• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
WANG Dong-zhi, ZHANG Dong-yan, WANG Fang, ZHANG Zhi-dong, HUANG Xuan-rui. Height curve construction of needle and broadleaved mixed forest under main site types in Saihanba, Hebei of northern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 7-14. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150359
Citation: WANG Dong-zhi, ZHANG Dong-yan, WANG Fang, ZHANG Zhi-dong, HUANG Xuan-rui. Height curve construction of needle and broadleaved mixed forest under main site types in Saihanba, Hebei of northern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 7-14. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150359
shu

Height curve construction of needle and broadleaved mixed forest under main site types in Saihanba, Hebei of northern China.

  • 1.

    1 College of Forestry,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei, 071000,P. R. China;

  • 2.

    2 Forest Resources Innovation and Protection Laboratory of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei,071000,P. R. China;

  • 3.

    3 College of Business,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei, 071000,P. R. China;

  • 4.

    4 Agriculture and Forestry Bureau of Jingxian County,Hengshui,Hebei,053500,P.R. China.

More Information
  • Received Date: October 08, 2015
  • Published Date: October 28, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Site index model is the most effective and usable method in evaluating potential productivity of forest. However, in the mixed forest with multiple tree species, multiple levels and complex stand structure, it is a scientific problem to be solved urgently that building dynamic position index model and evaluating the site productivity under different site conditions. In this paper, data from stem analysis of 348 dominant trees (174 Larix principis-rupprechtii trees and 174 Betula platyphylla trees) were used to evaluate dynamic base-age invariant site index models developed from Bertalanfy-Richards model, Hossfeld model, and Lundqvist-Korf model with the generalized algebraic difference approach (GADA) for broadleaved mixed forests in the warm temperate zone of northern China. Five dynamic site index models were created to evaluate site quality and site index conversion equations were established in different site types of mixed forest by geometric linear regression.The results showed that the optimal model for L. principis-rupprechtii was based on Bertalanfy-Richards model, and its evaluating values were R2adj 0.948, Bias 0.088, RMSE 1.089; the optimal model for B. platyphylla was based on Lundqvist-Korf model and its evaluating values were R2adj 0.966, Bias 0.066, RMSE 1.322. In different site types, the correlation coefficients between the site index of L. principis-rupprechtii and B. platyphylla were 0.87, 0.81, 0.84 and 0.91. Validation procedure showed that conversion equations were suitable for the studied mixed stands. The conversion equations can be applied in mixed species stands with inconsistent stratification or in stand conversion situations for an accurate and reliable evaluation of forest quality.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (30)
  • [1]
    CIESZEWSKI C J,BAILEY R L. Generalized algebraic difference approach: theory based derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes [J]. Forest Science,2000,46:116-126.
    [2]
    BRAVO F,MONTERO G. Site index estimation in Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands in the High Ebro Basin (Northern Spain) using soil attributes [J]. Forestry,2001,74:395-406.
    [3]
    WAND G G. White spruce site index in relation to soil,understory vegetation,and foliar nutrients [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1994,25:29-38.
    [4]
    CIESZEWSKI C J. Three methods of deriving advanced dynamic site equations demonstrated on inland Douglas-fir site curves [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2001,31: 165-173.
    [5]
    CIESZEWSKI C J. Developing a well-behaved dynamic site equation using a modified Hossfeld IV function Y3=(Axm)/(C+Xm-1): a simplified mixed-model and scant subalpine fir data [J]. Forest Science,2003,49: 539-554.
    [6]
    CARMEAN W H. Site index curves for upland oaks in the Central States [J]. Forest Science,1972,18: 109-120.
    [7]
    CIESZEWSKI C J,STRUB M,ZASADA M J. New dynamic site equation that fits best the Schwap pach for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Central Europe [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2007,23: 83-93.
    [8]
    PALAHI M,TOME M,PUKKALA T,et al. Site index model for Pinus sylvestris in north-east Spain [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2004,187: 35-47.
    [9]
    FONWEBAN J N,TCHANOU Z,DEFO M. Site index equations for Pinus kesiya in Cameroon [J]. Journal of Tropical Forest Science,1995,8(1) : 24-32.
    [10]
    DIEGUEZ-ARANDA U,GRANDAS-ARIAS J A,LVAREZ-GONZALEZ J G, et al. Site quality curves for birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.) stands in north-western Spain [J]. Silva Fenn,2006,40: 631-644.
    [11]
    BAILEY R L,CLUTTER J L. Base-age invariant polymorphic site curves [J]. Forest Science,1974,20: 155-159.
    [12]
    CURTIS R O,DEMARS D J,HERMAN F R. Which dependent variables in site index-height-age regressions [J]. Forest Science, 1974,20:74-87.
    [13]
    MONSERUD R A. Height growth and site index curves for inland Douglas-fir based on stem analysis data and forest habitat type [J]. Forest Science,1984,30: 943-965.
    [14]
    ERCANLI I,KSHRIMAN A,YAVUZ H. Dynamic base-age invariant site index models based on generalized algebraic difference approach for mixed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands [J]. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry,2014,38: 134-147.
    [15]
    SHARMA R P,BRUNNER A,EID T,et al. Modelling dominant height growth from national forest inventory individual tree data with short time series and large age errors[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2011,262:2162-2175.
