抗蚀性评价. 应用与环境生物学报. 2024(05): 886-893 .
6.	王依瑞，王彦辉，段文标，李平平，于澎涛，甄理，李志鑫，尚会军. 黄土高原刺槐人工林郁闭度对林下植物多样性特征的影响. 应用生态学报. 2023(02): 305-314 .
7.	赵云鹤，钟鹏，高晗，付玉. 土地利用类型对典型黑土团聚体稳定性和抗蚀性的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(09): 112-119 .
8.	胡亚伟，施政乐，刘畅，徐勤涛，张建军. 晋西黄土区刺槐林密度对林下植物多样性及土壤理化性质的影响. 生态学杂志. 2023(09): 2072-2080 .

Other cited types(8)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (892) PDF downloads (82) Cited by(16)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Key indexes and characteristics of soil anti-erodibility of Robinia pseudoacacia with different densities in loess region of western Shanxi Province, northern China

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

Other cited types(8)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content