Variation and probability grading of quantitative characters of traditional chrysanthemum cultivars

LUO Xin-yan; SONG Xue-bin; DAI Si-lan

doi:10.13332/j.1000--1522.20150137

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2016 > 38(1): 101-111. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000--1522.20150137

LUO Xin-yan, SONG Xue-bin, DAI Si-lan. Variation and probability grading of quantitative characters of traditional chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(1): 101-111. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000--1522.20150137

Citation:

PDF (1019 KB)

Variation and probability grading of quantitative characters of traditional chrysanthemum cultivars

Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, P. R. China.

More Information

Received Date: April 28, 2015
Revised Date: August 01, 2015
Published Date: January 30, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Identification and classification of cultivated plants is fundamental to the protection and application of plant varieties. Chrysanthemum × morifolium Ramat. is a cultivar with abundant variations, and rational grading of its quantitative characters may help us evaluate the cultivar resources from the quantitative and standard perspectives, and establish more detailed evaluation standards for the chrysanthemum. In this study, we tested and analyzed the variation of the 18 quantitative characters in 400 large-flowered chrysanthemums. The result showed that coefficients of variation of the 18 quantitative characters were all above 15%. Among them, the coefficients of variation were high in the number of disc florets (101.85%) and ray florets (70.02%), and floret width (59.49%), suggesting that some of flower traits have abundant genetic variation. The K-S test results indicated that 13 characters conformed to the normal distribution, whereas the other 5 characters followed skewed distribution. The values of 13 normally distributed characters could be divided, in a unified way, into 5 grades by 4 dividing points. The grading criteria of the other 5 characters were calculated. By applying the probability grading method of the new classification standards, the 400 chrysanthemum varieties are assigned and merged into digital codes. Through comparative analysis of these digital codes, we found that nine quantitative characters can distinguish 400 varieties. The assignment of these 400 cultivars according to the probability grading criteria can differentiate all the cultivars, and therefore, the new criteria of main ornamental characters could be regarded as the criteria of cultivars classification. The results of the probability grading would provide reference for the classification, identification and database construction.
- traditional chrysanthemum cultivars,
- quantitative characters,
- probability grading

FullText(HTML)

References (47)

