• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
HUANG Xiao-hui, FENG Da-lan, LIU Yun, ZHU Heng-xing, CHEN Dao-jing, GENG Yang-hui. Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 50-58. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324
Citation: HUANG Xiao-hui, FENG Da-lan, LIU Yun, ZHU Heng-xing, CHEN Dao-jing, GENG Yang-hui. Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 50-58. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324
shu

Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.

  • 1.

    1 Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing, 400036, P. R. China;

  • 2.

    2 College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, P. R. China.

More Information
  • Received Date: September 06, 2015
  • Published Date: October 28, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The tropic growth of mulberry roots in response to different water and nutrient conditions was studied in a simulated rocky desertification habitat. Four treatment groups were compared, including group H (variable moisture), group F (variable nutrients), group HF (both moisture and nutrients varying) and group CK (control), which were designed to simulate the heterogeneous soil conditions associated with rocky desertification. The experiment was conducted to study the influence of root tropisms on the growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees that grew in the stressful environment. The results showed that: 1) the roots of mulberry trees showed obvious hydro-tropism and fertilizer-tropism, but the fertilizer-tropism of mulberry roots did not occur in the condition of moisture shortage. 2) The mulberry roots in group H and HF both showed obvious tropic growth that promoted absorption to water for its growth, while in the group F and CK, roots showed no tropism characteristics and the trees grew under the drought conditions for a long term, maintaining a high root-shoot ratio. 3) Root surface area, total root length, number of root tips, root biomass, leaf area, plant height, basal diameter, crown width, and above-ground biomass of mulberry trees in each group were measured and compared, and these indices showed that the growth status of mulberry trees in group HF was the best, followed by those in group H. Group F and CK were significantly poorer. 4) The photosynthetic pigment contents, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid of mulberry trees in group F and CK were both significantly lower than those in group H and HF. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm, F′v/F′m, ΦPSII and ETR) of mulberry trees in group F and CK were significantly lower than those in group H and HF. The photochemical quenching coefficients (qP) of mulberry trees in group F and CK were significantly lower than those in group H and HF, by contrast with the non-photochemical quenching coefficients (NPQ), which were higher. These results indicated that in the rocky desertification area, water is the key factor that restricts live and growth of mulberry trees. Nevertheless, the mulberry trees can get enough water and nutrients due to root tropism and they show favorable growth characteristics.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (58)
  • [1]
    CHEN W J,REN X D, XIONG K N. Analysis on carbon fixation potentiality of rocky desert land:a case in Guizhou[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2011,30(2):163-168.
    [1]
    TUYET D. Characteristics of karst ecosystems of Vietnam and their vulnerability to human impact[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001,75(3):325-329.
    [2]
    陈伟杰,任晓冬,熊康宁.石漠化土地固碳潜力分析:以贵州为例[J].中国岩溶, 2011,30(2):163-168.
    [2]
    ZHANG Z H, HU G, ZHU J D, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and its impact on tree species distribution in a karst forest of Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011,35(10):1038-1049.
    [3]
    张忠华,胡刚,祝介东,等.喀斯特森林土壤养分的空间异质性及其对树种分布的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2011,35(10):1038-1049.
    [3]
    SHEN G F. The eco-environmental construction in the great west development strategy[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2001,37(1):1-6.
    [4]
    沈国舫.西部大开发中的生态环境建设问题:代笔谈小结[J].林业科学,2001,37(1):1-6.
    [4]
    KE Y Z, ZHOU J X, LU N, et al. Effects of salinity on photosynthetic physiology and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry(Morus alba) seedlings[J]. Forest Research, 2009,22(2):200-206.
    [5]
    LIU Y, WILLISON J H M. Prospects for cultivating white mulberry (Morus alba) in the drawdown zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(10):7142-7151.
    [5]
    HE X B, XIE Z Q, NAN H W. Developing ecological economy of sericulture and vegetation restoration in the water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Science Technology Review, 2007, 25(23):59-63.