    [16]
    TEWARI V P,LVAREZ-GONZALEZ J G, GADOW K V. Dynamic base-age invariant site index models for Tectona grandis in peninsular India[J]. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science,2014,76:1, 21-27.
    [17]
    NIGH G. Site index conversion equations for mixed trembling aspen and white spruce stands in northern British Columbia [J]. Silva Fennica, 2002,36(4): 789-797.
    [18]
    BRAVO-OVIEDO A,MONTERO G. Geographic variation and parameter assessment in generalized algebraic difference site index modelling [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2007,247:107-119.
    [19]
    DOOLITTLE W T. Site index comparisons for several forest species in the Southern Appalachians Proc [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1958, 22(5):455-458
    [20]
    CORRAL-RIVAS J J,ALVAREZ-GONZLEZ J G,RUIZ- GONZLEZ A D,et al. Compatible height and site index models for five pine species in El Salto,Durango (Mexico) [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2004,201: 145-160.
    [21]
    NIGH G,KAYAHARA G. Site index conversion equations for Western Redcedar and Western Hemlock [J]. Northwest Science, 2000,74:146-150.
    [22]
    TIWARI V P,SINGH B. Site index model for Tecomella undulata (Sm.) Seem.(Bignoniaceae) plantations in a hot arid region of India [J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2009,43:490-493.
    [23]
    DIEGUEZ-ARANDA U,BURKHART H E,RODRIGUEZ-SOALLEIRO R. Modeling dominant height growth of radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations in north-western Spain [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2005,215: 271-284.
    [24]
    VANCLAY J K. Assessing site productivity in tropical moist forests: a review [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,1992,54: 257-287.
    [25]
    KAHRIMAN A, YAVUZ H,ERCANLI I. Site index conversion equations for mixed stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) in the Black Sea Region,Turkey[J]. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry,2013,37: 488-494.
    [26]
    FRIES A,LINDGREN D,YING C C,et al. The effect of temperature on site index in western Canada and Scandinavia estimated form IUFRO Pinus contorta provenance experiments [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2000,30: 921-929.
    [27]
    SEYNAVE I,GEGOUT J C,HERVE J C,et al. Picea abies site index prediction by environmental factors and understorey vegetation: a two-scale approach based on survey databases [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2005,35: 1669-1678.
    [28]
    BRAVO-OVIEDO A,ROIG S,BRAVO F,et al. Environmental variability and its relationship to site index in Mediterranean maritine pine [J]. Forest Systems,2011,20(1): 50-64.
    [29]
    BARRIO G,HARRISON P A,BERRY P M,et al. Integrating multiple modeling approaches to predict the potential impacts of climate change on species’ distributions in contrasting regions: comparison and implications for policy[J]. Environmental Science Policy,2006,9: 129-147.
    [30]
    DELGADOCABALLERO C E,GMEZGUERRERO A,VALDEZLAZALDE J R,et al. Site index and soil properties in young plantations of Eucalyptus grandis and E.urophylla in southeastern MXICO[J]. Agrociencia,2009,43: 61-72.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Peng Bolin, Yang Hua, Xie Rong. Effects of thinning on stand diameter structural heterogeneity and growth dominance in spruce-fir forests of Changbai Mountains, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(5): 34-42. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200401
    [2]Jia Weiwei, Luo Tianze, Li Fengri. Branch density model for Pinus koraiensis plantation based on thinning effects[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(2): 10-21. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200057
    [3]Jin Xiaojuan, Sun Yujun, Pan Lei. Prediction model of base diameter of primary branch for Larix olgensis based on mixed effects[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(10): 1-10. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200133
    [4]Jiang Kaibin, Du Chengju, Li Sainan, Huang Shaowei, Liu Tianyi. Genetic evaluation on growth and branching traits of 4-year-old half-sib families of loblolly pine[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(9): 1-10. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190456
    [5]Ye Zi-qi, Deng Ru-jun, Wang Yu-chen, Wang Jian-ming, Li Jing-wen, Zhang Fan-bing, Chen Jie. Branching patterns of clonal root of Populus euphratica and its associations with soil factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(2): 31-39. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170426
    [6]Wang Shuo, Dong Li-hu, Li Feng-ri. Branch survival models of planted Larix olgensis tree[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(1): 57-66. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170203
    [7]JIANG Li-chun, PAN Ying, LI Yao-xiang. Model systems of branch characteristics and crown profile simulation for Larix gmelinii[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6): 1-7. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150339
    [8]WANG Shu-juan, XIE Bao-yuan. Modeling analysis of the bending modulus of elasticity for branches in the period of dormancy[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(6): 130-134. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.06.024
    [9]KAN Jiang-ming, LI Wen-bin, SUN Ren-shan. Computer vision based method of automatic measurement of trunk and branch diameters of standing trees[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(4): 5-9. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.04.002
    [10]LI Wen-bin, KAN Jiang-ming, SUN Ren-shan. An automatic identifying method of intersections between trunks and branches of standing trees[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(4): 1-4. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.04.001