References

[1]	雒新艳,戴思兰.大菊品种表型性状的分类学价值[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2010,32(3):135- 140.
[1]	LUO X Y, DAI S L. Taxonomic analysis of morphological characters of large-flowered chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(3): 135- 140.
[2]	ZHANG F, CHEN S, CHEN F, et al. Genetic analysis and associated SRAP markers for flowering traits of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)[J]. Euphytica, 2011, 177 (1): 15- 24.
[2]	LI R W, WANG C, DAI S L, et al. The association analysis of phenotypic traits with SRAP markers in chrysanthemum[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45 (7): 1355- 1364.
[3]	JING S X. On some problems concerned with compiling the descriptors of fruit germplasm in China[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sincia, 1993, 20 (4): 353- 357.
[3]	李仁伟,王晨,戴思兰,等. 菊花品种表型性状与SRAP分子标记的关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2012,45(7):1355- 1364.
[4]	ZHAO H J, LIU W S, LIU N, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of apricot (Armeniaca vulgaris) germplasm[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2013, 30 (1): 37- 42.
[4]	景士西. 关于编制我国果树种质资源评价系统若干问题的商榷[J]. 园艺学报,1993,20(4):353- 357.
[5]	赵海娟,刘威生,刘宁,等. 普通杏(Armeniaca vulgaris)种质资源果实主要数量性状变异及概率分级 [J]. 果树学报,2013,30(1):37- 42.
[5]	LIU M J. Study on the variations and grading standards of several economic characters of peach[J]. Journal of Beijing Agricultural College, 1992, 7 (2): 98- 104.
[6]	LIU M J. Studies on the variations and probability gradings of major quantitative characters of Chinese Jujube[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sincia, 1996,23 (2):105- 109.
[6]	刘孟军. 桃树部分经济性状的种内变异及其分级标准研究[J]. 北京农学院学报,1992,7(2):98- 104.
[7]	YANG J X, GUO B L. Studies on the variations and probability gradings of of major quantitative characters of Morus alba L[J]. Canye Kexue, 1998, 24 (2): 122- 124.
[7]	刘孟军. 枣树数量性状的概率分级研究[J].园艺学报,1996,23(2):105- 109.
[8]	LIU P, LIU M J, ZHOU J Y, et al. Distribution and probability grading index system of quantitative character of Chinese Jujube[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39 (6): 77- 82.
[8]	杨俊霞,郭宝林. 桑树数量性状的概率分级研究[J]. 蚕业科学,1998,24(2):122- 124.
[9]	YANG L, YANG L, LI L, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative characters of fruit in strawberry germplasm resource[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 20 (5): 1067- 1069.
[9]	刘平,刘孟军,周俊义,等. 枣树数量性状的分布类型及其概率分级指标体系[J]. 林业科学,2003,39(6):77- 82.
[10]	CHI H Y, LIU J, HU D H, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of Canarium album Fruit[J]. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology, 2008, 24(4): 25- 29.
[10]	杨雷,杨莉,李莉,等.草莓种质资源果实主要数量性状变异及概率分级[J]. 西南农业科学,2007,20(5):1067- 1069.
[11]	池辉云,柳军,胡德活,等.橄榄果实主要数量性状的变异及概率分级[J]. 广东林业科技,2008,24(4):25- 29.
[11]	MA Z S, WANG Y H, JIA Y Y, et al. Variation and probability grading of fruit firmness in peach germplasm resource[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 22 (1): 167- 169.
[12]	马之胜,王越辉,贾云云,等. 桃种质资源果实硬度评价及概率分级[J]. 西南农业学报,2009,22(1):167- 169.
[12]	NI Z G, ZHANG L H, XIE D H, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative characteristics of mango germplasm resource in Nujiang Valley, Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2009, 26 (4): 492- 497.
[13]	尼章光,张林辉,解德宏,等.怒江流域杧果种质资源主要数量性状变异及概率分级[J]. 果树学报,2009,26(4):492- 497.
[13]	ZHANG S Y, NING H J, FAN Y R. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of Cymbidium hubridum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013(9): 1118- 1121.
[14]	张韶伊,宁惠娟,范义荣.大花蕙兰主要数量性状的变异及概率分级[J]. 浙江农业科学,2013(9):1118- 1121.
[14]	MA X H, ZHAO Q F, DONG Z G, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of table grape resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2013, 14 (6): 1185- 1189.
[15]	LI H J, SHAO J W. Investigation collection and classification of chrysanthemum cultivars in China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 1990, 13 (1):30- 36.
[15]	马小河,赵旗峰,董志刚,等. 鲜食葡萄品种资源果实数量性状变异及概率分级[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2013,14(6):1185- 1189.
[16]	International Union for the Protection of New Plant Varieties (UPOV). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, homogeneity and stability, chrysanthemum spec[Z]. Geneva: UPOV,1979.
[16]	TIAN Y, LUO X Y, DAI S L. RAPD analysis of sporting and similar cultivars in chrysanthemum[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2008, 6 (6): 1223- 1232.
[17]	The Ministry of Agriculture of the People s Republic of China. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability: chrysanthemum[Z].Beijing: The Ministry of Agriculture of the People s Republic of China,2002.
[17]	李鸿渐,邵建文. 中国菊花品种资源的调查收集和分类[J]. 南京农业大学学报,1990,13(1):30- 36.
[18]	JING S X, LI B J. Study on description system of hawthorn germplasm resources[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sincia, 1990, 17(2): 81- 88.
[18]	田赟,雒新艳,戴思兰. 菊花芽变和相似品种的RAPD分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2008,6(6):1223- 1232.
[19]	SONG X B, HUANG H, ZHANG Y, et al. Studies on numerical taxonomy of cultivated Chinese and Japanese chrysanthemum[C]∥Advances in Ornamental Horticulfure of China.Beijing: Chinese Society for Horticultural Science, 2014: 1- 11.
[19]	中华人民共和国农业部. 植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性的测试指南:菊花[Z].北京:中华人民共和国农业部,2002.
[20]	ZHANG S L, DAI S L. Chinese chrysanthemum book[M].Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2013.
[20]	景士西,李宝江. 山楂种质资源性状描述系统的研究[J]. 园艺学报,1990,17(2):81- 88.
[21]	ZHANG Y, LUO X Y, ZHU J, et al. A classification study for chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × grandiflorum Tzvelv.) cultivars based on multivariate statistical analyses[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2014, 52(5): 612- 628.
[21]	XUE S J. China chrysanthemum mapping [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2004.
[22]	宋雪彬,黄河,张辕,等. 中日两国部分大菊品种的数量分类研究[C]∥中国观赏园艺研究进展.北京:中国园艺学会,2014:1- 11.
[23]	ZHANG Y, ZHU M L, DAI S L. Analysis of karyotype diversity of 40 Chinese chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2013, 51(3): 335- 352.
[24]	ZHANG F, CHEN S M, CHEN F D, et al. SRAP-based mapping and QTL detection for in florescence-related traits in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema morifolium)[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2011, 27(1): 11- 23.
[25]	张树林,戴思兰.中国菊花全书[M].北京:中国林业出版社.2013.
[26]	薛守纪.中国菊花图谱[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2004.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	张欣，宋襄翎，宋健. 聚醋酸乙烯乳液胶黏剂改性研究. 辽宁化工. 2022(10): 1382-1384 .
2.	郭永翠，秦江南，张锐. 核桃内果皮木质素生物合成途径关键基因研究进展. 现代园艺. 2019(07): 5-8 .
3.	胡萍，王丽芳，贾博然，刘颖，沙晓玲，任世学. 甲醛交联聚乙烯醇/麦草碱木质素发泡材料的降解性能. 生物质化学工程. 2018(04): 29-35 .
4.	巫国富，许民. CS改性WF/HDPE复合材料性能研究. 现代塑料加工应用. 2018(04): 24-27 .
5.	刘惠，沈丹丹，陈艳萍，苟进胜. 木质素/PVA发泡材料的制备及性能表征. 包装工程. 2017(19): 74-81 .
6.	李沛泽，王琪，黄国月，苏潇雨，任世学. PVA/超声波改性木质素发泡材料的制备与性能. 广东化工. 2017(18): 24-26 .
7.	卢佳欣，刘惠，沈丹丹，苟进胜，孟星彤，孙小琪. 可降解缓冲包装材料研究进展综述. 绿色包装. 2017(03): 41-47 .

Other cited types(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2387) PDF downloads (29) Cited by(14)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Variation and probability grading of quantitative characters of traditional chrysanthemum cultivars

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content