Effects of photosynthetic models on the calculation results of photosynthetic response parameters in <i>Sapindus mukorossi</i> leaves

Zhang Yunqi; Gao Shilun; Wei Xingbiao; Shi Wenhui; Ma Zhong; Su Shuchai

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180163

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2019 > 41(4): 32-40. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180163

Zhang Yunqi, Gao Shilun, Wei Xingbiao, Shi Wenhui, Ma Zhong, Su Shuchai. Effects of photosynthetic models on the calculation results of photosynthetic response parameters in Sapindus mukorossi leaves[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(4): 32-40. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180163

Citation:

PDF (607 KB)

Effects of photosynthetic models on the calculation results of photosynthetic response parameters in Sapindus mukorossi leaves

Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: May 16, 2018
Revised Date: November 27, 2018
Available Online: April 29, 2019
Published Date: March 31, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the effects of photosynthetic models on the results of photosynthetic response parameters ’ values of leaves in different parts of Sapindus mukorossi canopy, and to obtain appropriate application model and reasonable values.
MethodIn this study, S. mukorossi trees with stable fruiting stage were selected as the test trees in Jianning County of Fujian Province, southern China for determining photosynthetic response parameters of leaves in different parts of canopy. The rectangular hyperbolic model (RHM), non-rectangular hyperbolic model (NRHM), modified rectangular hyperbolic model (MRHM), and modified exponential model (MEM) were used for fitting the P_n-PAR response curves. The rectangular hyperbolic model (RHM), Michaelis-Menten model (MMM), and modified rectangular hyperbolic model (MRHM) were used for fitting the P_n-C_i response curves. The fitting accuracy of the models was tested by comparing mean square errors and determinant coefficients. The differences of photosynthetic response parameters ’ values among different models and different parts of canopy were examined by Duncan multiple comparison method and the data were also analyzed with ANOVA.
Result(1) The fitting accuracy of the 4 models for P_n-PAR response curve was as follows: MRHM > MEM > NRHM > RHM. The 3 models for P_n-C_i response curve produced the similar results: MRHM > RHM/MMM. (2) The significant difference of photosynthetic response parameters’ values among different layers varied by different models and the difference of these values among different directions was not significant. (3) The influence of different models on α_(I), P_nmax(I), LSP, R_d, P_nmax(C) and C_iSP was greater, the influence of different layers on LCP, α_(C), C_iCP and R_p was greater, while the influence of different directions on these all response parameters was little. The values of LSP, C_iSP, α_(C) and C_iCP were also significantly influenced by interaction.
ConclusionCompared with other models, MRHM could be better for fitting the photosynthetic response curve and obtaining more accurate values. The influence of models on the values of all photosynthetic response parameters was very significant, so the screening of models was important.
- canopy photosynthesis of Sapindus mukorossi,
- P_n-PAR response curve,
- CO₂ response curve,
- model fitting