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(40)

    1. 张金博，杨圆圆，徐柏松，曹颖，赫亮，冯健. 红松半同胞家系生长性状变异及优良家系和单株的筛选. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(02): 9-12+20 .
    2. 李学波. 遮阴处理对4个种源核桃楸幼苗光合特性的影响. 吉林林业科技. 2024(01): 1-6+12 .
    3. 陆斐，刘刚，陈晓波，柏景珊，郭郁娇，魏伟，王刚. 露水河沙松优良家系与优良单株初选. 北华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 589-596 .
    4. 尚福强，高源，马晓雨，李连强，张利民，张丽艳，张杰，冯健. 红松优树半同胞家系的遗传变异及优良家系和单株选择. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(10): 1-6 .
    5. 王佳兴，闫平玉，孙佰飞，刘劲宏，冯可乐，张含国. 长白落叶松自由授粉家系生长变异及优良家系早期选择. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 81-89 .
    6. 熊欢欢，张海啸，李艳霞. 果用红松优良无性系选择研究. 林业科技. 2024(06): 38-42+71 .
    7. 赵林峰，高建亮，彭劲松，姜小文. 3种类型杉木林分生长、密度和材质的综合评价. 安徽农业大学学报. 2023(01): 29-35 .
    8. 于海洋，辛菁锴，王晓梅，宋巍巍，张艳明，张林，杨雨春，毕成程. 红松亲本无性系生长性状变异选择研究. 防护林科技. 2023(04): 63-67 .
    9. 于海洋，庞忠义，殷春红，丁昌俊，王福森，张金旺，金培林，付志祥，曲冠证，赵曦阳. 100个杨树无性系生长及材性变异研究. 西北林学院学报. 2023(04): 134-142+155 .
    10. 郑如德，钱国财，潘昕，汤行昊，范辉华. 木荷优树自由授粉家系生长性状分析与早期选择. 防护林科技. 2023(05): 17-22 .
    11. 周炳秀，刘勇，彭玉信，张劲，赵建松，朱轶超，赵巧玲，王硕，陶靖，孟路. 雄性毛白杨无性系苗期表型和生理变异的早期综合评价. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(11): 1-9 .
    12. 尹一卜，李吉祥，郭樱杰，芦子廷，肖英，刘华领，詹亚光，曾凡锁. 白蜡属种间杂交子代木质素含量变异及FmPAL核苷酸多态性关联分析. 植物研究. 2022(02): 191-199 .
    13. 魏嘉彤，陈思琪，芦贤博，张非凡，潘振海，柳妍如，葛丽丽，赵曦阳. 基于生长与木材性状的红松优良种源评价选择. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(03): 12-23 . 本站查看
    14. 赵林峰，高建亮. 杉木速生无性系生长与形质性状的遗传变异与良种选择. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2022(03): 8-15 .
    15. 贾庆彬，刘庚，赵佳丽，李奎友，孙文生. 红松半同胞家系生长性状变异分析与优良家系选择. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 109-116 .
    16. 罗芊芊，肖德卿，徐洪辉，王建华，刘志明，陈雅，万文娟，邓章文. 马尾松无性系生长和形质性状变异分析和优选. 东北林业大学学报. 2022(09): 40-44 .
    17. 欧阳天林，朱柯帆，邱建勋，刘武阳，邱全生，肖德卿，王云鹏，周志春. 木荷种子园自由授粉家系生长遗传变异及初选. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2022(09): 17-23 .
    18. 王芳，陆志民，王君，张世凯，李峪曦，李绍臣，张建秋，杨雨春. 低温胁迫下红松与西伯利亚红松光合与气孔特性. 植物研究. 2021(02): 205-212 .
    19. 刘晓婷，魏嘉彤，吴培莉，吴琳，徐清山，房衍林，杨斌，赵曦阳. 吉林省天然红松居群表型变异分析及多样性研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(04): 25-34 . 本站查看
    20. 李岩，朱嘉瑶，王喜和，孙权，李玉磊，吴蕴洋，李德尧，李平扬，于海洋，赵曦阳. 红松优树无性系及其子代的生长评价与选择研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(10): 38-46 . 本站查看
