Study on the factors influencing surface runoff coefficient in <i>Festuca arundinacea</i> grassland

WEI Xiao-yan; BI Hua-xing; HUO Yun-mei; XIAO Cong-ying; YANG Xiao-qi

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160305

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2017 > 39(5): 82-88. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160305

WEI Xiao-yan, BI Hua-xing, HUO Yun-mei, XIAO Cong-ying, YANG Xiao-qi. Study on the factors influencing surface runoff coefficient in Festuca arundinacea grassland[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(5): 82-88. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160305

Citation:

PDF (953 KB)

Study on the factors influencing surface runoff coefficient in Festuca arundinacea grassland

1.
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P.R. China
2.
Forestry Ecological Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P.R. China
3.
Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-environmental Improvement with Forestry and Fruit Trees, Beijing, 102206, P.R. China
4.
Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P.R. China

More Information

Received Date: September 27, 2016
Revised Date: March 11, 2017
Published Date: April 30, 2017

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Festuca arundinacea as a kind of typical grass in northern China, it has the advantage of storing and infiltrating rain water. In order to research the runoff of F. arundinacea grassland, we studied the changing process of runoff coefficient under different coverage (bare land, 60%, 90%) and varied rainfall intensities (30, 60, 90mm/hour) in F. arundinacea grassland through artificial simulated rainfall experiments. And we also studied its relationship with different influencing factors. Taking bare land as control, we studied the runoff coefficient reduction rate of F. arundinacea grassland under varied experimental conditions. The results showed that: 1) The initial runoff time of F. arundinacea grassland decreased with the increase of rainfall intensity, and it prolonged with the increase of coverage. Simultaneously, the greater the rainfall intensity was, the smaller range the runoff coefficient reduction rate became. And the greater the coverage was, the more obvious the grassland delayed the initial runoff time. 2) The runoff coefficient of F. arundinacea grassland and bare land both rapidly increased and then tended to be stable with the increase of rainfall time. After simulation, it was found that the runoff coefficient all showed a logarithmic function with rainfall time. 3) Runoff coefficient of F.rundinacea grassland decreased with the increase of coverage, and it increased with the increase of rainfall intensity. Also, the lower the coverage was, the more significant the rainfall intensity affected runoff coefficient. But the larger the coverage was, the less significant the rainfall intensity affected runoff coefficient. 4) The ability of F. arundinacea grassland in reducing runoff coefficient was limited. With the increase of rainfall intensity, runoff coefficient reduction rates of two kinds of coverage grasslands were more close. When the rainfall intensities were 30, 60, 90mm/hour, the differences in runoff coefficient reduction rate between the 60% and 90% coverage grassland were 25%, 24%, 23%, respectively. 5) The regression equation of the runoff coefficient of F. arundinacea with rainfall intensity, coverage and rainfall time was established under experimental conditions. After verification, the equation could be applied to predict the runoff coefficient of F. arundinacea grassland under the experimental conditions.
- simulating rainfall,
- coverage,
- rainfall intensity,
- runoff coefficient

FullText(HTML)

References (26)