    [6]
    MIAO C Y, CHEN T F, HE B H. Study on mulberry effect of soil and water conservation applying in purple soil[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 19(1):117-123.
    [6]
    柯裕州,周金星,卢楠,等.盐胁迫对桑树幼苗光合生理及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2009,22(2):200-206.
    [7]
    贺秀斌,谢宗强,南宏伟.三峡库区消落带植被修复与蚕桑生态经济发展模式[J]. 科技导报,2007,25(23):59-63.
    [7]
    HUANG X H, LIU Y, LI J X. Effects of water stress on physiological characteristics of mulberry(Morus alba) seedlings in the hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2012,48(12):122-127.
    [8]
    缪驰远,陈田飞,何丙辉.桑树在紫色土水土保持效应方面研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):117-123.
    [8]
    QIN J, HE N J, HUANG X Z, et al. Development of mulberry ecological industry and sericulture[J]. Science of Sericulture,2010, 36(6):984-989.
    [9]
    DU X L, WANG S J, RONG L. Characteristics of foliar δ13C values of common shrub species in various microhabitats with different karst rocky desertification degrees[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(12): 3094-3100.
    [9]
    黄小辉,刘芸,李佳杏.水分胁迫对三峡库区消落带桑树幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学,2012, 48(12):122-127.
    [10]
    ZHU S Q, YANG S Y. A preliminary analysis of the Maolan karst forest∥ZHOU Z X. Scientific investigation of karst forest in Maolan[M]. Guiyang: Guizhou Peoples Publishing House,1987: 210-224.
    [10]
    秦俭,何宁佳,黄先智,等.桑树生态产业与蚕丝业的发展[J].蚕业科学,2010,36(6):984-989.
    [11]
    CHEN M G, JIN P H, LU X M. Preliminary evaluation on sericultural ecosystem services and their value[J]. Science of Sericulture, 2005,31(3):316-320.
    [11]
    杜雪莲,王世杰,容丽.喀斯特石漠化区不同小生境常见灌木种叶片δ13C值特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3094-3100.
    [12]
    朱守谦,杨世逸.茂兰喀斯特森林初析∥周政贤.茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1987:210-224.
    [12]
    ZHANG G C, YANG J H, ZHAO X M. Study on distribution characteristics and soil and water conservation of mulberry root system[J].Science of Sericulture,1996, 23(1):59-60.
    [13]
    ZHANG L. Evaluation of drought resistance of mulberry germplasm[J]. Foreign Agriculture: Sericulture, 1992(1):34-36.
    [13]
    陈敏刚,金佩华,鲁兴萌. 蚕桑生态系统服务功能价值的初步评估[J]. 蚕业科学,2005,31(3):316-320.
    [14]
    张光灿,杨吉华,赵新明. 桑树根系分布及水土保持特性的研究[J]. 蚕业科学,1996,23(1):59-60.
    [14]
    ZHANG W P, LIU J N, LI B G. Simulation of tropisms of three tropisms of root system growth based on feedbacks between functions and structures[J]. Transactions of the CSAE,2009,25(Suppl.2) :110-117.
    [15]
    Ministry of Water Resources of the Peoples Republic of China. Standard of classification for drought severity SL424-2008[S]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2009.
    [15]
    张林. 桑树种质的抗旱性评估[J]. 国外农学:蚕业,1992(1):34-36.
    [16]
    DUAN S S, GU W X. Relationship between root system characteristics and drought resistance of wheat populations in semiarid region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997, 8(2):134-138.
    [16]
    张吴平,刘建宁,李保国. 结构与功能反馈机制下根系生长向性模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009,25(增刊2):110-117.
    [17]
    WANG Z. Plant physiology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
    [17]
    FILIPPENKO V N. Gravi- and chemotropisms of the primary maize roots when affected by lead and cadmium[J].Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001, 48(1): 12-18.
    [18]
    SUN J W, YANG Y, HUANG Z A, et al. Reason for photosynthetic declination in rice from water stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2004, 18(6):539-543.
