Half-sib progeny test and evaluation of parents of <i>Picea crassifolia</i>

Chen Yali; Lü Dong; Zhao Ming; Zhao Hu; Zhao Xingpeng; Li Wei; Zhang Hongbin

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200370

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(4): 17-24. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200370

Chen Yali, Lü Dong, Zhao Ming, Zhao Hu, Zhao Xingpeng, Li Wei, Zhang Hongbin. Half-sib progeny test and evaluation of parents of Picea crassifolia[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(4): 17-24. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200370

Citation:

PDF (572 KB)

Half-sib progeny test and evaluation of parents of Picea crassifolia

Chen Yali^{1, 2,},
Lü Dong^{2, 3, 4},
Zhao Ming^{2, 3, 4},
Zhao Hu^{2, 3, 4},
Zhao Xingpeng^{2, 3, 4},
Li Wei^{1, 2, ,},
Zhang Hongbin^{2, 3, 4, ,}

1.
School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for the Breeding and Promotion of Endemic Plants of Qilian Mountains, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China
3.
Academy of Water Resources Conservation Forest of Qilian Mountains, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China
4.
Endemic and Rare Species to Protect Breeding Engineering Center of Qilian Mountains, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China

More Information

Received Date: November 22, 2020
Revised Date: January 15, 2021
Available Online: March 30, 2021
Published Date: April 29, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To lay the foundation for the genetic improvement of high generation of Picea crassifolia, the genetic variations of growth traits in the half-sib families of Picea crassifolia were studied, and the superior families were screened out.
Method With 100 Picea crassifolia half-sib families as the research objects, we investigated tree height (H), height increment in that very year (I), ground diameter (GD), and crown width (CW) of 15 and 20-year-old offsprings, variance and estimation of genetic parameters and parents’ general combining ability of half-sib families were analyzed, and on the basis of comprehensive evaluation on growth traits of parents, superior families were selected.
Result 4 growth traits were all significantly different (P < 0.01) among the half-siblings at the age of 15 and 20. The family heritability range of each trait in different ages was 0.554 − 0.855, and the family variation coefficients of growth traits ranged from 8.33% to 19.49%. The ranges of general combining ability (20-year-old) of H, GD, I and CW were −39.22 − 47.56, −1.19 − 1.05, −5.91 − 6.34 and −21.49 − 25.40, respectively. The correlation analysis results showed that there was a significant positive correlation among all growth traits (0.308 − 0.817). The growth traits were used to evaluate 15 and 20 years old half-sib families, 7 families were finally selected, and the average H, I, GD, east-west CW and south-north CW of the selected families in 20 years old were 209.40, 20.71, 6.33 and 141.87 cm, respectively, and the average genetic gain of each trait was 14.12%, 2.07%, 8.01% and 10.42%, respectively.
Conclusion There are abundant genetic variations among families of Picea crassifolia. Seven families with excellent growth traits were screened out, i.e. No. 49, No. 51, No. 60, No. 64, No. 108, No. 123 and No. 132. The selected superior families can provide high quality breeding materials for high generation seed orchards.
- Picea crassifolia,
- progeny test,
- general combining ability,
- multi-trait comprehensive evaluation,
- superior family election

