Impact assessment of ecological service value under multi scenario simulation in Beijing based on land use

Mou Yan; Feng Fei

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220351

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2023 > 45(5): 14-24. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220351

Mou Yan, Feng Fei. Impact assessment of ecological service value under multi scenario simulation in Beijing based on land use[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(5): 14-24. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220351

Citation:

PDF (7006 KB)

Impact assessment of ecological service value under multi scenario simulation in Beijing based on land use

Mou Yan,
Feng Fei^,

School of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: August 22, 2022
Revised Date: November 04, 2022
Available Online: April 11, 2023
Published Date: May 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Land use/cover change (LUCC) is an essential driving factor affecting regional ecosystem service values. The study analyzed the impact of land use evolution on the value of ecosystem service values (ESV), so as to provide scientific reference for regional construction of ecological civilization.
Method Based on land use status maps in 2010 and 2020, this study simulated land use patterns of Beijing in 2030 under three different development scenarios, and analyzed the impact of land use changes on total ESV with sustainable development goal 15 (SDG 15).
Result (1) From 2010 to 2020, the overall land use changes in Beijing showed a pattern of reduced arable land, grassland and water area, while forest land and construction land expanded. From 2020 to 2030, the trend of changes in various regions under the natural increase scenario (NIS) had slowed down compared with that from 2010 to 2020. Under the ecosystem protection scenario (EPS), forest and water area increased significantly compared with that in 2020, whose change rates were 4.96% and 14.26%, respectively. Under the cropland protection scenario (CPS), the trend of cropland reduction and urban expansion got curbed efficiently. (2) The total amount of ESV in 2010, 2020 and 2030 (NIS, EPS and CPS) was 41.84 billion CNY, 40.99 billion CNY, 40.36 billion CNY, 43.24 billion CNY and 40.70 billion CNY, respectively. For each land type, forest land, waters and arable land accounted for over 90% of the total ESV, with construction land encroachment and water restoration being the main reasons for ESV loss and gain, respectively. (3) Forest cover rate was increasing gradually in Beijing from 2020 to 2030. Additionally, the proportion of degraded land under the three scenarios was NIS > EPS > CPS, resulting in the loss of ESV of 380 million CNY, 410 million CNY and 810 million CNY, respectively, both exhibited opposite trends in size.
Conclusion Waters, arable land and construction land are the main types of land use changes in Beijing, and the conversion between the three is also a key reason for the fluctuation of the total ESV. In future land use planning, ecological protection and arable land protection measures should be comprehensively considered to achieve the maximization of regional ecosystem service value and the achievement of sustainable development goals.
- land use change,
- CLUE-S model,
- multi scenario simulation,
- ecosystem service value,
- sustainable development goal