    [18]
    TAKAHASHI H. Hydrotropism: the current state of our knowledge[J]. Journal of Plant Research,1997, 110(2): 163-169.
    [19]
    NEWCOMBE F C, RHODES A L. Chemotropism of roots[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1997, 37(1):22-35.
    [20]
    JAFFE M J, TAKAHESHI H, BIRO R L. A pea mutant for the study of hydrotropism in roots[J]. Science, 1985,230: 445-447.
    [21]
    KRAUSE G H, WEIS E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 1991, 42:313-349.
    [22]
    中华人民共和国水利部.旱情等级标准SL424—2008[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.
    [23]
    LIU Y, WANG G D, LIU G B. Difference and inherent linkage of root characteristics in different root classification of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2011, 12:1386-1393.
    [24]
    EAPEN D, BARROSO M L, PONCE G. Hydrotropism: root growth responses to water[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2005, 10(1):44-50.
    [25]
    段舜山,谷文祥.半干旱地区小麦群体的根系特征与抗旱性的关系[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(2):134-138.
    [26]
    王忠.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
    [27]
    TAKAHASHI H, MIYAZAWA Y, FUJII N. Hormonal interactions during root tropic growth: hydrotropism versus gravitropism[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,2009,69(4): 489-502.
    [28]
    BANO A, ULLAH F, NOSHEEN A. Role of abscisic acid and drought stress on the activities of antioxidant enzymes in wheat[J]. Plant Soil and Environment, 2012, 58(4):181-185.
    [29]
    XIONG L, ZHU J. Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis[J]. Plant Physiology, 2003, 133(1): 29-36.
    [30]
    HUANG X H, LIU Y, LI J, et al. The response of mulberry trees after seedling hardening to summer drought in the hydro-fluctuation belt of Three Gorges Reservoir Areas[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(10):7103-7111.
    [31]
    孙骏威,杨勇,黄宗安,等.聚乙二醇诱导水分胁迫引起水稻光合下降的原因探讨[J].中国水稻科学, 2004,18(6):539-543.
    [32]
    KRAUSE G H, WEIS E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 1991,42:313-349.
    [33]
    ZHANG S R. A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999, 16(4):444-448.
    [34]
    LU C M, ZHANG J H. Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants[J].Journal of Experimental Botany, 1999, 50: 1199-1206.
    [35]
    KOOTEN O, SNEL J F H. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology[J].Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3): 147-150.
    [36]
    LU Q, LI W, JIANG G, et al. Studies on the characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence of winter wheat flag leaves at different developing stages[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2001, 43(8): 801-804.
    [37]
    RUBAN A V, HORTON P. Regulation of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in plants[J].Functional Plant Biology, 1995,21(2): 221-230.
    [38]
    EHLERS W, HAMBLIN A P, TENNANT D, et al. Root system parameters determining water uptake of field crops[J]. Irrigation Science, 1991, 12:115-124.
    [39]
    HURD E A. Phenotype and drought to tolerance in wheat[J].Agricultural Meteorology, 1974, 14(1-2):25-39.
    [40]
    EAPEN D, BARROSO M L, CAMPOS M E. A no hydrotropic response root mutant that responds positively to gravitropism in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiol, 2003,131(2): 536-546.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(40)

    1. 张金博，杨圆圆，徐柏松，曹颖，赫亮，冯健. 红松半同胞家系生长性状变异及优良家系和单株的筛选. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(02): 9-12+20 .
    2. 李学波. 遮阴处理对4个种源核桃楸幼苗光合特性的影响. 吉林林业科技. 2024(01): 1-6+12 .
    3. 陆斐，刘刚，陈晓波，柏景珊，郭郁娇，魏伟，王刚. 露水河沙松优良家系与优良单株初选. 北华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 589-596 .
    4. 尚福强，高源，马晓雨，李连强，张利民，张丽艳，张杰，冯健. 红松优树半同胞家系的遗传变异及优良家系和单株选择. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(10): 1-6 .
