• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
HUANG Xiao-hui, FENG Da-lan, LIU Yun, ZHU Heng-xing, CHEN Dao-jing, GENG Yang-hui. Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 50-58. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324
Citation: HUANG Xiao-hui, FENG Da-lan, LIU Yun, ZHU Heng-xing, CHEN Dao-jing, GENG Yang-hui. Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 50-58. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324

Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.

More Information
  • Received Date: September 06, 2015
  • Published Date: October 28, 2016
  • The tropic growth of mulberry roots in response to different water and nutrient conditions was studied in a simulated rocky desertification habitat. Four treatment groups were compared, including group H (variable moisture), group F (variable nutrients), group HF (both moisture and nutrients varying) and group CK (control), which were designed to simulate the heterogeneous soil conditions associated with rocky desertification. The experiment was conducted to study the influence of root tropisms on the growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees that grew in the stressful environment. The results showed that: 1) the roots of mulberry trees showed obvious hydro-tropism and fertilizer-tropism, but the fertilizer-tropism of mulberry roots did not occur in the condition of moisture shortage. 2) The mulberry roots in group H and HF both showed obvious tropic growth that promoted absorption to water for its growth, while in the group F and CK, roots showed no tropism characteristics and the trees grew under the drought conditions for a long term, maintaining a high root-shoot ratio. 3) Root surface area, total root length, number of root tips, root biomass, leaf area, plant height, basal diameter, crown width, and above-ground biomass of mulberry trees in each group were measured and compared, and these indices showed that the growth status of mulberry trees in group HF was the best, followed by those in group H. Group F and CK were significantly poorer. 4) The photosynthetic pigment contents, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid of mulberry trees in group F and CK were both significantly lower than those in group H and HF. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm, F′v/F′m, ΦPSII and ETR) of mulberry trees in group F and CK were significantly lower than those in group H and HF. The photochemical quenching coefficients (qP) of mulberry trees in group F and CK were significantly lower than those in group H and HF, by contrast with the non-photochemical quenching coefficients (NPQ), which were higher. These results indicated that in the rocky desertification area, water is the key factor that restricts live and growth of mulberry trees. Nevertheless, the mulberry trees can get enough water and nutrients due to root tropism and they show favorable growth characteristics.
  • [1]
    CHEN W J,REN X D, XIONG K N. Analysis on carbon fixation potentiality of rocky desert land:a case in Guizhou[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2011,30(2):163-168.
    [1]
    TUYET D. Characteristics of karst ecosystems of Vietnam and their vulnerability to human impact[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001,75(3):325-329.
    [2]
    陈伟杰,任晓冬,熊康宁.石漠化土地固碳潜力分析:以贵州为例[J].中国岩溶, 2011,30(2):163-168.
    [2]
    ZHANG Z H, HU G, ZHU J D, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and its impact on tree species distribution in a karst forest of Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011,35(10):1038-1049.
    [3]
    张忠华,胡刚,祝介东,等.喀斯特森林土壤养分的空间异质性及其对树种分布的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2011,35(10):1038-1049.
    [3]
    SHEN G F. The eco-environmental construction in the great west development strategy[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2001,37(1):1-6.
    [4]
    沈国舫.西部大开发中的生态环境建设问题:代笔谈小结[J].林业科学,2001,37(1):1-6.
    [4]
    KE Y Z, ZHOU J X, LU N, et al. Effects of salinity on photosynthetic physiology and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry(Morus alba) seedlings[J]. Forest Research, 2009,22(2):200-206.
    [5]
    LIU Y, WILLISON J H M. Prospects for cultivating white mulberry (Morus alba) in the drawdown zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(10):7142-7151.
    [5]
    HE X B, XIE Z Q, NAN H W. Developing ecological economy of sericulture and vegetation restoration in the water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Science Technology Review, 2007, 25(23):59-63.
    [6]
    MIAO C Y, CHEN T F, HE B H. Study on mulberry effect of soil and water conservation applying in purple soil[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 19(1):117-123.
    [6]
    柯裕州,周金星,卢楠,等.盐胁迫对桑树幼苗光合生理及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2009,22(2):200-206.
    [7]
    贺秀斌,谢宗强,南宏伟.三峡库区消落带植被修复与蚕桑生态经济发展模式[J]. 科技导报,2007,25(23):59-63.
    [7]
    HUANG X H, LIU Y, LI J X. Effects of water stress on physiological characteristics of mulberry(Morus alba) seedlings in the hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2012,48(12):122-127.
    [8]
    缪驰远,陈田飞,何丙辉.桑树在紫色土水土保持效应方面研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):117-123.
    [8]
    QIN J, HE N J, HUANG X Z, et al. Development of mulberry ecological industry and sericulture[J]. Science of Sericulture,2010, 36(6):984-989.
    [9]
    DU X L, WANG S J, RONG L. Characteristics of foliar δ13C values of common shrub species in various microhabitats with different karst rocky desertification degrees[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(12): 3094-3100.
    [9]
    黄小辉,刘芸,李佳杏.水分胁迫对三峡库区消落带桑树幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学,2012, 48(12):122-127.