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	Larbi A, Vázquez S, Eljendoubi H, et al. Canopy light heterogeneity drives leaf anatomical, eco-physiological, and photosynthetic changes in olive trees grown in a high-density plantation[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2015, 123(2): 141−155. doi: 10.1007/s11120-014-0052-2
[2]	Cano F J, Sánchez-Gómez D, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, et al. Effects of drought on mesophyll conductance and photosynthetic limitations at different tree canopy layers[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2013, 36(11): 1961−1980. doi: 10.1111/pce.12103
[3]	郝建, 潘丽琴, 潘启龙, 等. 格木人工林不同冠层光合特征[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(5):871−877. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.05.014 Hao J, Pan L Q, Pan Q L, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics in different canopy positions of an Erythrophleum fordii plantation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(5): 871−877. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.05.014
[4]	Lombardini L, Restrepo-Diaz H, Volder A. Photosynthetic light response and epidermal characteristics of sun and shade pecan leaves[J]. Journal of the Americal Society for Horticultural Science, 2009, 134(30): 372−378. doi: 10.1051/fruits/2009013
[5]	冷寒冰, 秦俊, 叶康, 等. 不同光照环境下荷花叶片光合光响应模型比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(10):2855−2860. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140801.010 Leng H B, Qin J, Ye K, et al. Comparison of light response models of photosynthesis in Nelumbo nucifera leaves under different light conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(10): 2855−2860. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140801.010
[6]	Chen Z Y, Peng Z S, Yang J, et al. A mathematical model for describing light-response curves in Nicotiana tabacum L[J]. Photosynthetica, 2011, 49(3): 467−471. doi: 10.1007/s11099-011-0056-5
[7]	邓云鹏, 雷静品, 潘磊, 等. 不同种源栓皮栎光响应曲线的模型拟合及参数比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(2):387−394. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201602.035 Deng Y P, Lei J P, Pan L, et al. Model fitting of photosynthetic light-response curves in different Quercus variabilis provenances and its parameter comparison[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(2): 387−394. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201602.035
[8]	刘强, 李凤日, 谢龙飞. 人工长白落叶松冠层光合作用−光响应曲线最优模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(8):2420−2428. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201608.023 Liu Q, Li F R, Xie L F. Optimal model of photosynthesis-light response curve in canopy of planted Larix olgensistree[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(8): 2420−2428. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201608.023
[9]	Gomes-Laranjo J, Coutinho J P, Galhano V, et al. Differences in photosynthetic apparatus of leaves from different sides of the chestnut canopy[J]. Photosynthetica, 2008, 46(1): 63−72. doi: 10.1007/s11099-008-0012-1
[10]	赵娜, 李富荣. 温度升高对不同生活型植物光合生理特性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1):60−66. Zhao N, Li F R. Effects of enhanced temperature on the photosynthetic characteristics in different life-form plants[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25(1): 60−66.
[11]	赖金莉, 陈剑成, 陈凌艳, 等. 凹叶厚朴和无患子光响应特征与叶绿素荧光参数的比较[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 47(2):174−180. Lai J L, Chen J C, Chen L Y, et al. Comparisons on photosynthetic light response characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters between Magnolia officinalis subsp. biloba and Sapindus mukorossi[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 47(2): 174−180.
[12]	刁松锋, 邵文豪, 董汝湘, 等. 无患子光合生理日变化及其与生理生态因子的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(4):828−834. Diao S F, Shao W H, Dong R X, et al. Diurnal variation of photosynthesis and relationship with the eco-physiological factors of Sapindus mukorossi[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34(4): 828−834.
[13]	Baly E C C. The kinetics of photosynthesis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1935, 149: 596−596.
[14]	Thornley J H M. Mathematical models in plant physiology: a quantitative approach to problems in plant and crop physiology[M]//Mathematical models in plant physiology. London: Academic Press, 1976.
[15]	Ye Z P. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa[J]. Photosynthetica, 2007, 45(4): 637−640. doi: 10.1007/s11099-007-0110-5
[16]	陈卫英, 陈真勇, 罗辅燕, 等. 光响应曲线的指数改进模型与常用模型比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 36(12):1277−1285. Chen W Y, Chen Z Y, Luo F Y, et al. Comparison between modified exponential model and common models of light-response curve[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 36(12): 1277−1285.
[17]	蔡时青, 许大全. 大豆叶片CO₂补偿点和光呼吸的关系[J]. 植物生理学报, 2000, 26(6):545−550. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-3877.2000.06.015 Cai S Q, Xu D Q. Relationship between the CO₂ compensation point and photorespiration in soybean leaves[J]. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica, 2000, 26(6): 545−550. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-3877.2000.06.015
[18]	叶子飘, 于强. 光合作用对胞间和大气CO₂响应曲线的比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(11):2233−2238. Ye Z P, Yu Q. A comparison of response curves of winter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO₂ concentrations[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(11): 2233−2238.
[19]	Harley P C, Thomas R B, Reynolds J F, et al. Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO₂[J]. Plant Cell & Environment, 2006, 15(3): 271−282.
[20]	叶子飘. 光合作用对光和CO₂响应模型的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6):727−740. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.012 Ye Z P. A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO₂[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6): 727−740. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.012
[21]	Walker D A, Jarvis P G, Farquhar G D, et al. Automated measurement of leaf photosynthetic O₂ evolution as a function of photon flux density[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1989, 323: 313−326. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1989.0013
[22]	廖小锋, 刘济明, 张东凯, 等. 野生小蓬竹的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(3):124−128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2012.03.024 Liao X F, Liu J M, Zhang D K, et al. Model fitting on light response curve of photosynthesis of wild Drepanostachyum luodianense[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2012, 32(3): 124−128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2012.03.024
[23]	柴胜丰, 唐健民, 杨雪, 等. 4种模型对黄枝油杉光合光响应曲线的拟合分析[J]. 广西科学院学报, 2015, 31(4):286−291. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7378.2015.04.011 Chai S F, Tang J M, Yang X, et al. Fitting analysis for 4 photosynthesis light response curve models of Keteleeria calcarea[J]. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 2015, 31(4): 286−291. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7378.2015.04.011
[24]	王秀伟, 毛子军. 7个光响应曲线模型对不同植物种的实用性[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(1):43−48. Wang X W, Mao Z J. Practicability of 7 light responsive curve models to different plant species[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2009, 29(1): 43−48.
[25]	蒋冬月, 钱永强, 费英杰, 等. 柳属植物光合−光响应曲线模型拟合[J]. 核农学报, 2010, 34(6):727−740. Jiang D Y, Qiao Y Q, Fei Y J, et al. Modeling photosynthetic light-response curve in Salix L.[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6): 727−740.
[26]	钱莲文, 张新时, 杨智杰, 等. 几种光合作用光响应典型模型的比较研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2009, 27(2):197−203. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0837.2009.02.013 Qian L W, Zhang X S, Yang Z J, et al. Comparison of different light response models for photosynthesis[J]. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 2009, 27(2): 197−203. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0837.2009.02.013
[27]	李芳兰, 包维楷. 植物叶片形态解剖结构对环境变化的响应与适应[J]. 植物学报, 2005, 22(增刊1):118−127. Li L F, Bao W K. Responses of the morphological and anatomical structure of the plant leaf to environmental change[J]. Bulletin of Botany, 2005, 22(Suppl.1): 118−127.
[28]	刘晓娟, 马克平. 植物功能性状研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2015, 45(4):325−339. Liu X J, Ma K P. Plant functional traits-concepts, applications and future directions[J]. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 2015, 45(4): 325−339.
[29]	Sims D A, Seemann J R, Luo Y. The significance of differences in the mechanisms of photosynthetic acclimation to light, nitrogen and CO₂ for return on investment in leaves[J]. Functional Ecology, 1998, 12(2): 185−194. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00194.x
[30]	Sage R F, Saemann J R. Regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity in response to reduced light intensity in C₄ plants[J]. Plant Physiology, 1993, 102: 21−28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.002215
[31]	Sui X L, Sun J L, Wang S H, et al. Photosynthetic induction in leaves of two cucumber genotypes differing in sensitivity to low-light stress[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(12): 2238−2247.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