    5. 王佳兴，闫平玉，孙佰飞，刘劲宏，冯可乐，张含国. 长白落叶松自由授粉家系生长变异及优良家系早期选择. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 81-89 .
    6. 熊欢欢，张海啸，李艳霞. 果用红松优良无性系选择研究. 林业科技. 2024(06): 38-42+71 .
    7. 赵林峰，高建亮，彭劲松，姜小文. 3种类型杉木林分生长、密度和材质的综合评价. 安徽农业大学学报. 2023(01): 29-35 .
    8. 于海洋，辛菁锴，王晓梅，宋巍巍，张艳明，张林，杨雨春，毕成程. 红松亲本无性系生长性状变异选择研究. 防护林科技. 2023(04): 63-67 .
    9. 于海洋，庞忠义，殷春红，丁昌俊，王福森，张金旺，金培林，付志祥，曲冠证，赵曦阳. 100个杨树无性系生长及材性变异研究. 西北林学院学报. 2023(04): 134-142+155 .
    10. 郑如德，钱国财，潘昕，汤行昊，范辉华. 木荷优树自由授粉家系生长性状分析与早期选择. 防护林科技. 2023(05): 17-22 .
    11. 周炳秀，刘勇，彭玉信，张劲，赵建松，朱轶超，赵巧玲，王硕，陶靖，孟路. 雄性毛白杨无性系苗期表型和生理变异的早期综合评价. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(11): 1-9 .
    12. 尹一卜，李吉祥，郭樱杰，芦子廷，肖英，刘华领，詹亚光，曾凡锁. 白蜡属种间杂交子代木质素含量变异及FmPAL核苷酸多态性关联分析. 植物研究. 2022(02): 191-199 .
    13. 魏嘉彤，陈思琪，芦贤博，张非凡，潘振海，柳妍如，葛丽丽，赵曦阳. 基于生长与木材性状的红松优良种源评价选择. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(03): 12-23 . 本站查看
    14. 赵林峰，高建亮. 杉木速生无性系生长与形质性状的遗传变异与良种选择. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2022(03): 8-15 .
    15. 贾庆彬，刘庚，赵佳丽，李奎友，孙文生. 红松半同胞家系生长性状变异分析与优良家系选择. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 109-116 .
    16. 罗芊芊，肖德卿，徐洪辉，王建华，刘志明，陈雅，万文娟，邓章文. 马尾松无性系生长和形质性状变异分析和优选. 东北林业大学学报. 2022(09): 40-44 .
    17. 欧阳天林，朱柯帆，邱建勋，刘武阳，邱全生，肖德卿，王云鹏，周志春. 木荷种子园自由授粉家系生长遗传变异及初选. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2022(09): 17-23 .
    18. 王芳，陆志民，王君，张世凯，李峪曦，李绍臣，张建秋，杨雨春. 低温胁迫下红松与西伯利亚红松光合与气孔特性. 植物研究. 2021(02): 205-212 .
    19. 刘晓婷，魏嘉彤，吴培莉，吴琳，徐清山，房衍林，杨斌，赵曦阳. 吉林省天然红松居群表型变异分析及多样性研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(04): 25-34 . 本站查看
    20. 李岩，朱嘉瑶，王喜和，孙权，李玉磊，吴蕴洋，李德尧，李平扬，于海洋，赵曦阳. 红松优树无性系及其子代的生长评价与选择研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(10): 38-46 . 本站查看
    21. 乔滨杰，王德秋，高海燕，李召珉，葛丽丽，丁文雅，赵曦阳. 干旱胁迫下杨树无性系苗期光合与气孔形态变异研究. 植物研究. 2020(02): 177-188 .
    22. 李嘉琪，韩喜东，马盈慧，李月季，王立祥，韩喜田，刘志，李海民，赵曦阳. 樟子松无性系生长性状与结实量变异研究. 植物研究. 2020(02): 217-223 .