    21. 乔滨杰，王德秋，高海燕，李召珉，葛丽丽，丁文雅，赵曦阳. 干旱胁迫下杨树无性系苗期光合与气孔形态变异研究. 植物研究. 2020(02): 177-188 .
    22. 李嘉琪，韩喜东，马盈慧，李月季，王立祥，韩喜田，刘志，李海民，赵曦阳. 樟子松无性系生长性状与结实量变异研究. 植物研究. 2020(02): 217-223 .
    23. 王芳，陆志民，王元兴，杨雨春. 233个红松优树半同胞家系的生长性状变异研究. 吉林林业科技. 2020(02): 1-4+24 .
    24. 刘晓婷，李嘉琪，李峪曦，赵男，胡佰策，高海燕，李召珉，葛丽丽，丁文雅，赵曦阳. 红松半同胞家系变异分析及优良家系选择. 分子植物育种. 2020(13): 4473-4482 .
    25. 蒋路平，王景源，张鹏，梁德洋，张秦徽，王碧莹，裴晓娜，赵曦阳. 170个红松无性系生长及结实性状变异及选择. 林业科学研究. 2019(01): 58-64 .
    26. 郭文丽，李义良，赵奋成，铁军，廖仿炎，钟岁英，林昌明，叶威方. 湿加松无性系表型遗传多样性研究. 植物研究. 2019(02): 259-266 .
    27. 王璧莹，赵曦阳，王洪武，姜国云，沈光，王连奎，李焱龙，林健，王忠良. 依据生长性状对红松半同胞家系的评价选择. 东北林业大学学报. 2019(04): 8-11+20 .
    28. 潘艳艳，许贵友，董利虎，王成录，梁德洋，赵曦阳. 日本落叶松全同胞家系苗期生长性状遗传变异. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(02): 14-22 .
    29. 王芳，王元兴，王成录，张伟娜，刘卫胜，陆志民，杨雨春. 红松优树半同胞子代家系生长、结实及抗病虫能力的变异特征. 应用生态学报. 2019(05): 1679-1686 .
    30. 张秦徽，王洪武，姜国云，沈光，王连奎，李焱龙，王雷，王立祥，李月季，李蕊，赵曦阳. 红松半同胞家系变异分析及选择研究. 植物研究. 2019(04): 557-567 .
    31. 刘雨林，张兰，王元兴，任炳忠，王寅亮. 长白山红松林针叶次生代谢产物研究. 安徽农学通报. 2019(20): 28-31 .
    32. 张秦徽，李蕊，王璧莹，Kombi Kaviriri David，裴晓娜，王忠良，梁德洋，张鹏，赵曦阳. 红松开花结实研究进展. 分子植物育种. 2019(04): 1364-1372 .
    33. 李光森. 红松多无性系群体的种实性状变异研究. 农业开发与装备. 2018(06): 110 .
    34. 姜国云，蒋路平，宋双林，王井源，王淇，王连福，张鹏，赵曦阳. 红松半同胞家系遗传变异分析及果材兼用优良家系选择. 植物研究. 2018(05): 775-784 .
    35. 潘艳艳，梁德洋，郭婧，王芳，王福维，李树春，赵曦阳. 日本落叶松不同种源及家系生长性状变异分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(11): 19-27 . 本站查看
    36. 隋立龙，王芳，赵泉湖，王太坤，姜鑫，王君，陆志民，杨雨春. 不同林分红松生长与结实性状比较研究. 植物研究. 2018(06): 886-893 .
    37. 刘德栋. 我国红松良种选育研究进展. 防护林科技. 2017(03): 96-99+116 .
    38. 廖怀建，邓疆，杜婷，石雷，周成理. 引进种源印度黄檀优株选择及优良无性系选择与评价. 林业科学研究. 2017(06): 916-920 .
    39. Shaopeng Yin，Zhenhai Xiao，Guohui Zhao，Xin Zhao，Xiaoyang Sun，Ying Zhang，Fuwei Wang，Shuchun Li，Xiyang Zhao，Guan-Zheng Qu. Variation analyses of growth and wood properties of Larix olgensis clones in China. Journal of Forestry Research. 2017(04): 687-697 .
    40. 张鑫鑫，夏辉，赵昕，张莹，李光岩，张磊，孙晓阳，韩冬荟，赵曦阳. 长白落叶松种子园亲本生长与结实性状综合评价. 植物研究. 2017(06): 933-940 .

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1969) PDF downloads (51) Cited by(62)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337673 Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return