1.	李一，潘立本，赵雯，穆立蔷，韩文静. 蒙古栎叶片功能性状变化特征及影响因素. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(03): 10-15 .
2.	白岩松，张雨鉴，秦倩倩，孙兴悦，刘艳红. 大兴安岭典型灌木叶片功能性状对环境因子的响应. 生态学杂志. 2024(01): 131-139 .
3.	郭文芳，陈艳梅，高飞，王佳乐. 太行山7种药用植物性状特征及其对土壤因子的响应. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(02): 612-621 .
4.	欧芷阳，郑威，庞世龙，何峰，申文辉，谭一波，陈始贵. 广西猫儿山优势木本植物叶功能性状关联性沿海拔梯度的变化规律. 生态科学. 2024(02): 95-101 .
5.	周会萍，姜金矜，黄艳丽，庄静静. 两种生活型木本植物叶功能性状变异特征研究. 沈阳农业大学学报. 2024(03): 298-305 .
6.	冯浩育，陈思帆，索奥丽，龚俊伟，陈锋，刘晓东. 不同火烈度下山西太岳山油松林灌木层物种多样性和叶功能性状. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(06): 38-47 . 本站查看
7.	谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，杨帆，王继丰，杨立宾. 五大连池火山黑桦叶性状对生境因子的响应. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2024(05): 112-124 .
8.	谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，王继丰，王建波，倪红伟. 五大连池火山蒙古栎种群空间分布格局. 生态与农村环境学报. 2023(07): 896-906 .
9.	黄庆阳，谢立红，曹宏杰，王立民，杨帆，王继丰，刘赢男，倪红伟. 细菌对五大连池火山森林凋落物早期分解的影响. 应用生态学报. 2023(07): 1941-1948 .
10.	刘爱林，张往祥，刘陈妤，高亮，杨晓倩，周婷，崔珺. 7种樟科植物叶功能性状及其对土壤因子的响应. 福建农业学报. 2023(12): 1428-1436 .
11.	杨巧，朱润军，杨畅宇，李仕杰，程希平. 基于树形结构的木棉叶功能性状差异性研究. 生态学报. 2022(07): 2834-2842 .
12.	王佳欢，刘彦林，曹鹤，杨新兵，赵迎雪，陈一凡，史宝胜. 采石场高陡岩壁坡向对葛藤叶形态及光合特征的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2022(05): 47-51+75 .
13.	顾泽，王博，陈思帆，王忆文，索奥丽，刘晓东，陈锋. 不同火烈度火烧迹地内油松叶功能性状的变化. 应用生态学报. 2022(06): 1497-1504 .
14.	谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，杨帆，王继丰，王建波，倪红伟. 五大连池火山蒙古栎种群结构及动态特征. 浙江农林大学学报. 2022(05): 960-970 .

Other cited types(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1720) PDF downloads (49) Cited by(20)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of photosynthetic models on the calculation results of photosynthetic response parameters in Sapindus mukorossi leaves

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

Other cited types(6)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content