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	孙应德, 许重九, 张鸿昌. 青海的云杉和云杉林[J]. 青海农林科技, 1981, 11(3):47−52. Sun Y D, Xu C J, Zhang H C. Spruce and spruce forest in Qinghai[J]. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, 1981, 11(3): 47−52.
[2]	魏克勤. 祁连山水源涵养林区的青海云杉林[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 1985, 7(3):14−20. Wei K Q. Picea crassifolia forest of water resources conservation forest of Qilian Mountains[J]. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 1985, 7(3): 14−20.
[3]	郭前业, 吴鸿文, 张霞. 青海云杉播种育苗技术[J]. 中国林业, 2008, 59(8):61. Guo Q Y, Wu H W, Zhang X. Seeding andseedling technology of Picea crassifolia[J]. Forestry of China, 2008, 59(8): 61.
[4]	闫克林, 陈刚, 谢小兵, 等. 基于K-均值法的青海云杉无性系半同胞子代测定林生长性状聚类分析[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2017, 60(8):8−10. Yan K L, Chen G, Xie X B, et al. Clustering analysis on the growth traits of half sib progeny test forest of Picea crassifolia clones based on the K-means[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2017, 60(8): 8−10.
[5]	吕东, 张宏斌, 李秉新, 等. 青海云杉无性系开花特性及种子园花粉流时空变化[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(3):68−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2016.03.014 Lü D, Zhang H B, Li B X, et al. Flowering characters of Picea crassifolia clones and temporal-spatial variation of pollen flow in Picea crassifolia orchard[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44(3): 68−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2016.03.014
[6]	吕东, 张宏斌, 赵明, 等. 青海云杉无性系雌雄球花及球果量的变异研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2013, 48(3):68−73,81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2013.03.014 Lü D, Zhang H B, Zhao M, et al. Variation of cones and strobilus production among clone of Picea crassifolia[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2013, 48(3): 68−73,81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2013.03.014
[7]	赵祜, 王立, 吕东. 青海云杉种子园无性系结实性状遗传变异研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(35):155−157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2017.35.047 Zhao H, Wang L, Lü D. Genetic variation of clones fruiting traits in Picea crassifolia Kom. seed orchard[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(35): 155−157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2017.35.047
[8]	钟伟华, 何昭珩, 周达, 等. 火炬松自由授粉子代测定研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1994, 7(3):277−285. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.1994.03.010 Zhong W H, He Z H, Zhou D, et al. Research of open-pollinated progeny of loblolly pine[J]. Forest Research, 1994, 7(3): 277−285. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.1994.03.010
[9]	秦国峰, 周志春, 金国庆, 等. 马尾松遗传参数估算和优良家系评选[J]. 林业科学研究, 1992, 5(2):127−133. Qin G F, Zhou Z C, Jin G Q, et al. Genetic parameter estimation and pedigree selection of Masson^,s pine[J]. Forest Research, 1992, 5(2): 127−133.
[10]	王明庥. 林木遗传育种学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001: 171−177. Wang M X. Forest genetics and breeding[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2001: 171−177.
[11]	张宏斌, 吕东, 赵明, 等. 青海云杉半同胞子代测定和优良家系选择研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2013, 48(3):82−87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2013.03.016 Zhang H B, Lü D, Zhao M, et al. Half-sib progeny test and superior families selection of Picea crassifolia[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2013, 48(3): 82−87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2013.03.016
[12]	吕东, 张宏斌, 李秉新, 等. 青海云杉优良单株半同胞种子及其子代苗表型性状分析[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(3):377−383. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2018.03.009 Lü D, Zhang H B, Li B X, et al. Phenotypic traits of half sibs-seeds and their offspring seedlings on Picea crassifolia superior individual trees[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(3): 377−383. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2018.03.009
[13]	欧阳芳群, 祁生秀, 蔡启山, 等. 青海云杉自由授粉家系遗传评价与选择[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(6):26−32. Ouyang F Q, Qi S X, Cai Q S, et al. Genetic evaluation and selection on open-pollinated families of Picea crassifolia Kom.[J]. Forest Research, 2018, 31(6): 26−32.
[14]	张鸿昌, 许重九, 孙应德. 青海省几种云杉生长特性的研究[J]. 青海农林科技, 1984, 14(1):44−54. Zhao H C, Xu C J, Sun Y D. Study on growth characteristics of several spruce in Qinghai Province[J]. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, 1984, 14(1): 44−54.
[15]	王军辉, 张建国, 张守攻, 等. 青海云杉硬枝扦插的激素、年龄和位置效应研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 6(7):65−71. Wang J H, Zhang J G, Zhang S G, et al. Research of hormone, age and position effect of hardwood cutting in Picea crassifolia Kom.[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2006, 6(7): 65−71.
[16]	杨俊杰. 火炬松半同胞家系遗传测定[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2017. Yang J J. Progeny test of half sib families of Pinus taeda L.[D]. Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2017.
[17]	White T L, Adams W T, Neale D B. Forest genetics[M]. London: CABI Publishing, 2007.
