• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Gao Na, Jiang Xue, Zheng Xi. Construction and optimization of ecological network in Beijing section of Yongding River Basin based on ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(3): 106-118. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200272
Citation: Gao Na, Jiang Xue, Zheng Xi. Construction and optimization of ecological network in Beijing section of Yongding River Basin based on ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(3): 106-118. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200272
shu

Construction and optimization of ecological network in Beijing section of Yongding River Basin based on ecosystem services

  • School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information
  • Received Date: December 30, 2020
  • Revised Date: December 16, 2021
  • Accepted Date: December 09, 2021
  • Available Online: January 21, 2022
  • Published Date: March 24, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  With the accelerated urbanization of the watershed, the development of natural resources and the expansion of urban land have led to the gradual deterioration of watershed ecological environment and the weakening of ecosystem service functions. It is important to construct an ecological network to improve and repair the structure and function of the watershed ecosystem and further realize the sustainable ecological development of the watershed.
      Method  Taking Beijing section of Yongding River Basin as an example, this paper quantitatively assesses three ecosystem services, namely water content, soil conservation and habitat quality, and identifies ecological source sites using Getis-Ord GI* hotspot analysis; extracts ecological corridors and ecological nodes using the minimum cumulative resistance model; and finally constructs an ecological network. And the ecological network perfection degree was evaluated by the network closure (α index), line point rate (β index) and network connectivity (γ index) to further explore the ecological network optimization strategy under the green ecological development goal.
      Result  16 ecological sources, 23 ecological corridors and 19 ecological nodes were identified in the Yongding River Basin. The ecological sources and nodes were distributed in the northern and central parts of the study area, mainly consisting of woodland and cropland; the total length of ecological corridors was 52.03 km, distributed in a network along farmland, woodland and rivers. Based on the analysis and evaluation of the ecological network, ecological buffer zones of ecological sources and ecological corridors were set, and blind areas of ecological nodes were identified to optimize the spatial structure of the ecological network.
      Conclusion  Through the construction and optimization of the ecological network of Beijing section of the Yongding River Basin, this paper clarifies the key areas for ecological protection and restoration in the basin to provide spatial guidelines for the future ecological construction and restoration planning of the basin.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (51)
  • [1]
    肖笃宁, 陈文波, 郭福良. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(3): 354−358.

    Xiao D N, Chen W B, Guo F L. On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(3): 354−358.
    [2]
    Bolliger J, Lischke H, Green D G. Simulating the spatial and temporal dynamics of landscapes using generic and complex models[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2005, 2(2): 107−116. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2004.11.005
    [3]
    孔阳, 王思元. 基于MSPA模型的北京市延庆区城乡生态网络构建[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(7): 113−121.

    Kong Y, Wang S Y. Construction of urban-rural ecological network in Yanqing District, Beijing based on MSPA model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(7): 113−121.
    [4]
    刘宇舒, 赵天宇. 景观生态视角下镇域生态服务评价与网络构建[J]. 中国园林, 2015(10): 77−81.

    Liu Y S, Zhao T Y. Evaluation and network construction of township ecological services from a landscape ecology perspective[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2015(10): 77−81.
    [5]
    Samways M J, Bazelet C S, Pryke J S. Provision of ecosystem services by large scale corridors and ecological networks[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2010, 19(10): 2949−2962.
    [6]
    de Montis A, Caschili S, Mulas M, et al. Urban-rural ecological networks for landscape planning[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 50: 312−327. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.004
    [7]
    陈德超, 施祝凯, 王祖静, 等. 苏州环太湖地区生态网络构建与空间冲突识别[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(6): 778−787.

    Chen D C, Shi Z K, Wang Z J, et al. Construction of ecological network and identification of spatial conflicts in the Taihu Lake Rim of Suzhou[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(6): 778−787.
    [8]
    Liquete C, Kleeschulte S, Dige G. Mapping greezn infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: a Pan-European case study[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 54: 268−280.
    [9]
    With K A, King A W. Analysis of landscape sources and sinks: the effect of spatial pattern on avian demography[J]. Biological Conservation, 2001, 99(1): 75−88.
    [10]
    周锐, 王新军, 苏海龙, 等. 平顶山新区生态用地的识别与安全格局构建[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(6): 2003−2012.