    [10]
    ZHU S Q, YANG S Y. A preliminary analysis of the Maolan karst forest∥ZHOU Z X. Scientific investigation of karst forest in Maolan[M]. Guiyang: Guizhou Peoples Publishing House,1987: 210-224.
    [10]
    秦俭,何宁佳,黄先智,等.桑树生态产业与蚕丝业的发展[J].蚕业科学,2010,36(6):984-989.
    [11]
    CHEN M G, JIN P H, LU X M. Preliminary evaluation on sericultural ecosystem services and their value[J]. Science of Sericulture, 2005,31(3):316-320.
    [11]
    杜雪莲,王世杰,容丽.喀斯特石漠化区不同小生境常见灌木种叶片δ13C值特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3094-3100.
    [12]
    朱守谦,杨世逸.茂兰喀斯特森林初析∥周政贤.茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1987:210-224.
    [12]
    ZHANG G C, YANG J H, ZHAO X M. Study on distribution characteristics and soil and water conservation of mulberry root system[J].Science of Sericulture,1996, 23(1):59-60.
    [13]
    ZHANG L. Evaluation of drought resistance of mulberry germplasm[J]. Foreign Agriculture: Sericulture, 1992(1):34-36.
    [13]
    陈敏刚,金佩华,鲁兴萌. 蚕桑生态系统服务功能价值的初步评估[J]. 蚕业科学,2005,31(3):316-320.
    [14]
    张光灿,杨吉华,赵新明. 桑树根系分布及水土保持特性的研究[J]. 蚕业科学,1996,23(1):59-60.
    [14]
    ZHANG W P, LIU J N, LI B G. Simulation of tropisms of three tropisms of root system growth based on feedbacks between functions and structures[J]. Transactions of the CSAE,2009,25(Suppl.2) :110-117.
    [15]
    Ministry of Water Resources of the Peoples Republic of China. Standard of classification for drought severity SL424-2008[S]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2009.
    [15]
    张林. 桑树种质的抗旱性评估[J]. 国外农学:蚕业,1992(1):34-36.
    [16]
    DUAN S S, GU W X. Relationship between root system characteristics and drought resistance of wheat populations in semiarid region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997, 8(2):134-138.
    [16]
    张吴平,刘建宁,李保国. 结构与功能反馈机制下根系生长向性模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009,25(增刊2):110-117.
    [17]
    WANG Z. Plant physiology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
    [17]
    FILIPPENKO V N. Gravi- and chemotropisms of the primary maize roots when affected by lead and cadmium[J].Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001, 48(1): 12-18.
    [18]
    SUN J W, YANG Y, HUANG Z A, et al. Reason for photosynthetic declination in rice from water stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2004, 18(6):539-543.
    [18]
    TAKAHASHI H. Hydrotropism: the current state of our knowledge[J]. Journal of Plant Research,1997, 110(2): 163-169.
    [19]
    NEWCOMBE F C, RHODES A L. Chemotropism of roots[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1997, 37(1):22-35.
    [20]
    JAFFE M J, TAKAHESHI H, BIRO R L. A pea mutant for the study of hydrotropism in roots[J]. Science, 1985,230: 445-447.
    [21]
    KRAUSE G H, WEIS E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 1991, 42:313-349.
    [22]
    中华人民共和国水利部.旱情等级标准SL424—2008[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.
    [23]
    LIU Y, WANG G D, LIU G B. Difference and inherent linkage of root characteristics in different root classification of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2011, 12:1386-1393.
    [24]
    EAPEN D, BARROSO M L, PONCE G. Hydrotropism: root growth responses to water[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2005, 10(1):44-50.
    [25]
    段舜山,谷文祥.半干旱地区小麦群体的根系特征与抗旱性的关系[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(2):134-138.
    [26]
    王忠.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
    [27]
    TAKAHASHI H, MIYAZAWA Y, FUJII N. Hormonal interactions during root tropic growth: hydrotropism versus gravitropism[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,2009,69(4): 489-502.
    [28]
    BANO A, ULLAH F, NOSHEEN A. Role of abscisic acid and drought stress on the activities of antioxidant enzymes in wheat[J]. Plant Soil and Environment, 2012, 58(4):181-185.
    [29]
    XIONG L, ZHU J. Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis[J]. Plant Physiology, 2003, 133(1): 29-36.
    [30]
    HUANG X H, LIU Y, LI J, et al. The response of mulberry trees after seedling hardening to summer drought in the hydro-fluctuation belt of Three Gorges Reservoir Areas[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(10):7103-7111.
    [31]
    孙骏威,杨勇,黄宗安,等.聚乙二醇诱导水分胁迫引起水稻光合下降的原因探讨[J].中国水稻科学, 2004,18(6):539-543.
    [32]
    KRAUSE G H, WEIS E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 1991,42:313-349.
    [33]
    ZHANG S R. A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999, 16(4):444-448.
    [34]
    LU C M, ZHANG J H. Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants[J].Journal of Experimental Botany, 1999, 50: 1199-1206.