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	王军, 顿耀龙. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(5): 798−808. Wang J, Dun Y L. A review on the effects of land use change on ecosystem services[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(5): 798−808.
[2]	牛忠恩, 何洪林, 任小丽, 等. 基于过程模型的2000—2018年中国陆地生态系统服务时空动态及其权衡与协同分析[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(2): 1−15. Niu Z E, He H L, Ren X L, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristic of terrestrial ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies in China from 2000 to 2018 based on a process model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(2): 1−15.
[3]	Wang Z M, Mao D H, Li L, et al. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992–2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 514: 119−130.
[4]	鲜祖德, 巴运红, 成金璟. 联合国2030年可持续发展目标指标及其政策关联研究[J]. 统计研究, 2021, 38(1): 4−14. Xian Z D, Ba Y H, Cheng J J. Relevance study on United Nations 2030 sustainable development goal (SDG) indicators and the policies[J]. Statistical Research, 2021, 38(1): 4−14.
[5]	United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development[R]. New York: United Nations, 2014: 1−41.
[6]	邵超峰, 陈思含, 高俊丽, 等. 基于SDGs的中国可持续发展评价指标体系设计[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(4): 1−12. Shao C F, Chen S H, Gao J L, et al. Design of China’s sustainable development evaluation index system based on the SDGs[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(4): 1−12.
[7]	张辰, 易扬, 孙浩. 典型山区土地利用及生态系统服务价值变化−以北京市门头沟区为例[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2020, 32(4): 9−14, 18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2651.2020.04.002 Zhang C, Yi Y, Sun H. Changes of land use and ecosystem service value in typical mountainous areas-case study of Mentougou District of Beijing[J]. Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 32(4): 9−14, 18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2651.2020.04.002
[8]	张彪, 史芸婷, 李庆旭, 等. 北京湿地生态系统重要服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1311−1324. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160771 Zhang B, Shi Y T, Li Q X, et al. The key ecological services and their values of wetland ecosystems in Beijing[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(8): 1311−1324. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160771
[9]	宋蔚. 基于CLUE-S模型的南通市港闸区土地利用变化模拟[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2010. Song W. The modelling of land use changes based on CLUE-S model in Gangzha District of Nantong[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2010.
[10]	李媛洁, 叶长盛, 黄小兰. 基于CLUE-S模型的南昌市“三生”空间时空演变及情景模拟研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5): 325−332. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.05.037 Li Y J, Ye C S, Huang X L. Temporal-spatial evolution and scenario simulation of production-living-ecological space in Nanchang based on CLUE-S model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(5): 325−332. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.05.037
[11]	Zheng F Y, Hu Y C. Assessing temporal-spatial land use simulation effects with CLUE-S and Markov-CA models in Beijing[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2018, 25(32): 32231–32245.
[12]	北京市统计局, 国家统计局北京调查总队. 北京统计年鉴2021[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021: 7−24. Beijing Municipal Bureau Statistics, Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics in Beijing. Beijing statistics yearbook 2021[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021: 7−24.
[13]	邵明, 李雄, 刘志成, 等. 基于LUCC的承德市域生态系统服务价值演变分析与优化研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(3): 106−116. Shao M, Li X, Liu Z C, et al. Evolution analysis and optimization research of ecosystem service value in Chengde City, Hebei Province of northern China based on land use/land cover change (LUCC)[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(3): 106−116.
[14]	任杰. 基于CLUE-S模型的区域土地利用变化情景模拟[D]. 天津: 天津工业大学, 2021. Ren J. The scenario modelling of land use changes based on CLUE-S model[D]. Tianjin: Tiangong University, 2021.
[15]	樊文杰, 戴晓爱, 谢一茹, 等. 利用CLUE-S模型对四川省未来10年土地利用变化的预测与分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(7): 2641−2647. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.07.011 Fan W J, Dai X A, Xie Y R, et al. Prediction and analysis of land use change in Sichuan Province in the next 10 years based on CLUE-S model[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(7): 2641−2647. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.07.011
[16]	陈理庭, 蔡海生, 张婷, 等. 基于Markov-FLUS模型的饶河流域土地利用多情景模拟分析[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(10): 3947−3958. Chen L T, Cai H S, Zhang T, et al. Land use multi-scenario simulation analysis of Rao River Basin based on Markov-FLUS model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(10): 3947−3958.
[17]	Peng K F, Jiang W G, Ling Z Y, et al. Evaluating the potential impacts of land use changes on ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios in support of SDG reporting: a case study of the Wuhan urban agglomeration[J/OL]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 307, 127321[2022−06−14]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621015407.
[18]	朱培兴, 邢付吉. 提高曲靖市森林覆盖率的分析与思考[J]. 绿色科技, 2020(23): 159−161. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2020.23.064 Zhu P X, Xing F J. The analysis and thinking on improving the forest coverage in Qujing City[J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2020(23): 159−161. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2020.23.064
[19]	郭晓娜, 陈睿山, 李强, 等. 土地退化过程、机制与影响−以土地退化与恢复专题评估报告为基础[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6567−6575. Guo X N, Chen R S, Li Q, et al. Processes, mechanisms, and impacts of land degradation in the IPBES thematic assessment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6567−6575.
[20]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243−1254. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001 Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243−1254. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
[21]	谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189−196. Xie G D, Lu C X, Leng Y F, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2): 189−196.
[22]	王兆峰, 许静. 土地利用演变对国家公园生态系统服务价值的影响−以三江源国家公园为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(17): 1−11. Wang Z F, Xu J. Impacts of land use evolution on ecosystem service value of national parks: take Sanjiangyuan National Park as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(17): 1−11.
[23]	罗紫元, 曾坚. 资源环境保护下天津市用地空间增长模拟[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(2): 341−357. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200741 Luo Z Y, Zeng J. Spatial growth simulation of land use in Tianjin from the perspective of resource and environmental protection[J]. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(2): 341−357. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200741
[24]	邵梅, 马立鹏, 王新源, 等. 2004—2014年河西走廊荒漠化草地生态系统服务价值估算[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(3): 63−73. Shao M, Ma L P, Wang X Y, et al. The valuation of ecosystem service value of desertification grassland from 2004 to 2014 in Hexi Corridor, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(3): 63−73.
[25]	李亦佳. 基于LUCC的南昌市生态系统服务价值时空变化分析与预测[D]. 南昌: 东华理工大学, 2021. Li Y J. Analysis and prediction of the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem service value in Nanchang City based on LUCC[D]. Nanchang: East China University of Technology, 2021.
[26]	孙福红, 郭一丁, 王雨春, 等. 我国水生态系统完整性研究的重大意义、现状、挑战与主要任务[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(12): 2748−2757. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.08.11 Sun F H, Guo Y D, Wang Y C, et al. Significance, current situation, challenges and future direction and development on the researches of ecological integrity for fresh waters in China[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(12): 2748−2757. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.08.11
[27]	Bai Z G, Dent D. Recent land degradation and improvement in China[J/OL]. Ambio, 2009, 38(3): 150[2022−05−12]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19580032/.
[28]	Dearing J A, Yang X D, Dong X H, et al. Extending the timescale and range of ecosystem services through paleo environmental analyses, exemplified in the lower Yangtze Basin[J/OL]. PNAS, 2012, 109(18): E1111−E1120[2022−05−12]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118263109.
[29]	Kavvada A, Metternicht G, Kerblat F, et al. Towards delivering on the sustainable development goals using earth observations[J/OL]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 247, 111930[2022−05−12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111930.
[30]	邓楚雄, 刘俊宇, 李忠武, 等. 近20年国内外生态系统服务研究回顾与解析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(10): 2119−2128. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.10.024 Deng C X, Liu J Y, Li Z W, et al. Review and analysis of ecosystem services research between domestic and foreign in recent 20 years[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2019, 28(10): 2119−2128. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.10.024

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views PDF downloads

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Impact assessment of ecological service value under multi scenario simulation in Beijing based on land use

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content