    Zhou R, Wang X J, Su H L, et al. Identification of ecological land in Pingdingshan New Area and construction of security pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(6): 2003−2012.
    [11]
    彭建, 汪安, 刘焱序, 等. 城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 333−346. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502013

    Peng J, Wang A, Liu Y X, et al. Research progress and prospect on measuring urban ecological land demand[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 333−346. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201502013
    [12]
    彭建, 郭小楠, 胡熠娜, 等. 基于地质灾害敏感性的山地生态安全格局构建: 以云南省玉溪市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 627−635.

    Peng J, Guo X N, Hu Y N, et al. Construction of mountain ecological security pattern based on geological hazard sensitivity: Yuxi City, Yunnan Povince as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(2): 627−635.
    [13]
    邵明, 李雄, 刘志成, 等. 基于LUCC的承德市域生态系统服务价值演变分析与优化研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(3): 106−116. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190480

    Shao M, Li X, Liu Z C, et al. Analysis and optimization of the evolution of ecosystem service value in Chengde City based on LUCC[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(3): 106−116. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190480
    [14]
    Newton A C , Hodder K , Cantarello E . Cost-enefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 49(3): 571−580.
    [15]
    Niemel J, Saarela S R, Sderman T, et al. Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2010, 19(11): 3225−3243.
    [16]
    和娟, 师学义, 付扬军. 基于生态系统服务的汾河源头区域生态安全格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 814−825. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200406

    He J, Shi X Y, Fu Y J. Optimization of ecological security pattern in Fen River headwaters region based on ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(4): 814−825. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200406
    [17]
    黄智洵, 王飞飞, 曹文志. 耦合生态系统服务供求关系的生态安全格局动态分析: 以闽三角城市群为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4327−4340.

    Huang Z X, Wang F F, Cao W Z. Dynamic analysis of ecological security pattern with coupled ecosystem service supply and demand: taking the Min Delta urban agglomeration as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4327−4340.
    [18]
    Beier P, Majka D R, Spencer W D. Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages[J]. Conservation Biology, 2008, 22(4): 836−851. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x
    [19]
    Saura S, Rubio L. A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape[J]. Ecography, 2010, 33(3): 523−537.
    [20]
    Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin R F, et al. Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps[J]. Conservation Biology, 2011, 25(5): 879−892. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x
    [21]
    吴健生, 马洪坤, 彭建. 基于“功能节点−关键廊道”的城市生态安全格局构建: 以深圳市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 79−87.

    Wu J X, Ma H K, Peng J. Construction of urban ecological security pattern based on “functional nodes-critical corridors”: the case of Shenzhen City[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(12): 79−87.
    [22]
    陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序. 基于“重要性−敏感性−连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 471−484.

    Chen X, Peng J, Liu Y X. Construction of ecological security pattern in Yunfu City based on “importance-sensitivity-connectivity” framework[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 471−484.
    [23]
    吴健生, 岳新欣, 秦维. 基于生态系统服务价值重构的生态安全格局构建: 以重庆两江新区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 429−440.

    Wu J S, Yue X X, Qin W. Construction of ecological security pattern based on ecosystem service value reconstruction: taking chongqing liangjiang new area as an example[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 429−440.
    [24]
    胡炳旭, 汪东川, 王志恒, 等. 京津冀城市群生态网络构建与优化[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4383−4392.

    Hu B X, Wang D C, Wang Z H, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological network in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei city cluster[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4383−4392.
    [25]
    王楚琦, 闫晋钰, 李冠衡. 基于ENVI技术的永定河段景观格局演变与优化研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(6): 118−129. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200204

    Wang C Q, Yan J Y, Li G H. Study on the evolution and optimization of landscape pattern in Yongding River section based on ENVI technology[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(6): 118−129. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200204
    [26]
    Dong R, Zhang X, Li H. Constructing the ecological security pattern for sponge city: a case study in Zhengzhou, China[J]. Water, 2019, 11(2): 284. doi: 10.3390/w11020284
    [27]
    de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary unit[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 50−61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
    [28]
    宋婷, 李岱青, 张林波, 等. 秦巴山脉区域生态系统服务重要性评价及生态安全格局构建[J]. 中国工程科学, 2020, 22(1): 64−72.