[18]	Zhao X, Hou W, Zheng H, et al. Analyses of genotypic variation in white poplar clones at four sites in China[J]. Silvae Genetica, 2013, 62(1−6): 187−195. doi: 10.1515/sg-2013-0023
[19]	陈晓阳, 沈熙环. 林木育种学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005. Chen X Y, Shen X H. Forest tree breeding[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2005.
[20]	解孝满, 李景涛, 赵合娥, 等. 柳树无性系苗期遗传测定与选择[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2008, 35(3):6−9, 14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2008.03.002 Xie X M, Li J T, Zhao H E, et al. Genetic determination and selection of willow clones at seedling stage[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2008, 35(3): 6−9, 14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2008.03.002
[21]	Lai M, Sun X, Chen D, et al. Age-related trends in genetic parameters for Larix kaempferi and their implications for early selection[J]. BMC Genetics, 2014, 15(1): S10.
[22]	李帅锋, 苏建荣, 郎学东, 等. 思茅松自由授粉家系遗传参数与早期选择分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(6):929−935. Li S F, Su J R, Lang X D, et al. Genetic variation and early selection analysis of open-pollinated families of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(6): 929−935.
[23]	杨秀艳, 张守攻, 孙晓梅, 等. 北亚热带高山区日本落叶松自由授粉家系遗传测定与二代优树选择[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(8):45−50. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100807 Yang X Y, Zhang S G, Sun X M, et al. Genetic test of open-pollinated Larix kaempferi families and selection for the second generation elite trees in northern sub-tropical alpine area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(8): 45−50. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100807
[24]	姜国云, 蒋路平, 宋双林, 等. 红松半同胞家系遗传变异分析及果材兼用优良家系选择[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(5):775−784. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2018.05.018 Jiang G Y, Jiang L P, Song S L, et al. Genetic variance analysis and excellent fruit-timber families selection of half-sib Pinus koraiensis[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(5): 775−784. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2018.05.018
[25]	Bogdan S, Katicic-Trupcevic I, Kajba D. Genetic variation in growth traits in a Quercus robur L. open-pollinated progeny test of the Slavonian provenance[J]. Silvae Genetica, 2004, 53(5-6): 198−201.
[26]	王娅丽, 李毅, 陈晓阳. 祁连山青海云杉天然群体表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 54(2):70−77. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.02.011 Wang Y L, Li Y, Chen X Y. Phenotypic diversity of natural populations in Picea crassifolia in Qilian Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 54(2): 70−77. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.02.011
[27]	贾晨, 辜云杰, 夏川, 等. 枫香半同胞家系子代测定及优良家系选择[J]. 西部林业科学, 2014, 43(5):122−128. Jia C, Gu Y J, Xia C, et al. The half-sib family progeny test and excellent family selection of Liquidambar formosana[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2014, 43(5): 122−128.
[28]	Maniee M, Kahrizi D, Mohammadi R. Genetic variability of some morpho-physiological traits in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum)[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2009, 9(7): 1383−1387. doi: 10.3923/jas.2009.1383.1387
[29]	许娜, 安三平, 王丽芳, 等. 青海云杉半同胞家系遗传变异及二代优树选择[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 2017, 2(1):1−5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0960.2017.01.001 Xu N, An S P, Wang L F, et al. Genetic variation and plus trees selection of families of Picea crassifolia[J]. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 2(1): 1−5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0960.2017.01.001
[30]	Kumar S, Lee J. Age-age correlations and early selection for end-of-rotation wood density in radiata pine[J]. Forest Genetics, 2002, 9(4): 323−330.
[31]	Abdulsalam M, Ariyo O, Alghamdi S. Analysis of combining ability over environments in diallel crosses of maize (Zea mays)[J]. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 17(1): 69−78. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.01.004
[32]	杨章旗. 马尾松优良家系选择的适宜年龄研究[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2004, 24(4):24−26. Yang Z Q. Suitable age for selection of superior families in seed orchards of Masson pine[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2004, 24(4): 24−26.
[33]	李青粉, 马建伟, 王军辉, 等. 油松自由授粉家系分阶段测定与选择的差异分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(4):451−456. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2015.04.001 Li Q F, Ma J W, Wang J H, et al. Analysis of stage test and height selection of open-pollinated Pinus tabulaeformis family analysis of stage test and height selection of open-pollinated Pinus tabulaeformis family[J]. Forest Research, 2015, 28(4): 451−456. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2015.04.001

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1584) PDF downloads (61)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Half-sib progeny test and evaluation of parents of Picea crassifolia

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content