References

[1]	KRANS J V, MORRIS K. Determining a profile of protocols and standards used in the visual field assessment of turfgrasses: a survey of national turfgrass evaluation program-sponsored university scientists[EB/OL]. (2007-11-30)[2017-01-10]. http://ddr.nal.usda.gov/bitstream/10113/…/1/IND44030817. pdf.
[2]	余高镜, 林奇田, 柯庆明, 等.草坪型高羊茅的研究进展与展望[J].草业科学, 2005, 22(7):77-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.07.022 YU G J, LIN Q T, KE Q M, et al. Progress and prospects of tall fescue turfgrass[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 22(7):77-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.07.022
[3]	OSTERKAMP W R, HUPP C R, STOFFEL M. The interactions between vegetation and erosion: new directions for research at the interface of ecology and geomorphology[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2012, 37(1):31-36. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1191/0309133302pp337pr
[4]	朱永杰.城市典型草坪绿地对地表径流削减作用研究[D].北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10022-1016126390.htm ZHU Y J. Experimental study of reduction on typical urban lawn green surface runoff[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10022-1016126390.htm
[5]	霍云梅.覆盖度、雨强及坡度对城市典型草坪绿地坡面产沙影响[D].北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. HUO Y M. Effects of coverage, rainfall intensity and slope degree on soil erosion of typical urban green spaces[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[6]	唐宁远, 车伍, 潘国庆.城市雨洪控制利用的雨水径流系数分析[J].中国给水排水, 2009, 25(22):4-8. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4602.2009.22.002 TANG N Y, CHE W, PAN G Q. Runoff coefficient analysis for urban stormwater and flood control and utilization[J]. China Water and Waste Water, 2009, 25(22):4-8. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4602.2009.22.002
[7]	赵会娟.地面坡度对草坪径流的影响试验研究[D].北京: 北京林业大学, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10022-2008085182.htm ZHAO H J. Experimental research on the impacts of ground slope on the runoff of turf[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10022-2008085182.htm
[8]	MAIDMENT D R. Urban storm drainage criteria manual[M]. Denver Colo: Urban Drainge and Flood Control District, 1991.
[9]	SCHAAKE J C, GEYER J C, KNAPP J W. Experimental examination of the rational method[J]. Journal of the Hydraul Division, 1967, 93(6):353-370.
[10]	GILL S E, HANDLEY J F, ENNOS A R, et al. Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure[J]. Built Environment, 2007, 33(1):115-133. doi: 10.2148/benv.33.1.115
[11]	武晟, 汪志荣, 张建丰, 等.不同下垫面径流系数与雨强及历时关系的实验研究[J].中国农业大学学报, 2006, 11(5):55-59. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4333.2006.05.012 WU S, WANG Z R, ZHANG J F, et al. Experimental study on relationship among runoff coefficients of different underlying surfaces, rainfall intensity and duration[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2006, 11(5):55-59. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4333.2006.05.012
[12]	朱冰冰, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等.草本植被覆盖对坡面降雨径流侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(3):401-407. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201003003 ZHU B B, LI Z B, LI P, et al. Effect of grass coverage on sediment yield of rain on slope[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(3):401-407. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201003003
[13]	武晟.西安市降雨特性分析和城市下垫面产汇流特性实验研究[D].西安: 西安理工大学, 2004. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10700-2004043341.htm WU S. Analysis of rainfall characteristics and experimental study of runoff-producing and flow concentration characteristics of city's underlying surface in Xi'an[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2004. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10700-2004043341.htm
[14]	张凯凯, 马娟娟, 孙西欢, 等.太原市高校不同下垫面条件下降雨径流系数试验研究[J].节水灌溉, 2014(12):29-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2014.12.008 ZHANG K K, MA J J, SUN X H, et al. Experimental study on rainfall runoff coefficient under different underlying surface of universities in Taiyuan City[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2014(12):29-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2014.12.008
[15]	李广, 黄高宝.雨强和土地利用对黄土丘陵区径流系数及蓄积系数的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2009, 28(10):2014-2019. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz200910016 LI G, HUANG G B. Effects of rainfall intensity and land use on rainfall runoff and storage in loess hilly region[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(10):2014-2019. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz200910016
[16]	樊慧静, 赵红莉, 蒋云钟.不同气候情景下土地利用变化对径流系数影响研究[J].水利水电技术, 2012, 43(4):11-14. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slsdjs201204003 FAN H J, ZHAO H L, JIANG Y Z. Study on impact from change of land-use on runoff coefficient under different climate scenarios[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2012, 43(4):11-14. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slsdjs201204003
[17]	ACKERMAN D, SCHIFF K. Modeling storm water mass emissions to the southern California bight[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2003, 129(4):308-317. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:4(308)
[18]	CRISTINA C M, SANSALONE J J. Kinematic wave model of urban pavement rainfall-runoff subject to traffic loadings[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2003, 129(7):629-636. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:7(629)
[19]	霍云梅, 毕华兴, 朱永杰, 等.QYJY-503C人工模拟降雨装置降雨特性试验[J].中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(2):31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2015.02.005 HUO Y M, BI H X, ZHU Y J, et al. Characteristics of artificial rainfall produced by QYJY-503C simulation system[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 13(2):31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2015.02.005
[20]	路炳军, 刘洪鹄, 符素华, 等.照相法结合数字图像技术计算植被覆盖度精度研究[J].水土保持通报, 2007, 27(1):78-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-288X.2007.01.019 LU B J, LIU H H, FU S H, et al. Accuracy and feasibility analysis of plant coverage measurement by overhead photograph and image processing[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 27(1):78-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-288X.2007.01.019
[21]	朱永杰, 毕华兴, 常译方, 等.90%盖度狗牙根草地对次降雨径流削减作用[J].北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(10):103-109. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150085 ZHU Y J, BI H X, CHANG Y F, et al. Effects of Cynodon dactylon grassland with 90% coverage on reducing single rainfall runoff[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(10):103-109. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150085
[22]	张洪江, 孙艳红, 程云, 等.重庆缙云山不同植被类型对地表径流系数的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2006, 20(6):11-13. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.06.003 ZHANG H J, SUN Y H, CHENG Y, et al. Effect on surface runoff coefficient of different vegetation types in Jinyun Mountain of Chongqing[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(6):11-13. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.06.003
[23]	王升, 王全九, 董文财, 等.黄土坡面不同植被下产流产沙与养分流失规律[J].水土保持学报, 2012, 26(4):23-27. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqsystbcxb201204005 WANG S, WANG Q J, DONG W C, et al. Runoff and sediment generations and nutrient losses under different vegetation coverage in loess slope[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 26(4):23-27. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqsystbcxb201204005
[24]	张旭昇, 薛天柱, 马灿, 等.雨强和植被覆盖度对典型坡面产流产沙的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(6):66-70. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201206012 ZHANG X S, XUE T Z, MA C, et al. Impacts of rainfall intensity and grass coverage on runoff and sediment yield on typical sloping land[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2012, 26(6):66-70. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201206012
[25]	李建生, 何增化.不同雨强下红壤坡地径流及土壤侵蚀研究[J].环境, 2006(增刊1):10-11. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/huanj2006z1006 LI J S, HE Z H. Study on runoff and soil erosion of red soil slopes under different rainfall intensity[J]. Environment, 2006(Suppl.1):10-11. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/huanj2006z1006
[26]	许翼, 徐向舟, 于通顺, 等.强降雨条件下城市回填土草坪径流系数的影响因子分析[J].水土保持学报, 2014, 28(6):82-87. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201406016 XU Y, XU X Z, YU T S, et al. Factor analysis of runoff coefficient subjected to heavy rainfall on urban lawns with backfill soils[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(6):82-87. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201406016