    Song T, Li D Q, Zhang L B, et al. Evaluation of the importance of regional ecosystem services and construction of ecological security pattern in the Qinba Mountains[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2020, 22(1): 64−72.
    [29]
    肖楚楚. 密云水库流域建设用地扩张对生态系统水质净化功能的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2013.

    Xiao C C. Impact of construction land expansion on water purification function of ecosystem in Miyun Reservoir Watershed[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2013.
    [30]
    Bai Y, Ochuodho T O, Yang J. Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 102: 51−64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.079
    [31]
    环境保护部, 国家发展和改革委员会. 生态保护红线划定指南[Z/OL]. [2020−06−06]. http://sthjt.jl.gov.cn/xxfb/jgsz/gcs/zrstbhc/zrbhq_84151/201711/P020171117571999569371.pdf.

    Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China, National Development and Reform Commission. Ecological protection red line delineation guide[Z/OL]. [2020−06−06]. http://sthjt.jl.gov.cn/xxfb/jgsz/gcs/zrstbhc/zrbhq_84151/201711/P020171117571999569371.pdf.
    [32]
    Wischmeier W H. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning[J]. Agriculture Handbook, 1978, 537: 285−291.
    [33]
    许丁雪, 吴芳, 何立环, 等. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响: 以张家口−承德地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7493−7501.

    Xu D X, Wu F, He L H, et al. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: the case of Zhangjiakou-Chengde region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7493−7501.
    [34]
    陈泓宇, 李雄. 基于MSPA-InVEST模型的北京中心城区绿色空间生境网络优化[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(2): 16−21.

    Chen H Y, Li X. Optimization of green space habitat network in central Beijing based on MSPA-InVEST model[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(2): 16−21.
    [35]
    张梦迪, 张芬, 李雄. 基于InVEST模型的生境质量评价: 以北京市通州区为例[J]. 风景园林, 2020, 27(6): 95−99.

    Zhang M D, Zhang F, Li X. Habitat quality evaluation based on the InVEST model: the example of Tongzhou District, Beijing[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 27(6): 95−99.
    [36]
    谢余初, 巩杰, 张素欣, 等. 基于遥感和InVEST模型的白龙江流域景观生物多样性时空格局研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(6): 979−986.

    Xie Y C, Gong J, Zhang S X, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of landscape biodiversity in the Bailong River Basin based on remote sensing and InVEST model[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(6): 979−986.
    [37]
    褚琳, 张欣然, 王天巍, 等. 基于CA-Markov和InVEST模型的城市景观格局与生境质量时空演变及预测[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4106−4118.

    Chu L, Zhang X R, Wang T W, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution and prediction of urban landscape patterns and habitat quality based on CA-Markov and InVEST models[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(12): 4106−4118.
    [38]
    陈妍, 乔飞, 江磊. 基于 InVEST 模型的土地利用格局变化对区域尺度生境质量的影响研究: 以北京为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(3): 553−562.

    Chen Y, Qiao F, Jiang L. Impact of land use pattern change on regional scale habitat quality based on InVEST model: a case study of Beijing[J]. Journal of Peking University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 52(3): 553−562.
    [39]
    Schröter M, Remme R P. Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31(2): 1−20.
    [40]
    Li Y J, Zhang L W, Yan J P, et al. Mapping the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services in conservation priority setting[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(6): 681−696. doi: 10.1007/s11442-017-1400-x
    [41]
    李双成. 生态系统服务地理学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.

    Li S C. Ecosystem services geography[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
    [42]
    李方正, 刘阳, 施瑶, 等. 基于生态系统服务功能模拟演算的绿色空间规划框架: 以北京市浅山区为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(11): 125−136.

    Li F Z, Liu Y, Shi Y, et al. A green spatial planning framework based on ecosystem service simulation and calculation: a case study of shallow mountainous areas in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(11): 125−136.
    [43]
    Bryan B A, Raymond C M, Crossman N D, et al. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how?[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2010, 97(2): 111−122.
    [44]
    王旭熙, 彭立, 苏春江, 等. 基于景观生态安全格局的低丘缓坡土地资源开发利用: 以四川省泸县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(12): 3646−3654.