    23. 王芳，陆志民，王元兴，杨雨春. 233个红松优树半同胞家系的生长性状变异研究. 吉林林业科技. 2020(02): 1-4+24 .
    24. 刘晓婷，李嘉琪，李峪曦，赵男，胡佰策，高海燕，李召珉，葛丽丽，丁文雅，赵曦阳. 红松半同胞家系变异分析及优良家系选择. 分子植物育种. 2020(13): 4473-4482 .
    25. 蒋路平，王景源，张鹏，梁德洋，张秦徽，王碧莹，裴晓娜，赵曦阳. 170个红松无性系生长及结实性状变异及选择. 林业科学研究. 2019(01): 58-64 .
    26. 郭文丽，李义良，赵奋成，铁军，廖仿炎，钟岁英，林昌明，叶威方. 湿加松无性系表型遗传多样性研究. 植物研究. 2019(02): 259-266 .
    27. 王璧莹，赵曦阳，王洪武，姜国云，沈光，王连奎，李焱龙，林健，王忠良. 依据生长性状对红松半同胞家系的评价选择. 东北林业大学学报. 2019(04): 8-11+20 .
    28. 潘艳艳，许贵友，董利虎，王成录，梁德洋，赵曦阳. 日本落叶松全同胞家系苗期生长性状遗传变异. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(02): 14-22 .
    29. 王芳，王元兴，王成录，张伟娜，刘卫胜，陆志民，杨雨春. 红松优树半同胞子代家系生长、结实及抗病虫能力的变异特征. 应用生态学报. 2019(05): 1679-1686 .
    30. 张秦徽，王洪武，姜国云，沈光，王连奎，李焱龙，王雷，王立祥，李月季，李蕊，赵曦阳. 红松半同胞家系变异分析及选择研究. 植物研究. 2019(04): 557-567 .
    31. 刘雨林，张兰，王元兴，任炳忠，王寅亮. 长白山红松林针叶次生代谢产物研究. 安徽农学通报. 2019(20): 28-31 .
    32. 张秦徽，李蕊，王璧莹，Kombi Kaviriri David，裴晓娜，王忠良，梁德洋，张鹏，赵曦阳. 红松开花结实研究进展. 分子植物育种. 2019(04): 1364-1372 .
    33. 李光森. 红松多无性系群体的种实性状变异研究. 农业开发与装备. 2018(06): 110 .
    34. 姜国云，蒋路平，宋双林，王井源，王淇，王连福，张鹏，赵曦阳. 红松半同胞家系遗传变异分析及果材兼用优良家系选择. 植物研究. 2018(05): 775-784 .
    35. 潘艳艳，梁德洋，郭婧，王芳，王福维，李树春，赵曦阳. 日本落叶松不同种源及家系生长性状变异分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(11): 19-27 . 本站查看
    36. 隋立龙，王芳，赵泉湖，王太坤，姜鑫，王君，陆志民，杨雨春. 不同林分红松生长与结实性状比较研究. 植物研究. 2018(06): 886-893 .
    37. 刘德栋. 我国红松良种选育研究进展. 防护林科技. 2017(03): 96-99+116 .
    38. 廖怀建，邓疆，杜婷，石雷，周成理. 引进种源印度黄檀优株选择及优良无性系选择与评价. 林业科学研究. 2017(06): 916-920 .
    39. Shaopeng Yin，Zhenhai Xiao，Guohui Zhao，Xin Zhao，Xiaoyang Sun，Ying Zhang，Fuwei Wang，Shuchun Li，Xiyang Zhao，Guan-Zheng Qu. Variation analyses of growth and wood properties of Larix olgensis clones in China. Journal of Forestry Research. 2017(04): 687-697 .
    40. 张鑫鑫，夏辉，赵昕，张莹，李光岩，张磊，孙晓阳，韩冬荟，赵曦阳. 长白落叶松种子园亲本生长与结实性状综合评价. 植物研究. 2017(06): 933-940 .

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1807) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(62)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    Copyright © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337673 Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return