    [35]
    KOOTEN O, SNEL J F H. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology[J].Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3): 147-150.
    [36]
    LU Q, LI W, JIANG G, et al. Studies on the characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence of winter wheat flag leaves at different developing stages[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2001, 43(8): 801-804.
    [37]
    RUBAN A V, HORTON P. Regulation of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in plants[J].Functional Plant Biology, 1995,21(2): 221-230.
    [38]
    EHLERS W, HAMBLIN A P, TENNANT D, et al. Root system parameters determining water uptake of field crops[J]. Irrigation Science, 1991, 12:115-124.
    [39]
    HURD E A. Phenotype and drought to tolerance in wheat[J].Agricultural Meteorology, 1974, 14(1-2):25-39.
    [40]
    EAPEN D, BARROSO M L, CAMPOS M E. A no hydrotropic response root mutant that responds positively to gravitropism in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiol, 2003,131(2): 536-546.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Zhang Luyue, Liu Yanhong, Han Dongqing. Differences in growth and adaptive strategies between male and female plants of Cercidiphyllum japonicum[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(12): 71-81. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230263
    [2]Jin Chuan, Zha Tianshan, Jia Xin, Tian Yun, Zhou Wenjun, Yang Shuangbao, Guo Zifan. Dynamics of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters under drought condition for three desert shrub species[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(8): 72-80. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190316
    [3]HAN Jing, WU Yi, ZHAO Lin, AI Yun-bi, LIU Yan, GAO Rong-fu. Effects of photoperiod on the growth, flowering and chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics of forced Paeonia lactiflora.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(9): 62-69. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140418
    [4]ZHAO Xi-yang, WANG Jun-hui, ZHANG Jin-feng, ZHANG Shou-gong, ZHANG Zeng-shun, MA Jian-wei, YUN Hui-ling, LI Kui-you. Variation analysis on chlorophyll fluorescence and growth traits of Catalpa bungei clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(3): 41-47.
    [5]QIAN Yong-qiang, ZHOU Xiao-xing, HAN Lei, SUN Zhen-yuan, JU Guan-sheng. Rapid light-response curves of PSⅡ chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in the leaves of Salix babylonica, Salix ‘J172’ and Salix leucopithecia to Cd2+ stress[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(6): 8-14.
    [6]CHEN Zhi-qiang, LI Qing-jian, SHI Rui-ting, ZHANG Jian-qiu, WANG Guo-zhu, ZHANG Yu-ling, LI Yue. Effects of soda salinealkaline stress on photosynthesis and growth of Nitraria sibirica[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(3): 31-37.
    [7]HAO Jian-qing, LV Na, YANG Yang, LI Wen-hai, BAI Xue, ZHENG Cai-xia. Comparative study of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and water physiological characters of heteromorphic leaves for Populus euphratica[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 41-44.
    [8]YING Ye-qing, GUO Jing, WEI Jian-fen, ZOU Yi-qiao, HU Dong-chun, FANG Wei.. Photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescent responses of Phyllostachys pubescens seedlings to water deficiency stress.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(6): 128-133.
    [9]HUANG Hua-hong, CHEN Fen-xue, TONG Zai-kang, ZHU Yu-qiu.. Photosynthetic properties and chlorophyll florescence parameters of dwarf Chinese fir.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(2): 69-73.
    [10]DUAN Ai-guo, BAO Er-jiang, ZHANG Jian-guo, HE Cai-yun, SAI Li-ke, . Dynamic laws of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in needle leaves of different leaf ages and locations of Pinus armandii[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(5): 26-32.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 罗茂,关志华,颜幼春,柴莹莹,刘佳琪,张佳敏,王忠红. 模拟根际生境下青甘韭生长与品质的差异分析. 高原农业. 2025(01): 65-72+132 .
    2. 黄小辉,吴焦焦,王玉书,冯大兰,孙向阳. 不同供氮水平的核桃幼苗生长及叶绿素荧光特性. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 119-126 .
    3. 郑伟,师筝,龙美,廖允成. 黄绿叶突变体冀麦5265yg的光合生理特性分析. 中国农业科学. 2021(21): 4539-4551 .
    4. 王佳敏,宋海燕,陈金艺,张静,李素慧,陶建平,刘锦春. 多年生黑麦草对干旱胁迫下喀斯特异质生境的生长响应策略. 生态学报. 2020(13): 4566-4572 .
    5. 王生云,陶永明,司剑华. 不同配方轻基质对鳞皮云杉生长及光合参数的影响. 浙江林业科技. 2019(02): 50-55 .
    6. 乐佳兴,田秋玲,吴焦焦,高岚,张文,刘芸. 无患子幼苗的生长和光合特性对重庆低山丘陵区不同生境的响应. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(06): 75-85 . 本站查看
    7. 戴前莉,黄小辉,黄馨,唐龙波,朱恒星. 不同生境条件下凤丹生长及光合特性比较. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(09): 53-58 .
    8. 陶永明,司剑华. 不同轻基质配方对川西云杉幼苗生长的影响. 浙江林业科技. 2017(04): 66-70 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (1807) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(13)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return