• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
WANG Yi, FU Jian-xin, QI Shuai, DAI Si-lan.. Investigation of phenotypic and amino acid sequence changes in Arabidopsis lfy mutants.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(3): 108-115.
Citation: WANG Yi, FU Jian-xin, QI Shuai, DAI Si-lan.. Investigation of phenotypic and amino acid sequence changes in Arabidopsis lfy mutants.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(3): 108-115.

Investigation of phenotypic and amino acid sequence changes in Arabidopsis lfy mutants.

More Information
  • Received Date: December 31, 1899
  • Revised Date: December 31, 1899
  • Published Date: May 29, 2013
  • LFY and its homologs are key integrators controlling the vegetative-to-reproductive transition in higher plants. A better understanding of flowering-time genes possesses practical applications for shortening tree juvenility and improving flower bloom period. To examine the effects of amino acid sequence changes of LFY on its function in Arabidopsis, the phenotypic variation and sequence characterization of lfy2 and lfy5 were investigated in this study. The results showed that although lfy2 and lfy5 derived from different ecotypes of Arabidopsis, the phenotypic variations of mutants were similar. The flowering time of lfy mutants was 14 days later than wild-type,the numbers of cauline leaves and lateral shoots were increased, and the floral organs were missing and homeotic. Sequence analysis revealed that the amino acid mutation sites of LFY were P236L in lfy2, and F42L, V209A and P236L in lfy5 with F42L and V209A being at non-conserved sites. Q-PCR analysis showed that the transcript levels of FLC and TFL1 were increased in the inflorescence of lfy, and those of FT and AP2 were decreased, while AP1, AP3 and AG were not expressed. These results suggest that mutation at the site of 236 on LFY-C domain caused the loss of LFY function and was responsible for the mutant phenotype in lfy2 and lfy5.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chen Xinyu, Meng Jingxiang, Zhou Xianqing, Yuan Huwei, Niu Shihui, Li Yue. Genetic variation of needle morphology and anatomical traits and physiological traits among Pinus tabuliformis geographic populations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(7): 19-30. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190170
    [2]Wu Dongshan, Yang Zhangqi, Huang Yongli. Analysis and evaluation of resin productivity and resin component among different half sibling families of Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(2): 53-61. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170377
    [3]Pan Yanyan, Liang Deyang, Guo Jing, Wang Fang, Wang Fuwei, Li Shuchun, Zhao Xiyang. Variance analyses on growth traits of Larix kaempferi in different seed sources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(11): 19-27. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170478
    [4]SONG Sha-sha, GOU Yu-bo, HE Xin-yan, CHENG Yan-xia. Effects of modifier application on saline-alkali land amelioration and weeping willow growth[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(5): 89-97. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160207
    [5]ZHANG Zi-jie, YANG Shan-xun, ZENG Yan-jiang, WANG Rong-gang, WANG Li-ming, PANG Xiao-ming, LI Yue. Variation within clones and families and superior individual selection in different cultivars of Camellia oleifera‘Ruanzhi’.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 59-68. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160104
    [6]ZHANG Xin-bo, LI Yue, YUAN Hu-wei, LI Wei, FU Yu-hua, LIU Zhi-yuan, ZHU Song-lin. Genetic variations of growth traits in a 21-year-old stand progeny of Shanxi natural Pinus tabuliformis forests.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(3): 104-109. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.03.016
    [7]LI Yan-jie, JIANG Jing-min, LUAN Qi-fu.. Determination and genetic analysis of resin productivity, resin density and turpentine content in halfsib families of slash pine[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(4): 48-51.
    [8]ZHAO Xi-yang, MA Kai-feng, SHEN Ying-bai, ZHANG Ming, LI Kui-you, WU Rong-ling, ZHANG Zhi-yi. Characteristic variation and selection of forepart hybrid clones of Sect.Populus.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(2): 45-51.
    [9]LI Qing-jian, CHEN Zhi-qiang, SHI Rui-ting, ZHANG Jian-qiu, WANG Guo-zhu, ZHANG Yu-Ling, LI Yue. Alkaline-salt tolerance indices of Ulmus pumila L. seedling and family evaluation on alkaline-salt tolerance[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 74-81.
    [10]MAO Ai-hua, LI Jian-xiang, ZHANG Chao-ying, LI Qing-jian, WANG Shun, CHEN Xiao-yang, LI Yue. Geographic variation and provenance selection of Platycladus orientalis in a 19-year-old testing plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(1): 63-68.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 王宇虹,陈仲榆,杨晓丹,赵鲁强,袁晓玉,梁莉. 重庆两场森林火灾蔓延特征的数值模拟. 气象科技. 2024(02): 205-217 .
    2. 张玉强,张渊鑫. 烟雾特征融合的火灾识别方法研究. 延安大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 7-13 .
    3. 刘九庆,项前,王宇航. 基于SIFT算法和改进的RANSAC算法对森林火灾的图像识别与试验研究. 森林工程. 2022(06): 96-103 .
    4. 董非,杨卫军,李丹,方戍,林昕. 基于红外热像仪的火源定位方法. 消防科学与技术. 2019(03): 394-397 .
    5. 袁雯雯,姜树海. 林火图像识别理论研究进展. 世界林业研究. 2018(01): 35-39 .
    6. 段锁林,毛丹. 关于火灾火焰图像检测算法研究. 计算机仿真. 2016(02): 393-398 .
    7. 吴建胜,高云玲,张宾. 一种基于视频的火焰检测方法. 计算机应用与软件. 2014(01): 173-175+190 .
    8. 林宏,刘志刚,赵同林,张雁. 基于视频的林火烟雾识别算法研究. 安全与环境学报. 2013(02): 210-214 .
    9. 车晓波,刘健翔,刘广敏,欧阳红晋. 早期火灾的双波段图像型探测装置的研制与应用. 科技创新与应用. 2013(05): 30-31 .
    10. 张艳超,赵建,孙强,毕国玲. 千兆网高清双波段视频采集系统. 光电工程. 2012(02): 118-122 .
    11. 林宏,强振平,鲁宁. 森林火灾检测预警系统初步研究. 现代物业(上旬刊). 2012(09): 33-35 .
    12. 秦飞飞,唐丽华. 基于数字高程模型的森林火灾远程视频同步跟踪算法. 浙江农林大学学报. 2012(06): 917-922 .
    13. 王士迪,裴海龙. 基于视频图像的火焰识别算法. 现代电子技术. 2011(02): 82-86 .

    Other cited types(21)

Catalog

    Article views (1495) PDF downloads (69) Cited by(34)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return