    Wang X X, Peng L, Su C J, et al. Development and utilization of land resources on low hills and slow slopes based on landscape ecological security patterns: a case study of Luxian County, Sichuan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(12): 3646−3654.
    [45]
    张继平, 乔青, 刘春兰, 等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的北京市生态用地规划研究[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(19): 28−36.

    Zhang J P, Qiao Q, Liu C L, et al. Research on ecological land use planning in Beijing based on the minimum cumulative resistance model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(19): 28−36.
    [46]
    殷炳超, 何书言, 李艺, 等. 基于陆海统筹的海岸带城市群生态网络构建方法及应用研究[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4374−4382.

    Yin B C, He S Y, Li Y, et al. Research on the construction method and application of ecological network of coastal zone city cluster based on the integration of land and sea[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4374−4382.
    [47]
    Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N, et al. Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2010, 95(1−2): 16−27.
    [48]
    陈小平, 陈文波. 鄱阳湖生态经济区生态网络构建与评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1611−1618.

    Chen X P, Chen W B. Construction and evaluation of ecological network in Poyang Lake ecological and economic zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(5): 1611−1618.
    [49]
    古璠, 黄义雄, 陈传明, 等. 福建省自然保护区生态网络的构建与优化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3): 1013−1020.

    Gu F, Huang Y X, Chen C M, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological network for nature reserves in Fujian Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(3): 1013−1020.
    [50]
    符小静. 北京市景观格局分析及生态网络空间优化研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2019.

    Fu X J . Analysis of landscape patterns and spatial optimization of ecological network in Beijing[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019.
    [51]
    朱强, 俞孔坚, 李迪华. 景观规划中的生态廊道宽度[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(9): 2406−2412. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.09.037

    Zhu Q, Yu K J, Li D H. Ecological corridor width in landscape planning[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(9): 2406−2412. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.09.037
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 吕寻，李万峰，胡勐鸿，戴小芬，成红梅，委霞. 日本落叶松种子园和优树自由授粉家系选择与利用研究. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(03): 1-9 .
    2. 张勰，伍汉斌，程勇，张春艳，王欣，蒋宏春，张森强，段爱国. 杉木育种群体遗传多样性评价及核心种质构建. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2024(09): 118-126 .
    3. 胡勐鸿，李万峰，吕寻，戴小芬，李宗德，周卓玲. 日本落叶松种子园和人工林优树自由授粉家系苗期选择. 森林工程. 2024(06): 64-78 .
    4. 胡勐鸿，李万峰，吕寻. 日本落叶松自由授粉家系选择和无性繁殖利用. 温带林业研究. 2023(01): 7-16 .
    5. 胡勐鸿，吕寻，李万峰，戴小芬. 日本落叶松种子园和人工林优树自由授粉家系试验林比较. 温带林业研究. 2023(02): 8-16 .
    6. 康向阳. 论林木常规育种与非常规育种及其关系. 北京林业大学学报. 2023(06): 1-7 . 本站查看
    7. 赵阳，冯延芝，杨超伟，王保平，乔杰，殷世雨，周海江，李芳东. 基于全基因组重测序的泡桐属植物遗传关系分析. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2023(06): 1-10 .
    8. 李江，陈伟，陈少瑜，罗婷，冯弦，陈绍安，姜远标. 思茅松高世代育种策略研究. 西部林业科学. 2023(04): 1-6+19 .
    9. 邱妍，翁启杰，李梅，陈升侃，周长品，李发根，甘四明. 尾叶桉×细叶桉多年生生长及其与材性相关的遗传分析. 林业科学研究. 2022(04): 1-8 .
    10. 汪淑娟. 林木育种技术在绿化苗木培育中的应用. 南方农业. 2021(05): 89-90 .
    11. 杜超群，孙晓梅，谢允慧，侯义梅. 北亚热带日本落叶松不同改良水平群体的遗传多样性. 林业科学. 2021(05): 68-76 .
    12. 康向阳. 林木遗传育种研究进展. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(03): 1-10 .
    13. 边黎明，陈松，史月冬，叶代全，施季森. 湖南排牙山杉木优树子代测定长期试验的遗传分析. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2020(12): 1-8 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1431) PDF downloads (135) Cited by(16)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    Copyright © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337673 Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return