[1]	WANG Hong-yan, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, ZHA Tong-gang, ZHU Yu-shen, ZHANG Jian-jun, ZHU Jin-zhao.. Modification of SCS-CN model for estimating event rainfall runoff for small watersheds in the Loess Plateau, China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(8): 71-79. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150508
[2]	ZHU Yong-jie, BI Hua-xing, CHANG Yi-fang, HUO Yun-mei, WANG Xiao-xian. Effects of Cynodon dactylon grassland with 90% coverage on reducing single rainfall runoff.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(10): 103-109. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150085
[3]	PAN Xin, WANG Yu-jie, ZHANG Hui-lan, WANG Yun-qi, WANG Bin, GELIBA. Runoff and sediment effects in erosive rainfall of typical plant conservation practice in the upper reach of Guanting Reservoir, Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(7): 76-84. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150014
[4]	LI Han-zhi, YU Xin-xiao, FAN Deng-xing, SUN Jia-mei, CHANG Yu, LIANG Hong-ru. Effects of ryegrass coverage on runoff velocity of cinnamon soil slope under simulated rainfall[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(5): 94-98. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.05.014
[5]	CHANG Yu, YU Xin-xiao, CHEN Li-hua, FAN Deng-xing, LIANG Hong-ru, SUN Jia-mei. Effects of undergrowth litter layer on runoff and sediment reduction under simulated rainfall conditions[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(3): 69-74. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.03.010
[6]	LI Suyan1, HUANG Yu2, ZHANG Jianguo. The effects of fir plantation thinning on soil and water loss.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(3): 120-123.
[7]	ZHANG Jian-jun, DONG Huang-biao, NA Lei, WANG Peng. Comparison of rainfallrunoff process in watersheds under different scales on the loess area in western Shanxi Province, northern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(2): 106-112.
[8]	XU Xiang-zhou, LIU Da-qing, ZHANG Hong-wu, DONG Zhan-di, ZHU Ming-dong. Laboratory rainfall simulation with controlled rainfall intensity and drainage[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(5): 52-58.
[9]	YANG Hai-long, ZHU Jin-zhao, QI Shi, ZHU Guo-ping. Surface roughness coefficient of forest watershed in the Three Gorges Region.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(1): 38-41.
[10]	MA Qing-wen, LI Feng-lan, LI Cheng-sen. Coefficients of variation and factors affecting stomatal parameters.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(1): 19-23.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	刘巧娟，张之松，满秀玲，高明磊，赵佳龙. 寒温带多年冻土区不同林龄白桦林土壤酶活性动态特征. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(03): 125-131 .
2.	高海燕，杨制国，张胜男，黄海广，闫德仁. 科尔沁沙地油松人工林林龄对土壤酶活性及化学性质的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2024(02): 108-117 .
3.	赵娜，沈爱红，石云，佘洁，张风红，郭瑞，吴涛，李建华，朱晓雯，李红霞. 贺兰山东麓冲积扇区不同微地形土壤理化性质及酶活性特征. 西南农业学报. 2023(11): 2451-2463 .
4.	伍晓丽，潘媛，赵晓，谭均，陈大霞. 玄参与烟草轮作对根际土壤养分、酶活性及微生物群落结构的影响. 西南农业学报. 2022(01): 58-64 .
5.	王小燕，姚宝辉，张彩军，王缠，孙小妹，苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化. 草地学报. 2021(02): 220-227 .
6.	张亚，张文静，杨礼通，雷应雪，杨丽，蔡晓林，梁清，肖玖金. 火烧迹地不同植被恢复下土壤团聚体酶活性特征. 四川农业大学学报. 2021(01): 79-85 .
7.	刘金炽，招礼军，朱栗琼，权佳惠，金赟. 喀斯特地区泡核桃林土壤酶、微生物量及无机氮的动态研究. 广东农业科学. 2020(10): 83-92 .

Other cited types(12)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1628) PDF downloads (30) Cited by(19)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Study on the factors influencing surface runoff coefficient in Festuca arundinacea grassland